Jump to content

Anyone think Lorraine Broderick should return to AMC?


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 51
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I'd be SOO sad if JFP ever came to Pine Valley...

Yah I'd take Broderick back in a heartbeat. It's interesting many of the old episodes I have of AMC from the early 80s list her as the head writer, despite no official credit to the fact. I also thought her era, despite shrinking ratings, in 96-98 was brilliant even with a few story duds.

I was away in europe for much of her era co-HW OLTL but she never seemed to gell there, what did peopel think of her work on it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Gary Tomlin injected a campy flare into OLTL, while the show had some misses, it was generally a good era for OLTL imo. Totally ahead of the crapfest JFP and McTavish had prior and better than what come later. There was a lot more humor on the show and the dialogue was GREAT. One thing with Broderick, the shows she head-writes generally always shine in the dialogue department. It was also this era where OLTL won its first and only Emmy for Outstanding Drama Series. Though it wasn't all good, but this era in OLTL's history was definitely a breath of fresh air, since the show had been in rapid decline for years prior to it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

YES!

Broderick is my #1 favorite soap writer. She truly knows AMC; her stories have always struck me as raw and realistic. Hell, even the wacky stuff she was forced to do by the network -- Voodoo, Santa Claus -- included sincere emotion and we're basically in-character for those involved.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

got that right. The only concern I would have is that Frons micromanges the soaps too much these days. Im not sure if she'd be given the freedom that she truly wants but instead would just be an extension of Frons and JHC. I could see Broderick leaving on her own bc of "creative differences"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I just have to reiterate -- I LOVED HER LAST TENURE AT AMC! There was a witty sense of humor about the show that's been missing all of these years. Not only that, but LB was very into developing relationships, both romantic and friendly. She created the Erica/Skye/Janet trio and it worked. Also the Erica/Esther friendship was great, too. The contrasts of those friendships gave Erica a more human feel. Yeah, she was this big time cosmetics exec, former model and celebrity, but she had "real" friends. I loved the development of Adam and Liza under Broderick, as well. The scenes with Adam, Marian and Liza were hilarious.

Also, under Broderick, you got the sense that you were watching real people and they actually did all live in the same town. There was no "Star" no "hero" no "saint." It was just people living their lives and dealing with their issues and relationships.

Now, this whole "let's have Ryan be all-knowing, all powerful, heroic GOD" crap is on my last nerve.

As much as I enjoy Zendall, this should NOT be the Zendall/Ryannie show.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yes I would love for Broderick to return but I doubt she will since it is clear she dislikes Frons. They offered her the head writing gig for AMC in 2003 but she refused and I cannot see her writing under a hack like Frons. But it would be wonderful if she could come back...ABC just needs to get it together and can Frons and bring in Felicia Minei Behr as president.

As much as I enjoyed the first few weeks of B&E, they really have not captivated me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yes, we need Broderick to come back and fix the current crap!

I hope JFP never comes near AMC. It's gotten bad enough the past few years and she would just kill it.

I can understand why Broderick wouldn't work for Frons. It's been obvious the past few years from his quotes about AMC that he has no clue what used to make this show so great.

ITA that B&E came on strong in the first few weeks by delving more deeply into the characters, especially Greenlee, than anyone had in years, but they've since petered out. The show is nearly as unwatchable now as it was under McT.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think Frons showed with the hiring of B&E that old AMC is no longer AMC. I think at best he wants an improved version of McTavish's version of the show. That's the only way I can understand him picking B&E over Kay Alden. She did an excellent job of reviving Y&R after Bill Bell stepped down, revived several families and characters that were on the simmer. She had great humor, camp, romance and character driven drama. From her speech at MIT she seemed to REALLY want the job and to turn AMC around.

With all those positives working for Alden, if he'd turn he down, then he wouldn't even consider Broderick. From what I've read about her, AMC seems to be the soap for her and I'd love to see her get her hands on it again. As much as Frons may want to, how can he justify keeping B&E who have been duds since day one? The ratings were dropping with McTavish and are getting worse. I hope they don't wait too long like CBS did (still are) with ATWT (which is pretty dead ratings wise).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Not only that, but Tony, Annabelle, and Jim had zero skin in this game. The Fishing Trip story had a huge impact on the Reardons and Annabelle because it was about THEIR relatives and how what happened to them shaped their own lives. People directly and indirectly affected by this--i.e. Alan, Amanda, Philip, and even Lujack--weren't involved in this at all, either because they were off the canvas or involved in other stuff. I mostly admire Long's talent for using the past to enhance her stories in the present, but this one was a huge turkey. We saw Brandon old and decrepit dying on screen. Even if we were able to suspend disbelief, why wouldn't he have wanted revenge on Lucille, who tried to kill him? If he wanted to go live with his Barbados squeeze, who would have cared about that by then? In the end, it had little to no impact on the larger story because they were too chicken to bring in that branch of the Spauldings into the main story (until later).  Just a really bad storyline that mainly existed to stretch out the GL stints of the actors who played Tony, Annabelle, and Jim.  
    • Agree to disagree as to Lois's return. Moving from the specific to the general, IMO, successful: Tracy, Lois, Lulu so far & Lucas so far. Questionable: Lucky. But I do not believe that having a romantic partner at all times is the be all & end all of things.  Reminder about how we got from there to here with Rena: Everything was a part of the great unknown, whether they'd like her or vice versa, so they by intent signed a 30 episode deal. Before they even got to the end of those 30 episodes they knew they really liked each other a lot & so they with mutual satisfaction (we think) agreed upon a handshake open-ended deal, which as far as anyone knows is how it still stands. What is good about that? Neither side has YET wanted it to end. What's bad about that? Maybe it is a little weird.  Now, it seems to me that Lois is not going to have time for anything or anyone at all EXCEPT the fallout over the GIO reveal for the upcoming future days & weeks & I do think she is going to take the brunt of a LOT of people's anger. In a way that has begun this week with Tracy being SO UGLY to her.  About Jason & romance. They're not writing any. If I understand what he's said from that podcast they never had any intention with either Anna or Sasha. Also, if they had wanted to write either of those, he would've been against it, although he realizes it's not up to him. (Finola has expressed same at fan events, etc.) (Others who have similarly stated their "preferences": Sonny does not want to be with Carly. Carly does not want to be with Sonny. So, these preferences Jason, Anna, Sonny, Carly, they all work out & none of them is having the show want those pairings either, so, again, works out.  About these writers & romantic couples, they spent a year blowing up every couple that existed. Now a few months has gone by & they have YET to create even one new couple. The only thing that has come close is Lucky & Liz. 
    • I find it hard to believe that they actually watched the same version of "Steel Magnolias" that I did. Are we sure they didn't watch the horrible re-make?    

      Please register in order to view this content

      Oh dear lord, did you have to remind me of that?!! That was definitely not Sally Field's finest hour, and Abby (Maura Tierney's character) was surely one of the most depressing characters ever written for tv or film. I'm not sure she cracked a smile even once during all her years on ER.  
    • I always thought Lois was such a unique character and considered her supporting her first run.  She was in a lot of different places on the canvas, but I don't think she had more focus than Brenda or Robin at her peak. With Ned basically out of the picture Lois doesn't quite have enough ties on the canvas to make her relevant and the show has done very little to give her new relationships and friendships.  She's stuck in the Q mansion most of the time. Oh, I agree it's a problem across the board for GH.  The only stable couples on the show are Brook Lynn/Chase and Portia/Curtis.  Unseen Olivia/Ned and Kevin/Laura are happily married I suppose.   Eventually I am sure Liz/Lucky and Dante/Lulu will get their romance, but is there any other couple that's even rootable?   I can't recall an era when Jason, Carly, and Sonny were all at such loose romantic ends at the same time.   Which is fine.  However no other romance besides Willow/Drew is being focused on.
    • https://www.nzherald.co.nz/lifestyle/shortland-street-fears-speculation-grows-about-shows-future-amid-industry-struggles/T2GECWXTI5AD3AMEV46YYYUE6E/ Still a big cloud over whether the show will get another year.
    • I had hoped they'd pair her with Michael Knight. They had a nice chemistry and he's been one of the better random castings on GH. When it comes to Gio, I found the scenes with Dante to be overdone. It's obvious they're trying to set up conflict for the reveal but I don't think that was needed. It actually made me less excited for the reveal and killed any interest I had in Dante and Gio forming a bond.
    • He also lost the woman he was going to marry, under very sudden circumstances. They are probably surprised Rena has wanted to stay. I think Lois works OK in her current capacity, if they allowed her to have more of a point of view, a bit more life of her own, and not just the reason for Gio's paternity being hidden. The character always felt very thin to me and on paper this dynamic with Tracy, Brook Lyn, Gio, visits from Gloria could be better for her than how overly centered she was on the canvas the first time around. But as of now she could be better used.  Somehow the show that was revived due to supercouples seems completely alien to romance. The older cast has this hardest but even with tiers who are younger or middle-aged, they've really dragged their feet about Liz and Lucky, they have contorted themselves in trying to figure out how to pair a man with Joss, Kai and Trina barely get focus...and others I struggle to remember. They also blew up Sasha/Cody so now I guess we're meant to be waiting to see if she finds true love with Jason? The show is so hesitant and when you are this hesitant it means you are incapable of writing romance.
    • I agree.  Rena doesn't seem to mind the lighter workload and seems happy though. Strangely, a lot of the veteran cast are without viable love interests-Sonny, Nina, Lois, Jason, Tracy, Alexis, Carly (Brennan doesn't count).  The show lacks serious interest in romance.
    • I just can't wait until next week when we can go back to a full weeks worth of episodes. 3 episodes and a mid-week gap has been so difficult to deal with, especially in light of how good the show is.
    • I always hoped they'd change Parker's paternity back to Phillip.  I guess it doesn't matter since Chloe is off the show currently.  I don't recall Holly or Maggie mentioning Parker, so it's not they are close to him. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy