Jump to content

DAYS: NY Post Inverview with Kola Boof!


Recommended Posts

  • Members

I hope this doesn't come across as disrespectful or bashing, but I smell a big ol' rat in all of this. I'm not sure what's going on but something is not on the up and up here. Everytime something happens either [!@#$%^&*] or EricaKane come out and try to clear it up and it ends up even more confusing. They both seem to be in never ending damage control over all this.

Which board did [!@#$%^&*] post on this time, Kenny?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 155
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

At this point, I don't know what to believe. I am very grateful for all the info Gabe has provided us, but I just wish NBC would come out with a press release or something. I just hate that they are being so secertive about EVERYTHING!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I couldn't agree more. IF NBC or Corday would clear all this up then fans could go from there and stop the speculating. It's strange to me that the only interviews that NBC or Corday have done have only mentioned Hogan and Beth. I just with they would give us the straight scoop on [s.W.S.N.B.N.].

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think what you are saying, Steve, is that you just want someone else added to that story, and not for it to kick into high gear.

If that is what you're saying, I agree. But, this is a huge umbrella story, thatshould take time to build. And, not all the players are involved right now. John and Marlena have not been brought back to the canvas yet. When they are, we can finally really delve into the mystery of what happened to Steve (and hopefully, find out who John really is).

As far as E.J. is concerned, I do want for him to show grey areas. Not necessarily eveil (but if done right, go for it). I think if written well, and not rushed, it could be a major catalyst for Samantha to finally grow upo and stop being Sami. She needs a great big God-like kick in her backside for all the evil crap she has done to people. Now, what would happen if a man she trusted started visting some evil stuff back on her son and loved ones? She would eventually find out, and try to take him to task. But, E.J. just could easily say "It's nothing you haven't done yourself, my dear."

And yes, it could end up being a classic love story for her and Lucas. A realistically evil character could go along way into showing everyone about themselves.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I, personally, don't mind supercouples at all. In fact, I rather enjoy them. The problem with supercouples is that writers don't know how to write a good supercouple story anymore. Too many writers seem to want to play couple roulette and keep throwing characters into random pairings every six months, never giving a couple a chance to get any sort of rooting value (or, even when it does happen, they split the couple up and then move them in other directions with other people, never to be in a scene together again). The problem with fanbases is, at least IMO, not as much to do with psycho fanaticism, but mainly to do with a lack of faith in writers. When a fan of a "supercouple" has faith in the writers, they can sit through a couple's separation or a romantic interloper because they know (and are allowed to believe based on on-screen events) that the couple will eventually find their ways back together. Unfortunately, too many of today's writers don't inspire that faith and fans get nervous when an "inventive" writer tries to reinvent the wheel -- when their couple splits up or is kept apart, the writer doesn't know how to inspire that faith in viewers and fans get fearful (many time justifiably so) that their couple might be done for good because an assanine writer wants to "do something different."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Probably because there is only "verbal agreements" as of now.

I expect SOD to get interviews when Hogan has time. Right now he has an enormous amount of writing to do to get things going again on the show.

I have absolutely no suspicions at all with the info we're getting from EricaKanefan. I just wish that people would give [s.W.S.N.B.N.] a chance and not sit in judgement of her.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yes but if you are not a fan of the couple then it is not a good story. They never have been one of my favorite couples but have enjoyed some of their stories in the past because they involved people I did care about. Their story is almost and I do say almost an Island story at this point. I enjoyed the few days that they were involved and intersecting with the Jack story, but now that they are off on this journey to find Steve and each other - it is a big bore to me.

As I said if you are a fan of the couple then the story is great, but if not then it is a big bore.

But I hate any kind of Island story where characters are off in their own little part of the show. I will just be glad when the story does move along - gets other people involved - just something more added to it.

I just wonder if there was more than this planned for them in the beginning, but it all was changed when JER quit. Whatever it is the first few days when they first saw each other were great, but not enjoyed hardly any of it since.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

And CREEPY! The pic is CREEPY!

I so agree. I am so sick of this [!@#$%^&*] BULLSHIT! Let her [!@#$%^&*] be on the [!@#$%^&*] credits and write some good stories. Until then, I wish everyone would shut their god damn mouths about it! :angry:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Days needs to comment on this because it is getting out of hand. It was fun at first but we need answers. Everyone knows about Sheffer, Milstein, and Boof so they may as well come out with it. I mean verbal agreements or not Days needs to say something. The Wyman quote is not what I want-I want Corday, Sheffer, or someone in an actual interview in SOD or something so I can hear some actual info about it. I know they will never tell you everything but they can give us some particulars and it would be a show official speaking about it and that is important.

UGh-this is getting sickening. :angry:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

ErikaKane4life has hinted strongly that he may be let go for financial reasons. As I said in another thread, I will be absolutely furious if they do this. I was a J&J fan years ago, but I'm not so invested in them as a couple as I am in Matthew Ashord's portrayal of Jack.

He's needed, for the show and for his family connections to Steve -- such amazing chemistry there. Like Stephen Nichols, he has chemistry with almost everyone he plays against. And like SN, he's the kind of actor who brings out the best in other actors.

If NBC/Days can find money in the budge for "actors" like Farah Fath and Austin Peck, they can damn well find money for an actor with as much talent as Matt Ashford.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Please register in order to view this content

         
    • @TaoboiI ran into Dani’s favorite party planner again tonight

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I think they’re desperately trying to cover his awful tattoos. But anyway them being unable to style short kings properly has been a major pet peeve of mine for a while now.  I honestly don’t understand what some people expect from actors to even begin considering them for recognition. Let’s be real—awards mostly mean that an actor is respected by their peers and has some level of cultural relevance. Actual judgment on the acting itself? That’s often secondary—highly subjective and shaped by the times. I completely agree on both points. If you’re an actor or a dancer you shouldn’t get any tattoos (sorry not sorry). Tomas’ tattoos are ugly too. And regarding the couples- you’re completely right. These writers are unable to write romance.   Further comments: - Kat cannot be this dumb to keep tampering with evidence over and over again. And I’m officially not a fan of the actress—every time she’s in a scene with Leslie, she doesn’t seem intimidated at all. She plays it like comic relief, which is just too much, especially when paired with Leslie’s histrionics and over-the-top antics. Leslie is older, dangerous, and has literally been portrayed as homicidal—Kat should be at least a little scared. • I also didn’t like Kat playing damsel in distress with the hotel manager. It gave off the same weird energy as Dani with the cop. I would’ve much preferred the version Paul Raven suggested, with her sneaking in through housekeeping. • And yes, Dani again accused Hayley of faking the pregnancy—this time even specifying she might be using a pillow under her shirt. (No fake miscarriage being mentioned) I stand by my take: this is ridiculous writing. No one in the real world—except us, the chronically online soap watchers—would even think of such a conspiracy theory. Haley is no Beyoncé. • What in the world was Chelsea wearing in her hair the other day? And this whole thing with Madison is beyond cringe. Chelsea’s coming off as needy and toxic—basically like every other Dupree. • I’m glad the casino storyline is moving forward, but it’s still boring as hell. Honestly, I’d be so here for a plot twist where Vanessa and Doug take Joey out. • The direction and editing lately have been rough. Abrupt cuts, weird pacing… something just feels off overall. There’s a strange uneasiness to how it’s all coming together. • And finally: Tomas is too much of a saint. Where are the messy sluts when you need them? (Vanessa doesn’t count.)
    • I was watching some August 1987 episodes and they brought back so many memories. I had some thoughts: Lisa and Jamie were so dull. Lisa was such a nothing character. It boggles my mind that so much story was centered around her in such a short amount of time. Joanna Going is a talented actress, but the material was just not there.  It was so good to see Wallingford and Mitch again. I know there was talk about Felicia a while back, but these episodes reminded me how integral Felicia was for the show.  Sally Spencer was done so dirty. She is turning in superb performances in an icky storyline. I wish she had stuck around longer. She has chemistry with everyone. The McKinnons should have lasted longer. Spencer had some strong stuff with Stephen Schnetzer and Mary Alexander. AW waster such a talented actress by getting rid of her. Justice for Cheryl too. I also missed Ed Fry when he left. Sandra Ferguson was a star from the moment she came on. She was charismatic and just popped. She had immediate chemistry with RKK and blended in well with Wyndham and Watson. I'd forgotten about the teenage Matthew.  I have no memory of Peggy Lazarus. She must not have lasted long. Was the original plan for John that he was going to turn out to be the twins' real father?      
    • If the new and improved copies that @rsclassicfanforever has uploaded can be manually moved into the "by month, by year" folders, that would be awesome. I personally don't think it's necessary to keep the older versions (which either have Dutch subtitles hard coded on them, or are lesser in picture quality). That's a lot of valuable drive space that could be cleared. Just my view but can appreciate others may feel differently. The structure had been by month by year previously, so I think it would be easier to conform to that, where so much prior work to get it to that format has already been done. Hopefully you can "drag and drop" so the new copies are in the right month/year? Re Clips, I never look at them now we pretty much have the episodes in full. Appreciate others may use, however. Thanks for all your hard work here @BoldRestless!
    • Oh yes defintely, Josh Griffith repeats and repeats the same storylines.
    • Isnt’t this storyline similar to the Cameron Kirsten situation though? Sharon thought she killed him. He ended up being alive and Sharon was being tormented with thinking she was seeing his face everywhere and that’s how we got that iconic scene with her and Nikki in the sewers.   I understand in Mariah’s case this is different circumstances but it does seem like a play on that whole thing. Maybe I’m wrong. I just wish if they were going to make any character follow in Sharon’s foot steps it would be Faith. Mariah wasn’t even raised by her, and her personality is different. I would expect her to take a different path. I understand I could be completely jumping ahead because the storyline hasn’t even played out yet but we’ll see. 
    • Thanks again @Paul Raven Monica was completely without redeeming qualities at this point. I always found the whole Monica = Carly narrative regressive, as I don't think shows comparing characters so heavily is ever a great idea, but she's actually worse than Carly was. Was it the Pollocks who had Leslie have a miscarriage?  Giving her a child, especially by rape, was not a good idea, but a part of me wishes they'd committed to it just to see what story it might have had in later years.
    • @janea4old Your detailed explanation and delving into the psychology and motivations is no doubt the opposite of what we will see onscreeen. As @ranger1rg stated we will get a few scenes and some sketchy explanations. Like the adoption of Aria, most of it will take place off screen.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy