Jump to content

Anyone think Lorraine Broderick should return to AMC?


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 51
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Zwick and Herkovitz would do any tv show justice--they're probably my fave tv writers ever. But would they ever write for a daytime soap? no... Their film work (which I've always found less interestign than their domestic dramas--though it is interesting that for films they prefer such big epic stories and for tv they prefer domestic relationship shows) is too important and they couldn't do both, plus they're working hard on quarterlife right now (can't wait!--just over a month for the online premier). Add to that that I'm not sure they'd be quite right for AMC because their stuff is SO non-soap opera int erms of all the daytime drama things we take for granted (many people have compared Brothers and Sisters to their writing and while I love B&S and see their compairsons its WAY more soapy for example). Plus AMC has always had a camp element (characters larger than life) especially to their comic scenes which Id on't think H&Z would or could do and I'd miss...

Anyway..Washam was at GL? I always wondered if he did any other soaps... I really think Broderick should be the true heir to Agnes for AMC... Anyone know how old the woman is?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

>> though it is interesting that for films they prefer such big epic stories and for tv they prefer domestic relationship shows

That's b/c, Zwick & Herskovitz are aware that what might work beautifully in one medium might not in another. After all, the beauty of TV is its sense of intimacy, the fact that we invite these characters into our homes every week and "eavesdrop" on most, if not all, facets of their everyday lives.

Put that on a 70-foot screen, and somehow, for me, the magic is lost. The cinema, therefore, demands bigger stories, with more larger-than-life characters.

And yes, I agree their best work isn't exactly soap opera...but who says you can't elevate the genre a little? Besides, did anyone ever watch "Family", the series they worked on back in the '70's? Believe me, lol, they can get good and soapy when they want to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I started watching in 1989, so yeah, I think so. But I was too young (10) to understand. I didn't start getting into writing until high school (1993-97), and by the time I started paying attention to who wrote what was smack dab in the middle of Lorraine's 1995-97 tenure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yeah but Family was a Spelling show ;) (though did have Mike Nichols as an EP) I believe only Herskovitz (or was it Zwick *blush) were directly invovled and in later seasons... I just don't see AMC interestign them too much--nto due to snobbism but just the commitment. maybe as a consultant?

And I agree with you--that they realize that for a tv series domestic drama is probably what it shows the best--for a movie not so much

(and where the HELL is thirtysomething on DVD?? Recently a Canadian netowrk reran the whole series, a few years back, and Iw as in Heaven as I had only caught some eps before. but they stopped half way through the final season!)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Of course Lorraine Broderick should come back! But it will be a cold day in hell.

I miss her AMC which as many have already stated, is the closest thing to Nixon's classic All My Children. Its been a steady downhill tumble since 1997.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I actually found a bunch of tapes I saved from when Agnes Nixon came back in 99-2000 You can really see she was trying to build back some of the samller details (even silly side stories liek Marian wanting to get to go to the Queen's tea with Adam and being mad that Scott wasn't interested, made sense) and I think it was a very strong show. I never got though why she brouight in Jean Passanate as co-writer and I hope that, since she was still co writer at the time, stuff like Libidizone were all Jean's stuff when Agnes was finishing up the Bianca comes out stuff

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I just can't wait until next week when we can go back to a full weeks worth of episodes. 3 episodes and a mid-week gap has been so difficult to deal with, especially in light of how good the show is.
    • I always hoped they'd change Parker's paternity back to Phillip.  I guess it doesn't matter since Chloe is off the show currently.  I don't recall Holly or Maggie mentioning Parker, so it's not they are close to him. 
    • I’ve reached the summer of 1998.  Until now, my impression has been that the show has steadily improved since the great quality dip of 1994, reaching as high as 8/10 in 1997. Sure, I could complain about a few things in 1997 (Claudia got wasted after her initial storyline; Thorne’s feelings for Taylor were a bit too sudden; the storyline where Sheila lived with James and Maggie while pregnant got rather boring; Mike periodically revisiting Sheila despite being on the run from authorities), but overall it was a very strong year.  I liked the Thorne/Taylor/Ridge triangle, the mystery plot about who shot Grant, the sham wedding to trap Sheila, Stephanie/Eric/Lauren, and Clarke manipulating his way back to working at Forrester. I even liked the Greenland storyline with Eric/Lauren/Rush, although I had expected to hate it. Maybe 1996 tops 1997 in raw soapy excitement (especially as Sheila got a chance to interact with a larger canvas of characters), but certain problems with overall storyline cohesion puts it somewhat below 1997 for me. Unfortunately, 1998 has turned out to be a bit of a speedbump, perhaps on par with 1995 levels of quality: - Maggie’s character really got trashed after James left her to be with Sheila, and the early 1998 storylines where she imprisoned Sheila in the house from Psycho, or installed those wires and mikes and such in her house to make her think she’s going crazy, were total GARBAGE. So much so that the latter storyline (and Maggie with it) pretty much disappeared into a limbo.  - I have mixed feelings about the twins plotline with Lauren. No way did Rush survive being shot with a crossbow through the chest, and the romance between Lauren and Rush’s good twin brother Johnny was rather dry to me. I did however enjoy the camp aspect of Rush taking his brother’s place to be with Lauren, and Eric rescuing her. But it doesn’t appear like Bell cared too much about the Johnny/Lauren romance beyond the twin storyline gimmick, and it too disappeared in an unsatisfactory manner (come on, why not hire Johnny’s actor for just 5 more episodes for an arc where he realizes Lauren is not over Eric, or JUST SOMETHING?) - Clarke wormed his way back to FC in late 1997, which had exciting storytelling potential, but then he disappeared almost entirely. Sad to see my favorite character wasted in this manner. Does he get anything interesting to do between now and the Morgan saga of 2000-2001? - The Thomas saga was entertaining in 1997, but it got stretched out too much, and made some of early 1998 tiresome, with Ridge having to decide YET AGAIN which woman he wants to be with. On the plus side, I like the plotline of Thorne being neighbors with Macy and Grant, and we’ve finally been introduced to the SORASed Rick/Amber/CJ crowd. The Stephanie/James/Sheila triangle is also starting, and it makes me excited (I remember seeing some if it in my childhood). I know Sheila, Grant, and James are all leaving soon, which I honestly kind of dread - between them and Clarke’s near-absence, it feels like herd is going to get culled too much in the near future. But I know there’s the familiar 1999-2002 to look forward to.
    • LOL - this is a perfect description, and that's what I loved about it! May be a bit campy, but it immediately caught my attention in a good way.  I'm not familiar with the Fishing Trip storyline, I'll have to look that up. I've noticed that about Josh, which has made him less attractive to me overall. He just yells a lot when he's not happy. Wow, Reva was married to HB!  LOL - "Always... eventually, and again"
    • I love your ideas. I would love to see Jack grown up this confused unhinged individual. He should hold a grudge against both Brooke and Taylor.   
    • @chrisml

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Lois's return has been a bust. So disappointing that the writers have never written for her. As with Tracy, the pool of GH vets is so thin, there's no one to pair her with. Doubtful they would go to the trouble of properly recasting a legacy character and then sticking  him with Lois; they're obviously not that invested. If she wants to be on this show, it'll be as a noisy grandma who stays in the background. 
    • I love me some Anita and TT. They need to give her a good storyline and I know that it's coming. 
    • @Franko Thanks for tagging me. A few days ago I was talking in another thread about the rise of "snarky" critics for TV shows in the '90s online recaps, but this is just more along the lines of a mauling. There's also the unspoken reality that films like Steel Magnolias were seen as movies for women, so therefore they sucked. Pauline Kael also had her share of blunt, at times incredibly nasty remarks, but the vitriol is often balanced by her love for film. I'm not seeing that here.  With that said, the comment about Field's work becoming unbearable describes how I felt when I tried to sit through her and Maura Tierney on ER. 
    • I skipped most of Daniel too. I think it's awful he has kids with Nicole, Csrky5 and Chloe and Brady, Bo and Philip do not. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy