Jump to content

February 12-16, 2007


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 124
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I'm not saying that GH won't fall, but based on experience before this sweeps period I think you will see GH maybe drop some but I don't think they will drop alot.

Unlike past sweeps where there was no buildup to sweeps. This time GH began building up stories and all even to some degree during November sweeps. In mid December they stabilized their ratings and in January began to rise. That is the reason you see them soaring during this sweeps.

This is one time in my opinion that people who say that GH produces good stuff for 3 months of the year and the rest of the year are crap - may soon not be able to say that. Because for November the show was spectacular but December and January were very good for me. And even many of the vets were on for quite a few appearances - some not big stuff when they were on but they were there.

And so far the spoilers for the next 2 weeks are not too disturbing as far as balance goes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I would of liked to see something a little more exicting. But Sheffer is making it character driven NOT lets blow something up, start something of fire or kill some people stunt. Some of these shows are up but will be back down next month when people have the same complaints as they did before.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Wow to AMC and GH ratings. AMC almost hit 4 million viewers for the Valentine's Day episode. Maybe this will tell TPTB something. I am so happy to see soaps having a good sweeps overall. With all that gloom and doom talk in January this is just what the genre needed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

MONDAY, FEBRUARY 12, 2007

1.(1) Y&R: Monday: 4.4/5,922,000 (+67,000)

2.(3) GH: Monday: 3.3/4,263,000 (+25,000)

3.(2) B&B: Monday: 3.2/4,101,000 (-193,000)

4.(4) OLTL: Monday: 2.7/3,524,000 (-211,000)

5.(5) AMC: Monday: 2.7/3,403,000 (+31,000)

6.(6) ATWT: Monday: 2.5/3,285,000 (-12,000)

7.(7) DAYS: Monday: 2.4/3,104,000 (+24,000)

8.(8) GL: Monday: 2.1/2,731,000 (-323,000)

9.(9) PSNS: Monday: 1.5/1,878,000 (-154,000)

TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 13, 2007

1.(1) Y&R: Tuesday: 4.8/6,379,000 (+457,000)

2.(3) B&B: Tuesday: 3.6/4,643,000 (+542,000)

3.(2) GH: Tuesday: 3.3/4,291,000 (+28,000)

4.(5) AMC: Tuesday: 2.9/3,855,000 (+452,000)

5.(6) ATWT: Tuesday: 3.0/3,798,000 (+513,000)

6.(4) OLTL: Tuesday: 2.8/3,574,000 (+50,000)

7.(7) DAYS: Tuesday: 2.7/3,441,000 (+337,000)

8.(8) GL: Tuesday: 2.6/3,286,000 (+555,000)

9.(9) PSNS: Tuesday: 2.0/2,417,000 (+539,000)

WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 14, 2007

1.(1) Y&R: Wednesday: 4.6/6,347,000 (-32,000)

2.(3) GH: Wednesday: 3.4/4,625,000 (+334,000)

3.(2) B&B: Wednesday: 3.3/4,508,000 (-135,000)

4.(4) AMC: Wednesday: 3.0/3,989,000 (+134,000)

5.(5) ATWT: Wednesday: 2.6/3,492,000 (-306,000)

6.(6) OLTL: Wednesday: 2.6/3,376,000 (-198,000)

7.(7) DAYS: Wednesday: 2.6/3,356,000 (-85,000)

8.(8) GL: Wednesday: 2.5/3,286,000 (SAME)

9.(9) PSNS: Wednesday: 1.7/2,296,000 (-121,000)

THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 15, 2007

1.(1) Y&R: Thursday: 4.6/6,108,000 (-239,000)

2.(3) B&B: Thursday: 3.3/4,342,000 (-166,000)

3.(2) GH: Thursday: 3.1/4,053,000 (-572,000)

4.(7) DAYS: Thursday: 2.4/3,292,000 (-64,000)

5.(4) AMC: Thursday: 2.6/3,200,000 (-789,000)

6.(5) ATWT: Thursday: 2.4/3,108,000 (-384,000)

7.(6) OLTL: Thursday: 2.4/3,035,000 (-341,000)

8.(8) GL: Thursday: 2.3/2,903,000 (-383,000)

9.(9) PSNS: Thursday: 1.4/1,839,000 (-457,000)

FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 16, 2007

1.(1) Y&R: Friday: 4.6/6,057,000 (-51,000)

2.(2) B&B: Friday: 3.4/4,197,000 (-145,000)

3.(3) GH: Friday: 3.0/4,016,000 (-37,000)

4.(5) AMC: Friday: 2.7/3,334,000 (+134,000)

5.(7) OLTL: Friday: 2.5/3,193,000 (+158,000)

6.(6) ATWT: Friday: 2.6/3,154,000 (+46,000)

7.(4) DAYS: Friday: 2.4/3,066,000 (-226,000)

8.(8) GL: Friday: 2.3/2,891,000 (-12,000)

9.(9) PSNS: Friday: 1.5/1,933,000 (+94,000)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

2.5 for DAYS: not good enough! Sheffer isn't doing any better than JER! I fear DAYS is permanently stuck in the 2.4-2.6 range.

Y&R: despite the trashing LML gets on this board, I think Y&R is easily the best of the lot currently.

B&B: Glad to see they got a 3.4 for the 5000th episode on Friday, one of the best episodes in a while.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Really an excellent point. I'm worried about Derek but he's not working. The Duprees being too good somehow ... well, if they say it instead of be it, okay yes, I would worry but as long as they keep on being good, geeze, that's something to celebrate, not worry!!!  Party on?!
    • I blame Mitch.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I agree. For now. I am sure in a year's time...a new family (or old) will start to appear on the show. 
    • There's some irony in Philip being forgiven, because it forces everyone to admit that Victor was wrong to change his will.  Everyone, eventually including Xander, (I presume), seems to think it was wrong for Victor to divide his estate in Xander's favor.  I appreciated Stephanie forgiving Philip, because she's got no skin in that game.  But, Belle's line about Philip missing Xander because he misses Bo did not ring true.  I think Philip would be sad if Bo dies, but I think he's more concerned currently about Xander. I am enjoying this EJ mystery so much that I am hereby taking a vow not to read spoilers.  I am also vowing — for the last time — to stop harping on this, but: the concept of a “sepsis treatment” remains absurd. Hospitals prevent sepsis through vigilant infection control; once sepsis sets in, it causes multiple organ failures. Treatment involves supporting each failing organ individually. The notion that a single medication could magically reverse organ failure is medically laughable. However, I like the contrast of Kim going through cancer, which is incurable in their universe.  Kayla's comment on the health of both of her siblings was both heartbreaking and an interesting twist.  MBE is also totally underrated.  She is carrying the weight of so many stories.   And, I like the use of Kayla as an audience surrogate.  She's arguably the most "real" person in Salem. Kayla isn't psychic, she wasn't SORASed, she's not a billionaire, and she doesn't have a bionic eye.  So, I enjoy that we get her perspective of the nuttiness that surrounds her. However, I don't get what gives her the authority to turn down EJ's offer.  I understand that they need a hospital figurehead to show us scenes of the competition to buy the hospital.  But, unless the entire administration has been let go, the Chief of Staff wouldn't make those choices.
    • But why worry about something that might not happen? Right now, most things revolve around the Duprees. We have no idea if or how long that will continue. For now, it's working.
    • The Duprees not having any staff is a bugbear for me. They've included the background staff at the Country Club but no one at the Dupree home. Even just an extra bringing in a tray of food/drinks or responding to a request from Anita would suffice.
    • Shut up, Dante and Lois.  I actually don't mind this particular soap trope, but in the context of this storyline, it just feels forced and unnecessary. If anything, this Dante/Gio tension needed to begin months ago. Plus, this storyline, in general, isn't doing Lois any favors either.  Emma comforting Gio was really sweet though. It's definitely time for the two of them to have their first kiss. And, Joss playing Secret Agent Barbie will just never work.
    • Note to makeup - Smitty’s eyebrows, bad clamshell look.  

      Please register in order to view this content

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy