Jump to content

The Tennis Thread


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Members

The Real Househusbands of the ATP are going at it on Twitter!:lol:

Andy Murray vs. Stakhovsky

Dusan Lajovic just told Rajeev Ram he'd rather watch Serena eat tacos than watch him play tennis!:ph34r::lol:

Andy Roddick put Darren Rovell, some sports blogger/journalist in his place.

I have to go to bed but the fun is endless!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 12.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Soapsuds

    4184

  • Faulkner

    3003

  • DramatistDreamer

    2409

  • ChitHappens

    1615

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

Venus vs Serena always brings in high ratings as it did this past US Open. Anything Serena brings in ratings…as for Roger he brings them in too but it also depends on who he plays. I will say Novak does not bring in ratings or fan fare….thus his behavior when he is losing and the fans are supporting his opponent in majors.

Andy Murray is on the women's side….good for him…I may not like his tennis or antics on the court but glad to see he supports women's tennis. Stakhovsky comes off as an a hole….LOL….he needs to work on his game and worry about that instead of women's tennis. Rajeev Ram is such a boring and awful player…Id rather watch anyone else but him play…..what did that fool say? And what did Stakhovsky say too??

I didnt care for Tennis Channel and the way they brushed aside Novak's comments. I guess being number 1 does help.

Edited by Soapsuds
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I hadn't seen Tommy Paul play before …they(the media) had made a hoopla about him….I was impressed with his game. I thought he should have won his match. I like his game better than Fritz. I know he won the French Open last year so that bodes well for American males in clay in the coming years. Was surprised that Borna lost too…man was he upset and barking at his camp while leaving the court….LOL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Loving the game of Kyle Edmund. His game is so much better than Murray's. Imagine if he had a quality coach. I love that Novak is getting the business from fans in the stands…LOL. And he had a talk with Chris Evert and Billie Jean about his comments. Yeah whatever…of course everything is forgotten because he is the top male in the tour. I am sure had it been another tennis player saying that he would have been toast.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The Miami Open tournament needs serious improvements to its facilities and STAT!  It is so rundown with lights that flare out right in the middle of matches at night, burnt PA systems, etc.  And except for a few matches (I missed the Edmund match) most have been lackluster.  I think many of the offcourt drama seems to be draining some of the players at the moment.

 

What's going on off-court?  Let's review the year thus far:

Match-fixing scandals

Drug/Doping Offenses

Sexism/Equal Pay matter revisited and the ensuing clapback between players and fans and sports journalists alike

and now...MURDER!

 

* Then there's the DelPotro question--his loss to Zeballo after having his wrist evaluated by an oncourt physio.

*Then there's the Federer question-- While Federer officially withdrew with a stomach virus, there were reports of him seen limping around the complex yesterday, so some are questioning the official reason for his withrawal.

 

This year, tennis has more drama going on than any of the 4 remaining Daytime dramas combined!

Edited by DramatistDreamer
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Pretty much …lots of drama….as for the Miami Open it is very outdated tourney ….the lights are the worse….they have been that way for years now. And the court and seating looks pathetic….

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Monfils should have lost to Dimitrov. Monfils handed him the 3rd set at the beginning only for Grigor to mess it up. I couldn't believe the slow paced serves Grigor was giving Monfils. He wasn't even trying to ace him? I don't know whats going on in his head but it sure isn't winning tennis matches. He only beat Andy because Murray was playing worse than him that day. Kei….eh…..I had high hopes for him when he made the finals in the US Open…now I have none….he is Chang all over again…he might win a major one day but wouldn't be surprised if he ever did. Kei was on fire 2 years ago and now he is just limping into matches. I hope its Theim that comes through and dethrones the supposed big 4 that ESPN wants us to believe. I don't see the rest in the top 20 dethroning them. Milos is so overrated…when he gets to the finals he goes out with a whimper and uses injury as an excuse for the loss…..Murray at Australian Open and last week against Novak. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Maybe the surface just wasn't great for Dimitrov's game?  Monfils tends to excel on clay courts and from what I've heard, Miami is playing quite slowly this year.  I guess I saw that match completely different than you, I thought it was one of the better quality matches on the men's side.  Grigor has only beaten Monfils once in their 5 meetings so perhaps that played into it as well?

 

Well, so far, Kei's not limping in his match vs. Kyrgios.  He seems quite focused.

ETA:  Kei really handled Kyrgios very efficiently.  Here's to hoping he doesn't get dragged by Djokovic!:ph34r:  Seriously, someone needs to beat Djokovic for once.

Edited by DramatistDreamer
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

 

A pretty big scandal, in short.  I tend to rattle on sometimes so maybe an audiovisual may be more entertaining :D

Here's a link to a CNN interview with one of the journalists (almost 400 journalists worldwide worked on this in secret, communicating on what I believe to be an encrypted online portal) who got the anonymous tip about this law firm Mossack & Fonseca who had all these files (almost 40 years worth:blink:) on various political leaders, celebrities and wealthy who were using their firm to hide money and financial assets.  In some cases it is legal (although mostly unethical), while in others illegal (drug kingpins or dictators squirreling away embezzled funds).

 

http://www.cnn.com/2016/04/04/world/panama-papers-explainer/

 

Oh, and in the sheer volume of data leaked-- this dwarfs Wikileaks!

Edited by DramatistDreamer
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • As always, really interesting to get your impressions! I was only watching sporadically during this period (whereas I was transfixed during the Marian storyline), but if I remember correctly 1996 was a pretty rough transitional year. It came at a period where P&G was playing musical chairs with its executive producers--ATWT was hit especially hard by this. The current executive producer, Michael Laibson, is out in November 1996, replaced by Paul Rauch, who stays for nearly 6 years. While Rauch has a few really bad ideas that cause long-term damage to the show, those don't really kick in until 1999, and his first couple of years are very strong. So once you get to 1997, you should see the show rebound significantly. 
    • Haha love a little drunk posting

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I’m up to April 01, 1996. I think I’m starting to understand what many have said.. things are different. I miss the community vibe of Springfield, when you had people working at the hectic newspaper, the choatic diner, the rich were coming in for coffee, or the TV network was abuzz about the latest scandal. Things have become a little more tunneled into their own storylines. Right now, for me anyway, there isn’t a strong desire to see what happens next, ever since the Brent/Marian story ended. It was a darker, more suspenseful storyline that really got me intrigued and waiting to see what happens next, while everything else was just a nice view of midwestern families living their dramatic lives. And I love that too, when the characters and storytelling is strong, but right now, some things are a little stale. In these last 5 weeks, we had two bigger events: Nick and Susan’s wedding:  it was sweet, but I really found it weird they played music over their vows instead of being able to hear them. Then, they leave town immediately after and for good? We really didn’t get a ton of time with them - one minute Susan is in a hospital bed, post-coma, celebrating the new year, and now she’s married and gone. I’m having a hard time with the revolving door of characters since my early ’95 watch. This year we’ve lost so many characters, gained so many characters, and to what end? Henry’s funeral:  this was so sad, considering the real actor passed. I’m curious what other fans thought about the funeral. Granted, when an actor passes, you don’t have much time to plan ahead, so you need to insert it into whatever storylines are happening at the time.  But sadly, this funeral happened when everyone was hating each other. Vanessa was upset with Matt because the Amanda secret came out and he kept it from her. Quint showed up, with his very young affair no less, which made both Nola and J upset. Amanda was there which upset both Blake and Ross. Roger insisted he give a speech which upset everyone. Vanessa was mad at Quint for bringing his young girlfriend, and then Dinah was so upset about her grandfather, which was emotional, but everyone is currently at odds with Dinah. The flashbacks were effective, and the most emotional scene was Vanessa’s breakdown when reading Henry’s letter to her.  Otherwise, it was a pretty hateful funeral, which felt icky. Otherwise, my quick pros and cons currently happening… Pros: Alex and Hawk are great and funny. He gets under her skin and it’s hilarious to watch her react, but she needs him. They were in LA trying to get dirt on Amanda’s former life and Hawk was living it up with young gorgeous women and all the spending money at his disposal.  Generally, the Amanda and her secret storyline is interesting and I really like the actress. Alex vs. Amanda is entertaining. Tina came onto the scene around the time Nadine died, but she’s been given a backstory which is interesting to me now. She’s a prostitute, who means well, and is trying to take care of her daughter, Dahlia. She grew up with Frank, who has a soft spot for her. Marcus, in a new storyline he desperately needed away from Dinah and his dad, has taken a strong liking to Dahlia. She sings well and he plays saxophone well, so their music is endearing. Sadly, Tina got involved in a robbery gone-bad, where they held up a Spaulding board of directors meeting. She flees, but Frank catches her outside and is forced to arrest her, while Cleary (she’s back!) arrests the main bad guy involved and saves the Spaulding family. I’m curious to see where this one goes, but curious, was Tina actually on the show before this or is she a brand new character? Cons: The Dinah/Hart/Roger storyline is pretty stale now. I need something new. Lucy and Alan-Michael are barely on since Brent left, which is sad. You spend an entire year on a storyline that builds their relationship, brings strife and wedges, and now that they’re finally able to be together in love with no obstacles, you never show them? I want to see them happy! Oh and Lucy and Bridget/David haven't had a scene since Marian tried to get 'a room at the boarding house, which is weird because we haven't seen Bridget react to Lucy being alive. I don't even know if Lucy even lives at the boarding house or with AM, but it's sad pretending like Lucy/Bridget/David were never close friends. Reva/Josh, which is hogging airtime, is a serious whiplash. One week Josh loves her, she hates him; the next week, she loves him, he hates her. He’s always lying to Annie, but now he’s marrying her again, the second wedding in 4 months. I’m also very tired of Marah, her angst over everything, and their overwhelming concern over her. As much as I don’t like Buzz, it is funny watching Reva work at the diner, but I’ll never side with Alan so watching him have feelings about Reva/Buzz or Reva/Josh does nothing for me. Finally, the other small B storylines are only on like once a week which isn’t enough:  Gilly/Griffin/Viviane, Michelle/J, Blake/Ross/Rick, Rick/Abby, Holly/Fletcher and the baby. Something that just popped up out of the blue is David Grant leaving Springfield out of nowhere. He professed his love to Bridget, who turned him down, so he decides to leave when Griffin gives him a job opportunity. Sadly, another character written out for many new characters being introduced. Makes me wonder who is making these calls - the producers, the network, the writers, the fans?
    • OH. The AMC/OLTL Crossover with helicopter, down in the woods, 2 very pregnant, both give birth, only one baby lives. We are on the same page!!!
    • Backtracking because BTG has been distracting me from keeping up with GH. Why is Carly always involved with a paternity lie? Lulu is Dante's (wife? if Im correct) so she has the right to tell him about his son. If anything, she's in a better place to reveal paternity drama than Robin was. As for Robin...I'm conflicted about whether it was HER place to tell AJ he was Michael's dad. Being with a man who's pretending to be someone else's baby daddy is wild. Dante was snoring blaming everyone  but Rocco, however he was right about Jason. A convo isn't enough, neither is trying to be your son's friend. Adolescents need a disciplinarian. At least Lulu made Rocco and Danny scrub the house. 
    • May 2025: Stephanie Sloane interviews Kirsten Storms about all of Maxie's romances in the past 20 years: https://www.swooon.com/gallery/general-hospital-maxie-romances-spinelli-johnny-nathan-kirsten-storms/
    • I saw a new BTG promo during Watson tonight (Sunday May 11).   I don't remember what I saw (and I wouldn't say here on the nonspoiler thread anyhow). I know only that it was different from the "next on BTG" preview at the end of Friday's episode. If anyone catches the new promo, please post it on the spoiler thread.
    • I hope GH gives Lesley an on screen memorial I'd love to have Scott, Robert, Holly, Rose Kelly, Mike Webber, Blackie Parish  & Claudia Phillips return for the episodes
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy