Jump to content

All Soaps: Is the lack of diversity boring you?


Recommended Posts

  • Members

I was thinking today about how a few of the soaps I watch are starting to bore me a little. I was trying to think of ways they could be more interesting. It's always been obvious that soaps lack diversity, but it just struck me hard today, how tired I am of watching people who are all mostly like me (white, straight, late 20's). Why are soaps so afraid of diversity? I was just thinking today, that I can't even think of one middle eastern character (nevermind family) in all of soaps. There are so many good stories that could come out of that. But then the only soap I can think of that even recognizes we have a war going on is Days. :blink:

There aren't that many African American or Latino characters either. Not to mention gay and lesbian characters are few and far between and don't get much in the way of love scenes. I think there's a lot of potential there too. And of course, we all know how older characters and actors have been treated lately, but the baby boom generation is huge and entering their 50's/60's. Even though I don't want to see all characters like myself, I'm not sure if I would be interested in a show that had no one like myself either. So wouldn't more people be likely to watch if there was more inclusion?

I guess what I'm asking is, why do you think TPTB haven't given us much diversity, in terms of race, orientation and age? If it's because they think it won't sell do you believe they are right about that? Or are they just too lazy to make changes and take a risk?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 25
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I think some of it is the writers are too lazy to invest into stories that could cause some controversy with the general public. They are afraid of negative feedback if they take the risk.

Mostly I think people are afraid of change - change of story, change of direction, change of characters who viewers know. Writers don't seem to want to invest in characters other then their favorites they write for. Which sucks for fans who are looking for diversity, creativity, and originality, like me.

Jen

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Over in a post on the GoldDerby boards, we noted that there has never been a black woman nominated for Outstanding Lead Actress in a Drama Series Daytime Emmy award. It's the only award covered by GoldDerby (Oscars, Tonys, Primetime Emmys, Golden Globe, etc.) that has never had a black female performer up for its biggest prize.

Daytime actually should be quite ashamed of itself for its lack of diversity, and I think it's one of the big reasons why soaps won't survive. They never grew with the country culturally. Actually, it seems like they've regressed in many ways. Daytime actually seemed more racially diverse TWENTY YEARS AGO. Passions, for all the bad ink written about it, has done a great job in diversifying its cast. OLTL has certainly broken ground with Evangeline as a leading lady, to its credit. GH, GL, AMC, B&B, and ATWT hardly even TRY any more to give their actors of color frontburner story, if they even have actors of color to begin with.

About the GLBT thing: Soaps are still doing coming-out stories like they are so provocative. Yeah, they would have been provocative in 1977. It's PLAYED OUT. Now's the time for stories on gay marriage, interracial gay relationships, bisexuality, "down low" relationships (like PSNS is doing--maybe we should give JER more credit), lesbian adoption, etc, etc.

Like [s.W.S.N.B.N.] said, why did Luke have to be a poor little gay victim on ATWT? He should have beaten some @ss.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

OLTL has kept a Latino family on the front and center for years, the Vegas. As annoying as Antonio can be they haven't forgotten his Latin roots. And Evangeline is front and center as well, frequently. They deserve some credit there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I agree. It also wasn't long ago that on Sunset Beach, we had Kelly Hu and the characters of Michael, Vanessa, and Virginia as frontburner characters. Generations was on featuring a prominent black family, and OLTL had the Vegas, even if they weren't used to their full potential.

If primetime and cable dramas have no trouble featuring diverse characters of color and sexuality with no problem, why can't daytime soaps? The days of the main audience being housewives are long gone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

One thing that often puzzles me is that on daytime television, while there have been Latino characters who were front and center, there have never been (to my knowledge) Latino couples. It's often a Latina/Latino with a White or Black love-interest. Not that there's anything wrong with that, but it seems like daytime execs are fearful of having a Latino couple on the front burner.

Overall, the lack of diversity doesn't bore me, but it often frustrates me (in particular AMC). But what can you do? I think daytime is taking a step backwards when they use to be the one who took a step forward (and primetime shows often followed their lead).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

1) I think lack of diversity is a big thing. There needs to more shakeup and variety.

2) Same old boring couples over and over. Fans today are less likely to take to a new couple or they latch on to couples like they are life-partners, and that hurts some too. I have my favorite couples but after awhile featuring the same couple over and over gets boring. There is just not a lot that you can do with a couple keeping them happy that doesn't get boring or repetitive.

3) The biggest lack of diversity is the lack of ages on the show. Used to be writers wrote for all ages. Now it is the same old people day in and day out that get the attention because they fit into a certain demo they want.

4) Also a big thing with diversity is not just the lack of races, but the lack of various social classes. I remember on Another World, you had the wealthy, the middle class and the poor. And the poor were really poor, and they weren't caricatures they prodded out as comedy relief and they weren't always the villians either - seeking to take advantage of the wealthy or get ahead. Today more often that is the only time you see a poor character - they are pictured as willing to do anything to get the money that the wealthy have. And they never dress like poor folks either. Or worse yet they dress them trashy as if saying all poor people can't afford good clothes so they dress like trashy whores.

5) Finally casting is a big thing that is a problem too. Soaps used to be full of all types of performers. Some looked good, some looked okay, and some were on the less attractive side. But they could all act. Casting departments today on soaps or TPTB one seem to look for one thing - to fill their soaps with beautiful people. If they can act they are lucky, but if not well that's okay too. I would find it very hard to think that performers like Dorothy Lyman, Wings Hauser, and some others would even be able to find jobs on soaps these days, but yet in the 70's they were discovered by soap casting directors and were on soaps for many years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think that diversity is a big issue on daytime; however, it is doesn't rate as high on my "to-do" list as other problems. Hell, writers have their hands full these days writing the characters they have now. There's little consistency in the characters these days. People change personalities with the same regularity that they change their underwear. Because of that, we cannot relate to them as much as we used to. Once daytime gets settled in writing good plots for good characters played by good actors, then I'd like to see some diversity. But simply bringing on diverse actors simply for diversity's sake is unwise IMO. If you have nothing for them to do beyond the "token [insert diverse group] family," then it will be ineffective and insensitive. For example, the Boudreaus on GL. They had such potential when they first came on. They were integrated EXCELLENTLY into the canvas (perhaps Lloyd Gold's best achievement on GL) and then dissapeared because there was nothing to do with them.

SO the short answer is yes, it is a problem, but no it shouldn't be corrected now while we have such dumbasses infiltrating the writing department.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Before we get some diversity I need some changes behind the scenes. I don't want these incompetent hacks trying to tell stories like these, when they haven't proven themselves to be good writers. I don't need to see 'token minorities' running around just so the show could fill some quota, or become more 'diverse.'

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Well, I'm not really interested in having diversity for the sake of political correctness. That's not what I'm getting at. I'm just saying, I'm bored with characters that are basically cookie cutter in many ways. I can hardly name one female character that isn't baby crazy or hasn't been baby crazy at some point.

It's 2007!! Can't their be a character who doesn't want to be on the mommy track? What about a female character who is having fun being single and doesn't see marriage and babies as the ultimate validation (Sex and the City). It's not just about race and orientation, but that is part of it. I'd just like to see people who are different than I am, because it's more interesting. Right now, I turn on the T.V. and these people are too much like me to hold my attention. Not that I plan on quitting soaps, but I'd be a lot more interested if they shook things up.

I completely agree with the person who brought up social class and beauty as well. Characters don't all have to be rich or perfect to be interesting. In fact sometimes those are the very things that make them uninteresting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I think they’re desperately trying to cover his awful tattoos. But anyway them being unable to style short kings properly has been a major pet peeve of mine for a while now.  I honestly don’t understand what some people expect from actors to even begin considering them for recognition. Let’s be real—awards mostly mean that an actor is respected by their peers and has some level of cultural relevance. Actual judgment on the acting itself? That’s often secondary—highly subjective and shaped by the times. I completely agree on both points. If you’re an actor or a dancer you shouldn’t get any tattoos (sorry not sorry). Tomas’ tattoos are ugly too. And regarding the couples- you’re completely right. These writers are unable to write romance.   Further comments: - Kat cannot be this dumb to keep tampering with evidence over and over again. And I’m officially not a fan of the actress—every time she’s in a scene with Leslie, she doesn’t seem intimidated at all. She plays it like comic relief, which is just too much, especially when paired with Leslie’s histrionics and over-the-top antics. Leslie is older, dangerous, and has literally been portrayed as homicidal—Kat should be at least a little scared. • I also didn’t like Kat playing damsel in distress with the hotel manager. It gave off the same weird energy as Dani with the cop. I would’ve much preferred the version Paul Raven suggested, with her sneaking in through housekeeping. • And yes, Dani again accused Hayley of faking the pregnancy—this time even specifying she might be using a pillow under her shirt. (No fake miscarriage being mentioned) I stand by my take: this is ridiculous writing. No one in the real world—except us, the chronically online soap watchers—would even think of such a conspiracy theory. Haley is no Beyoncé. • What in the world was Chelsea wearing in her hair the other day? And this whole thing with Madison is beyond cringe. Chelsea’s coming off as needy and toxic—basically like every other Dupree. • I’m glad the casino storyline is moving forward, but it’s still boring as hell. Honestly, I’d be so here for a plot twist where Vanessa and Doug take Joey out. • The direction and editing lately have been rough. Abrupt cuts, weird pacing… something just feels off overall. There’s a strange uneasiness to how it’s all coming together. • And finally: Tomas is too much of a saint. Where are the messy sluts when you need them? (Vanessa doesn’t count.)
    • Andrew sure has hard nips.
    • I was watching some August 1987 episodes and they brought back so many memories. I had some thoughts: Lisa and Jamie were so dull. Lisa was such a nothing character. It boggles my mind that so much story was centered around her in such a short amount of time. Joanna Going is a talented actress, but the material was just not there.  It was so good to see Wallingford and Mitch again. I know there was talk about Felicia a while back, but these episodes reminded me how integral Felicia was for the show.  Sally Spencer was done so dirty. She is turning in superb performances in an icky storyline. I wish she had stuck around longer. She has chemistry with everyone. The McKinnons should have lasted longer. Spencer had some strong stuff with Stephen Schnetzer and Mary Alexander. AW waster such a talented actress by getting rid of her. Justice for Cheryl too. I also missed Ed Fry when he left. Sandra Ferguson was a star from the moment she came on. She was charismatic and just popped. She had immediate chemistry with RKK and blended in well with Wyndham and Watson. I'd forgotten about the teenage Matthew.  I have no memory of Peggy Lazarus. She must not have lasted long. Was the original plan for John that he was going to turn out to be the twins' real father?      
    • If the new and improved copies that @rsclassicfanforever has uploaded can be manually moved into the "by month, by year" folders, that would be awesome. I personally don't think it's necessary to keep the older versions (which either have Dutch subtitles hard coded on them, or are lesser in picture quality). That's a lot of valuable drive space that could be cleared. Just my view but can appreciate others may feel differently. The structure had been by month by year previously, so I think it would be easier to conform to that, where so much prior work to get it to that format has already been done. Hopefully you can "drag and drop" so the new copies are in the right month/year? Re Clips, I never look at them now we pretty much have the episodes in full. Appreciate others may use, however. Thanks for all your hard work here @BoldRestless!
    • Oh yes defintely, Josh Griffith repeats and repeats the same storylines.
    • Isnt’t this storyline similar to the Cameron Kirsten situation though? Sharon thought she killed him. He ended up being alive and Sharon was being tormented with thinking she was seeing his face everywhere and that’s how we got that iconic scene with her and Nikki in the sewers.   I understand in Mariah’s case this is different circumstances but it does seem like a play on that whole thing. Maybe I’m wrong. I just wish if they were going to make any character follow in Sharon’s foot steps it would be Faith. Mariah wasn’t even raised by her, and her personality is different. I would expect her to take a different path. I understand I could be completely jumping ahead because the storyline hasn’t even played out yet but we’ll see. 
    • Thanks again @Paul Raven Monica was completely without redeeming qualities at this point. I always found the whole Monica = Carly narrative regressive, as I don't think shows comparing characters so heavily is ever a great idea, but she's actually worse than Carly was. Was it the Pollocks who had Leslie have a miscarriage?  Giving her a child, especially by rape, was not a good idea, but a part of me wishes they'd committed to it just to see what story it might have had in later years.
    • @janea4old Your detailed explanation and delving into the psychology and motivations is no doubt the opposite of what we will see onscreeen. As @ranger1rg stated we will get a few scenes and some sketchy explanations. Like the adoption of Aria, most of it will take place off screen.
    • I'm suddenly fearful that DAYS is going to pull a Flowers-for-Algernon stunt and Bo's progress will be reversed.  While @te. is stuck on Abe's tiny bedroom, I can't stop thinking of the size of Bo's huge hospital room.
    • Okay, why are Paulina and Abe sleeping like that?!  I'd take a screen grab if I wasn't lazy, but come on.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy