Jump to content

B&B: How Would You Revive the Show?


Recommended Posts

  • Members

One idea: Hire Matt Ashford when he has finished on DAYS. I'm not sure where he'd fit in on B&B - maybe as a recast Storm Logan, for instance? I think he and Hunter Tylo would make a good pair on screen.

Yes: I have a feeling B&B will need to lose its #2 position in the ratings before Bell makes any changes. :rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 58
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

In all honesty, I don't think it matters a bit who is in the writing team so long as Brad Bell is at the helm. Everything he wants, he gets but clearly his enthusiasm for the show is beyond waning.

There just needs to be some significant change to the structure of the canvas to prevent all of the repetitive incestuous triangles between Eric and Stephanie's children. I was the one who suggested in another thread bringing in John Forrester as a now wealthy adversary to Eric. He could take over Marone Industries after Massimo's suspicious untimely death which would put him right in the middle of the canvas -- both Nick and Ridge would be involved with the company and therefore Jackie and Stephanie.

John Forrester could be the villain the show is lacking. Someone out to get the whole family but not necessarily in a psychotic, Sheila like way.

I've also thought it would be interesting to do a sort of "All About Eve" scenario with Stephanie. She could hire a young female assistant who would insinuate herself into Stephanie's life and trust while attempting to sabotage it from within. It would be fun as a 6 month arc to see Stephanie completely alienated because of this woman while the rest of the family can see her for what she is. Obviously when Stephanie found out the truth, the showdown would be electric.

Finally with the 20th anniversary next year I was thinking of possible stories to coincide with a walk down memory lane and I thought an interesting option might be for Sally Spectra to decide to write a tell all biography of the Forresters. She has motive (Macy, Darla) and it could be an amusing new twist on the Spectra/Forrester feud whilst providing tons of flashbacks and revisits from old characters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Can we hire you to write for B&B, James? :lol: Good stuff.

The problem is Brad and his Attention Deficit Disorder. He hires newbies, plays with them for a couple of weeks, then tosses them aside when his interest wanes, only to revisit the Brooke/Ridge stuff.

He also lacks the brilliant writing talent of his father. I think he writes more to pit certain fanbases against the other ("an enraged audience is an engaged audience," I believe, is one of his quotes) and get an audience reaction as opposed to any sustained interest in the characters and SLs and where those are going.

Don't get me wrong -- campiness, shaking things up... those things are fine. On balance. He needs to pace himself with those because they are merely plot points and shouldn't define everything that B&B is about.

IMO, Brad should step down from the HW position and give it up to Mulcahey (who I adore) and concentrate on his role as EP.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The problem for me has always been Brooke and Ridge. That's why I left the show so long ago.

Their story is tiresome and I hate Ronn Moss!

There's not much Brad Belle can do with just a half hour show. He needs to step away and let someone else take over who has a fresh perspective.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think that the show should bring a new family new blood to the show. Have a new headwriter and like people said if bell wants to make a new soap let him go. Bring back morgan, shelia, kristen, kimberly, cj, sally, clarke, amber, deacon, James, Pierce, Erica, Oscar, Rick, Jessica. THEY SHOULD let Hector and Dante go. EXtend to one hour and the show will be back to its old self. Plus with all these characters back therer will be more storylines and everyting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think one of the biggest problems is that B&B is missing the glamour of the old days, Taylor and Brooke were simply gorgeous to look at, they wore amazing clothes. Alot of that is missing. And another is, the show used to have a sort of delicious tawdryness to it, when it just concerned Eric and Ridge sleeping with Brooke. They even had it a bit still even though it got really nasty and she screwed. Thorne But ever since Brooke had Bridget's husband's baby, they crossed the line into disgusting. And they keep doing it again and again.

They prop Brooke up as if she is some goddess with a magical twat that entwines men despite their will. Its ridiculous. This aging California cheerleader is supposed to enthrall all men with her overwhelming beauty. Get serious. With that said, I think KKL is a very pretty lady and is aging beautifully, but lets be real.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I watch the show like everyday and I still have no answers as to how that happened. I think bridget was relieved that she wasn't preggers and she told Dante she didn't want to rush into Marriage and having a child with him. Furious, FeFe comforted him and I guess he's in love with her this week.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

There are several things that Brad Bell can do to improve the show (firing himself is not an option I assume):

1. Write long-term stories. Not 3 month story arcs and then fire the actors involved leaving Brooke and Ridge the only viable characters in the aftermath

2. Either stick with Bridge or end them permanently. This back and forth is insanely annoying.

3. If Bridge doesn't work out (try it one more time just to see if it sticks) then put Ridge and Donna together. I know I'm in the minority here but I love "Ronna". (Its the only Ridge romance I've enjoyed besides Tridge Part 1.)

4. Kill off Nick. He has worn out his welcome after cheating on his wife (who was grieving for their dead daughter) with her mother. What a horrible thing of Brad Bell to do to a once great character.

5. Give Bridget a love interest who won't boff her mother. Is that too much to ask? Brooke stealing her daughter's men is just disgusting.

6. Stop writing total sleaze. A little romance goes a long way.

7. Get decent associate writers.

I'd like Days to overtake B&B in the ratings so something would happen behind the screen creatively.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Please register in order to view this content

         
    • @TaoboiI ran into Dani’s favorite party planner again tonight

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I think they’re desperately trying to cover his awful tattoos. But anyway them being unable to style short kings properly has been a major pet peeve of mine for a while now.  I honestly don’t understand what some people expect from actors to even begin considering them for recognition. Let’s be real—awards mostly mean that an actor is respected by their peers and has some level of cultural relevance. Actual judgment on the acting itself? That’s often secondary—highly subjective and shaped by the times. I completely agree on both points. If you’re an actor or a dancer you shouldn’t get any tattoos (sorry not sorry). Tomas’ tattoos are ugly too. And regarding the couples- you’re completely right. These writers are unable to write romance.   Further comments: - Kat cannot be this dumb to keep tampering with evidence over and over again. And I’m officially not a fan of the actress—every time she’s in a scene with Leslie, she doesn’t seem intimidated at all. She plays it like comic relief, which is just too much, especially when paired with Leslie’s histrionics and over-the-top antics. Leslie is older, dangerous, and has literally been portrayed as homicidal—Kat should be at least a little scared. • I also didn’t like Kat playing damsel in distress with the hotel manager. It gave off the same weird energy as Dani with the cop. I would’ve much preferred the version Paul Raven suggested, with her sneaking in through housekeeping. • And yes, Dani again accused Hayley of faking the pregnancy—this time even specifying she might be using a pillow under her shirt. (No fake miscarriage being mentioned) I stand by my take: this is ridiculous writing. No one in the real world—except us, the chronically online soap watchers—would even think of such a conspiracy theory. Haley is no Beyoncé. • What in the world was Chelsea wearing in her hair the other day? And this whole thing with Madison is beyond cringe. Chelsea’s coming off as needy and toxic—basically like every other Dupree. • I’m glad the casino storyline is moving forward, but it’s still boring as hell. Honestly, I’d be so here for a plot twist where Vanessa and Doug take Joey out. • The direction and editing lately have been rough. Abrupt cuts, weird pacing… something just feels off overall. There’s a strange uneasiness to how it’s all coming together. • And finally: Tomas is too much of a saint. Where are the messy sluts when you need them? (Vanessa doesn’t count.)
    • I was watching some August 1987 episodes and they brought back so many memories. I had some thoughts: Lisa and Jamie were so dull. Lisa was such a nothing character. It boggles my mind that so much story was centered around her in such a short amount of time. Joanna Going is a talented actress, but the material was just not there.  It was so good to see Wallingford and Mitch again. I know there was talk about Felicia a while back, but these episodes reminded me how integral Felicia was for the show.  Sally Spencer was done so dirty. She is turning in superb performances in an icky storyline. I wish she had stuck around longer. She has chemistry with everyone. The McKinnons should have lasted longer. Spencer had some strong stuff with Stephen Schnetzer and Mary Alexander. AW waster such a talented actress by getting rid of her. Justice for Cheryl too. I also missed Ed Fry when he left. Sandra Ferguson was a star from the moment she came on. She was charismatic and just popped. She had immediate chemistry with RKK and blended in well with Wyndham and Watson. I'd forgotten about the teenage Matthew.  I have no memory of Peggy Lazarus. She must not have lasted long. Was the original plan for John that he was going to turn out to be the twins' real father?      
    • If the new and improved copies that @rsclassicfanforever has uploaded can be manually moved into the "by month, by year" folders, that would be awesome. I personally don't think it's necessary to keep the older versions (which either have Dutch subtitles hard coded on them, or are lesser in picture quality). That's a lot of valuable drive space that could be cleared. Just my view but can appreciate others may feel differently. The structure had been by month by year previously, so I think it would be easier to conform to that, where so much prior work to get it to that format has already been done. Hopefully you can "drag and drop" so the new copies are in the right month/year? Re Clips, I never look at them now we pretty much have the episodes in full. Appreciate others may use, however. Thanks for all your hard work here @BoldRestless!
    • Oh yes defintely, Josh Griffith repeats and repeats the same storylines.
    • Isnt’t this storyline similar to the Cameron Kirsten situation though? Sharon thought she killed him. He ended up being alive and Sharon was being tormented with thinking she was seeing his face everywhere and that’s how we got that iconic scene with her and Nikki in the sewers.   I understand in Mariah’s case this is different circumstances but it does seem like a play on that whole thing. Maybe I’m wrong. I just wish if they were going to make any character follow in Sharon’s foot steps it would be Faith. Mariah wasn’t even raised by her, and her personality is different. I would expect her to take a different path. I understand I could be completely jumping ahead because the storyline hasn’t even played out yet but we’ll see. 
    • Thanks again @Paul Raven Monica was completely without redeeming qualities at this point. I always found the whole Monica = Carly narrative regressive, as I don't think shows comparing characters so heavily is ever a great idea, but she's actually worse than Carly was. Was it the Pollocks who had Leslie have a miscarriage?  Giving her a child, especially by rape, was not a good idea, but a part of me wishes they'd committed to it just to see what story it might have had in later years.
    • @janea4old Your detailed explanation and delving into the psychology and motivations is no doubt the opposite of what we will see onscreeen. As @ranger1rg stated we will get a few scenes and some sketchy explanations. Like the adoption of Aria, most of it will take place off screen.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy