Jump to content

GH May 2020 Discussion


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Even back then, it came across that he loved Lucky and Laura, but he was always going to be out on the edge somewhat.  He was always going to be attracted to danger and excitement.

 

I think Labine did better by Luke (even if he did not agree), than Laura.  She became a little too domesticated as time went on, although I did enjoy the show back then.

 

I think if Tony pushing back against Labine gave us what we saw, it was the right decision.  His Luke was more rounded and was still Luke, but older and a little wiser.  The fact that he couldn’t just pick up and run gave him a tension to play.  Guza over time just let him be an [!@#$%^&*] that hated Laura and the responsibility of his family.

 

Also- I am pretty sure I have read quotes from him about that clause in his contract.  Never that he could redo a scene to change the intent, but that he could rewrite the dialogue to fit Luke.  So his comments about that are interesting.

 

I do admit to missing Luke.  But the Luke I really miss wasn’t what he was by the time he left the show.  The last time I saw a glimpse of the real Luke was when Laura woke up from her catatonic state.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 62
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

Yeah, I was shocked to see any threads being made...except for DAYS of course which probably will make it to the end of the year.

 

Let's hope they get more creative with the flashbacks then.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Here's a clip with three examples for you @Darn - both hit and miss.

 

The first flashback in the clip - Brando and Molly hooking up - is probably the usual, normal kind of flashback you'd expect to see on a soap and imo fits into the scene well.

 

The second flashback with Sam randomly having a flashback to a conversation with Jordan while grabbing a coffee cup  (lol) is an obvious insert.

 

And in normal times it would definitely not be necessary for Molly to have a minute long flashback about her and TJ deciding that they would become domestic partners before telling her sisters that that is what she and TJ had decided.

 

Please register in order to view this content

 

Edited by Dion
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

Thanks! Yikes this is worse than JER! At least they planned for those! You can tell the Molly one was meant to go into a break or cut to another scene so it sort of works like you said but the others are super random.

 

This is just a sign they care very little about the pacing or structure of these shows. They are just time fillers for network TV.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

Which is bullshit, because until 1999 or so he fought very hard for the opposite, and was very passionate when discussing it in public. What changed BTS is debatable, but not confirmed public record. He proceeded to do a slow 180 over the next fifteen years.

 

The bottom line IMO is Tony never got over losing the darker Bill Eckert character, and other career opportunities for different types of roles. So he began to channel that concept of Eckert (which he used to expound on a lot - go back and look) and those other energies into the latter-day Luke, regardless of how inconsistent that was with his past work, the role or his dedication to character integrity. He kept claiming it was just being 'honest' about who Luke was, but he couldn't even be honest with himself about his own prior take on Luke or the character he'd spent his career defining and protecting. The darkness in Luke and in his upbringing had coexisted with his dedication to a better life for his wife and children. It existed in tandem, but never eclipsed one half of him until 2003-onward.

 

That being said: Tony and JJ clearly rewrote all their scenes a few years ago during his exit storyline, and it was the first time GH had felt like its true self in a long, long time. The dialogue was so far beyond the rest of Frank and Ron's show it was jarring.

Edited by Vee
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

He did start morphing into a Luke/Bill hybrid.
 

There is no denying he had some issue with Labine’s interpretation though.  She even commented about it during her We Love Soaps interview.  So some aspect of what we saw was a compromise between her ideas and his wish to not make Luke a traditional dad/husband/person.  I still think that he was pretty great at that point, and loved his place on the show.

 

The problem for me was when he started turning awful, around the introduction of Nikolas, nobody was allowed to call him out.  Sure Bobbie would call him paranoid, but the Cassadines were up to something. What I really needed was someone who was a friend of Laura’s to tell him she was victimized by her time on the island, and all he can see is his own pain and ego.  She is not defying you to want a relationship with her son.  She is fighting a deep personal wrong on many levels.  But after Tiffany left, Mary Mae died and Justice let her go on trial for a murder he committed, there was a real lack of support for Laura.
 

When they brought on Ethan was when he lost me.  We watched the show.  There was no way Luke, at that point, would have cheated on Laura.  Not the versions we had been watching, even with the gap in their history.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think the darker Luke of '96-'98 was very compelling. I felt some moments went too far but overall the core of the character remained. You could believe he was reacting to his family disintegrating. Further, at that time Tony still spoke publicly with passion about Luke's deep love and commitment to his family. He didn't fully abandon that line or his stance on Laura until around the late 2000s - he used to call himself the proud guardian of Luke and Laura's love with Genie gone. But he's been revising his own beliefs ever since.

 

Luke did have a wonderful moment early in the Cassadine revival story when they broke the news about Nikolas to Lucky, where he sternly told Lucky his mother went through hell years ago on the island, had lived with her secret for years, and they needed to support and not judge her. I've never forgotten that.

Edited by Vee
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

From what I can remember, he didn’t really start trashing the couple until after the story with Laura waking up from her catatonic state the first time, for the wedding anniversary.  I also remember him saying things like Vee mentioned.

 

By the time she came back after waking up permanently for that other short story, it seemed like nobody was happy.  I wish they had just left her asleep until the show actually intended to keep her around.  Because that story was so strange, and really kind of set the tone that Luke would rather be with Tracy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yes, he didn't start the revisionist myth on L&L until after that (bad) story in '05. During promotion of that anniversary he remained very complimentary. I think he realized the pairing with Tracy was actually working (for awhile at least) and went off the spool.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't remember him trashing them till after the "Laura wakes up" story either. That was also around the same time that was he was fully in on the relationship with Tracy and that they brought back Robert and Holly and when he first met Anna. That all seem to lead to Tony Geary deciding Luke needed to regress back into the old days where he was just out for money and could just pick up and take off with Robert. Those events- along with bad writing and him changing his mind on L&L- lead to the next decade of mediocre to bad stories. Things like Ethan, him running over Jake, him fooling around with Anna and various hookers, and the idea that he was playing same time next year with Holly for all of the 80s and 90s. None of it meshed with what we had seen on the screen and was clearly just driven by him chasing after some version of Luke that didn't exist except in his mind. His final story where it was obviously suppose to be Bill Eckert but either him or Ron got mad and it changed is another example. At this point in time, I honestly feel like they should have just killed him off during that story where he got shot him with the poison bullet. That I think would have been a fitting end for him. Instead, I think that lead into yet another "adventure" where Luke and Holly/Tracy/Anna/Laura (I can't remember which one it was at this point) ran around the world chasing some mystery person. It just got absurd, at least to me. 

 

I admit that I found Luke and Tracy amusing at the beginning at when they were just using each other and he was really after Skye. They never should have let them become a real legitimate couple but that's what Tony Geary wanted I guess. At some point too, Tony Geary clearly decided that he was only going to "show up" in scenes or stories with people he deemed worthy of him. Go back and watch scenes of how lazy he acts in scenes with people like Greg Vaughan and Emme Rylan vs. how he acted in scenes with people like Jane Elliot, Jackie Zeman, Jonathan Jackson, and the other GH vets. It's night and day. 

 

I agree that Laura really suffered from losing all of her support. Even now, I feel like Laura has no support outside of Lulu. Does Laura have any friends? Even if we don't see them onscreen together, you can at least assume people like Felicia & Lucy and Felicia & Anna are still friends. Who are Laura's friends? 

 

I also agree that Luke also suffered from nobody calling him out ever, outside of Bobbie. At a certain point in time, characters like Lucy, Sonny, and Alexis would have done it but that all faded over time. When he started to turn dark, they definitely could have used like Mary Mae or Tiffany to tell him to think about Laura's feelings. Obviously they weren't options, but they could have had it be someone like Monica or even Bobbie. That was definitely a missing beat, even if the story was still good and Luke going down that path was a compelling at the time. Like most GH stories, it didn't start to fall apart till way later.

 

This went back to before he started trashing Luke & Laura, but the constant need for him to have a new love interest was also I think damaging to him in the long run. Him being with like Holly, Tracy, and Skye were one thing, but them trying to pair him with Felicia and Anna was just so wrong. 

Edited by AdelaideCate007
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Really enjoyed today’s episode. Even though things have been happening, today seemed different, like it somehow seems more interesting than usual. It reminded me of one of those episodes that we saw when Dan first started writing.

 

Not sure about Ava and Nikolas. The actors do have chemistry but it doesn’t really feel like it’s romantic chemistry. They might be better off as just rivals or maybe friends. But the seeds are still being planted for their storyline and if it breaks up Liz and Franco, I’m all for it.

 

I did like that they remembered Francophrenia. It reminded me how much I actually liked James Franco in the role and how much I wish Franco hadn’t been recast or “redeemed” 

 

Sam is a selfish douchebag and I hope Kristina rips her a new one tomorrow. 

 

And just for the record, it is NOT Jordan’s fault that Molly slept with Brando. The blames lies with Molly and only Molly. 

Edited by AbcNbc247
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

Curtis and Laura are friends, he's probably the closest friend she's had since Mary Mae.

 

And Carly and Laura are close now too, though it's usually more Laura supporting Carly than the other way round. Carly does become somewhat of a decent human being when she is with Laura and actually felt bad for keeping Nikolas' return a secret from Laura.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I think the party reveal was what made them recast Ted since they saw he couldn't handle it and the fallout. It'll be interesting to see if the same will happen once Martins secret and the ensuing fallout is set to happen - it might give an indication with how far their patience for green newbies is. 
    • Is Tomas a main character? Are Ashley & Derek tasked with doing any heavy lifting? Are they onscreen everyday or are they recurring characters? 
    • Oh, really? Did Tomas leave for his home planet? How about Ashley or Derek? I got time.
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Which isn't saying much because he's still the worst actor on the show...
    • The show is definitely trying to make Lulu seem like she's wrong and Brook Lynn is being tormented.  I just don't really see it that way.  Lulu really hasn't done anything except confront BLQ.   She hasn't told anyone, Chase already knows, and she's writing an article about adoption.  Everyone is jumping down her throat for something Lulu actually has a personal investment in.  Brook Lynn's freakout about a newspaper article on adoption is way more suspicious than Lulu just writing a story about it lol. Chase is coming off ridiculously self-righteous too.  Telling Dante to make Lulu stop while lying to him about his child.
    • I do like that they seem to be pushing ahead with Dante and Lulu as opposed to what I feared would be an overly-long wait for a reunion. But while Lulu has always been rash and at times self-righteous, the story does feel skewed towards FV's faves (Setton vs. Laura's kids).
    • The fact that Lois brought Gio to Brook Lynn's wedding, encouraged him to stay in town, then decided he should live at the Q's make her look dim and like she was asking to get caught lol. I still strongly dislike this story, but the performances have been good.  Like you said Gio finally has a story and Dante will get something to do besides playing house with Sam on the backburner.
    • @Maxim

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • I'm up to 300. About 12 episodes left of the Barnes.  The development of the Prescott family has been the big event in the last few months of episodes I've watched. Jerry Timms as Gil is a nice addition as the show's new young stud. I like when the villains start out as deeply human and just generally flawed individuals like Gil, and early Nancy. Something the show does well is the sorta low level conflict that can generate with things like Gil's carefree playboy "life of the party" lifestyle interfering in the day to day happenings of him and his family. Gil is a shameless flirt and orders a beer or three when he is on lunch from the construction site. I think the conflict between himself and his father, Jason, is compelling even if I'm not sold on Read Morgan. If Morgan was a local talent, I think I might be more generous, but Morgan had a bit of primetime credits I believe. Jason, like Gil, isn't a one woman man so the internal conflict within the Prescott clan is ripe for drama. Yet, there are definitely flaws. Gil's relationships with Sheila Carter, a recast Vicki Lang, and Deena Greely seem to unattached to the larger story that I am not invested. Donna Denton isn't bad as Deena, but she lacks a bit of presence to carry the story in Mitch Dunbar's absence; she is now Mitch's law partner. Gil's flirtation with a married Lori was interesting and appeared to be done to build conflict between Gil and Russ, who seems to be heading in Renee Crawford's Marianne Prescott's direction now that Becky is out the door. Crawford slides right into the role of Lori's friend and Russ' love interest well even if Becky was (at least in the pre-Barnes) episodes more compelling as a woman who had deeper flaws than Marianne. Marianne's inner conflict has some legs if it goes anywhere. With her mother Corrine's passing, Marianne has assumed the mantle of the woman in her father's life and defacto mother to her restless, reckless brother Gil. At present, Marianne is putting her graphic design dreams on hold to work at Prescott Development, sacrificing her own desires for the "greater good" fo the Prescott men. I feel like Marianne is the kind of girl that Carrie Weaver will love and unintentionally terrorize with her overbearing, nearly incestual love for her son, Russ. If Chris Auer hadn't jumped ship to the writing team (his scripts are strong so I'm not mad), I would have liked to seen Francis pining for Marianne to complete the assumption of Becky's role in the lives of the men Becky knew (and who loved her).  The complete revision of the Vicki character with the recast and pairing her with Gil is odd. It is basically a new character. Laura Leigh Taylor's Vicki was more conservative and business focused while the new Vicki is more outgoing and lively. I don't hate the new actress but it's such a dramatic shift in characterization and I'm not clear why. I know a later character (Stacey Phillips) assumes the characterization of Taylor's Vicki Lang, but I don't think that occurs until a few months into Jason Vining's work. I also just cannot see Taylor's Vicki giving Gil the time of day when she constantly rejected Peter.  The quad between newly arrived developer Jason Prescott, recently widowed Terry, Terry's old friend Dr. Alex Greely, and Jason's corporate attorney Sharon Landers is equally weak. Alex comes off as desperate. Robert Burchette is more than serviceable in the role of friend and the lovelorn colleague, but Alex's jealousy of Jason doesn't work for me. I don't get the sense the friendship has run that deep, but maybe it does for Alex. The actress playing Sharon lacks the bravado to sell Sharon as this shark who kills it in the boardroom and could tear apart the moral Terry. I like that Jason's relationships with Terry and Sharon echo Gil's own bad boy behavior that Jason constantly chatisizes Gil for, but I do wish there was some angle here to root for other than praying that Terry decides to enter the convent.  As I was reflecting on the Prescotts, I can see why Vining makes some of the changes he does. Jason isn't a bad character, but Read Morgan doesn't work in the role. Recasting probably would have worked given the show's large canvas involved in the city planning of Kingsley from the political and business angles, but as the show delves deeper into the criminal underworld, I can see why Jason was just dropped. Also, it would have been more interesting if Jason's wife wasn't dead, but had divorced him ages ago and was living in abroad to pop up as a conflict down the line, which is ultimately what happened with Dave and Kate Phillips. On a side note, Dave has been offscreen for most of the tailend of the Barnes run reconciling with his either estranged or ex-wife, I cannot remember which.  The Prescott Development stories are bizarre. You have the antics of Gil slowly turning Peter to the dark side (a story that would have worked better with Nancy as the devil on Peter's shoulder) which is obviously built to give conflict between Jason and Terry. Simiarly, Gil's romance of Alex's niece Deena seems to set up animosity between Jason and Alex over their child and defacto child. I just cannot invest in Terry and Jason. Not that I want Alex and Terry, but Jason is just not working for me. I get we are going for the gruff widower who works in construction with a strong belief in the Lord, but I just don't think Jason projects the image of romantic lead. It's reminiscent of Bert Kramer as Alex Wheeler for me.  The story the Cavalares family is insane. Dom Cavalares is the drunk single father of teenage Donna. Donna is friends with Jill and they smoke some weed together before Donna ends up being taken into the Cummings home because when her father gets drunk he gets physically abusive. The scene of a drunk Dom breaking into the Cummings' home and attacking Donna is wild. It is a terrifying sequence where Dom comes in raging to get his daughter back with the Cummings' girls (Liz, Jenny, and Jill) and Donna present before Jeff comes in and gets knocked out by Dom. I think it ends with Donna being dragged away. I cannot imagine any show doing that in the past two decades.  In some ways, I suspect that the Barnes might have dusted off Roy Winsor's projection for the Jeff Cummings story and used them as the inspiration. When Jason learns Dom is a drunk, Dom ends up going to AA, which was the original story direction before Jeff was saved by the light. The bookstore angle quickly faded before being shifted to Jill to give her something to do. The set up for the Cummings' turning their home into a halfway house was probably the spinoff idea. I don't think its terrible, but it's not working in the larger scale of the show's canvas. I appreicate the attempts to rectify the Jeff story by having Dom turn to AA (offscreen), but I would have liked it more if we actually saw some more regret from Jeff over what he had done. Beth Slaymaker's role in this story is intriguing. As the judge handling Donna and Dom's situation, it is clear that she has a bit of sympathy for Dom that she might not have had if she hadn't given up Jill when she was younger.  The Jill-Peter romantic angle never developed the way I expected it to. Jill's "transformation" leading to more interest from both Gary and Peter feels dated by modern standards, but was probably a popular trope for the time. I think Jill has stopped appearing now that Beth has bought her the book store. I cannot say I am sorry to see her go because I don't think they knew what to do with her. Jill was such an abrasive character who I didn't like as a person, but who made sense. She was just exhausting in larger doses. Seidman was much more appealing as Jill's persona softened.  The Redlons reunion has been odd. I don't remember if it was earlier and included in my last post, but Carla nearly runs off with Jimmy in a sequence that is very well done and tense. I don't think Carla and Gene work completely. Both actors are wonderful, but I don't like how they play the duo. Carla's career should have her being pulled in directions (which it does, at times) but I think its such an odd choice to play this story in isolation of the Russ-Becky marriage. Gene's political career isn't my favorite story, either, but that's more because I don't care for Jason. I'll do a separate post later about the Carpenters with Nancy and the end of Becky and Russ' marriage. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy