Jump to content

Knots Landing


Sedrick

Recommended Posts

  • Members

There's such a literary quality to the entire episode.  

The conflict commences with a disagreement about FOOD.  Laura cooks Richard's eggs wrong.  His horsey response leads her to cancel her plans with Valene and go to a bar where a strange man lights her cigarette, resulting in all the drama. 

Valene, the character whom Laura dumped, is the sole witness who understands Laura is lying her head off about what happened that afternoon. 

The conflict ends with another disagreement about FOOD. Richard nixes every menu suggestion Laura offers at the restaurant.  His horsey response leads her to sashay into the lounge where yet another strange man appears with a cigarette lighter, and it's VALENE once again who sees where things are heading. 

Another irony is that the episode began with the 4 couples (separately) at breakfast, and it ended with the 4 couples (jointly) at dinner.

Karen nailed the "Smartass Pollyanna" role, immediately ordering every menu item that Richard wouldn't allow Laura to order.

I honestly couldn't believe how much thought and creativity went into that episode.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 3.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

"The Lie" is a great episode. You really see inside the Avery's dysfunctional marriage. It has a bit of a "Looking For Mr. Goodbar" vibe with the scenes at the cocktail lounge and Laura's attack in the guys sleazy studio apartment. 

The whole episode has that late 70's suburban feel with the breakfast scenes and banter among the couples. I noticed Laura making coffee in a percolator (which was very much of the era). Joan Van Ark said Knots ground zero scenes mainly took place in the kitchen and the bedroom. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

John Pleshette wrote the first 2 episodes of S4.  He played Richard on the show.  He wrote 8 episodes over the first four seasons. I thought all of his scripts were great.  Notably, Ann and Ellis Marcus were brought in as executive story editors for the entire season three to collaborate with head writer Diana Gould; they were fired after one season.  That's when the soapiness developed.  No surprise given Marcus' background.  Ann was rehired as a head writer/supervising producer for Season 14 and brought back Rocci Chatfield. Ellis was not part of the team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think Ann Marcus was actually rehired in the back half of season 13 after John Romano was sacked and production was shut down.

There was speculation of cancellation during season 3 but I’m sure Lorimar would have used its power as the producer of top-rated Dallas to keep Knots on the air if it had come to that. And maybe it did. I remember one of the critics referring to it, during season 3, as “turgid”.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

S3 was rough for several reasons. 

First and foremost, Sid's death cast a pall over many of the show's storylines, and over Karen's storylines in particular.  I suspect that's the primary reason why her and Mack's romance was so well-received the next season.  Viewers were just so happy to see Karen happy and in love again after spending the previous year grieving for Sid.

Also, S3 was, IMO, a bit of a course correction from S2, when the show "lathered up" too quickly before they had the chance to develop the characters fully.  S3 does a MUCH better job of laying the groundwork for the Gary/Val/Abby triangle than S2.

At the same time, because their attempt at becoming more soap-like in S2 had turned out to be such a mess, I suspect the producers were somewhat skittish about trying again, so what you get in S3 is a mix of S1 (self-contained episodes) and S2 (ongoing stories), which might've worked just as well in S2, but only if we had known the characters more. 

It's only when the Gary/Val/Abby triangle takes off in the latter part of S3 do you get the feeling that David Jacobs and his team have gotten the hang of things.

There's really only two seasons of KL that I always struggle to get through.  One is S13, and the other is S2.  

Edited by Khan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Even the self contained episodes of season 3 still had the threads of the ongoing plotlines interwoven in some respects.

Episode 13 with Karen's friend was self contained..yet you had movement in the Laura/Richard story, the Fairgates still grieving Sid, the tension between Abby/Val, and was the seed that was planted to explain where Diana ends up when she leaves in early season 6.

Episode 14 with Cricket was self contained...but also still focused on Sid being grieved, exposed the divide between Gary/Val in terms of communication with Gary/Abby having a great rapport...plus Abby/Val clashing over Cricket at the hospital after Olivia is hurt.  And you also see Val typing away with Lillimae snooping on what she's writing (which carries over into the next episode).

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Richard always came off to me as such a slimy and sleazy prick in these early seasons so it always surprised me he was later actually given custody of his kids and went on the “Laura left here to die!!!” tirade in the aftermath of Laura’s death. Did a guilty conscience help him change? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I was going to mention this - the season opens with three very good episodes focusing on Sid's death, but man, his absence was felt back at the cul-de-sac. With Sid gone and Kenny and Ginger taking a backseat, the show feels a little empty. Lilimae's a good addition to lighten things up, but I'm finally seeing why this is a point where the show's future was in jeopardy. Knowing that the best is yet to come makes it easier to watch, that's for sure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think making the audience wait a year for Karen to have a serious romantic partner was right. You saw every step of her journey including false starts with other men before she finally let Sid go.

My issues with S3's middle third are less to do with her family's story (except for some of the Diana eps lol) and more to do with other stuff that was standalone or felt circular.

I do love how they very deliberately make you think 'Sid's risky operation' is another standard episodic TV setup a la Val in S2, and that he's out of the woods before then, only for him to die on the table very quickly.

Edited by Vee
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I thought Sid’s death was handled so well for the reasons you mention, Vee. I contrast it with Dallas after Bobby “died”. Pam mourns the love of her life for about 30 seconds and then jumps back into bed with The Pornstache (Mark Graison). Dallas couldn’t stand for any of its women to be without a man. That’s also why we got romantic black holes like Jack and Jenna, and Ray and Jenna. But I digress.

The story of the Fairgates that year was compelling to me. I agree that it was some of the other story choices that damaged S3.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I still don't understand why they brought Mark back over and over on Dallas. They'd just done a long, tedious season story in which Pam does a wild goose chase around the globe looking for Mark and finally determining he is in fact dead after all, then the dream season kicks in and Peter Dunne and co. bring Mark back for real immediately on the heels of Bobby's death. The character doesn't work for me. I suppose they felt pressed to bring in a man, any man for Pam. I've been viewing the dream season with Dunne's KL team moving to Dallas concurrently with some of the Dallas hands moving to KL Season 7, and the contrasts are striking.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Days of our Lives S60E204 – Thursday, June 5, 2025 Okay, today’s episode was kind of boring. It was nice seeing Jack and Jen back, but they wasted an entire episode on Jen chatting with Julie - one scene would’ve been enough. Also, why didn’t Jack and Jen go comfort Marlena? And wouldn’t a flashback with Jack, Jen, and John have been great? Maybe something from the Cruise of Deception era? Bottom line - it feels like once John’s memorial is over and the returning fan favorites leave Salem… the show’s going to be dull again.
    • Everything with Elon and Trump is a stunt. If people, and the sycophantic press, are talking about their "feud," they are not talking about Republican plans to gut Medicare, Medicaid, and the ACA. 
    • I can't fully remember, but I don't think they tried to get Beth Chamberlin back. I think Laibson/McTavish likely saw Beth as old news and wanted to move Philip on; either that or have her return only when Philip was closely tied to a new woman. Thanks as always for these recaps. I think I had stopped watching around this time and mostly kept up by reading in the soap magazines. Bridget's degradation was horrible to watch, as the character had grown so much over the years and was clearly regressed just to be a foil for a "hot" couple viewers had zero investment in. 
    • Having the majority of the cast on those low numbers is no way to tell story. And just 2 dayplayers for the month. So sad for the #1 soap.  
    • I believe it was. And this is actually one of the cases where I wouldn’t mind some dumb soap opera bringing back from the dead. They gave Mishael, Amanda, with all of Hilary’s connections but none of the personality except for fleeting moments. Hilary absolutely should’ve just left town. They decided to kill her and the baby. Just baffling,
    • That was Mal Young right? He thought a tragic death was a better option than crafting a story where Hilary leaves town. Was it a case of punishing someone who wants to leave? And then they have to jump through hoops to bring the actress back.
    • Ooo @TaoboiI will say I just watched Amanda give it to Abby and I loved it. Honestly just made me miss Hilary more. I will never understand or get over that decision to kill her off. Also call me crazy but I could definitely see the Damian actor playing NuTed on BTG. Very much still enjoying the Lily attraction.
    • I rewatched these episodes---they broke my heart. Somehow, Nola had seen Vanessa leave the hospital, and follows her home, and Maeve just lets out this primal scream---chills went down my spine. And knowing the history between them---never quite liking the other and always getting on each other's nerves (to put it mildly)---makes it a much richer to have them put it all aside in the moment and be family to each other. I've never seen/heard what Maeve thought of the story itself, but she did want a break, so it's not like she was fired and then brought back. Yes, Vanessa could be this stubborn and unwilling to ask for help. She'd pretty much always been an "I can do this on my own" type of woman, although when she first came to town, she would still run to Henry. But after she met Billy, she stopped relying on her father. It's part of the reason she (briefly) got addicted to pills after Bill's birth---she was determined to take care of him all by herself and became obsessed with the idea she was the only one who could. Of course, nothing before to this extreme. I should say, there's no way (IMO) they could've told this story---Vanessa letting her loved ones thinking she'd died---if her father Henry had still been alive. She never would've been able to do that to him. And it does chafe that she's letting Bill believe it, when her mantra had been all about protecting him since the day he was born. I honestly don't recall what I thought about it at the time. But now I'm thrilled she's free of Matt at least. LOL.
    • I had no idea Peter Reckell was 70. He doesn’t look or feel it and I guess I thought Bo and Hope were closer in age than 9 years. Wow even the new writers had to have Jack praise Leo. Melissa Reeves continues to slip back in effortlessly as Jennifer. I like Ari and Holly being old friends. Holly learning about John’s death reminded me of how John used to call her Nikki if my memory is serving me right. Doug who happily sleeps in high school Holly’s room shirtless and in his underwear is now asking about birth years. How old is he anyway?    The Cat and Chad romance is insulting. 
    • Her husband is Marty Levy. Chocolate Fortunes (her company) was started in 1987.  So that explains the mystery of 'Whatever happened to Pam Peters?' She had been running a successful business for decades.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy