Jump to content

GH: June 2024 Discussion Thread


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 910
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

-- It's such a cliche to throw in one obstacle after another to keep a couple from having sex for the first time.

Why not have Gio show up with the violin AFTER Cody and Sasha have had sex? Make that part of the romantic moment. Instead we got another sex interruption.

-- Also maddening: GH working overtime to get us to understand/forgive/whatever Heather's killing spree. Now Scott gets multiple scenes to defend her and throw the blame on cobalt poisining.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Great Carly and Sam scenes today, bringing up Morgan was a valid low blow but they both got good digs in.

Anna and Valentine have good chemistry and I enjoy her and Jason working together but Jagger’s an idiot at this point.

Sasha and Cody continue to sleep induce and IDK wtf Kin Shriner was doing in those Scott and Lucy scenes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

So, Sam has more nerve than anyone most of us have ever known! The sheer audacity of her & what she said to Carly! I confess that I am a fan of the Davis women, but today Sam was way out of line. She has been this way about Danny ever since she caught him climbing out. 

Isn't it interesting that at this point in the game, John Jagger Schmidt Cates has now shown himself to be - how shall I say this - STUPID?!!! 

He talks to Jason & alleges some incredibly unbelievable things about Anna & Brennan. Jason goes directly TO ANNA & tells her every single thing John said NOT TO! I kinda LOVE IT. 

The dialog today was to die for. Carly & Sam ended up screaming at each other. And, Jagger speak, plus Jason & his rapport with Anna, golly gee, what a day on GH !!! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I didn't watch the entire episode and just came in halfway, but I thought Sam explained herself well?

Also, Jagger, if nothing else, has always been an idiot.  Going back to the ASJ days.  It's the one consistent thing about the character.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yup.  From what I saw Sam basically said she grew up and out of that ride or die phase and didn't want her son to end up dead, injured, in the mob, etc.  That seems like a perfectly adult reasonable assessment.  She even explained why Jason doesn't listen to her and why she went to Carly. Of course Carly is going to disagree because....Carly.  And she has no self-awareness.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Why would Sam even want Carly as a friend lol? The bomb for Morgan was meant for Sonny.  That's sorta Sam's entire point.  She's not going to stand by like Carly and let a bomb meant for Jason to go off on her son.  And I don't even like Sam.  She had points today.

ETA-apparently the bomb wasn't meant for Sonny and it was some other form of revenge, but point still stands.  

Edited by carolineg
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It doesn’t matter what was intended for whom - Carly’s involvement with monsters like Sonny and Jason put a marker on her kids backs regardless.

Her parenting choices are exactly why Michael was shot and then sent to prison. All the while she was pretending like Michael having a relationship with the Quartermaine’s was more detrimental to his health than the mob violence she exposed him to due to her own alliances. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • On the subject of sets (seems more interesting to discuss than the actual show)  Some sets we don't see anymore Lauren/Michael apartment (haven't seen that in years) Victoria's house (are Marian/Tessa living there?) Apartment above Crimson Lights (I think Chelsea was the last resident) Penthouse (Lily's home) Chancellor Estate (Devon/Abby) Chancellor office (once Dark Horse) Nick's house GCAC room (used as residence/hotel room for several characters) Some of these may pop up again. The tack house,for example, was not seen for many months before being used again. Have I missed anything?
    • Thanks for searching through everything. Worked on them so long, just too lazy to check for those links myself, so I am glad you chose to do it! I guess I never did type out anything for 1973-1977 in regards to the preemptions, but they are on the charts at least (and this far back, they don't seem to do any of those "breakouts" anymore, so things are simpler in the 1970's, so eventually I could type those out). 
    • I dump on the Y&R sets problem all the time, but BOLD is no better -- and they're not even introducing new sets. All of their sets are years old, and very few look like they're inhabited by people with money. Is that going to change with this move? I'd rather they save the money spent on another remote, which is no better than an HGTV travelogue, and get some new/better sets.
    • The donut posts here make up for a Friday show that was barely meh. Aside from seeing Anna, I really didn't care much about anything else. While I understand the thought behind breaking up all the sadness with "other scenes," I'd rather they moved right to John's funeral. Instead of hearing a stupid story about John changing some minor character's tire 20 years ago, just move on to the crying. I also thought the Chad and Cat scenes were a waste. I realize not everyone is devastated by John's death to the point of not functioning, but going sky diving is a choice. By the way, Jack and Jennifer are giving me nothing on this return. Please leave asap. DAYS did such a great job with John's death, so ending the week this way was a letdown.
    • Add Dr. Montgomery to list of fine women on this show! I hope the show goes forward with Madison/Chelsea and then once they're developed, bring back Allison, who is now divorced or a widow, for a Madison/Chelsea/Allison triangle.  It would definitely be the hottest triangle in daytime.  
    • I wonder if Linda Bloodworth-Thomason had Kim in mind for any of her other characters/series. If they intended Allison Sugarbaker (Julia Duffy's character) to be more in line with who Suzanne was/Delta Burke's portrayal-persona, then I think Kim would have aced that. Yes, it would have been odd, Kim having previously played a different character (from a different family), but Designing Women wouldn't have been the first show with that issue. Or maybe Kim could have played Beth Broderick's role on Hearts Afire. Or Patricia Heaton's role on Women of the House.
    • Sony is probably waiting until Y&R’s lease is up as well. All of TV City is going to be gutted, so they have to relocate at some point. 
    • At this point Y&R's next step is to go fully green screen and have the actors Zoom from home.
    • I was just taking about this in the Y&R thread - they desperately need better studio space. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy