Jump to content

The Doctors


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

 

Yes, I was disappointed in that as well. Not only does Marland shy away from medical stuff, when it gets down to it, he shies away from in-depth legal stuff. Of course we know Matt won't go to trial, so in a way, they are taking the easy way out. Having the policing, lawyering and doctoring take place off screen so we can show things like Matt drinking or Maggie pulling her hair out about Matt's drinking.

 

Another thing I didn't care for was how everyone was commenting on Matt's overnight drinking problem. Even Nola was jumping on him about it. She works in a nightclub where a lot of people drink. It's not like she hasn't seen intoxicated behavior before. We also had Mike piling on. Marland has avoided the grand jury scenes in favor of these repetitive scenes of Matt drinking.

 

Personally I would like to have seen Virginia's testimony, Nola's testimony and Jerry's testimony. Plus I think we needed to see Stacy being interrogated by the jurors. And Paul. Not to mention Matt going before them a bit tipsy. Marland really made the wrong decision. He skipped a lot of riveting on-camera drama that should have been depicted.

Edited by JarrodMFiresofLove
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

That would be great, although I am mindful of the fact that we have been lucky to get ANY of these vintage eps. Seeing material from 1967 through to the mid-1970s is a miracle, considering many of never knew TD episodes had been saved at all.

 

I know I am dreaming in Technicolor, but if only Retro TV would consider buying and broadcasting another vintage soap after TD finishes its run. The station can continue broadcasting another round of TD repeats, but I'd be thrilled if they would add a second vintage serial with extant episodes like early GH (whose 1960s material is rumored to exist), or DAYS or Y&R episodes from the beginning (which we know for a fact still exist) to their line-up. Even Ryan's Hope or Dark Shadows would be nice, although they have already been broadcast in fairly recent years. P&G could sell Retro TV ATWT, AW, TGL, SFT and/or TEON from the late 1970s too!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

Hmm, I had forgotten all about Capitol. It was never one of my favorite soaps, but I imagine its episode library could still exist. It would not be my first choice of classic soaps to see again  (that would be Y&R starting in 1973 or AW from 1964 to 1975), but I'd give it another shot!

Edited by vetsoapfan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

Capitol is the show I'd choose too...simply because of its era, its cast, its glossy production values, and the fact five years' worth of episodes wouldn't take forever to get through. I've sent an email to Retro requesting this. Maybe others will send emails too.

 

Capitol's entire library does exist. The show has been successfully rerun many times in Europe. To this day it's still popular in Italy. There are Italian websites devoted to it, and episodes on YouTube that were dubbed into Italian. It did so well because its glossy production values probably made it seem like a daytime version of "Dynasty."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Bonus points if they tried to re-create the lineup from that era and shortly after. SFT at 12:30, ATWT in the 1 p.m. hour (to represent the classic 1:30 slot), AW at 2 p.m., TGL at 3 p.m. and EON at 4 p.m. (or 12 if they'd prefer a solid block). Run Texas at 11 a.m. when it comes time to air and one could have a P&G overload.

 

(Or, as The Doctors' sponsor might say, "you're soaking in it.")

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The Doctors didn't show court material, not when Steve "killed" Dan, or Penny "killed" John Morrison. So them not showing it in this case, is not surprising. Marland won one of his writing Daytime Emmys for Guiding Light trial material (saw the video clip of his speech online from the awards and the package had courtroom during the Jennifer Richards  trial story). Perhaps they didn't want to pay for a courtroom set. 

 

When it comes to the writing of the characters, I see this as an evolutionary process. The Pollocks were very plot-oriented, which in the long run hurt things. Other television shows what I've seen of this era have very underwritten characters in drama - the comedy shows that I've seen reruns from the MTM family and such are much stronger. So I can sort of accept this failing, it isn't like today when the characters are ill-defined, when I know soaps did better. 

 

The dream line-up I think most of us wouldn't get any sleep if that happened, as it would be too many hours in the day to keep up with these shows.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don’t know why I thought I wouldn’t like Nancy Barrett as Cathy, but she’s doing just fine. I kept pictures immature Carolyn, obviously forgetting how many different roles she played on Dark Shadows and she’s nothing like Carolyn here. It’s still a shame this role was recast twice. The original actress was really good! I hope the third one is as well. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Well, I have now watched the first month's worth of available episodes, from December 1967 to January 1968, and I am thrilled to say that I am thoroughly enjoying this series.

 

Rita Lakin and Rick Edelstein are handling the scripts and storylines beautifully. The drama is predicated on multi-dimensional characters and their interpersonal relationships which is absorbing on its own. No clones, time travellers, devil possessions or underground cities are necessary. Realistic human drama, family conflict, romance and heart are what the best soaps are made of, so bravo!

 

The principle cast is talented, attractive, charismatic and the actors play well off each other. There are no bland "hair models" here. These pros can act. You cannot fake chemistry and the show lucked out in that regard. Nick/Althea, Matt/Maggie, Matt/Nick, Steve/Carolee, Althea/Maggie, John Rice and everybody, Karen Werner and everybody...all ooze chemistry. I feel that the minor supporting players like Ruth and Bill Winters (who have been featured only nominally so far) are less effective, but the show does not seem to be terribly invested in them. It looks like TPTB are focusing on the actors and characters who really shine. The only actress and character whom I find doesn't fit well at all is Betty Walker as Polly Merriweather, the elderly patient whom John Rice is treating. John supposedly adores her, but I see no true chemistry between them; their scenes seem forced, as if the writers and actors are trying desperately to show a connection that just is not there. The actress overplays her role, and her dreadful wig is distracting. I hope this storyline ends soon. Other than that, everything happening on-screen is quite absorbing. Liz Wilson is the kind of ingenue that all soaps want to have, but so many young female leads end up being nothing more than bland baby girls who engender scant interest at best. Liz is adorable and has spunk. The direction is also quite good. The main characters actually interact with and acknowledge the existence of the extras playing the hospital personnel, making the environment feel more realistic. (On most soaps today, the few extras we see walk around like silent zombies in the background, totally ignored by the principle cast.) There is often amusing "business" happening on-screen, which warrants the viewers' attention.

 

In one of the latest episodes I watched, Nick and Matt had a heated argument about Nick's letting his bad temper get out of control--again--and Matt did a totally hilarious impersonation of Bellini ranting like a moron. It was great! I also like the Maggie and Althea friendship. Maggie calls Althea out on her nonsense, but there is no denying their close bond.

 

If I have one complaint, and it's minor: all the green used as a principle color in the sets is too much. Green walls, green doors, green furniture, green coffee cups, in the hospital and in characters' home. Yikes! I also find it weird that none of the doors in the hospital have frames around them. 

 

Minor quibbles aside, however, this show is rocking.

 

I know everything changes in later years (the Pollacks focus more on plot than characterization and relationships, and eventually the writing falls into the toilet and stays there), but for now, in 1967-8, The Doctors is a fine, vintage soap.

 

Watching this show makes me realize how nostalgic I am for all my long-gone, past favorites.

Edited by vetsoapfan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

If the idea of switching to color was to look more modern and appealing to the viewing audience, Colgate-Palmolive and NBC should have coughed up the dough to redo the paint, or at least minimize it to a degree. They could have kept green as the principle color of the hospital, but broken it up here and there with other, neutral colors on key walls. Of course the tiny budget would not have allowed them to completely overhaul everything, but painting a few sets a different color could have been done on the cheap.

 

Still, this is a minor complaint. I am still thoroughly enjoying the series.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Yes, I am familiar with Fred Silverman. Agree, the 90 minute AW a very poor decision by Silverman. I think Silverman was behind the decision to go with Texas.
    • Thanks -- you're doing God's work The Gio reveal was everything I hoped for and more. GH got it right. Head to toe, GM is a stunning physical specimen.
    • I really wonder how they'll handle Netflix's usual long breaks between seasons. That girl is going to grow up fast... makes me wonder if this wouldn't have been a better fit for HBO Max considering they're leaning into a more broadcast style of production model with The Pitt.
    • I agree -- I didn't suspect Ted, either. I think a lot of people are giving themselves way too much credit in predicting Ted's problems

      Please register in order to view this content

      And can I have a different take on Ted here? Yes, he's made a huge mistake with this Leslie debacle, and yes, he has to suffer and pay for it. But does that make Ted a terrible human being? I don't think it does. He made a horrific mistake over 2 decades ago, and as far as we know, he's been a good husband and father since. As far as we know, he hasn't strayed or violated his marriage since. He didn't know that he fathered another child, and thought he "removed" Leslie from his life. I won't blame Nicole if she doesn't forgive him, but I also won't blame her if she decides what they have and what they've had more than makes up for what he did. Ted is getting dragged far more than Bill is on these boards, and I think Bill is MUCH worse as a husband and father. How many times did he cheat on Dani during their marriage? How many times did he do vile things in his role as fixer? How much did he hurt his daughters by screwing their friend and marrying her? With Keith Robinson coming in as Ted, maybe we'll see a character change in direction and we'll discover that Ted has many flaws and always had a dark side. For now, though, I'm inclined to both be angry with Ted for hurting his family while also sympathizing with him. I know what you mean, but I do think that was intentional. So much was going on in that episode, and I think they decided not to let Nicole's reaction be lost in all that. Nicole will get those scenes that you're asking for.  
    • That was the original point of me sending you her 6 airdates, so now with those, and the link to the daily episode guide I've provided, that should help you more easily find the additional Ruth Buzzi scenes. I will always repeat myself when it comes to defending my data that I've taken decades to research and compile. But, as you pointed out in a recent post, I am kind, so at least I will do it with you in a kind way as opposed to the usual social media way most people do with just getting rude/nasty. That's not my style, as you correctly pointed out earlier this week, and never will be.  So, all is well! 

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Ambyr Michelle continues to be *that girl.* She’s just a star, period. Elevates every scene she’s in on the sheer strength of her emotional realism and charisma. Can sell any dialogue. I wish the show veered away from the B&B-style scripting. TMG/Leslie’s tirade stood out, I suppose, but she’s getting a bit mustache-twirly. And I wish DD had more to do in that episode than stand and sob.
    • Well, that was down to CBS being weak and not being willing to just pulling the plug entirely. They didn't want to commit to cancelling the show in case they needed it for their schedule basically; plus they kept showing that they were willing to make cuts if needed to be. 
    • I'm sorry but clearly what I've said is not satisfactory to you. I have now read what you have to say, twice. As it happens, my interest at this point is looking at other mislabeled files to find this other Ruth Buzzi content. I do not see any point to each of us repeating ourselves, so I will leave it here. 
    • It seemed to be your intent. coming into a thread I started and making multiple posts saying my data was wrong. In the next paragraph you say "Of course, I was suspicious from the very first instance where what I saw & heard did not agree with what it should have.  I'm very glad to know why." That certainly didn't stop you from immediately saying the data was wrong, until I provided additional receipts. Why did you not check the daily episode guide (for instance, this one for the 1980's) I posted for the world to see for exactly this reason...to help confirm airdates: http://daytimeroyaltyonline.com/days-daily-summaries-1980-1989-t15361.html? That is what you should be checking BEFORE you make any posts in the future like this, trying to suggest something from my data is incorrect. You could have also messaged me and asked me why your dates weren't adding up with what the correct data is. I would have fast forwarded through that video you posted, spotted Roman and Hope and immediately have told you that was the 11/1/83 episode.
    • Jason, just let me say that it was not my intent to any way impugn any of your data  or research. I'm very sorry if it came out that way. Obviously the person I got these 4 November episodes from has mislabeled files, multiples, which I was certainly unaware of.  When I am editing it is all about what I see & hear. Later, I find time for greater reflection.  Of course, I was suspicious from the very first instance where what I saw & heard did not agree with what it should have.  I'm very glad to know why.  If you find you are no longer interested in the edit, that is fine. I have no ego in this. I did it only to share it.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy