Jump to content

Unpopular Opinions


Recommended Posts

  • Members
Posted

Don't feel bad. I thought the same thing. It's made lots of posts outside of the Y&R thread pretty damn confusing for me.

I'm a little dense... :lol: :lol:

  • Replies 1.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members
Posted

I don't find this unpopular just because it's the truth!! Although -I think Roseanna and the Cosby show come from two separate generations- Soaps back in the day had a range of economic statuses to refer from- everyone on soaps have money- except the few whom will be rich in no time. The emotional connection to these shows is gone. It's all cognitive. There aren't many points of view presented on a storyline. If something happens, it happens to two characters- rich, white, and under the beliefe that love will triumph and hot sex can make up for everything.

  • Members
Posted

GREAT post! About the race thing--that always bugs me. Even now (when most white kids seem to listen to "black" music etc etc0 there's this tv conception that people identify only with their own race. I'm gay and I still identify and can relate to lotsa straight romances and not to some of the few gay ones. I remember with last year's "Cuban/American" soap Cane many critics said that white people just won't watch--it wasn't a brilliant show (though I thought it had potential) but when I watched I never thought that I just couldn't relate cuz of the races. These shows ar emeant to be telling universal stories and emotions here...

E

  • Members
Posted

Wow, I thought I was the only one that liked Cane. I agree it was not brilliant, but it was entertaining for the short time it was on and their race was not even an issue.

  • Members
Posted

It definetly had potential--CBS acutally surprisingly seemed to be standing behind it too but then they just let it fall. But yeah I didn't knwo one other person, even online, who watched it it seemed, so..But I was emabrassed that TV magazines said it had little hope because white Americans would have little interest...

  • Members
Posted

My mother and I, African-Americans, both watched CANE...she in fact loved it and is upset that it isn't returning...I too thought it had potential, and I never thought the show would have trouble attracting broad audiences. The problem was the show never POPPED...you know, it was like the fuse of a firecracker had been lit, but it never went off. The drama never reached a fever pitch to excite audiences and get people talking. It spent far too much time in extending conversations about sugar and ethanol, when what was needed was a soft-pedaling of the business issue and more family and romantic conflict.

  • Members
Posted

I think there is a difference between a show making race and issue, and a show that views race as a non-issue. Soaps view race as an issue, while shows like Cane set up culture to create a strong backstory. If race is an issue, it limits storyline and I don't feel as though I am going to get the best from the writers. I also don't identify with that mindset and therefore, cannot watch no matter the theme or focus.

Cane focused on more than just Latin culture- family, money, politics, etc....but if that show were to go on for 40 years and end up with an all white, black, asian cast, I would be really confused. Or if I were to turn on the LWord and the cast were miraculously straight, I would be offended to my core. What I loved about Cane is that it showed an angle of Latin culture that Americans are in desperate need of. These shows seem to be catering to the hateful people that are still out there. (Try getting on craigslist and typing in black women- there are plenty of hateful people out there.) The networks forgot about the success that could come from investing in these shows.

  • Members
Posted

IN reference to daytime television- race does appear to limit their storytelling abilities. It's obvious they don't let character and storyline develop naturally, they try and sideswipe as much controversy as possible.

Race truly does enhance s/l, but when the people are writing for a daytime drama, they seem more burdened by their responsibilities to the networks, than they are excited about telling a diverse story from all points of view regardless of age, sex, or color.

  • Members
Posted

I think it's true that a good story can be told through characters of any race. Of course there are issues like job discrimination or diseases that tend to affect people of certain ethnicities, et cetera. But I think where soap writers have missed the ball when writing for non-white characters is a sense of cultural flavor. It's not about stereotyping or generalizing, and Dru saying, "Oh no she di'int!" is not what I'm talking about. A white family, a black family, and a Chinese family may live on the same block and have the same conversation over dinner, but it won't sound the same. It'll be, er, "colored" by unique cultural expressions, old sayings, different points of view. So when writers in the past have said, "I don't know how to write for a black woman", well for one, they better learn how to or hire another writer, but I don't take great offense to that as some people have. I think it's a very valid point. I know it may sound odd to some, but for some of the black, latin, asian posters out there, have you ever seen a character of your race do something on a show and think, "A (...) person wouldn't do that"?

  • Members
Posted

Uh...

I thought Vange and Todd were hot together, hotter than with Vange and John, but I'm glad they were never put together. Although, I think even with Vange as his guardian angel, so to speak, Todd would still be capable of being horrendous. (See: Dorian Lord)

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


  • Recent Posts

    • I loved watching Shanice hand Leslie her ass and finally shutting her up. It was so good. I also love Martin & Smitty's family.  Anita has to have some sort of plan giving Leslie the tickets to mail for Winterfest. She has to be setting her up for a fall. It's pretty obvious to me Vernon is not cheating with Sharon. I think Sharon is helping him with his terrible singing voice for Winterfest. I still believe Bill & Dani are endgame but I love Dani & Andre too. I am definitely enjoying this story. And making Hayley a black widow is a nice twist.
    • Sorry for the spam. Wasn't sure where to put this, it's from Tony Geary's husband's IG. Tony watching Genie and Maurice on Mo's show.
    • This show is really trundling along BTW. When is someone going to show up to slit Beastmaster's throat or crack the whip on metrosexual Sidwell? (BTW, openly presenting this cheery bon vivant as casually bisexual would at least be something vaguely diverting.) At least kill Brennan by year's end. I'm bored.
    • She told Vanessa to "DOUBLE her offer" on the Jarvis house.  The Jarvis family accepted the doubled price.  Assuming the house has an appraised value of $2,000,000, she's theoretically paid the Jarvis family $4,000,000 for the house.  The bank would loan Leslie 80% of the appraised value ($1,600,000), and Leslie had to pay the balance with cash at closing --- $2,200,000.  She only had ONE million.  Where the hell did she get the rest?!  And now she's got contractors working on the house all day & half the night.  Who's paying THEM?  I keep thinking all this will crash around her.  Either that or the writers have absolutely no idea the limits of a million dollars.  Sounds like a "lot of money", but it obviously ain't when we look at Leslie's spending since she got that million dollar check in August.     
    • Maree Cheatham     pg. 403

      Please register in order to view this content

            MATLOCK Sister Peggy (1) 2025   Ray Wise    pg. 428 movie THE WOLF IN THE WELL    Roland Carmel    2024 THE NAPA BOYS    Officer Toland   2025   PodCast HAVOC TOWN      Josiah Abbess       2025    
    • Vernon is an idiot. Why would he have Sharon in the same hotel that Leslie is staying at?
    • Yes, that out of the blue return was odd. Maybe GG found a forgotten clause in the contract he signed when he was wooed to ABC and they were forced to take him back! Like George Reinholt he talked about the contract that promised him primetime roles. But it was loaded in the networks favor. I think it was Gloria Loring that re-signed at Days on the promise of primetime opportunities, but that was all it was- she was put up for guest spots and TV movies but not necessarily guaranteed that she get the role.
    • I still am baffled by why Monty brought back stunt hire Gerald Gordon in the early '80s out of nowhere for like a year. I haven't found anyone who can come up with a thing he did in that second stint of note.
    • It's interesting to watch this having watched The Doctors. I'm not sure I'm seeing that much of a difference in the characters Gerald Gordon and Anna Stuart played on The Doctors and what they're playing here.
    • I keep forgetting a huge chunk of that year was written by scabs. You're probably right, because by the time the strike was over, they were likely planning an exit for Alan's character as it must have been obvious by then that Bernau was not going to return. If he was still there, it's also doubtful they would have approached MZ and MG about coming back. Wild.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy