Jump to content

March 3-7, 2008


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Members

When RC was writing, the balance was shaked-up every month. He did it the right way.

What I want to know is what do you want OLTL fans want?? He is showing veterans. Todd, Nora, Viki, Clint, etc. Yes, he shows John. Yes, his stories are parenting stories. But he has only been here six months. Six months is not enough time to show all the stories you have planned. And he also had to clean up the mess that Dena made.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 183
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Thanks Ryan. I don't think it's the end of the world or OLTL is doomed to hell. For me, it's just boring right now. I suspect at some point, I'll go back. I do believe the very worst thing OLTL could do is change writers again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

LMAO I'm sorry but AMC DESERVES these ratings. Guess viewers aren't interested in a bitch on a pole, or the sextet of suck(I know I'm sick of it). The writing is all over the place, one day characters say one thing, then next they say the complete opposite. Even Jesse & Angie are getting repetitive, and D&D can only carry that for so long....AMC is a true clusterfuck

AMC keeps mocking viewers and giving them giant FU's, guess viewers are biting back.

OLTL, just wow. I fear for that show. They seem stuck at 2.0, it's gonna be hard for them to get viewers back(ala Days) if this keeps up, same for AMC and GH.

How the HELL does Frons STILL have a job when ABC Daytime is literally bleeding from its core?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yes there are vets on (and a lot of them), but the stories still don't make sense. Clint and Nora make no sense and it seems like the only reason they are together is to show a contrast to Bo and Lindsay, who also makes no sense. Ron is just using things that worked 10 years ago and making the characters act that way again. The food fight with those 4 vets made no sense and was stupid. Nora acts ridiculous and Lindsay should be held accountable for her actions. The ratings are just as bad now as they were under Ron. Ron has no idea how to do sweeps...nothing happened in November sweeps. He took over and we got Marice on the run with various wigs for WAY TOO LONG. If I NEVER see another character in a car again on this show it will be too soon, between Marcie (and her horrendous hysterics) and Tommy...Todd and John and my personal favorite Todd/Blair/John/Marty. These are all things that went down under Ron's watch, not Dena's and not the scabs. I understand he needs to fix things, but fix them, don't drag out crap because storylines "cannot be quickly ended." When you don't end crap that doesn't work, you end up with ratings of 2.0 (lows that were reached under Ron's tenure). I enjoy both Viki and Charlie and Jared and Natalie, but the uncle thing was way too much and again that is something Ron did. I don't blame him for what is playing out now, but the stories were bad before mid February...WTF wants to see Natalie pining for her uncle while he kissed her sister. And don't get me started on Marcie on the run. I use to enjoy Marcie, but now I NEVER want to see her again until she pays for her actions, which she doesn't seem to be doing. It was dragged out WAY too long. That story should have climaxed in November, not January. Ron is better then Dena, but he is by no means the great white hope that many make him out to be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I have stopped blaming the headwriters for the rating fluctuations. What we are witnessing the cumulation of years of negligence on the part of the networks and producers combined with changing demographics of the soaps' viewership. I have noticed that once the ratings decline, there is no going back. Other than Y&R and B&B, the soaps are probably doomed to eventually disappear from network tv onto cable or the like.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

What's even bad, when even the actors on AMC have NO idea what's going on with the storylines. Cameron Mathison said as much in a recent interview in SID. I guess he was told the amnesia storyline would go one way, but they ended up doing it another.

Just WOW, when actors have NO clue what's going on this show is in serious trouble

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

WOW! Some nasty/negative comments toward GL before the actual posting of the ratings. Let's see here.............

GL is #6 in total viewers (6. GL 2,745,000 (+3,000/+97,000)), they are the only soap to increase in the viewership from last week and they EVEN increased from last year.

GL is #6 in 18-49 Women Viewers (6. GL 856,000 (+21,000/+63,000)) with increased from last week and last week. They even beat AMC which ABC Soaps were supposed to be known for it's good demo ratings. They rank #4 in the 18-49 demo ratings (4. GL 1.3/8 (same/+.1)).

GL is is #1 in the Girls 12-17 Viewers (1. GL 65,000 (+18,000/+53,000)).

GL is the most diverse soap time slot-wise than any soaps on air since they air in many markets from 9am, 10am, 2pm and 3pm without any consistent time slot. The new production format was in full blast during this week so obviously marketing and sampling is taking place. Perhaps innovation and building on new, first time viewers for GL is the key to the future as all shows are competing with youtube, internet, and hundreds of cable channels.

Monday: 1.9/2,463,000 #7 out of 8

Tuesday: 2.0/2,755,000 #6 out of 8

Wednesday: 1.9/2,735,000 #6 out of 8 but very close behind DAYS

Thursday: 1.9/2,796,000 #6 out of 8 but very close behind GH

Friday: 2.1/2,978,000 #5 out of 8

If GL was in consistent time slot across the country like GH, I believe they would have higher ratings than GH and even their lead-in ATWT (no offense intended).

Yes, GL has problems but it's not a disaster as people constantly point out and I love watching this show through the good/bad times since 1989. GL in my opinion is severely underrated and they have only one way to go and that is up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

ABC also needs to fire the current promo monkeys and hire new ones cause they clearly don't know how to promote stuff people want to see.

We're STILL being subjected to Ryan's "one sexy man" promo on Soapnet, when the Ryan amensia stuff is clearly a flop, yet they keep promoting it. GH promoting more mob violence, the majority seem sick of the mob.

Seriously WTF is going on with this network????

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

How did I guess last week when Days was pretty boring it would go up? Seriously. Ratings have no rhyme or reason to them. Days will probably go down this week even though it's a bit better. Hopefully it can at least hold the 2.2 for this week.

This is a bad week for soaps though. I mean, I am shocked GH got nothing for the bridge stuff last week. I mean, the story sucked but usually for big events they get something. I feel bad for OLTL. Good for GL in viewers though.

ABC has major issues though. They are setting up to be the ratings story of 2008 much like Days was of 2007. Even if Days is up vs last year's lows, it still looks good when you see a plus there. I mean, they have gotten viewers back and CBS has too.

As for ATWT, why would all the publicity get them anything? Shock and awe doesn't work anymore. Just ask JER. That is all he did his last few years at Days and the past few years at Passions and the ratings did nothing despite any media attention the shows did get. The only recent "shock and awe" story that got media attention and did well was the SSK story on Days and that was for a short while. It all went downhill from there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Bad week for soaps. I was hoping ATWT would stay at 2.4. I had a feeling it would drop. The week was slow until the end of the week. I knew the pubilcity it was getting wouldnt raise the ratings. The positive is they are still at #3 in Total Viewers.

I cant believe GL is only .3 back from the number 3 spot in HH's. That is just awful. GL is the worst show in daytime right now.

OLTL is not all that. What is with all the praise it is getting. It deserves the ratings it is getting.

GH back at #3 in HH's....grrrrrrrrr

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Clint and Nora is something new instead of going back to the same old same old relationships. And Jerry Ver Dorn actually has chemistry with Hilary B. Smith(hell even Catherine Hickland).

I get what you are saying, but if Ron is taking things back to how they were in the 90's he is doing a good thing because that is what One Life to Live is. The 90's made its identity more than the seventies or eighties did, IMO. Ron has returned it to its identity that Dena deprived it of.

Ron is not the best HW, and yes the Marcie story was long, but it was long because it played a factor in many stories and if it had not been that long things wouldn't have gone in the great directions they did. Marcie was needed to get Viki and Gigi to Llanview, and if the hostage situation had happened in say November Viki would barely have had time to meet and bond with Charlie, much less be in Paris, Texas.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

You cannot always go home again. I am all for Ron writing stories that are similiar to the 90's for OLTL. But he isn't, he is just recycling old plots and putting the same people in them, even though they are no longer the same people anymore. Characters grow and evolve. Write compelling stories for who they are now, not who they use to be.

I disagree that you had to drag the Marcie stuff out because of Viki and Gigi...Ron CHOSE to tie those stories together. It makes no sense that Gigi had to come to town because Ramsey was trying to kill her and Shane. It was just as weak as some of the crap Dena has pulled.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • BTG: A-  DAYS: B+  Eastenders: C
    • There was a rumor that Jean will die and that’s probably why she’s back then
    • There has been some confusion about Michael & facial burns. Please see this post: https://bsky.app/profile/shallotpeel.bsky.social/post/3lqkrryu54226 I've chosen to put this here instead of the Classic Thread because it is now with the appearance of recast Michael that this has come up. Different places online, including at least one podcast, remarks have been made about how remarkable it is that he is without facial scarring. Other fans say it was clear from the first that he did not have facial burns. What is included in this post is 2 screengrabs where you can see his face at the hospital & a very quick edit of that day in the hospital. 
    • Put me in the LOVE KMH camp. As a poster alluded to above, her detractors seem to come from people who first experienced the 80s Emily actress. And that's often the case with soaps, myself included. I enjoy the original actor so much that I just never take to the recast. However, KMH played Emily far longer than the original - for almost 20 years - and when she had great material, she was great. I get the sense she didn't like playing the whiny oh-woe-is-me Emily which was all the material she got from about 1996 until she took over the Intruder in late '99/early '00 and got to play a stronger kiss-ass woman who didn't care what anyone thought of her. (Some would call that a bitch but, if a man was in that role, he'd just be called a smart and savvy businessman.) Her relationship with Hal was great. The transformation was done realistically and I thoroughly enjoyed those years the best out of all. Once the writers decided to break up those two, they went back to writing Emily half the time as whiny and pathetic. I preferred when the writers made her stronger.
    • Hahaha - I do. I've always been the type, though, that can't miss anything. I get FOMO, so I'll not skip episodes or fast forward anything. There are only a few TV shows I've dropped because they got so bad vs. sticking it out to the end.  The promise that GL 1997 is better is what keeps me going. I especially want to see the fallout of Blake's lie about her twins and then Annie's descent which I believe won Watros's Emmy.
    • Rita's rape is an episode i constantly search on YouTube hoping one day that it will show up. I always feel like I may have seen it, but I was only 6 at the time and can never figure any of the things I have vague recollection of 
    • FROM THE VAULT: NON-SOAP DAYTIME RATINGS: HIGHLIGHTS FROM FEBRUARY 1973 & MAY 1973:

      Please register in order to view this content

        FROM THE VAULT: NON-SOAP DAYTIME RATINGS: HIGHLIGHTS FROM AUGUST 1973 & NOVEMBER 1973:
    • The rape was in 1979 after they were married. Blake was the result of Holly cheating with him while she was married to Ed. I believe she was born in 1975. 
    • No. Ed and Holly were married and having problems. She had an affair with Roger and that's when Christina--Blake--was conceived. The rape happened much later, after Holly and Roger were married.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy