Jump to content

B&B: March 2024 Discussion Thread


Taoboi

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 236
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

Hope lost her virginity to MARRIED Liam, got slut shamed by the public cause her HFTF line basically stood for "purity and innocence" and got knocked up by a MARRIED Man while his child was barely a few months old

Hope ain't no one to throw stones at anyone. She's heading to Brooke JR territory, not by who she's slept with but her actions

This is so good, I love this version of theme 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yeah but... respectfully /I hope you don't get offended by my comment/ I want to clarify that - Steffy is throwing stones... not Hope. Hope is actually minding her business and doing her life choices, which I think in 2024 is very demeaning to NOT RESPECT. We live in a post-me too MOVEMENT world and to shame a woman or judge her for refusing a marriage IN THE WAY Steffy is doing... is wrong. Steffy is a BULLY in this situation. And even if people love her to obsession... they should understand that it's not ok.

This leads me to my general observation of this situation - people in the boards, I am not talking about anyone in particular, have this strange habit of forgiving their favorite characters all the mistakes and character flaws that they like to point out in the opposite character that they hate. It's human nature I suppose. We like to be blind to the things that are not good in the people we like and love and associate with. But that doesn't make the history disappear.  And that is also very problematic behavior when people start noticing it too much. 

So yeah, it's funny to see some people on the boards judging Hope for things Steffy used to do years ago and did THEM worse... while they are obsessed and forgiving and understanding of Steffy. That is the same treatment favorite children get when a narcissistic parent favors them. Two children can do the same thing and only one gets judged and harassed.

I am not a fan Hope or Steffy, I personally find both characters lacking in substance and badly written from the get go. I appreciate the actresses and I believe they are some of the best and DESERVE better storylines... or even BETTER shows to play in.

That's what I think.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Girl power is something Bradley is not capable of managing in this show and I will prefer he not EVEN try again... after the Taylor Brooke fiasco.

He should stick to what he does semi-good - borderline-incest, paternity tests and mints.

 

Edited by Althea Davis
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Today's show was as bad as usual, and might have been even worse.

NoT one thing new was said, and nothing new happened. We got a repeat of every show from the past 2 weeks as Hope and Thomas avoided each other and talked to other people about their relationship.

Godawful.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Not to give JER credit, but I long for the days of Passions, where at least the characters there had friends to confide their relationship woes too....The fact the Mom's, Dad's, and Brother's/Sisters etc...were kept out of the loop a good chunk of the time, made things slightly more realistic. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Surely we (and Billy Flynn) are not going to be saddled with a character named Aristotle Dumas? This isn't 1970's Edge of Night.
    • What annoys me a little bit about the "day players" is they sound a bit too "Brooklyn-ish" sometimes.  Obviously, the show was taped in New York City, and the actors are all New York actors, but Monticello is supposed to be located in Illinois or Ohio.  Occasionally, they grab actors and actresses for small roles who have VERY distinct New York accents, which contrasts sharply with the main cast, none of whom have noticeable accents (except for our dashing European gigolo, Eliot Dorn, of course).  The heavy Brooklyn accent works fine if the character is a bookie, or the owner of a pawn shop, or a guy who's selling stolen guns on the street corner.  But when it's a steadily recurring character -- such as the first Mrs. Goodman, who worked for Miles and Nicole -- it's pretty jarring to me sometimes.  And you'll see it often -- such as an "under-five" character who witnesses a car accident, or a character who witnesses a shooting, or the occasional desk clerk, or waiter.  
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • I'm screaming at those clips and gifs.  THIS IS PURE GOLD.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • That's always been my thought. I can't imagine that the show would play up the unseen AD so far in advance without them casting a *star*. After today's episode, I wonder if he'll somehow be connected with Diane. It was strange that Diane mentioned her very distant family today. I can't recall Diane ever talking about her backstory. Maybe he's her much younger brother?  It's also possible he's connected to Diane during her time in LA. Sally's already said she crossed paths with him. OC, I think Dumas is Mariah's mistake.... As a side note, it was good to see some mixing it up - Adam with Clare/Kyle and Sharon with Tessa.
    • Here's the place to share some memorable criticism. You don't have to agree with it, of course (that's often where the fun starts). Like I mentioned to @DRW50, Sally Field was a favorite punching bag in the late '80s and early '90s.   Punchline (the 1988 movie where she and Tom Hanks are stand ups): "It's impossible to tell the difference between Miss Field's routines that are supposed to be awful, and the awful ones that are supposed to be funny." -- Vincent Canby, New York Times. "It's not merely that Field is miscast; she's miscast in a role that leaves no other resource available to her except her lovability. And (David) Seltzer's script forces her to peddle it shamelessly." -- Hal Hinson, Washington Post. "As a woman who can't tell a joke, Sally Field is certainly convincing. ... Field has become an unendurable performer ... She seems to be begging the audience not to punch her. Which, of course, is the worst kind of bullying from an actor. ... She's certainly nothing like the great housewife-comedian Roseanne Barr, who is a tough, uninhibited performer. Sally Field's pandering kind of 'heart' couldn't be further from the spirit of comedy." -- David Denby, New York   Steel Magnolias: The leading ladies: Dolly Parton: "She is one of the sunniest and most natural of actresses," Roger Ebert wrote. Imagining that she probably saw Truvy as an against-type role, Hinson concluded it's still well within her wheelhouse. "She's just wearing fewer rhinestones." Sally Field: "Field, as always, is a lead ball in the middle of the movie," according to Denby . M'Lynn giving her kidney to Shelby brought out David's bitchy side. "I can think of a lot more Sally Field organs that could be sacrificed." Shirley MacLaine: "(She) attacks her part with the ferociousness of a pit bull," Hinson wrote. "The performance is so manic that you think she must be taking off-camera slugs of Jolt." (I agree. If there was anyone playing to the cheap seats in this movie, it's Shirley.) Olympia Dukakis: "Excruciating, sitting on her southern accent as if each obvious sarcasm was dazzlingly witty," Denby wrote. Daryl Hannah: "Miss Hannah's performance is difficult to judge," according to Canby, which seems to suggest he took a genuine "if you can't say something nice ..." approach. Julia Roberts: "(She acts) with the kind of mega-intensity the camera cannot always absorb," Canby wrote. That comment is so fascinating in light of the nearly 40 years Julia has spent as a Movie Star. She is big. It's the audience who had to play catch up. And on that drag-ish note ... The movie itself: "You feel as if you have been airlifted onto some horrible planet of female impersonators," Hinson wrote. Canby: "Is one supposed to laugh at these women, or with them? It's difficult to tell." Every review I read acknowledged the less than naturalistic dialogue in ways both complimentary (Ebert loved the way the women talked) and cutting (Harling wrote too much exposition, repeating himself like a teenager telling a story, Denby wrote). Harling wrote with sincerity and passion, Canby acknowledged, but it's still a work of "bitchiness and greeting card truisms." The ending was less likely to inspire feeling good as it was feeling relieved, according to Denby. "(It's) as if a group of overbearing, self-absorbed, but impeccable mediocre people at last exit from the house."
    • I tend to have two minds about Tawny (Kathy Najimy) fainting during Soapdish's big reveal. You're the costume designer, if anything, you should have known the whole time. I guess it's an application of what TV Tropes calls the "Rule of Funny." Every time I watch Delirious, I always want the genuine romance in John and Mariel's reunion at the deli counter to last longer. Film critics had their knives out for Sally in this period. I'll start a separate thread on the movies page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy