Jump to content

December 17-21, 2007


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 201
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I do not see it as hypocrisy when soaps get criticized pretty much equally with some receiving more and deservedly so and most people here can take the heat and deal with criticism rather than blow a gasket over it.

I see a lot of shots at AMC and it does deserve it because the show is not doing well right now....the 2008 previews look promising so I am hoping, aside from the Sean/Hannah spoiler, that it will improve and perhaps we get new head writers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I actually have watched GH for many years and I have a problem with this comment. Why is it that GH needs the violence to be kept alive they survived for many years without it. Maybe I'm wrong but as far as I'm concerned shouldn't good stories be what brings and keeps viewers? I am all for action and adventure stories GH has been known for these for years, but I think that people see that they are recycling the same plot line over and over again and this is what is turning people off. JMO

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Exactly...I see a lot of AMC criticism, to which it deserves. The only good thing I can see out of B&E stint as head writers would be the crash story (before it got into revenge), Aidan/Greenlee (I know you do not like them and for that I am going to be forced to hunt you down and slice your head off. KIDDING! :P), Ritchie, and adding diversity with Dre, Quinton, Jesse, and Angie.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I have to agree. I think this is the first person I have run into at a message board that wants more violence on soaps...that is very rare since viewers tend to want romance, action/adventure, suspense, family oriented and social issue storylines. I am not saying this is bad but it is interesting

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Your argument holds no merit because IMO it's not true. I don't know if you actually read the other posts at SON, but people are ALWAYS bitching about something. I'm kinda glad SON's GH fanbase has dwindled over the past couple of years. If you think the bitching is bad now? It was a hell of a lot worse back then.

It's clear that no matter what anyone says to you, you're going to believe that only poor GH is "picked on" at SON. It's not the case. I know it's true, and so do many others. But you have the right to your opinion, and I have the right to mine. I respectfully disagree with you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

GH has had the mob on screen since the early 70s, it just wasn't the focus or exploited like it has been over the past 10 years. Luke Spencer when he first debuted was involved with Frank Smith and the reason Luke and Laura were on the run for many years. But it seemed around 1997 is when the mob became the focal point of the show and it's been that way ever since.

GH has a HW who likes to blow things up, he likes to write from plot point to plot point, he likes that Sonny and Jason win at everything and God forbid they look stupid or be made an ass - he can't have that so it's quickly turned around at another character's expense.

There are many reasons why I hate this show and why I am bitter, and I suppose the Internet exposure has tainted my views of GH - but then again, it isn't just me who has tuned out. MILLIONS of viewers have over the past year and I just have to wonder why they tuned out, if as some say, GH is the best soap on Daytime television?

Believe it or not, there are fans are fed up with the way the show is written and the backstage politics. They are fed up fighting an uphill battle to get a damn payoff for their favorites, they are fed up with the fab quartet being front and center and forget all of the other 65 people on the roster. And I suppose many are fed up with the newbies getting contracts while 30 year vets are being fired. But then again I guess to some that doesn't matter as long as mob violence reigns supreme. :rolleyes:

But then again .. what do I know, I'm just a Days fan. <shrugs>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • There's some irony in Philip being forgiven, because it forces everyone to admit that Victor was wrong to change his will.  Everyone, eventually including Xander, (I presume), seems to think it was wrong for Victor to divide his estate in Xander's favor.  I appreciated Stephanie forgiving Philip, because she's got no skin in that game.  But, Belle's line about Philip missing Xander because he misses Bo did not ring true.  I think Philip would be sad if Bo dies, but I think he's more concerned currently about Xander. I am enjoying this EJ mystery so much that I am hereby taking a vow not to read spoilers.  I am also vowing — for the last time — to stop harping on this, but: the concept of a “sepsis treatment” remains absurd. Hospitals prevent sepsis through vigilant infection control; once sepsis sets in, it causes multiple organ failures. Treatment involves supporting each failing organ individually. The notion that a single medication could magically reverse organ failure is medically laughable. However, I like the contrast of Kim going through cancer, which is incurable in their universe.  Kayla's comment on the health of both of her siblings was both heartbreaking and an interesting twist.  MBE is also totally underrated.  She is carrying the weight of so many stories.   And, I like the use of Kayla as an audience surrogate.  She's arguably the most "real" person in Salem. Kayla isn't psychic, she wasn't SORASed, she's not a billionaire, and she doesn't have a bionic eye.  So, I enjoy that we get her perspective of the nuttiness that surrounds her. However, I don't get what gives her the authority to turn down EJ's offer.  I understand that they need a hospital figurehead to show us scenes of the competition to buy the hospital.  But, unless the entire administration has been let go, the Chief of Staff wouldn't make those choices.
    • But why worry about something that might not happen? Right now, most things revolve around the Duprees. We have no idea if or how long that will continue. For now, it's working.
    • The Duprees not having any staff is a bugbear for me. They've included the background staff at the Country Club but no one at the Dupree home. Even just an extra bringing in a tray of food/drinks or responding to a request from Anita would suffice.
    • Shut up, Dante and Lois.  I actually don't mind this particular soap trope, but in the context of this storyline, it just feels forced and unnecessary. If anything, this Dante/Gio tension needed to begin months ago. Plus, this storyline, in general, isn't doing Lois any favors either.  Emma comforting Gio was really sweet though. It's definitely time for the two of them to have their first kiss. And, Joss playing Secret Agent Barbie will just never work.
    • Note to makeup - Smitty’s eyebrows, bad clamshell look.  

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Okay I can buy that when Brook Lynn was a teen.  Now she knows the child is a boy one would think she'd be slightly suspicious.  Then again, Gio looks nothing like either of them so maybe not lol.
    • I've been behind & just got caught up & the last 3 days were amazing!
    • Yeah.  The hot, poor bad boy with a chip on his shoulder but with a heart of gold was a common soap trope in the 80s 

      Please register in order to view this content

    • That's been an issue with me... the lack of a cohesive 'Have Not' crowd that has focus other than Leslie/Eva.   I would beef up Jan, Mona, Laura, Joey, and few other male characters.. and not just be out to overthrow the Duprees.. but co-existing and broadening the scope of the show since the show is called Beyond the Gates. I think the set up the show has with everything revolving around the Duprees will become predictable especially if they always win.   It would be like Victor Newman on Y & R for 40+ years.. always winning, hardly ever losing.   With MVJ/Guza.. both trained under that mindset... I fear that will happen.   I've always heard from a performer that is playing a character like Leslie/Dana that you have to find the victim/hurt beneath the surface in order to play a villain/villainess... and I think that's why I enjoy watching her.. because she brings so much more to the part than what the writers put on the page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy