Jump to content

Amped-Up Comebacks


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 50
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

Correct me if I'm wrong (which I might be) but I would nominate Marco Dane's 1992 return to GH.

Although, Gerald Anthony won an emmy on a strong initial story pairing with Tracy.  I recall an unseemly story where Marco was going to abscond with the funds from Lucy Coe's annual Nurse's Ball AIDS fundraiser.  It seemed irresponsible to take an event that meant to be GH's annual public service episode and pervert it with the story about stealing charitable funds.  (Here's where I am uncertain, if Marco wanted to steal the money, or was that someone else's scam?)

I would further argue that the Marco who showed up in Port Charles possessed all of the worst parts of the character that were derived from other's writers trying to make him a comedic figure.  Certainly, Marco had a wacky side, but he was so much more complex during his relationships with Karen and Katrina.  So, to write him as essentially a buffoon, or side kick to Luke and Sonny, robbed the 1992 audience of what made the character so revolutionary in the first place.

Edited by j swift
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Not to go off topic, but am I correct that someone tried to scam the Nurse's Ball charity?  I don't remember how that whole story got resolved

What I do remember is that Marco was involved with Sonny during his strip club days and that there had been no character development, or call back to prior events, in his treatment of Karen Wexler versus his treatment of Tina

Edited by j swift
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I should have been clearer with my intent with this thread. I intended it to be about actors who noticably overacted (or to be charitable, added extra flourishes) upon their returns. There's been some good examples throughout the thread, but your mentioning Marco stands out because Gerald Anthony was specifically called out by Michael Logan in 1992. Something along the lines of Gerald's talent being undeniable, but that this time around, he was coming across as subtle as Jackie Gleason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

How are we defining amped up?

re: Robin Strasser, whose mid-‘90s Dorian is perhaps my all-time favorite portrait of a soap character from the acting to the look… I noticed that she was suddenly inexplicably playing to the cheap seats and I did not care for it. On her hotline, she mentioned that she NEVER watched herself but did end up catching herself on the air and felt like she was underplaying, not doing enough. Dommage. That’s when she started amping it up and the character was never the same.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Brenda Dickson - Although on her intial return to Y&R she was mostly the same with some over the top moments, as time went on she started overplaying more and more and by her last year it was ridiculous. The definition of playing to the cheap seats. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

@DRW50has mentioned this lately, but I've talked about it a lot as well. As Robin has said more than once, her forced exit by JFP rattled her terribly and made her intent on 'upping her game'. I heard that and it made a lot of sense to me re: what had happened to her work while the show was still on the air. I think the exile hurt her a lot and I personally don't think she ever recovered performance-wise; I think she felt she always had to go to the limit or very big most of the time in order to prove her worth to the show and the network.

OTT Robin Strasser is still great, of course. I would never begrudge her coming back. But yes, I think she had less and less quiet moments and stillness once she returned in 2003.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I admit I am curious about amped up as well when we mean amped comebacks. Does it mean that we are referencing returns that are just as good as the first run or just returns where they came with a lot of thunder regardless of how it turned out.

 

Because for the former, I naturally have to mention Vanessa Marcil's as Brenda to GH the first time. And how well done I remember it being and how it touched on so many people in her short period. Of course, I could also mention her third return (and the advertising surrounding it) for the latter.

 

Or something like Sydney Penny's Julia's return to AMC. That got some good advertising from what I recall as well...coming back to find Noah's killer.

 

And speaking of Michelle Stafford...her return as a tech whiz, Jack's new love interest, and behind the Jabot Glow by Jabot, mentoring young vixen Brittany. 

 

I love that someone already mentioned it, but H#LL TO THE YES to Eileen Davidson's first return to DAYS...a decade in the making...like VM's Brenda on GH...and that lived up to the potential from the moment, her head tilted upward in that hat right up until her destroyed wedding (honorable mention to the stopped first wedding) to Brady leading to where it should lead...a final showdown with Marlena. 

 

And H#LL TO THE YES PART 2 on Eileen Davidson's return to Y&R. I was not even watching when she was Ashley in her first run. But I knew of it, saw the remsemblance with BE, and knew her from DAYS. So when she came out of the shadows to Rafael...it was kinda of a wink to the gothic-ness of Kristen Dimera, but her presence of elegance was also apparent for who Ashley is. I was in awe. 

 

I also lived for Princess Tina on OLTL...even if the road to her getting to have scenes with the people she should have scenes (and Cord) was a long road to get to, but never toooo boring...but worth it for me. 

Edited by Taoboi
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I was going to say Vanessa's first return as well, but I wasn't sure if it counted.  I am not sure Vanessa amped up anything as far as her acting, but definitely her style, presence, and overall writing helped as well.  But I would definitely say she lived up to her own hype in that run.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Not really short-lived as GH went to color in 1967, so the blue background actually lasted about twice as long as the black background. You can see it at the very beginning of this set of clips from 1974:

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Both EE and Corrie remind me of RC's OLTL, where maybe, just maybe, if we keep bringing up the past in cheesy, forced ways, the audience will transfer their positive memories of better days onto what we're giving them now. I used to love that kind of crap, but it became so constant and transparent with OLTL, not to mention obnoxious as hell. Like when they had KDP singing the Peabo Bryson theme over the opening sequence for an episode or two. I've been reading little blurbs about Sonia's exit, and they all mention trumpets as if the she had grown up and became a trumpet virtuoso. It's too sitcommy to me, just like Bianca being damn near 50 and still wearing the jacket and hoops. But then they like to introduce new young female characters and put them in a metallic jacket and hoops so that the audience will like them right away. Things just hit better when it's more of an "If you know, you know," type of thing. Like Max watching Stacey's plane leave in 2010 as Stacey gazes down at the Thames in reference to the opening sequence...just like when Phil watched Kathy's plane leave in 1998 as Kathy gazed down at the Thames in reference to the opening sequence. It's like the more "iconic" the original scene is, the less effective the later allusion to it is. B&B and Y&R recreating their first scenes were perfect because we don't get hit over the head with how incredibly iconic those scenes were to begin with.
    • Ted has been too-good-to-be-true-on-the-surface guy from the get go. It's always these guys that end up having a secret mistress with 2 children on the side or are secretly bisexual and sleeping with men while they wifey thinks she is living the dream. Even the way Dani was talking about them in the beginning... I knew it was coming. The show was hinting at it. And it came.  I have nothing against the show writing a second affair, when it's used to present this exact type of message. That the two sisters end up dealing with a similar catastrophe. I would have had problems with it... if it was not written the way it is. But I have no problems with it right now. And I love how the focus is not just on the affair, but on Ted's overall character. His dark side. And, no, you don't need to be a serial killer or a lunatic with a knife to be a bad guy. Sometimes just making bad decisions that end up hurting your entire family makes you that.   
    • Oh, really? I didn't see that at all. Ted's only been loving and supportive, even with this reveal I still haven't seen anything too dark from him. Shitty father and husband, sure. My one nitpick is that they could have accomplished that without having another affair though. 
    • Remember post-ATWT how Brooke Alexander was in eight million commercials and home improvement shows?  She was the epitome of a millennial consumer surrogate. Meanwhile, Kelly Menighan worked the heck out of the short hairdo for years, and never got a beauty contract.  TBH, her whole vibe gave Midwest suburbs, as interpreted through the eyes of a Manhattan costume department with a network budget for designer goods. She was definitely sophisticated given her limited access to shopping at Lisa's Boutique in Oakdale.
    • Please register in order to view this content

      This is mine!

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Absolutely agree. Nicole's reaction to Ted, and Kat's reaction to Eva, will be interesting.
    • One tiny problem. Apparently she just inked a new deal. All it means, though, is that they will want to get some mileage out of her before they implement the DRW50 Master Plan. What do ya think? 6 months too short? 3 years def too long. A year and a half?
    • Your haughtiness amuses me in return. Like you think you know ALL?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy