Jump to content

Unpopular Opinions


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I don't find this unpopular just because it's the truth!! Although -I think Roseanna and the Cosby show come from two separate generations- Soaps back in the day had a range of economic statuses to refer from- everyone on soaps have money- except the few whom will be rich in no time. The emotional connection to these shows is gone. It's all cognitive. There aren't many points of view presented on a storyline. If something happens, it happens to two characters- rich, white, and under the beliefe that love will triumph and hot sex can make up for everything.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

GREAT post! About the race thing--that always bugs me. Even now (when most white kids seem to listen to "black" music etc etc0 there's this tv conception that people identify only with their own race. I'm gay and I still identify and can relate to lotsa straight romances and not to some of the few gay ones. I remember with last year's "Cuban/American" soap Cane many critics said that white people just won't watch--it wasn't a brilliant show (though I thought it had potential) but when I watched I never thought that I just couldn't relate cuz of the races. These shows ar emeant to be telling universal stories and emotions here...

E

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It definetly had potential--CBS acutally surprisingly seemed to be standing behind it too but then they just let it fall. But yeah I didn't knwo one other person, even online, who watched it it seemed, so..But I was emabrassed that TV magazines said it had little hope because white Americans would have little interest...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

My mother and I, African-Americans, both watched CANE...she in fact loved it and is upset that it isn't returning...I too thought it had potential, and I never thought the show would have trouble attracting broad audiences. The problem was the show never POPPED...you know, it was like the fuse of a firecracker had been lit, but it never went off. The drama never reached a fever pitch to excite audiences and get people talking. It spent far too much time in extending conversations about sugar and ethanol, when what was needed was a soft-pedaling of the business issue and more family and romantic conflict.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think there is a difference between a show making race and issue, and a show that views race as a non-issue. Soaps view race as an issue, while shows like Cane set up culture to create a strong backstory. If race is an issue, it limits storyline and I don't feel as though I am going to get the best from the writers. I also don't identify with that mindset and therefore, cannot watch no matter the theme or focus.

Cane focused on more than just Latin culture- family, money, politics, etc....but if that show were to go on for 40 years and end up with an all white, black, asian cast, I would be really confused. Or if I were to turn on the LWord and the cast were miraculously straight, I would be offended to my core. What I loved about Cane is that it showed an angle of Latin culture that Americans are in desperate need of. These shows seem to be catering to the hateful people that are still out there. (Try getting on craigslist and typing in black women- there are plenty of hateful people out there.) The networks forgot about the success that could come from investing in these shows.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

IN reference to daytime television- race does appear to limit their storytelling abilities. It's obvious they don't let character and storyline develop naturally, they try and sideswipe as much controversy as possible.

Race truly does enhance s/l, but when the people are writing for a daytime drama, they seem more burdened by their responsibilities to the networks, than they are excited about telling a diverse story from all points of view regardless of age, sex, or color.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think it's true that a good story can be told through characters of any race. Of course there are issues like job discrimination or diseases that tend to affect people of certain ethnicities, et cetera. But I think where soap writers have missed the ball when writing for non-white characters is a sense of cultural flavor. It's not about stereotyping or generalizing, and Dru saying, "Oh no she di'int!" is not what I'm talking about. A white family, a black family, and a Chinese family may live on the same block and have the same conversation over dinner, but it won't sound the same. It'll be, er, "colored" by unique cultural expressions, old sayings, different points of view. So when writers in the past have said, "I don't know how to write for a black woman", well for one, they better learn how to or hire another writer, but I don't take great offense to that as some people have. I think it's a very valid point. I know it may sound odd to some, but for some of the black, latin, asian posters out there, have you ever seen a character of your race do something on a show and think, "A (...) person wouldn't do that"?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Uh...

I thought Vange and Todd were hot together, hotter than with Vange and John, but I'm glad they were never put together. Although, I think even with Vange as his guardian angel, so to speak, Todd would still be capable of being horrendous. (See: Dorian Lord)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy