Jump to content

Will you pay $1.99 for Peacock? Update!!! Blockbuster sale!!! Peacock at just $1.99 a month!!


Days of our lives on Peacock  

56 members have voted

  1. 1. Will you pay $4.99 to watch Days of our Lives on Peacock?



Recommended Posts

  • Replies 117
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

indeed! this always happens here in Brazil for an example, we Have Globoplay a Brazilian answer to Netflix, because it belongs to a TV Station we have accesse to several of it's Telenovelas from way back in the 1970's! and when it stopped only charging a modical tax it had major backlash but i understood why, they were retoring TV Shows over 40 years old, turning some old ones already on the arquives into HD QUality, adding some international shows, I'm watching Buffy The Vampire Slayer for the first time there for example, with the minus they're taking centuries to deliver the dubbed episodes though, but i think it's natural people dislike paying more despite improvement, what is making me angry is they're moving a 57 year old show to streaming just to force fans to subscribe to Peacock Premium and risking the show for some pennys because they don't even want to improve the show for that, they want people to pay the same cheap show they're getting on TV

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Amen!

It's kind of insulting to ask longtime fans to now pay for a poorly written show operating on a shoestring budget, that was free when it was better quality.

As much as I love soaps, some of them have been begging for cancelation they way they've been written and presented in the past 17-20 years. 

Edited by ironlion
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

They dug their own grave by not listening to their show's fans and let their egos/smart a$$ attitude rule.

Why hasn't Ron Carlivati said anything yet? Instead they had their director Scott McKinsey make a statement above the cancellation/move.

Edited by Soapsuds
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I've been subscribed to Peacock from day one just because I wanted to watch Days commercial free. Then I noticed their original programming is really strong so I've stuck around. I actually haven't watched Days in a few months, but I'm hopeful they do add classic episodes

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'm a big Astros baseball fan. They are currently playing on Peacock. A lot of Houston Astros fans thought the game was being played on the regular channel. They are throwing fits and saying they aren't paying $4.99 to watch the game. That's just for one time. No more Astros games are scheduled on Peacock.

Days is in deep trouble!

Edited by Soapsuds
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Peacock might not be tremendous, but it’s much better than some people here give it credit for.

There’s more original programming all the time, and a big library of NBC and Bravo shows. There are sporting events. There are complete series runs of shows like Downton Abbey.

I get it gratis because my cable is Xfinity/Comcast, but I’d pay the $4.99 if I didn’t.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think at a time where the country is likely headed towards another economic recession and where inflation is already problematic, shelling out an extra $4.99 a month doesn't look too appetizing for the average person. From the very sparse research that's been done on daytime audiences, they tend to be: (1). Older and thus less likely to purchase a streaming subscription or (2). Working/lower income, meaning every dollar counts for their wellbeing or they may not see adding yet another streaming subscription as necessary. 

If NBC/Peacock has the intention that DAYS is somehow going to create insane demand for that streaming service, that doesn't seem like a sound business strategy. We'll see of course. 

Edited by BetterForgotten
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

And from what I just saw, the person who wrote the original tweet is Canadian and will be unaffected (at least directly) by the decision to move to Peacock.

The daytime soaps industry needs to admit that a large section of their daily viewers are likely retirees on fixed incomes. The reality is that the US doesn’t have as generous a social safety net as Canada and many people have had to keep a tighter rein on their pocketbooks and wallets. 
If this person is so fixed on everybody chipping in to subscribe to Peacock’s paid tier, why doesn’t she start a Go Fund Me account to raise money and gift some subscriptions? Otherwise, she needs to mind her own business (which is free, by the way) and see to her own plans.

Soap fans can really be unproductive. Musing on soap specific message boards is one thing but sending trash takes onto internationally known microblogging social media sites is another thing altogether. 

Edited by DramatistDreamer
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

ITA with you and @ironlion but I understand how times have changed just as my own life and viewing habits have changed. As someone who used to be home all day when AMC and OLTL were still around (posting daily at SON), who is now someone who often works six days a week, twelve hour days at that, I have found comfort in creating my own viewing routine out of necessity. I’ve been watching DOOL on Peacock and B&B on Paramount for months now, typically late at night as I eat dinner and get ready for bed. Add Judy Justice on FreeTV to the list. I’m watching DOOL live as I type this because I’m off on Mondays and too tired to run errands lol. But I do feel for people who can’t work streaming platforms into their budgets and will be missing their story airing 5x/week at 1pm. Not to sound selfish at all, but programs airing during daytime hours are simply no longer of use to me unless I can watch them elsewhere at night or on the weekends. I could invest in an expensive DVR package, but I know good and well shows would just pile up unwatched when I find it so simple to watch on my iPad that I can tote into the bathroom when I’m showering or shaving. It sucks to have to pay, but at least there is the option. This is much better than cancellation which would put so many people out of work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I really have no problem with Kai as a character or with the actor. The problem is putting together two very nice people -- Kai and Trina. Neither of them has a bad side, neither of them has a devil on the shoulder, neither of them is impulsive. I think that's a problem in a soap relationship. Yeah, I agree. All this freaking out might make sense if Lulu wanted to do a tabloid expose on BLQ's LOVE CHILD. We have no indication that's the case.  
    • So Sonni would have somebody to talk to who she wasn't conspiring with (Will or Alan)? Alex kept telling Sonni how important her friends were...when she had virtually no friends. Instead they created loyal servants like Jane and Vera to give Alex people to play off of. They did that with Iris on AW, but Vivien was mostly there for comic relief Alex keeping Marah's paternity a secret was absurd. But I still love the scene between Alex and Alan where he convinces her by reminding her how they protected each other from their abusive father. Chris and Bev ATE that scene. Unfortunately, that took place only a few months before he exited the show...always thought they could have built on that, explored more how being Brandon's children screwed them both up. Maybe even used it as an explanation for the way their relationship could constantly swing from hatred to love. Instead of it being merely dictated by the plot.
    • The first one is Cass Winthrop dressed as Krystle Lake on Another World (not from his original creation of the character to hide from the loan shark Tony the Tuna, but at a romance convention trying to find out what had happened to Felicia who was missing). The second one is also Another World, Jake McKinnon as Doris although I don't recall what his purpose was.
    • I know there was one brief scene in the summer of 1989 where Lillian did mention Calla.. but in relation to her past relationship to Ross and it was to Roger while he was a patient at Cedars.  I think he was trying to pump her for information on Ross.. and for some reason, Calla's name came up.   I could see perhaps Beth mentioning that her mother Lillian was visiting Calla.. but not exactly giving any sort of details as to the going ons in Calla's life off screen.
    • Mac Scorpio and Kevin Collins, GH

      Please register in order to view this content

        Clips:

      Please register in order to view this content

          Jon Lindstrom did a zoom event on March 26, 2023 and talked about the  Kevin/Mac drag scenes.  quotes here: https://soaphub.com/general-hospital/news-gh/soap-hub-flashback-friday-jon-lindstrom-reveals-his-gh-drag-secret/
    • i saw someone post this (at the 3 minute mark) and theres a bunch ive never seen! if anyone knows the characters/shows i'd love to know! 

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • They're neither great nor terrible AFAIK, but it is more a question of the streaming numbers in this day and age vs. actual TV airings. The Chibnall era reminded me much more of the crisis years, but I do think it's a very real possibility now as well due to the streaming bubble collapse affecting the show and its prospects.
    • ANYTHING to get her off the screen..she COULD have been interesting if she and Van had a few face offs..(there was a mild one of her going back to work...but I wanted something meatier "Bitch, I am Vanessa Chamberlain and I don't take advice from someone who followed the..career path you did!" I did like Alex's outright disdain for her.
    • Thanks @Vee for the commentary.    I haven’t even watched this season yet after  I couldn’t get past the couple episodes last season…like it was too Disneyified for my taste, although I did think it was a least better than the Chibnall era (but so is a lot of things). I’ll probably go back and binge it now. Hoping this season ends on a high note. I did read the ratings are terrible. As it stands I’m beginning to feel like what long time DW fans felt with S26 in 1989.
    • Yes, they are all on contract. Next.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy