Jump to content

DAYS: Gets whole SOD Cover


Ponz

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 60
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members
Posted

I love how much press John & Marlena have gotten while offscreen. Campaigns, mentions, even Carolyn Hinsey (who's never been positive towards them in the past) said she couldn't wait for their return.

  • Members
Posted

OMG. I'm SHOCKED. DAYS of all soaps got a SOD cover? No way!?

LOL.

Any noteworthy spoilers to pass on?

And as for J&M ... it's because no soap has been stupid enough to backburner (or shove off screen) two popular characters that have been on near continuously for over 20/30 years ...

  • Members
Posted

Would he give an interview this early? Aren't we still like two months from his material airing? Hopefully we will here from BM since her material starts airing next week. I really want to hear her plans for Days till Hogan's stuff starts airing.

According to Deb from TBN, J&M are on the cover. There is a VCR alert with Shelle. There is a little pic with Mimi on the cover because it reports the info about Farah leaving. Deb is suppose to post more later I guess.

Days should have the cover. It is their first week of being free from JER's clutches.

  • Members
Posted

Wow, a DAYS cover? SOD? What? Sorry the title just asks for the snarky reply. ;)

THE COVER IS

DAYS's BIG NEWS (J/M Cover: IN!, small picture of Mimi: OUT!)

The Story You Won't Find Anywhere Else!

Who's Wearing the Glove? (Small pics of Stef, Jan, Tony)

Wee, S/L have erotic dreams about each other this week (7/31)

So, Mar is going to ask for a seperation from John. She needs to rediscover herself. Hall has a busy work schedule ahead of her and was ready for the Blacks' next chapter. Hall and the show are thisclose to coming to terms about a contract. Farah is leavin, blah, blah. Speculation about glove and crap. No Hogan.

  • Members
Posted

So it looks like Hogestyn got his wish. John and Marlena are seperating. Marlena will go off to rediscover herself and John will shack up with Kate.

  • Members
Posted

Wow, that's gotta suck for J&M fans ... their couple is gone for two months, reuniting (off-screen), and then they come back and separate. Ouch...

  • Members
Posted

I'm still positive. I love that Marlena's being a strong, independant woman and wants to KNOW why she reacted the way she did. That's who Marlena is. She always takes responsibility. And she wasen't the only one hurt by Alex, John was too. This affects both of them. It's not all bad.

On the negative, if I trusted the show, I'd be happy about this seperation because it means they could have secret ONS without people knowing. Which is something I've always wanted. For them to start fresh, madly in love, but dating and being all cutesy. First date and everything.

  • Members
Posted

i'm just so glad that john and marlena are finally back..i would rather they get an actual storyline rather than not doing anything..

  • Members
Posted

Aside from thew Alex story, J&M have always been better apart. Even the most devoted J&M fans know that. Just look at the 90's! :lol:

  • Members
Posted

I don't mind them being apart, I just wish I trusted the show to do this right. They were apart for three years and we deserved a love scene before their TWO month forced vacation.

  • Members
Posted

I have one word for you, Pest Spray: transitions. I have little hope for the show myself, but I certainly know better than to ask for anything at a time like this.

  • Members
Posted

Frankly, her asking for a seperation is kind of not hard to believe. In the last two JERk infested years, she "murdered" her family and friends, was help captive, got pregnant then lost the baby, got amnesia, was almost killed by her new "husband", saw him fall to his death, and reunited quickly with John.

Um...yea, I think she needs time to be alone and think about a LOT of stuff. :lol:

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


  • Recent Posts

    • I could've sworn FV let other people direct either here or at OLTL. I may be wrong. IIRC Kimberly is now very active directing multi-cam/sitcom work.
    • IIRC MVJ said the million was just the first piece of what Leslie got or was already owed, something they did make explicit in dialogue but not too explicit. Still, I am past worrying about it. I do think they want 30-yo elder millennial Peaches in her Sophia Petrillo wig to be a point of pathos for Leslie. In theory I am fine with that, and don't dislike Peaches despite the jarring physical disconnect and need for a recast lol. But I do think they do a lot of B&B-style whizzing from Point A to Point C with Leslie on this kind of stuff - in one scene she is raising hell, in the next she is weeping over Peaches. There's very little transition to that sometimes that allows for the nuance, and that can be done much better and they can go much deeper with Leslie (and most characters). The newer/younger audience for the show may have less issue with this kind of quick change than we do.
    • Please register in order to view this content

       Thank you.   That was part of my reasoning as well. I think about the days of Kevin, Joey, and Jessica on OLTL or Lucky/Liz/Nik/Sarah/Emily on GH or the Last Blast Kids on DAYS or the Glow by Jabot kids, and it takes me back. Sure I started soaps due to the older cast with their divas, but I do like to see people around my age back then, too. Great memories.   So I love a good relatable teen tale. Bullying. Hormones for the Bad Boy. College choices and internal conflict. 
    • Thank you for the information.  I did listen to the entire interview with Miss Roux -- way back when it was first released.  But I am unable to recall her mentioning Connie Ford, and don't have time nor effort to listen to the entire thing again, just for one small morsel. So again, thanks for responding.    I do recall Roux sounded extremely fragile and perhaps a bit wounded in the interview. I almost felt guilty for even listening to it.  So perhaps that has some influence on my reluctance to listen to it again.  She seemed troubled, to say the least.   
    • Boxer-briefs, huh?   Well...called it on Cane/Giggly Heffa hooking up so not surprised.
    • Do you have Addie’s first air date??
    • Even now Victor is always so warm with Ashley. I liked their brief re-pairing as well.
    • @depboy Thanks. That does help. @titan1978 @Paul Raven Really enjoying the analysis of the production methods and what Monty was doing.  I wish we got some of those biopics here that a few UK soaps got as a biopic on Monty's first few years at GH would be fascinating. 
    • The original 'mansion' was one of the set upgrades they did in 1980 . It was the Chandler residence. When that story fizzled out I think it became Stuart Whyland's house -not 100 on that. But it was revealed that Stuart was working for the Di Mera's (rewrite) so Stefano moved into that house. Mmmm...then it became Alex Marshall's? Neil and Liz lived there also. At some point it was finally replaced.  
    •   Thanks. I'm glad she got to as I know some producers tend to get mad if actors want to direct.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy