Jump to content

DAYS: Ed Scott FIRED! Gary Tomlin HIRED!


Recommended Posts

  • Members

In terms of Scott's entourage (Foster, Maxam, etc)... let's face the reality of the situation. The only way I can see them leaving is if Scott gets another gig. It wouldn't make sense for them to leave their job purely out of loyalty to Ed (that would just be silly), OR for them to get fired (as far as we know, none of them were involved in the WGA problems). And the last thing they'd want to do is create MORE transitions in a show seemingly permanently-in-transition.

Then again, this is the show that fired nine writers in one fell swoop. Why not nine producers and directors? Oy...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 215
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Or if David Shaughnessy is rehired as Y&R's EP. Shaughnessy and Foster were BFF's. *Crosses finers*

Anyone notice the similarities between Lisa De Cazotte and Ed Scott? For years Ed Scott was relegated to producing Bill Bell's show, and he never had any direct influence on the storylines, because you don't f-u-c-k with Bill Bell. When Bill stepped down, he tried so hard to impose his vision on Y&R, which pissed Kay Alden off royally, and then she got his ass fired by going directly to Bill. :lol:

And then again at DAYS, Scott tried so hard to impose his vision on DAYS, by going as far to rewrite material. Whether Dena is a hack or not is another issue.

Judging by his falling out with Alden and the situation at DAYS, Ed Scott doesn't seem like a "writer's producer."

Of course this is related to Liza because she was to Jim Reilly what Ed Scott was to Bill Bell for years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think he's good at technical producing, but he's shown at more than one time he wants to have too much power. I may not be the biggest Kay Alden or Dena Higley fan in the world, but he did alter their writing to the point where both women had to go to higher-ups to get him fired. And as much as certain actors like him, I've always heard some pretty unflattering things about the guy as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

True enough. I stand corrected.

I just wanted to debate the whole "they'll quit/get fired because Ed was fired" argument. People need jobs, especially in this economy. It's not like it's all that easy to find a daytime gig these days. Or to find people who know what they're doing to replace them if they're fired. Maxam and Foster have impeccable reputations, and I can't see them getting fired or quitting... at least until their next contract cycle, and if the new EP just wants to work with his friends instead of people he might not be familiar with.

But you're right. I didn't think of the Shaughnessy angle.

Thing about the Shaughnessy angle though -- Y&R has shown they're not exactly going back to the talent pool that put them at #1 in the first place. But hopefully, I'll be proven wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Administrator

Well, Frons liked her enough to hire her for Night Shift. Maybe she's on the short list for the next opening at an ABC soap? She has the AMC/OLTL connection.

I hope Maxam stays, he's a fabulous director. But I think he'll be fired when his cycle his up and I wouldn't be surprised if he was immediately fired the way Roy Steinberg was fired last year when Ed was hired.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

So, what if Ed Scott became accredited by the WGA as a writer as well as an EP? Then, suddenly his crime would vanish?

Forgive me, I am just a longstanding viewer of both Days and Y&R. And I liked what I saw of Y&R when he was EPing the show and *loved* what he did with Days. IMO, he is a large reason why the show has come back from the brink.

Hollywood is filled with cross-pollination of this kind. Seems like everybody is an actor/producer/writer in one. You only have to look at the credits of your favorite Primetime shows to see half the main cast involved in production (and sometimes the writing). Matthew Perry on Friends is a famous example of joining the Writers' Room every week. Aaron Spelling pioneered this on 90210 of all shows, getting some of the vet actors behind the scenes in the producing and directing. To get them invested in their show and widen their backstage experience.

So why is this not OK on Days? Why are there calls for Ed Scott to be drummed out of the industry?

If it's good enough for the goose, then it is also good enough for the gander. Not to pick on GH (even though I hate the fact that it has been systematically DESTROYED all these years) -- but the showrunners over there have pretty much admitted that Jill Farren Phelps wrote a lot of the show during the writers' strike. Heck, Seamus Dever (who played Dr. Devlin) confirmed this in an interview to the soap press. Last I checked, she was Executive Producer, no? Now, there again, I much preferred what she put up on screen than Guza's "vision." I know I'll be flamed for that, lol.

But I guess "that's just the way they do things at GH," huh? GH is celebrated for letting its actors (MALE actors, that is) improvise a scene. Sure, perhaps that's not changing the writers' original intent. But what about when Maurice Benard and Steve Burton refused to play a scene which would show their characters coming to blows over Carly back in the day? TPTB acquiesced and the whole SL was changed to accomodate the two actors' preference. I don't think it is the first time that ever happened, either. Angel Boris, anybody?

All I'm saying is... I think people are being rather hard on a talented EP (of which there are few and far between right now) who may actually be doing what is standard practice in the industry. I personally think it would be a shame for Daytime to lose his kind of expertise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yes, which leads me to be very perplexed. I find it strange that both Scott and Griffith were fired last Friday, per Nelson of course, yet DAYS named its Co-EP replacement within the same day. Y&R, on the other hand, didn't seem to have anyone lined-up for the EP position after Griffith's firing. I think Corday was planning Scott's firing for months, and Tomlin might have secretly have been his back-up plan.

Shaughnessy is loved by the Bell's and the actors and crew on both Y&R and B&B. I think it were up to them, they wouldn't want another outsider running their flagship soap.

However, who will seriously replace Griffith? There's been almost no speculation on that show Sony, CBS, Bell clearly didn't have a replacement when the axe fell on Griffith.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

This is interesting actually. There are some claims that some Y&R writers (e.g., folks like Houghton...but I'm not sure if Houghton) aren't interested in going back. The idea is that there are other ways for them to earn a living, they feel undervalued, they don't see a long-term future in daytime. I was a bit incredulous when I first heard it, because I have a hard time seeing someone say 'no' to a paycheck...but I guess for some, the Y&R firings REALLY stung.

This is germane to your post because it really does seem that some people are making these "next step" decisions on non-economic grounds.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

We didn't know about Maria Arena until the day she started airing. (I realize that was strike mode, but still...). Thus, Y&R will likely just spring someone on us.

ALTERNATIVELY, they are going to be slow and careful this time....which means the position may be vacant for a time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

JFP wasn't writing entire storylines with the help of actors, the way Scott and his pets were at DAYS. It's one thing to tweak a storyline or ad-lib dialogue, and it's another thing to completely alter an already written storyline and essentially write your own storyline when you aren't a WGA member.

Scott, from what we're told, was rewriting the whole show, and what makes it worse he was rewriting it with an actor who also has no WGA affiliation.

Scott might be a good technical producer, but as I said before, he's shown in the past that he can be power-hungry and is not a writer's producer.

The WGA strike is one thing, but Scott was pulling this when the strike was OVER. Who expects WGA members to write during the strike? Unless their scabbing (like Dena allegedly did), or go Fi-Core, no one affiliated with the WGA is going to write a soap, so it's known that producers have to step up to the plate in that instance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Speaking of 1986, YT recommended me some 1986 episodes revolving around Kyle/Reva/Maeve/Fletcher/Cain. What struck me most about the episodes is Zimmer seems at a loss. This does not feel like Reva at all. Was Kyle always such an a-hole? Why was the pairing so popular? He's so unlikeable, and Malloy's theatrical acting does not help matters. Jay Hammer is extremely charming as Fletcher--did they ever try Reva and Fletcher? The real star of these episodes is Leslie Denniston. When she tells Kyle she wants a divorce, it's a fantastic scene and Denniston is putting in some great work while the stuff around her is just weird and off-putting. 
    • The Day Of The Jackal author Frederick Forsyth dies
    • 6-5   Case in point...lol.   Kat and Jacob can soooo have a spinoff. Just watching her being adamant that Eva is up to no-good while Jacob continues to try to play straight man to the craziness continued to be a hoot to watch. And the sad part is that Kat is on the right trail, just following the wrong clues. Or worse coming to the wrong conclusion. All because of her dislike for Eva.    Meanwhile, Eva continued to make inroads. I know I have said this since the start of the show, but I love how for the most part, the writers write the characters in gray. Not completely white. Not completely black. Most of the characters have moments where they resonate with the audience and then have moments where they are unlikeable. Like technically, Eva should be a pariah. I like that she knows this, understands this, and still shows remorse and still tries to work to get back the lost trust. It makes her so rootable. And played by a star is a bonus.

      Please register in order to view this content

       It is also what makes the rivalry between Eva and Kat so much fun to watch. Also played by a star. Neither one is perfect really, but they are oh so watchable and a nice by-product of the SilkPress storyline.    Same for Anita. I love the regal coldness TT has given to the role. The sense of ruthlessness beneath the beautiful face. And yeah it can be a turn-off. And it's been nice to see a softer side to her throughout this story of her and her bandmates. She is far from perfect. She...is also NOT a doormat so it was great to watch her versus her bandmates this episode.    I like the run-in between NuTed and Nicole. I'm getting used to NuTed. And Nicole's presence has been a little too light for my liking. I can only assume that is to build to the next Nicole vs Silk Press Sheila confrontation which rumor has it will be another good one.    Speaking of which...LAURA IS OUT OF THE HOSPITAL!!!! Praise it be!!! And I thought it was so adorable that Nicole, Kat, and Mona were on hand to welcome her back. I liked that Laura has an open mind toward Eva (unlike her feelings toward SilkPress). Another layer to add to the Eva vs Kat rivalry. 
    • Victoria Principal clearly stacked her Dallas coins real good. In the grand scheme of things, she was smart to walk away from Dallas when she did.
    • When Robert Calhoun became EP I thought GL was finally hitting its stride after some pretty rough years. Unfortunately the ratings during Robert Calhoun's run did not reflect the quality of the show.
    • There was a five week break between the last Friday episode and the Thursday episodes which were the final four episodes. I have a feeling the final four episodes were refilmed to wrap up the storylines. 
    • Yes, I forgot there was a gap between his exit from GL and his start at ATWT. This almost makes me want to cry. He really turned ATWT around (and good for them). It would have been great if someone had done the same for GL. Can't imagine who. The Dobsons were doing Santa Barbara at this point. I mainly blame Kobe. She may not have been the worst EP they ever had, but she almost totally destroyed the Bauers and decimated much of the rest of the cast, sometimes for egotistical reasons. That was a huge mistake and made it that much harder for the show to recover.
    • Douglas Marland began at As the World Turns in September 1985 but it took about a year for his run to show growth in the ratings. 1986 As the World Turns becomes CBS's #2 daytime drama after Y&R.
    • This is not at all surprising. Watching the recently uploaded episodes, the uneveness is SO apparent. Characters are changing at the drop of a hat. The stories are close to incoherent. It's a mess, and we're only up to May. What a fall from grace. An Emmy-winning show with good ratings and within a few short years hitting possible cancelation territory.  I'm surprised CBS and/or P&G didn't try to do SOMETHING to restore its former glory. Was Marland still at ATWT at this point? 
    • I think she did, yes. The only part of that return I remember appreciating was the ripoff they did of Earrings of Madame De, where a secretly broke India sold a trinket and Ross or Alan (I think it was Ross) then bought it for her, not knowing it was hers.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy