Jump to content

Sara A. Bibel's Blog


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 264
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Nice blog, I'll be checking it more when she updates. :)

I heard Latham fired her when she voiced her opinion over Adrienne Leon's firing last year. :rolleyes:

Too bad AMC didn't work out for her, she seems like a big fan of what that show used to be.

I hope she can eventually make her way back to Y&R, but I don't think that's happening. The show seems intent on destroying itself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I would imagine that it ruffled some feathers at AMC when someone who actually cared about the show started showing up the story meetings and giving her two cents. Esesnten, Brown, Walsh, Demorest, Hayes, and Carruthers had clearly gotten to a place where they were content to just fly paper airplanes around the room and collect their paychecks. Bibel probably tried to get them to actually engage some brain cells...and out she went.

Given the time where she was with the show I would wager she didn't see eye-to-eye with the rest of the team on the "Crash" story.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It's writers like Sara Bibel that give me hope. A tiny amount of hope...but hope nonetheless.

And yes, LML fired her because she actually thought her opinion mattered. I'd love to see her back. But, like Y&RWorldTurner said, Y&R appears intent on self destructing.

I hope she spills about AMC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yeah, I don't know that the American public is not homophobic anymore. But I do think that she's right about the tidal wave of fear going on in the media in general. This is mainly because the economy is so bad and the networks are capitalists through and through.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'm definitely seeing a trend in the younger set of daytime writers.

I wonder if daytime just insists on shooting itself over and over again, starting in the foot and making its way up. They say they want new blood, but clearly, that "new blood" is what they're slowly phasing out.

The writers who keep their heads down, don't care what soaps used to be, and basically just get their work done with no muss or fuss, seem to be the ones who stick around, whereas those who grew up on soaps in the 80's (with the exception of RC, but there's always one exception to the rule) got their chance then were quickly shuttled out.

Is it fear? Lack of raw talent? Insecurity? I don't know - but it's interesting to see how similar Sara's story is to other younger daytime writers, and wonder if maybe there isn't some kind of underlying, unspoken bias against them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • To clarify, we could argue about the necessity to have John Black speak while in hospital, but the body created an opportunity for people to touch him, and move around him.  Even though I never totally suspended my disbelief, I appreciated their creative choice to form a visual representation of loss.  Certainly there were other ways to tell this story, but it will stay with me because those production choices enabled these performances. However, with disdain, I note that Days has found an odd middle ground between a flashback and a montage.  I define a flashback as least a couple of rounds of dialogue, if not a whole scene.  And a montage would be a visual snippet without much dialogue.  But, these were often just a single line, or an entrance.  It felt like a bit of tease, and made me wish that Peacock had curated a playlist of John Black's Greatest Hits, like they do for some Bravo shows.  
    • It's tough for me because I feel like this has always been Lulu. She used to be even worse, slut-shaming, verbally abusing other women, and always being written as being in the right. They should let Brook Lynn get dirtier, but I think the material of Lulu digging and being self-righteous, making everything worse even while not intending to do so, but also not being as in the wrong as Dante thinks she is, all makes sense for her. But I don't have as much experience with Lulu as a lot of fans as I just could never stomach her beyond the time she was a mute kid, so I don't have much right to speak.
    • Thanks @JAS0N47 for all the ratings!   All My Children hits Number 1 in the ratings for the first time in its history during the week of 8/20/73-8/20/73!
    • I think the writing is slanted against Lulu.  I don't think there is an issue with the character in general.  I just think Lulu comes doesn't get many layers or nuance in her writing.  Lulu becomes obnoxious and a bully to Brook Lynn and both characters SHOULD have flaws.
    • Totally here for Anita dumping Sharon in the past for first Dante Green, and then Vernon...
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Hey Anita and Sharon

      Please register in order to view this content

        
    • Amanda Setton and Rena Sofer was once again really good in today's episode.  As a Lucky/Liz fan, I didn't like their scenes either.  And they are nowhere near a proposal because they haven't been given a real story.  
    • I don't think Lulu is written that badly.  Lucky they do seem to have no real interest in. I wonder if this is another story they have decided to wrap up abruptly as it makes zero sense to have what would have clearly been serious conflict between Liz and Lucky just get shrugged off by her. Maybe the intense viewer negativity toward Kristina got through to them.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy