Jump to content

B&B: August 2024 Discussion Thread


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 343
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

Yes, Lunacy is cheesy, but it's also very classic Bell Sr. - every 2 years on Y&R - especially 1990s, he'd turn a seemingly *nice* girl psychotic.

Steffy outlined almost every relationship to Luna, but I was kinda hoping to hear:

'Luna, you're my husband's first cousin through his adopted mother's sister, who has been living with Bill Spencer, the father of my first husband and grandfather of my first-born child - and the man I saw you kissing!'

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I've decided to just call Luna's split personality...Tuna. Well, one thing I can say for Tuna, she's more interesting than sweet as pie, perfect, beautiful, would never do anything bad Luna. I wonder what the end game to this cheesefest is as of now (before BB changes his mind to something else). I mean, if Tuna did murder two people, there's no way the cops are going to let her walk around town...split personality or not!

In a way, it's kind of sad that we FINALLY get some sort of diversity on this show, and it turns into this. I am kind of excited sanctimonious Steffy will be stuck in a cage for a good bit. But, if Luna/Tuna goes, who are RJ and Will going to fight over? And, we ALL know that's coming!

I wonder if we'll also be told that Tuna was the one that actually slept with Zende, and she planned it. I mean...they did destroy Zende with that storyline though. I'm not sure if even this would fix that.  I thought RJ versus Zende had some potential, and they just went and shot themselves in the foot before that even got started.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

@1974mdp A few weeks ago, I called the Lunacy excuse for Zende, which is actually a good thing. Clearly, we'll hear how the alter intentionally took Poppy's mints and she likely drugged Zende, the same way she just drugged Steffy.

With Bill mentioning how Luna should speak to a professional at the same time Taylor announces she's reopening her practice ... but it'll be quite the family conspiracy if Luna actually did kill Tom + Hollis. I expect a twist to get Luna off the hook and keep her on the show. While Luna isn't perfect, it's been over a decade since B&B has had characters in their 20s that mattered.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

8-21

 

Wow. It took Steffy until Wednesday to confront Hope. I didn't know whether it shows how invested I've gotten in the show again, or if it's Lloyd Gold writing. LOL.

 

That said I liked that Finn told Steffy. And yeah, Steffy was right. But I didn't like how she was going off on him. Yeah, Finn can be surprisingly naive about people, but that's part of the reason you love him, Steffy. She was low blowing him a little too much for me. I do hope that if Hope is going to be catty about Steffywhen she is not in the room, she will be giving it to Steffy, too. After all, the real reason Hope is into Finn is that she feels he can do better than Steffy. Just own it, Hope. Earn the slap you have coming.

 

I can't believe that the Luna thread vanished after Monday. So far. So is Luna cray cray?

 

I mentally roll my eyes every time I see NuTaylor. But lord, if those writers aren't trying. I just think KA's reintro as NuTaylor was better. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Okay, I'm caught up.  @Maxim like you I have new life for RB's Taylor, she did well in her scenes with KKL.  Someone said Rebecca is at her best when she is bitchy, maybe that is her strong suit.  Hopefully chemistry will fall into place with the other actors.

As for Luna, this some crazy sh!t.

Edited by Jeff
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'm happy that you're happy! I was looking forward to seeing your reaction after I  told you about how much I loved her. Yes, not the Taylor I imagined, but I'll take her. I even showed a clip to my husband and he told me - I prefer this new Taylor, the last one was too funny for my taste. (I DO NOT agree with him

Please register in order to view this content

)

Edited by Maxim
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

"The role of Bridget Forrester will now be played by Rebecca Budig."

That's what we should have heard. 

Please refresh my memory y'all... last time we saw Krista Allen's Taylor, she and Brooke were basically cool with one another, right?

 

Edited by Gray Bunny
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

They were not - after months and months of a storyline about being best friends, girl-power and saying f-ck you to nasty men, they had 3 episodes where they fought and screamed at each-other, mostly Brooke... for Emmy reels and that's it. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

So what isn’t making sense is where Sheila fits into the Steffy, Luna etc. thing.  Because it always goes back to Sheila and or missing toes, so, how does Brad Bell get there?  She’s the one who does the rescue or Luna is Mary or something?  PS - actress who plays Luna - majorly flat back/no butt.  Wardrobe, watch the pants, looks like she got mashed back there. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Yes. I don't know if Lenore was ever asked. Then it became a nun. Thanks. I didn't realize it was in 1987. That timeline doesn't make a lot of sense even if she would have had Ed to interact with. If they didn't ask her back in 1989 and she was willing, what a stupid error. The attempts at these feuds, or even the whole families tied together stuff like Maryanne Carruthers, never had any real impact because of how depleted the Bauers felt even by the mid '80s. And instead of expanding them, which would have been common sense, various producers were just too lazy, or too ashamed, and kept bringing on other families, or bringing in too many people at one time and not knowing how to write for them (the Spauldings in the McTavish era - as SOD said at the time, everyone in the family had the same personality).
    • Wasn't there talk of them bringing back Rita as Gus' mother at one point? Or something?
    • I think they are a part of the same family, although Carla was never really scheming for the same reasons, and once her double life was exposed, she stopped. 
    • Rachel/Ada, Mona/Erica, a mother/daughter at LOVING, these are all examples of the Agnes Nixon "troublesome daughter/put upon mother" trope. Are Carla/Sadie by any chance one of the pairs that make up this trope? Another thing that these 2 shows might have in common. OLTL had a very strong thematic approach to socioeconomic differences between groups of people. Class differences. AW at an earlier point had this too but to be clear it was not as much as OLTL. So that is a similarity but marginal.  Besides that, I see no other comparable things. Paul Rauch was a very different EP at different shows. Oh, I've thought of one more thing. Using actors from the Broadway stage.  But, realistically that was something all of the NY shows had in common. So I don't think it has any uniqueness between AW & OLTL.  
    • When you look at the period between Sweeps, it's as if they tried to maintain a kind of pace where they had a lot of plates spinning in the air & on their fingertips & the whole goal was nothing but to not drop any of those plates. A version of spinning one's wheels. They're not getting anywhere but they give the appearance of a whole lot of activity. I believe it's all about this appearance. At moments they accidentally hit a chord & something resonates but it is a false event.
    • He found the hidden camera and removed the card 
    • Please register in order to view this content

    • I’m not speculating anything, but I admit, I’m getting a little worried about James Reynolds. 
    • I feel like this is what they're doing by creating lots of storylines but their biggest weakness for years is the inability to properly pace these stories and give resolution. A good example now would be the Gio story which has been simmering for months with very little movement. I went from not caring to being invested to not caring again because of how long it's taking for the secret to be revealed. One story like that would be fine but it seems like everything moves at this snails pace on GH. They need to do a better job of rotating the stories so everything isn't in that same treading water phase.
    • However, those of us who watch DAYS have been spoiled. On Peacock there are no preemptions. Not for anything & not in or about any show.  I read somewhere that we Baby Boomers in a way invented instant gratification but then we realized that it was not fast enough.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy