Jump to content

Dynasty Discussion Thread


dm.

Recommended Posts

  • Members

If memory serves, the whole thing happened due to a donation to the Carousel of Hope Ball which benefits juvenile diabetes, and it was filmed on location at the ball in Colorado.

Fun fact, it was Barbara Davis (widow of Marvin Davis), the inspo for the Colbys, and grandmother to Brandon (greasybear) Davis and Jason (RIP, gummybear) Davis, who chaired the event for years.

Edited by j swift
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

*smacks head* Yes, that would make more sense for the Fords to donate their salaries to the charity they were there in support of, as opposed to Betty's cause. Again, assuming that they did donate their money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Members

I don't really think she left because of her marriage. She was visibly burnt out with the show. Staying would have given her more money but if she wanted to go, I don't think she was wrong to go. They got so much wrong with Fallon until the final season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't blame her either. If you need the money and are willing to phone it in, stay, but if you have a chance to leave, take it. Fallon was a great character in the first season and as soon as season 2 started they removed everything that was interesting about the character. The Fallon of seasons 2-8 was a ridiculously hysterical heroine with very little appeal. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

@kalbir Your posting made me think about how much the basic ethos of the show changed from season one onward.  I'll summarize my reaction, realizing that it is an overstatement based upon years of episodes.

S1, Krystle and Steven are sort of the moral center of the show, and they are trying to tell everyone that love is more important than the acquisition of wealth.  Blake learns to trust and value his partner.  Fallon learns that playing with Blake's money is less essential than earning his respect.  There's a late 1970s value system at play.  

Then S2 onward, the tables turn, and it is all about how the acquisition of power through wealth gives people freedom.  Alexis wants her own agency and to be free of the judgment of men.  Fallon gets a hotel empire in order to satiate her desire for independence.  Steven has a literal about face (

Please register in order to view this content

).  

Making Blake a beneviolent hero suddenly changes the writing from being about prioritzing relationships over to money, to valuing all the things that money can buy.  It was a way of mollifying the masses to the disparity of wealth.  Whereas in the 70s, we told the middle class that money can't buy happiness.  The 80s were about that anyone could find success, and we should ignore the systematic issues that create disproportionate wealth.

Edited by j swift
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Dynasty is very much a product of the Reagan era and to me it was the epitome of Reagan era excess and greed. It's quite telling that it's run began just before Reagan took office and ended shortly after Reagan left office.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I can't remember who said it - maybe it was someone on this board? - but whoever said it was correct: DALLAS epitomized the first Reagan administration and the ascendance to wealth; and DYNASTY epitomized the second, with the consolidation of it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

That makes a lot of sense.

We could even tie the bizarre Krystal brain tumor/damage story to the end of the Reagan era - she started the show strong and vibrant and ends as a disappearing shell. 

Neighbours recently introduced another member of their rich family, who is named Fallon Morell. Another reminder that the main memory many have of Dynasty now seems to be stupid names...and the family in question is another reminder of just how dull rich families often are on soaps (Dynasty in particular after the first few seasons).

Edited by DRW50
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Members

I was watching this Locher Room interview from a few years ago to see what Susan Scannell said about Another Life, but she also gave some interesting details about her time at Dynasty. It starts somewhere around 35 minutes.

She says she had a MeToo incident. Her refusal to go along with what this person wanted led the show to go overbudget. This person (she doesn't give any names but does say "she" at one point) was tight with people on the show, so Susan ended up taking the fall. She only found out when a tabloid person asked what she was wearing to a reunion event, which she hadn't heard of. Susan also says that she was basically blacklisted in the industry due to this incident.

Please register in order to view this content

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Its realistic for Dani and  true of how the character thinks and operates
    • Random takes: - What was even the point of that jeweler guy? Also—Dani was borderline harassing him. - I know I’m probably in the minority here, but I want Jacob and Kat to happen. I need something messy to completely dismantle the Duprees—and Katomas just isn’t cutting it.  - I officially can’t stand Jacob and his wife. Same goes for Anita and Vernon. - Hayley’s corset was just as ugly as it looked uncomfortable. - I genuinely don’t remember when or how Derek and Ashley reconciled—and I’m someone who didn’t even mind their storyline! LMAO. - Tuesday’s episode was a mess. - Dani finding out about Hayley’s pregnancy and immediately thinking, “She’s faking it”—huh?! What writer thought that was a realistic reaction? I get denial, but that leap was absurd. I agree the ‘Leslie Victorious’ moment was way OTT. But hey, at least I wasn’t yawning. The following episode, where she handed over her daughter’s last few belongings was much better. - I can’t with the constant back-and-forth between Orphey Gene’s and the Country Club. I forgot this was such a soap trope, but even back in my loyal viewer days (late ‘90s, early 2000s), it wasn’t this bad. While GH has a ton of beautiful sets, we’re stuck with the same three—and half of them are ugly. Also: it’s been way too long since we had a party, gala, or any kind of event. I know the Richardsons’ anniversary gala (back in late April) has had a big ripple effect, but I was kinda getting used to those large-scale episodes. Fingers crossed they don’t go with Guza.  
    • The horrific comments execs and writers make when they justify rape storylines or keeping rapists as love interests is just so icky. I remember Ron Carlivati's comments about the reraping of Marty storyline on OLTL. Made my skin crawl.  No matter what you think of her, Susan Lucci could have demanded front burner storylines but she never did. She was happy to be part of an ensemble. I never got that vibe from Zimmer.  For me, Reva was just not a character I cared that much about after a certain point no matter how talented Zimmer is/was. I think Zimmer had a keener eye for what made a good storyline, but she was less willing to take a backseat if it meant someone else got to shine. I'm trying to recall if she ever mentions Michelle Forbes in her book--one of the few times the viewers did not care about Reva in a storyline. My sense is if she did, it was probably some backhanded remark about how she had to show Forbes the ropes.    
    • GH was good? I havent watched since Joss went away to do her traininig and Lulu had just called Brooklyn out for having Dante's baby and not telling him
    • BTG: A-  DAYS: B+  Eastenders: C
    • There was a rumor that Jean will die and that’s probably why she’s back then
    • There has been some confusion about Michael & facial burns. Please see this post: https://bsky.app/profile/shallotpeel.bsky.social/post/3lqkrryu54226 I've chosen to put this here instead of the Classic Thread because it is now with the appearance of recast Michael that this has come up. Different places online, including at least one podcast, remarks have been made about how remarkable it is that he is without facial scarring. Other fans say it was clear from the first that he did not have facial burns. What is included in this post is 2 screengrabs where you can see his face at the hospital & a very quick edit of that day in the hospital. 
    • Put me in the LOVE KMH camp. As a poster alluded to above, her detractors seem to come from people who first experienced the 80s Emily actress. And that's often the case with soaps, myself included. I enjoy the original actor so much that I just never take to the recast. However, KMH played Emily far longer than the original - for almost 20 years - and when she had great material, she was great. I get the sense she didn't like playing the whiny oh-woe-is-me Emily which was all the material she got from about 1996 until she took over the Intruder in late '99/early '00 and got to play a stronger kiss-ass woman who didn't care what anyone thought of her. (Some would call that a bitch but, if a man was in that role, he'd just be called a smart and savvy businessman.) Her relationship with Hal was great. The transformation was done realistically and I thoroughly enjoyed those years the best out of all. Once the writers decided to break up those two, they went back to writing Emily half the time as whiny and pathetic. I preferred when the writers made her stronger.
    • Hahaha - I do. I've always been the type, though, that can't miss anything. I get FOMO, so I'll not skip episodes or fast forward anything. There are only a few TV shows I've dropped because they got so bad vs. sticking it out to the end.  The promise that GL 1997 is better is what keeps me going. I especially want to see the fallout of Blake's lie about her twins and then Annie's descent which I believe won Watros's Emmy.
    • Rita's rape is an episode i constantly search on YouTube hoping one day that it will show up. I always feel like I may have seen it, but I was only 6 at the time and can never figure any of the things I have vague recollection of 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy