Jump to content

The Spin Off Thread


Paul Raven

Recommended Posts

  • Members

The Ropers lack of success is interesting in that the equivalent UK spin off 'George and Mildred' was a hit and TR followed that template just as Three's Company did from 'Man About the House'

Just shows how tricky it can be. Any insights Khan(or others)?

An interesting spinoff was Benson from Soap.

Soap was an adult satirical comedy and Benson a fairly standard sitcom. There was no relationship apart from Benson and even that character was softened.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 131
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

Three's Company also had the flop post-TC spinoff,  Three's A Crowd, whereas  the UK spinoff, Robin's Nest, ran for several years. 

I'm not sure if the writing was better, or if the  UK took those  characters into their hearts in a way that the US - in spite  of TC having a long run - did not. 

There were even several popular films for Man  About the House and George and Mildred. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Rhoda was good..when she was married and it was like a Mad about you for the 70s.  When they broke up, ratings did fall and the show became a pale version of Mary Tyler Moore.

Phyllis had a good start..but having a lead actress murdered in real life after a few episodes had filmed was an omen.  Had that not happened..I think it would have lasted beyond 2 seasons.

One the issues with spin offs is that the character is watered down in order to be the lead.  Rhoda, Addison on Private Practice (when she would visit Grey's, she was her old self), the Ropers, etc. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Actually, "Roxie" did make it to series, but I think it lasted only one or two episodes before CBS quickly yanked it from the schedule.

"Frasier" is maybe the most successful spin-off series of all time.  Tone-wise, it was more sophisticated than "Cheers," but it certainly earned a devoted following of its' own, thanks to the Niles/Daphne saga.

Granted, I've never seen "George and Mildred," nor can I presume to speak for anyone else, but I thought the Ropers, as written on "Three's Company," were a one-joke couple who couldn't support their own show.

"Three's a Crowd" failed, because Alan Campbell's surfer-dude chef character, T.Z., was super annoying; and Mary Cadorette, who played Jack's gf, Vicky, was a straight-up dud.

I'll agree that "Rhoda" was good, but only for the first season or so.  By the second season, it was clear the writers were having trouble writing for her, and for her and Joe.  (They REALLY got the casting for Joe wrong.)  In the end, many episodes wound up being centered around Brenda's neurotic love life.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Oh that's right - I always forget that Andrea Martin sitcom was the same as her K&A  character...I guess because they changed the name. 

Here's the premiere of George and Mildred. The premise is probably about the same as The Ropers, but I guess some things just don't translate. I also wonder if ABC starting to fall off by the time the show debuted didn't help. 

Please register in order to view this content

Many years ago I read a large book, from 1980 or so, about sitcoms, which would list each new sitcom from about 1950 on, and have longer writeups for certain sitcoms. They complained  about Rhoda because they said that Rhoda was just turned into Mary Richards, and Brenda became Rhoda.  And that by the end of the show, Brenda had also  become Mary, so who was Rhoda? 

I actually liked Joe, but marrying them off so  quickly was a mistake, and so was the divorce. I would have killed him.

By the end of the  show you had Rhoda's mother getting divorced and also going through a psychiatric crisis, and so on, and all I could think was, who really wants to see that? It's like an Alan Alda movie. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Certainly the UK sitcoms and their US equivalents were quite different and some translated better than others.

The whole class system that is the basis of George and Mildred doesn't really have an equivalent in the US and Yootha Joyce's Mildred is a world away from Helen Roper.

Rhoda slimming down and finding happiness did change the character and making her the Mary to Brenda's Rhoda did dilute the concept.

Again the constant changing of timeslots can't have helped.

It was launched behind Maude, giving it a protected slot to grow, which it did and ranked 6th

In season 2 it was moved up to 8pm Monday, with Phyllis folllowing, giving CBS a strong start to the evening. Rhoda was 7th and Phyllis 6th.

Season 3 started on Mon then CBS switched to Sunday at 8 and ratings fell.

Season 4 was Sunday at 8 Rhoda was 25th.

Season 5 Rhoda was moved to Sat where it died.

Maybe Mon at 8 was the ideal slot, but CBS was moving its sitcoms all over the place.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Is Lou Grant the only example of a spin off where a drama came out of a sitcom?

Sitcoms seem to be the breeding ground for spin offs, but can we recall any that were in other genres?

Knots Landing and The Colbys cover the soap genre.

The Law and Harry McGraw from Murder She Wrote. Although this is an example of an occasional character getting their own show, not a regular character doing so.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Peter S. Fischer never should have spun off Harry McGraw.  He was fine as a recurring character on MSW, but being the lead on his own, weekly series was just too much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

JAG spun off NCIS.

NCIS franchise: NCIS, NCIS: Los Angeles, NCIS: New Orleans, NCIS: Hawai'i

CSI franchise: CSI: Crime Scene Investigation, CSI: Miami, CSI: NY, CSI: Cyber, CSI: Vegas

Criminal Minds had two spin offs, Criminal Minds: Suspect Behavior and Criminal Minds: Beyond Borders.

Edited by kalbir
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Hahaha, yeah they really are.

NCIS is in its 19th season. JAG was on for 10 seasons (1 on NBC, 9 on CBS). It's crazy that the spin off has been on almost double the number of seasons of the parent show.

Edited by kalbir
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Joanie Loves Chachi from Happy Days.

4 episodes aired after Happy Days in a short season

The first episode was #2 for the week behind Dallas, even outrating its Happy Days lead-in.

It continued to do well so for Fall 82 ABC moved it to Thurs @8 to take on Magnum PI.

In Wk1 Magnum had a 2 hr premiere 23.1/37 while JLC could only muster a 13.5/23. That set the pattern and JLC was cancelled.

At least they got to return to Happy Days.

From Scott Baio

All the Happy Days people had written the first four episodes, when the show got picked up for series, but then they left to go back to Happy Days, and we were stuck with new writers who didn’t know us. So that was a problem. And then some of the people on the show had chemical issues, and that was a problem. It was just on and on and on, and it just sort of all crumbled and fell apart. In retrospect, if given the choice again, I would not have done that show. That was just the wrong idea. If I had to do it all over again, I would’ve waited ’til Happy Days was over until I did anything else.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Sorry, just realized I'd somehow lost a whole paragraph in that last post.
    • Thanks @Paul Raven  They should have brought Billy back in the early '90s for more drama with Hart and Blake. Maybe Blake would have gotten involved with him to try to ruin him in Roger's eyes, but realize under his sweet nature, Billy was a player himself.
    • Checked. Taggert last date, Wed, 7-19-23, so a long dadgummed time ago.
    • Please register in order to view this content

    • Watching the cult of Fetterman collapse is one of the few political bright spots for me. The best part  is watching all the people who built him up now decide they want to tear him down. I'll be fascinated to see how this ends for him. https://buckscountybeacon.com/2025/05/pennsylvanias-democratic-senator-john-fetterman-raises-alarms-with-outburst-at-meeting-with-union-officials/

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Long ago, this Rachel fan channel uploaded a number of clips of Rachel with Felicia during the alcoholism story, and this one in particular stands out for me. 

      Please register in order to view this content

      And then you have this scene, which is the dark mirror of the above, especially the final moment: Felicia started out as camp bitch on a very dreary show, and then got into a lot of comedy. Some of the comedy was very stupid, but many viewers still felt drawn to it, to Lily, Cecile, Cass, Felicia, Kathleen, Wallingford. There was a vibrancy which Dano fit well in, her fashions and melodrama parodied in a gentle way. This was missing in some of the long-suffering parts she had on shows like ATWT. By the late '80s, especially after Wallingford's death, those times were gone, and Donna Swajeski added further misery to Felicia with the Gold Street backstory. Luckily, after a bit of time the show found a good framing for this new twist on Felicia. The stories with finding and losing a love from her past, learning that a woman she hated was the daughter she'd spent years searching for, sinking into alcoholism, they all fit into the type of material suited for the '40s and '50s screen goddesses.  When Dano tried some of this old weepy type of material when she went back to ABC, it mostly fell flat, as the atmosphere wasn't the same and her character always felt shoehorned in. It worked perfectly at this period on AW because you had Iris, you had Rachel, you had Donna - you had a number of tough-but-vulnerable women of a certain age, most of them grandmothers by this point, but still trying to find love, find themselves. This is what AW could have had earlier if they hadn't dumped Pat and Alice, but better late than never. This is an approach you saw more often on British soaps than on US soaps, which for a number of years respected women in that age group. Both UK and US soaps have done away with this, both countries having the ladies devolve into perpetual ingenues (with added doses of endlessly self-aware camp in the UK) or just being shipped off entirely.  You could even see that on AW with the treatment of Iris (shipped off, never to be mentioned again, too old to return), Donna (repeatedly humiliated and crippled), Felicia (regressed into degrading herself with married John), Rachel (mother to newborn twins, put into lengthy periods of trauma through her new relationship with Carl). 
    • I'm of a certain age where I caught some of Upton's final year and it was not great but Jean Holloway was worse. All I remember is Bambi, Bambi, Bambi!
    • Yes, of course, all of those servants added to the overall picture at AW & also people had relationships with those servants! I like it when Anita asks after one of the servants at the club, how their children are doing & like that. 
    • Great scenes between Marlena and EJ today. Paula and Jeanne are making EJ have more depth than Ron had during his long drawn out tenure.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy