Jump to content

Katie Peretti of ATWT...When the h%ll did she become a lead role?


Recommended Posts

  • Members

When did Katie become leading material? Why is she getting all the storylines? And after seeing the spoilers for her character I am pissed!!!!!!!!!!!!! Katie is a bore, whiny brat of a female. She needs to be backburned and not featured in another out of my a$$ storyline by Jean P.

Come on ATWT get with the program!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! The show is going down the tubes and isnt funny anymore!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 28
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

ICAM. Actually, I liked Katie a little before this last triangle with Mike and Simon. Now I just want Carly to punch her face in. Could she be a more whiny vindictive witch?! I am just sick of every guy on the show thinking Katie is perfect. I don't want her fired, but I could use a nice long break.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I would love an anwser to that also, it would seem that TC(Katie) is golden to JP, and that she is ATWT, and least that is what JP wants the viewers to think.

I have a feeling it has to do with the huge Matie fanbase that writes letters to JP and CBS everyday and keeps on naming Katie the top character of ATWT in all the soap mags. I am sorry but 99% of the viewers are not part of that fanbase, and JP should not be listening to them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Terri Columbino is great, but as a SUPPORTING ACTRESS! That is the problem with the show, the lack good lead actresses. Not because they don't have them, but because they don't USE them. Ellen Dolan, Colleen Zenk Pinter, Martha Byrne and Maura West should be the leading ladies. Terri Columbino, Elena Goode, Marie Wilson and Jennifer Landon should be supporting, but it's the opposite.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

B)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Chris B @ Dec 29 2006, 12:09 PM) </div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec-->Terri Columbino is great, but as a SUPPORTING ACTRESS! That is the problem with the show, the lack good lead actresses. Not because they don't have them, but because they don't USE them. Ellen Dolan, Colleen Zenk Pinter, Martha Byrne and Maura West should be the leading ladies. Terri Columbino, Elena Goode, Marie Wilson and Jennifer Landon should be supporting, but it's the opposite.

Very true Chris, One of the main reasons that ATWT was so good 2000-2004 was because Ellen Dolan, CZP, MB, and MW were the leading ladies of the show, TC, EG, Marie W, and JL should not be getting nearly the amount of airtime or storylines they are getting. Lets face it the four should be leading ladies have been with ATWT for years and years, yet the JP leading ladies except of TC have been with the show what 4 years or less, that is one of the problems with the show, Just because JL won an emmy does not mean she is Leading Lady material. I would say in 10-15 years these would be the new leading ladies, but not while your real current day leading ladies are still in there prime.

If I was seeing Barbara, Margo, Lily, and Carly(without Simon) everyday this show would be 200% better right now, these are the woman characters that are ATWT not Gwen, Jade, Katie, or Meg, they are like you said they should be supporting characters to the leading characters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Another problem with the show are the bland male characters. The only ones that are fleshed out are Mike, Dusty, Simon, Craig and Paul. Tom and Bob are extras, Jack is Carly's bitch and Holden is like a desperately boring housewife. I'm sure when Austin Peck arrives they'll shove him right down our throats. I dread the day. :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I wonder how Terri Columbino feels about this. She is a really good actress, I think, and she showed that well when Katie killed Nick earlier this year. She loves the show as well, and I remember an interview with her in which she said she fondly remembered Chris and Nancy's anniversary 20 years ago and loves working with the older veterans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

B)-->

QUOTE(Chris B @ Dec 29 2006, 11:32 AM)
I'm sure when Austin Peck arrives they'll shove him right down our throats. I dread the day. :(

Another stupid move on ATWT part. Why did they cast him? Just for eye candy!!! He was horrible on Days.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

LOL...Soapsuds, I think you've made my bleepin' day!!!!! :lol::lol:

Teri is a nice little actress. Occasionally she can bring the drama or just let Katieb*tch out. HOWEVER, Katie's never been a compelling character. Hogan had a hard time giving Katie anything significant to do, but kept her front and center in stupid adventure stories with Simon, and with Mike in phuck phuck all day long stories.

In some ways, I think Katie's prominence was more circumstance. Think of all the younger actresses that have come and gone in her age group since she's been here.

I'm sure they cast Peck hoping that TC's fans would be delighted with more eye candy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Up until 1-2 years ago, I actually liked Katie. I loved her in the beginning when she and Henry schemed together at WOAK. I loved her w/ Simon, in the beginning, when they first got married just so that Simon could stay in the country, and eventually fell in love. I even enjoyed their island adventures the first 2 times. Even when she and Mike first started dating, I thought they were pretty cute. Then, even when she married Henry and broke his heart, I thought she was still a good character.

I always found her character to be lighthearted...nothing really awful happened to her, you know? Her storylines were always small in comparison to the bigger storylines happening. She came on the show as the "little sister," and IMO, she should still be playing supporting to Craig and Margo. And up until JP took over, Katie was always supporting...and that's where she should have remained. I think TC is a wonderful actress: she's proven herself to be able to pull off dramatic scenes several times before. But she's just not lead actress material, and the more that the writers shove her down our throats, the more I've come to hate the character.

I think the thing that turned me away from the character was when she broke up Jen and Mike's marriage. I guess that's when she started becoming "lead" b/c since then, the character has been on-screen non-stop. Everything she does, no matter how the writers try to justify it, comes off as completely selfish. They try to make her likable by making her friends with Henry and Nancy Hughes, but it really doesn't work, for me: Henry, IMO, deserves his own storyline, and I'd rather see Nancy w/ her actual family.

One thing that ATWT doesn't do well is specifying between lead and supporting. I always thought that it was good to have an ensemble cast, but now it seems to not be working well on the show. Take for instance MW, who most people would assume is lead. Well, in 2006, I didn't see Carly as lead. In fact, I think TC and KMH are more of the leads now, which is sad b/c I think Katie and Emily do a lot better as supporting characters. In 2006, for the most part, Carly was the one supporting Katie's storylines, and characters like Meg were supporting Emily's storylines.

Just b/c a character is supporting doesn't mean that they're not as important as the leads. IMO, I find the supporting actors and actresses to be a lot more talented than the leads in most cases. At the Emmys, the supporting categories are always my favorites b/c they're a lot more balanced and well-represented than the leads, which tend to be really predictable. But some people view supporting as secondary, which doesn't make sense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Horrible is too kind a word for his terrible acting. Even with the interim HW and Hogan's scripts he still sucked donkey balls. The other actors put him to shame in the reveal scenes with Sami, Carrie, Austin and Lucas. ATWT has always been known for having one of the best casts and he is no doubt going to drag it down. I just hope it's such a failiure (like everything else they;re trying) and they write him off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

         
    • @TaoboiI ran into Dani’s favorite party planner again tonight

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I think they’re desperately trying to cover his awful tattoos. But anyway them being unable to style short kings properly has been a major pet peeve of mine for a while now.  I honestly don’t understand what some people expect from actors to even begin considering them for recognition. Let’s be real—awards mostly mean that an actor is respected by their peers and has some level of cultural relevance. Actual judgment on the acting itself? That’s often secondary—highly subjective and shaped by the times. I completely agree on both points. If you’re an actor or a dancer you shouldn’t get any tattoos (sorry not sorry). Tomas’ tattoos are ugly too. And regarding the couples- you’re completely right. These writers are unable to write romance.   Further comments: - Kat cannot be this dumb to keep tampering with evidence over and over again. And I’m officially not a fan of the actress—every time she’s in a scene with Leslie, she doesn’t seem intimidated at all. She plays it like comic relief, which is just too much, especially when paired with Leslie’s histrionics and over-the-top antics. Leslie is older, dangerous, and has literally been portrayed as homicidal—Kat should be at least a little scared. • I also didn’t like Kat playing damsel in distress with the hotel manager. It gave off the same weird energy as Dani with the cop. I would’ve much preferred the version Paul Raven suggested, with her sneaking in through housekeeping. • And yes, Dani again accused Hayley of faking the pregnancy—this time even specifying she might be using a pillow under her shirt. (No fake miscarriage being mentioned) I stand by my take: this is ridiculous writing. No one in the real world—except us, the chronically online soap watchers—would even think of such a conspiracy theory. Haley is no Beyoncé. • What in the world was Chelsea wearing in her hair the other day? And this whole thing with Madison is beyond cringe. Chelsea’s coming off as needy and toxic—basically like every other Dupree. • I’m glad the casino storyline is moving forward, but it’s still boring as hell. Honestly, I’d be so here for a plot twist where Vanessa and Doug take Joey out. • The direction and editing lately have been rough. Abrupt cuts, weird pacing… something just feels off overall. There’s a strange uneasiness to how it’s all coming together. • And finally: Tomas is too much of a saint. Where are the messy sluts when you need them? (Vanessa doesn’t count.)
    • I was watching some August 1987 episodes and they brought back so many memories. I had some thoughts: Lisa and Jamie were so dull. Lisa was such a nothing character. It boggles my mind that so much story was centered around her in such a short amount of time. Joanna Going is a talented actress, but the material was just not there.  It was so good to see Wallingford and Mitch again. I know there was talk about Felicia a while back, but these episodes reminded me how integral Felicia was for the show.  Sally Spencer was done so dirty. She is turning in superb performances in an icky storyline. I wish she had stuck around longer. She has chemistry with everyone. The McKinnons should have lasted longer. Spencer had some strong stuff with Stephen Schnetzer and Mary Alexander. AW waster such a talented actress by getting rid of her. Justice for Cheryl too. I also missed Ed Fry when he left. Sandra Ferguson was a star from the moment she came on. She was charismatic and just popped. She had immediate chemistry with RKK and blended in well with Wyndham and Watson. I'd forgotten about the teenage Matthew.  I have no memory of Peggy Lazarus. She must not have lasted long. Was the original plan for John that he was going to turn out to be the twins' real father?      
    • If the new and improved copies that @rsclassicfanforever has uploaded can be manually moved into the "by month, by year" folders, that would be awesome. I personally don't think it's necessary to keep the older versions (which either have Dutch subtitles hard coded on them, or are lesser in picture quality). That's a lot of valuable drive space that could be cleared. Just my view but can appreciate others may feel differently. The structure had been by month by year previously, so I think it would be easier to conform to that, where so much prior work to get it to that format has already been done. Hopefully you can "drag and drop" so the new copies are in the right month/year? Re Clips, I never look at them now we pretty much have the episodes in full. Appreciate others may use, however. Thanks for all your hard work here @BoldRestless!
    • Oh yes defintely, Josh Griffith repeats and repeats the same storylines.
    • Isnt’t this storyline similar to the Cameron Kirsten situation though? Sharon thought she killed him. He ended up being alive and Sharon was being tormented with thinking she was seeing his face everywhere and that’s how we got that iconic scene with her and Nikki in the sewers.   I understand in Mariah’s case this is different circumstances but it does seem like a play on that whole thing. Maybe I’m wrong. I just wish if they were going to make any character follow in Sharon’s foot steps it would be Faith. Mariah wasn’t even raised by her, and her personality is different. I would expect her to take a different path. I understand I could be completely jumping ahead because the storyline hasn’t even played out yet but we’ll see. 
    • Thanks again @Paul Raven Monica was completely without redeeming qualities at this point. I always found the whole Monica = Carly narrative regressive, as I don't think shows comparing characters so heavily is ever a great idea, but she's actually worse than Carly was. Was it the Pollocks who had Leslie have a miscarriage?  Giving her a child, especially by rape, was not a good idea, but a part of me wishes they'd committed to it just to see what story it might have had in later years.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy