Jump to content

Days of Our Lives: November 2023 Discussion Thread


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 449
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

Dimitri went to the hospital first with the baby, as Leo directed him to do... but then as he arrived he saw Rafe there and was afraid of being arrested so he quickly left without being seen. 

I have no idea why Dimitri brought the baby to Sloan's place.  Maybe Dimitri knows that Sloan is Leo's lawyer?  Maybe that's why he brings her the baby?  He probably knows that Sloan can handle shady situations.

He might not even know that Sloan was planning to adopt, unless he heard Nicole and EJ discussing things at the DiMansion before he was kicked out.  Clearly Dimitri just wants a way out of Salem and doesn't care about the health of the premature baby.

Edited by janea4old
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I sure hope so!!! 

 

I mean, was the character rehab blatant or what's more obvious than blatant?!!! Wow. If they think they can change fans minds with suddenly crafting a kind, responsible adult in one days' show they do not know soap fans at all! 

Ari & Serfaty were both excellent today. Good for them. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

My quibble of the day is - what has Sloan done to turn every perspective adoptive parent in Salem against her?  She's got a good job, she married an ex-priest, and she may be one of the few citizens of Salem to have never been falsely accused of murder. 

Sure, her brother's a creep, but she hadn't seen him for so long that they had different accents.

Is it her dislike of chowder?  Are there folks still holding it against her that she put her feet on the coffee table that one time at the Victor's mansion?  Does everyone really like Paulina that much after she tried to teardown the square?  Why are we supposed to take it for granted that Sloan would have difficulty adopting, when in our universe it wouldn't be an issue?

On a serious note, I hate that Sloan has become such a symp for Eric, when he was the one who pushed for a commitment.  Gurl, if you are worried your man loves someone else, don't ruin your career, kick him back to his daddy's boarding house, there's plenty of fish in the sea (including Chad).

Edited by j swift
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Just about! I still have no idea why they did that Jada/Eric pregnancy, although I appreciated that a female character chose to have an abortion and hasn't been made to suffer for it. (One could argue that being paired with Rafe is the ultimate suffering, but you know what I mean.)

Edited by Michael
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Seriously, I will give this show money if they agree to kill off Leo. So sick of this POS and the prop writing for him. 

Dimitri’s explanation for giving the baby to Sloan makes sense but Melinda’s still really doesn’t. Why is she so obsessed with this? I get that they’re friends, but come on. They really needed to give us a better explanation as to why she’s so determined for Sloan to have a life with Eric and the baby. Maybe tie it to Li and her feelings for him, perhaps. 

Again, it’s not really the idea, (though I do have mixed feelings about Nicole having to suffer the loss of a 3rd child) it’s the execution. This all just seems so lazy. 

I did like Tate and Holly today though. They’re good together and I like how the show is going through the motions of them slowly becoming a couple. Tying it to Johnny/Chanel could be really good too. 

Btw, shut up Stefan

Please register in order to view this content

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'm shocked, I tell you, that you didn't mention that the Script Writer of the Day was Jamey Giddens! Yesterday it was Brkdn Writer Chris Dunn & today Brkdn Writer Jamey Giddens. Well, the Writing team is down 8 writers & up 2 nepotism hires, for a net loss of 6 writers, so they are putting these people to work - is it double duty, you think? 

But, about the show, did Melinda seem diabolical to anyone else? 

And, was I the only one who felt like "shades of Rosemary's Baby"? 

 

 

Edited by Donna L. Bridges
just had a thought
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I think Hotel would have the similar demos as Dynasty W 19-49 would have been strong. St Elsewhere survived b/c it attracted wealthier/urban viewers and The Equalizer was probably stronger with men and younger viewers. So each had their own niche-good counter-programming. As for Aaron Spelling's influence over ABC in terms of scheduling, I don't know if he would have been happy with Charlie's Angels moving to Sunday, The Colbys scheduled on Thursdays or Matt Houston moved to Fridays. I think he just had to roll with the punches.
    • Thank you @Broderick. That information was so helpful. I watched the first episode of the "Mansion of the Damned" storyline. I was extremely confused by Margaret Colin's Paige and her relationship to other characters. Your post helps me understand what's happening. The rest of the show was easy to understand and I'm enjoying it. Hunter's Nola is a good character for me since I know Kim Hunter from other work.  I must have seen clips of Edge of Night before because I remember seeing April. 
    • How is it back tracking when it was in fact the word I originally used? It's not.
    • You know what is a great way to stop these unclear "rumors"?  Just stop posting them and then back tracking with words like "apparently".   Anyhow, I didn't find the Tracy/Lois scenes as good as I hoped.    
    • Jason, in thinking this over, I realize that we look at this space, differently. To me it is a potentially collaborative space. Now that I've realized this, what I should have said, "I'm having a problem because what I'm seeing is not matching up with your descriptions. Maybe these files I just got are misdated. Maybe it's something else. I will keep you posted. Meanwhile this episode, its edit, is ready, even though I might have to issue a corrected date later. But, people can enjoy the performances now. 
    • Thank you for the constructive suggestion. 
    • But how is it "apparent" that she signed a new 3-year contract? Your wording had a voice of authority -- as if you knew it was true. A better way to post about it? Say you read online that she signed a new contract, but have no idea if that's true.
    • This interview actually reminds me a bit of Kim Zimmer’s press during the infamous clone storyline on Guiding Light, or Deidre Hall during the possession story on Days. All three were seasoned daytime veterans who made it clear they valued airtime for their characters, not just being part of a romantic pairing. It seems that idea was part of the pitch behind these bigger-than-life plots. They all took big swings in their performances. When I read Kim Zimmer’s memoir, I thought she captured it best — she wanted to be respected for being willing to take those risks. To paraphrase her, she knew it was ridiculous for Reva to think she was pregnant after menopause, but she still threw herself into those scenes and made them real. That’s what really struck me about Victoria Wyndham’s interview too. She responded like a real person. It felt like she was telling Michael Logan that she knew Justine — and a geriatric pregnancy with twins — was totally preposterous, but that she still deserved credit for trying to keep the show alive and entertain the audience. And honestly, I think that's more than fair. Logan is looking for a reductive answer for who is to blame.  And, she's telling him to accept that they were all well-meaning.  Which is not a defense of bad storytelling.  But, I understand that she's frustrated because she interpreted Logan's critique as a lack of commitment, and she wants him to know that she was committed! (maybe not for the best, but committed).
    • Fine, you only had to say so. It's not a problem to me NOT to post this. I have no idea what this means. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy