Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Members
Posted

I don't trust Leskie. Why celebrate it today though? I could see if we're going to be busy or out of town during her birthday.

Hmmm. Got some Stella Dallas undertones. I like it.

  • Replies 2.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members
Posted

I'm an old time soap fan, so I love core families. The Duprees must be the biggest core family in the history of daytime.  And I may be wrong, but it seems every living member of the family is on the show together now.  Have there been any mentions of living family members who are off the canvas? It's very unusual not to have a few family member off the canvas who can join the show later. Interesting.

  • Members
Posted (edited)

Nope. I wanted there to be some too! There's still time because we don't know too much about Vernon and Anita's families. They could have siblings, cousins, nieces, and nephews show up.

The Duprees are a big family, I am sure one of the Historians around here could let us know if they are the largest in Daytime.

Edited by DemetriKane
  • Members
Posted

Up until now, I think the Horton's were the biggest core family in daytime, but the Hortons never had this many family members on the show concurrently.  All the others -- Hughes, Ryan, Bauer, Matthews, Martin, Cory were smaller families than the Hortons and certainly smaller than the Duprees.

Here's another question: Have Anita and Vernon actually and literally said in the script that Dani and Nicole are their only children?  Or are we just assuming that, because no others have been mentioned?  I'm really not hoping for an illegitimate kid to come out of the woodwork.  But I would prefer Anita and Vernon having more offspring, perhaps just not mentioned yet.  

  • Members
Posted (edited)

I believe you're right about the Hortons.

I wanna say in Epi. 1/2 when Vernon and Anita discussed their love story they said “And we had two beautiful daughters”, I could be wrong though, I will have to rewatch those scenes. I would like for them to have more offspring as well, but only if it makes sense. 

Anything is possible at the moment.

 

Edited by DemetriKane
  • Members
Posted (edited)

They're not the same age though. Fridays show established that bit of timeline.

 

I mean she explained it; it was to cheer Eva up. Why would she lie all her life about her bday being 2 weeks later than it actually was? Thats not even a significant enough difference to even matter for any timeline

 

At the very least they dont have any other children together but there is the chance that he could have kids prior to her. OR they could have an estranged child that was so disgraced that he was disowned that they rather not talk about

Edited by Cheap21
  • Members
Posted

Seems like Hayley was trying to feel Bill out about having a baby as opposed to her actually thinking she's pregnant. The conversation was very manipulative.

Kat is very elitist and that overshadows her legitimate suspicions about Eva. From the start she talked about Eva's clothes.

Naomi is a fool for withdrawing from the case. After she pushed her clients to press forward she is now dropping them.

  • Members
Posted (edited)

She did explain it. However, I still find it interesting that both got some sort of party today. What is the coincidence? There has to be a reason for that by the writers, or is it just a red herring of sorts to make our minds wonder? Or I am looking too deeply LOL.

If Leslie did kidnap Eva that doesn't necessarily mean she knows her actual date of birth though. I believe TPTB could come up with plenty of reasons to make the scenario work. 

On the bright side, Leslie throwing Eva a party just to cheer her up was thoughtful!

 

@Tisy-Lish I also remember a scene between Dani and Nicole where Dani says You're my only sister“ So if there is more children they probably aren't aware of them.

Edited by DemetriKane
  • Members
Posted

Yep. It’s also making Eva a hell of a lot more sympathetic of a character in this budding feud (in addition to the Eva actress just being a stronger and more charismatic actress). Eva is the underdog and Kat is the mean rich b!tch who thinks she’s better than the girls from across town. That part drowns out her legitimate concerns about Eva. 

It will be a huge kick in the gut to her if she finds out that Eva is actually Ted and Nicole’s biological child, if they do decide to go down that route. 

  • Members
Posted

That was the smartest thing she’s done all month. Them women are idiots that need to be babysat and we’re about to jeopardize Naomi’s credibility with how wish was they are. Also it’s a clear conflict of interest and she never should have been the lawyer rep  representing them; it should have been another lawyer at her firm 

  • Members
Posted

This story has/had the potential to be very nuanced and not so cut and dry.

All three women have proven to not be very bright so I'm betting that the performance reviews all three received at work were legit, but because slimy Mike had harassed all three women.. they have a case.

The ironic thing is that Hayley might actually have deserved the promotion, but because of the actions of Mike and also her having an affair with Bill.. that is called into question.   

There have a few instances where Hayley has displayed skills that would make one a good paralegal.  She's detail oriented (she figured out Dani had broken into their house), she's rightly questioned certain statements from Bill, had a few good points in her interactions with Naomi, and today's pregnancy talk was in an area where she's manipulating him.. but also be upfront/pro-active. 

Maybe they'll be a twist and Bill won't let her opt out of the case because of his pride and wanting to go up against the best.

 

In regards to todays episode:

Today was a character development day, and Danielle Paige is settling in nicely as a soap opera script writer.  

The ironic thing about Kat/Tomas is that they might not be a long term couple because of her persona/looking down on Eva.. not because of anything Eva is doing to them.

Dana is still the breakout character..imho.

  • Members
Posted (edited)

I really think its as simple as it was presented. Leslie wanted to lift Eva bc she was having a bad day and to makeup for upsetting her earlier. The fact is her birthday this year is going to be awful as it will happen after the paternity reveal so she wanted to give her a happy memory before she blows things up

Edited by Cheap21
  • Members
Posted

-- I have no problem with product placement, but that Febreze insert was awful and went on too long. Subtle is better, and that was getting hit on the head with a hammer.

-- so Tomas bought Kat a calculator necklace. Sorry, boy got no game. A guy who wears a big, gaudy ring on his index finger should know better.

--  Naomi is moving into "terrible lawyer" category. Now she wants to withdraw? I don't care how dumb her clients are, she's not doing them right. She should also make far fewer visits to her father's office.

-- The party scenes were good, although I hope we eventually get words of wisdom from Vernon that don't come with a story about his activist days.

-- Kat was rude to Eva, but Naomi was crazy to tell Eva to stay for cake. That's pretty damn clueless. And even if Kat goes overboard with the mean girl stuff, it's not like she's not right about Eva.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I did not care, just clarifying that was the discussion point. If there are ice cream bars in Statesville I am sure there is a full spa
    • Seeing Peter Bergman (Jack) and Melody Thomas Scott (Nikki) act opposite each other really makes me mad that their short-lived reunion in 2012 was just that... short-lived. I've always loved the Jack/Nikki pairing.
    • No.  I recall there was also a mention about how distracting it was EOB's Gwen wasn't wearing nail polish as well.  That it was someone's pet peeve. And, yes, the fact characters can have a manicure in prison is the wildest continuity issue here.
    • Can anyone remember Mary Ellen Stuart's run as Jenny? I'm trying to fill in the cracks for missing stuff that we overlooked.  Bulletpoints:  * Dated Ross * Rusty's police partner * Directly responsible for Dinah coming forward about George Stewart (Cam's father)
    • But that's not weird... nail polish is allowed in prisons via commissary. Same with general makeup, haircuts, and hair colouring products.
    • This is DAYS, the show that said you could brainwash anyone with simple kitchen appliances.  An actor's nail polish or lack thereof should be the least of our concerns, lol.
    • It was not that she wasn't wearing nail polish, it is that she managed to get a manicure in prison
    • "We're Knot Done Yet": the name of this lovely podcast AND what JVA tells her plastic surgeon at every appointment. In other news, Michele Lee is reminding me more and more of my old music teacher from elementary school, and I couldn't STAND that bitch.
    • I apologize if this has been covered already, but does anyone know whether Douglas Marland was HW'ing by that point?  If he was, then I see what he meant when he said (in so many words) that he had inherited a mess when he started at GH.  Aside from Alan and Monica, none of that material seems very promising.  The story with Mark Dante and the Corbins is the wrong kind of predictable (y'know, the kind where you know what's going to happen, but you just don't give a crap?), the stuff with Scotty and Laura is cute but toothless, I don't know WHAT the hell Gina and Steve Carlson's character are arguing about and Rick Webber has to be the dumbest man alive not to see David Hamilton twirling his invisible moustache over how to make a killing off Lamont Corbin's declining health.  (By the way, "LAMONT CORBIN"?  What is this, "The Shadow"?  And "Corbin Limited" sounds like some jive I'd hear over on Y&R.) In a way, it's kind of like watching today's GH, right down to the dialogue that's serviceable and pushes plot along but says nothing about the characters' inner lives.
    • It absolutely was; the narrative was there, and they followed it promptly. Maybe that's back when women had babies at young ages?!?!?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy