Jump to content

AMC: Cady's Last AMC-related blog


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 130
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I think that is exactly what she is saying. Kate was supposed to be Emma.

I think there were alot of factors at work here. They fired Vincent in September.... so I am sure this is when the re-write occurred regarding Emma and then I am sure shortly after Megan dreamed up this Dixie dies scenario as probably the satin slayer arc was being finalized around that time too.

I still wonder though if Dixie's death wasn't planned until much after all of this occurred.... perhaps Emma being Emma and Kathy coming on had nothing to do with Dixie's exit. I still think it was a last minute decision.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

LOL Emma would have hardly been a shocker. The minute Annie and Emma were cast, practically everyone assumed Emma was Kate. And then when it was revealed Annie and Madden had a connection.

It was painfully obvious that Emma was most likely Kate. For what ever reason they re-wrote it at the last second. Whether it was to facilitate Vincent's exit or the death of Dixie, it was a quick re-write.

I thought it was a good twist and Megan actually didn't go the predictable route for a change when Emma was revealed not to be Kate.... but that's a moot point now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Oh, I enjoyed the way it played out. And I agree that it's better this way (with Kathy as Kate). Even when I was 'lurking' at AMC, testing the waters, I thought Emma might be Kate. So I agree, that was kind of predictable. Wasn't she the only right-aged kid, too, at the time? So you're right. That wasn't so shocking. Honestly, I'm sure that's why I enjoyed the Kathy reveal so much (partly). Because I knew it was either Emms or Kathy-cakes but didn't know which one -- and then...the SHOCKER!!

I guess I'm more SHOCKED that it was a rewrite, and that Cady blew the lid off that. what a revelation!!! Has any other fired actor deliberately spoken out about rewrites?!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Cady just confirmed what most of us already pretty much assumed.

I am glad she blew the lid off it. I think the original plan was to have Kate back with Tad and Dixie by November sweeps, or at least them find out who she is. Well Emma's identity was revealed in November, but she wasn't Kate.

Personally the whole finding Kate story is so tainted and useless now that Dixie is gone. For me anyway. I will get no payoff now. The payoff would have been for Dixie finally to place Kate back in Tad's arms and bring Tad and Dixie full circle again. That will never happen now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Ok guys this is easy -

Emma was supposed to be Kate.

Annie and Ryan were supposedly popular to focus groups. Frons loved Annie. So he decided he needed a way to tie Annie to Pine Valley for good - and of course that is with a Lavery.

They decided since Annie needs to stay, and Emma isn't Kate anymore, then David is not needed. Vincent is fired to save money.

Then they decided to get another girl that is tied to Madden, Julia, and Jamie -- and finally give Tad/Dixie their reunion that all fans wanted -- but then something happened and an immediate Dixie-is-dead story is created.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

A couple of things that I am aware of: Cameron Mathison was telling fans at a fan event on August 19 that he didn't think Emma was going to be Kate but that she was going to be his daughter. I didn't believe it (probably because I didn't want to). So, the decision to not make Emma be Kate was made pretty early if even Cam knew about it in mid-August and was telling fans about it at a PA. Also at the AMC Focus Group at SSW with a group of 19 - 26 year olds, not one person liked Ryan and Annie together. Not one. Zendall were the most popular couple, followed by Tad and Dixie. And everyone was disappointed that Emma was not Kate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I was never a big fan of Cady's but I am now!!! I love how she basically says that McTavish has lost her creativity. What was the purpose of pursuing her only to tell her they ran out of story. I think an eight year could figure out more story for her than what McTrash could.

And I think it is pretty classy of her to tell her fans to keep watching the show. She could be bitter and tell everyone to boycott AMC which a lot of people are doing anyway. I just wonder if TIIC are surprised about how strong the reaction has been to Cady's firing. Not that they care anyway.

And I think AMC twists the focus groups to suite there needs. I haven't seen hardly any support or much reaction to the Ryan/Annie pairing. But if Frons loves them, he will push them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • The last five or so episodes of season 8 after the Jean Hackney story ended were pretty strong with the Laura/Val friendship breakdown, Ben's PTSD with Val trying to help him, and the start of Jill realizing that Val was as much of a threat to her happiness with Gary as Abby was. I always thought that the Jean Hackney story should have ended at mid season at the latest... and then deal with the fall-out because seeing Ben/Val switch roles with Ben in mental decline instead of Val would have been interesting to explore.  And seeing Val and Laura's friendship suffer also was interesting and should have been explored especially with Karen caught in the middle and Abby both intrigued and amused at the conflict that she didn't cause. However, season 8 was the only Latham run season where Val was well written.  
    • Well, she's not in there sweeping the floors at the end of the night, and you don't bring in an award-winning producer to just sit on their backsides (or hey, maybe you do!). Again, without knowing the specific capacity she's in there working as⏤and it seems as if we are not going to at the present time⏤it's hard to speculate/discuss. I would interpret she's in a role that either would not require being credited, or she's, as others have speculated, is back and not receiving credit for the work she's done. That'd be like saying, per the WGA, all writers must be credited, but as we've seen by those who've worked as fi-core, they don't always receive credit. 

      Please register in order to view this content

       And, if my research is correct, per the DGA, you can request not to be credited for work you do. I could only assume the same would be for the PGA, as well.
    • When Anita read Barbara's letter, it started out with the viewers hearing it in Barbara's voice as Anita read silently. And then Anita saying the next portion aloud while Barbara's voice continued simultaneously. And then ending with Anita alone saying the last part aloud. Excerpt from interview  (link to full interview) The rest may be spoilerish -- Only the nonspoiler part here: I love the idea of reading that letter,” shares Tunie. “And at one point in the script, I think it said that my voice joined her, and [Anita] started reciting the letter from memory because [she] memorized this letter. I suggested to Steve Williford, our director, ‘What if it’s like that moment in Hamilton when Hamilton is writing the resignation letter to George Washington, and then he starts saying it too, and then Hamilton’s voice fades away, and then it’s all George. What if we do something like that?’ And he was like, ‘Oh, my God! I just got chills. Let’s do it!’ So, we did it.” I understood that it worked really well, so I’m really happy about that.”  
    • I think MVJ and Guza made a good team in the launching of the soap, and I'm hoping that the rotation of all stories and characters is maintained once he officially departs from the credits. And so far, Ron C's breakdowns have been decent... but they pop only when he's paired with a good script writer like Jazmin.   I hope once Guza leaves officially... that MVJ is able to reign in Ron C and the dread Jamey G.
    • I read that, but my interpretation was that she is uncredited because it is in a non-production capacity.  In others words, she's not secretly producing, or writing, as some had speculated prior to the confirmation. Her likeliest position would be in a post-production consultant capacity. I assume we agree on this?
    • Errol already confirmed she is back at Y&R and in a non-producing role; this alludes to she is not credited for the role she has.
    • I don't think Lisa served a purpose after the serial killer storyline. The writers never gave her anything to do but be Vicky's nemesis. Joanna Going deserved better. Another example of a character taking over the show and then the writers not having a longterm plan for the character.  Exhibit B: Sally Spencer. Such a missed opportunity. It really angers me how they misused her. She could sing and act and they just threw her away in that sexist nonsense storyline. Once the story was over, they wrote her off. The McKinnons should have lasted for years. I will give the show credit for how they introduced Sandra Ferguson as Amanda. I thought it was expertly done. She comes in and she immediately connected to RKK's Sam. She has chemistry with Matthew and she has realistic conversations with MAc and Rachel. That's how it is done. 
    • Great points, and it has not completely vanished. Leslie on Beyond the Gates fits the trope (she's still not over that Ted lovin' two decades later), though I will say there does seem to be an effort to make her more complex.
    • I understand why people speculate, but I have to say it doesn’t sound very plausible that Jill Farren Phelps would be working at Y&R in any uncredited role. CBS daytime shows are tightly bound by union contracts and corporate oversight, and that kind of informal arrangement would be a major liability in 2025. Before the mergers of SAG-AFTRA and the two WGA branches, it may have been easier to hire someone quietly or off the books. But those days are behind us. With digital payroll, tighter pension tracking, and increased scrutiny from legal and compliance departments, it’s just not the kind of thing anyone can get away with anymore. Most union members, especially producers nearing retirement, would not risk their eligibility or benefits to take an uncredited role. The Producers Guild of America is also very clear about crediting. To even receive the PGA mark, a producer has to be verified through a formal review process. According to their credit certification guidelines (source), "only individuals who performed a majority of the producing functions on a motion picture or television production" are eligible for credit, and those credits must be official and recorded. If someone is functioning in that capacity, they are not supposed to be uncredited. Studios that are union signatories, like CBS and Sony, know better than to skirt those rules. If anyone has a legitimate, primary source confirming that CBS is hiring someone like Phelps in an uncredited production role, I’d honestly be curious to read it. But without that, this just feels like rumor—not reality.
    • I keep thinking about the persistent trend of eroticizing mental illness on Guiding Light. Sonni and Annie were never more compelling, or more attractive to the show, than when they were manic. It played into a recurring theme: strong women undone by their unhinged reaction to sex. The writers were likely inspired by Basic Instinct and the broader wave of neo-noir films in the late '80s and early '90s, where female sexuality was often equated with instability. The result was a crude portrayal, not just of mental illness, but of womanhood itself. Both Sonni and Annie were introduced as sharp, capable women, brought in specifically as formidable antagonists to Reva. They were logical and composed, standing in contrast to Reva’s emotional volatility. That difference made them threatening, but not especially “sexy”—until desire became their undoing. In a very male fantasy, their strength unraveled the moment they slept with Joshua. As soon as they got a taste of Lewis lovin’, they spiraled into scheming lunatics, willing to torch everything to hold on to him. It was part of a larger trend in the culture. Fatal Attraction, Single White Female, and The Hand That Rocks the Cradle all traded on the idea that female desire was dangerous, barely held in check, and always teetering on the edge of madness. Looking back, it's a pretty grim trope. And while it's not completely vanished, I'm grateful we don't see it quite as often today.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy