Jump to content

Greatest Soap of All Time?


Recommended Posts

  • Members

ATWT, Y&R, GH, AMC, GL, and DAYS feel like the right top six, in any order, with AW and/or OLTL right there behind. If we were doing a top 10, the other two spots would be harder choices, with TEON, SFT, and maybe even B&B vying for spots. I get a sense that RH and SaBa had amazing peaks but couldn’t sustain them over time.

 

I dunno: the ‘90s were rough for almost everyone, but it feels like it’s a toss-up between Y&R, GH, and DAYS in terms of either impact or sustained acclaim. I almost think their ability to navigate the ‘90s would make them a solid top three (or top four with ATWT). For me, there just isn’t much to consider at all post-1999, save for a few good stretches here and there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 69
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

 

Definitely agree. If we focus by decade, DAYS' buzz and shaking up of the genre (for better of worse, long term) cannot be ignored. 

 

Interesting you said Y&R for 70's. I wasn't around during that time but I can see your point. It seems by the 70's, the distinction for "most influential and/or popular" is up for grabs, as you had ATWT as No. 1, but Another World and Days tying them a couple years, but the late-70's upswing of AMC and GH

 

Indeed they were. Ratings were up nearly across the board in '93 and '94 (before June of 1994....) versus their 91-92 numbers, save for AMC which enjoyed numbers in the 7's during 91-92. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I thought OLTL declined *very* sharply after around ‘94, and McTavish’s first HW stint at AMC was wildly uneven (that’s just IMO - I know many disagree). Not that GH didn’t have major ups and downs, but I thought it had a stronger overall decade than the other ABC soaps. But everyone became mortally wounded in some way around 95-97 and ‘98 was really bad for everyone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I agree that things got real rough around 1998.

 

 GH did have a strong decade in the 1990’s compared to the rest of ABC.  

I even think the stuff with Riche as EP but before Labine was pretty good.  I was all in on Karen/Jagger/Brenda/Jason as a teen, and the original Ryan story.  Once Labine arrived the show just became even better, and the first round of Guza was great too.  Only when he came back after Sunset Beach did I start to think it was just too dark all the time, and it got even worse once he came back without Riche.  That period he was gone though, after Culliton’s first six months and the team after him was pretty bad.

 

I think AMC lost some of its footing once Behr was gone, and OLTL had the strangest decade. GH went realistic (for the most part) and dark and was a critical darling and took back the top spot of ABC’s ratings.  AMC went kind of all over the place but felt like AMC for the most part.  But the 1990’s on OLTL were wild.  We had the end of the Rauch era, then Gottlieb/Malone, then JFP, all within less than 10 years.  That’s three wildly different eras of storytelling and as a viewer it really wore me down on that show.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...
  • Members

Hey there!

 

i started watching in 1984 but I have seen a lot of episodes prior to that and am completely familiar with the story from its beginning. I think ATWT was excellent from 1956-1980 and ok from 1981-1984. However, during the years 1985-1993, which were obviously the Marland years, I felt like the show was at its best-written. One of the reasons was because it richly incorporated its past into the current storyline better than any soap ever has. So, those years were the best in my opinion because it used all the great writing that had gone before while still having great current  characters, dialogue and storylines. To me, what makes a great soap is not not just good writing. Any show from any genre can have that. But only daytime soaps can have great writing that incorporates (and doesn’t ignore) decades of backstory. ATWT simply needed to be on for decades to get to that point, its zenith, in those Marland years. None of the writers after Marland could do that or wanted to do that. Although I find the story excellent in prior years, especially years 1956-1961 and 1969-1976, I didn’t list those years because I found ATWT a bit dry compared to the other soaps/time periods I listed. 1985-1993, however, is when it all came together and was daytime drama at its finest. Yes, ATWT’s heyday was in the years prior ratings-wise but I never consider ratings when deciding on what’s best. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Many of the TV soaps that had a period where they became a phenomenon with viewers and broader media attention. No one soap was the greatest IMHO.

 

Edge of Night in late 60s esp. under Henry Slesar (had a huge male audience)

Dark Shadows from Barnabas reveal through about a year before cancellation.

GH under Gloria Monty/Pat Faulken Smith

Days (James Reilly's first head writing stint around Marlena's possession) and earlier when Marlena was murdered but it was her twin.

ATWT for decades at number 1 from the early years till 70s

GL for longevity and under Marland, then later Pam Long had a huge resurgence despite being up against GH

AMC and YR for consistency of vision and top ratings under Nixon and Bell, respectively. through 80s

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I'd say just the opposite - conflict means they will find out and then be at odds. For the limited amount of time people on this show have conflict (if they aren't named Nina or Ric, I guess).
    • Totes mcgoats (aka I agree). But, now the character needs to move forward.  Clyde's exit was 12/11/24.  It is May.  She and Chad have been on one date. I don't think they've slept together. And she was only planning on sticking around for a year.
    • That is one of the best insults I've heard in a long time.  I burst out laughing when Kat called Eva that.  LOL Their scenes, of course, were really good.  Colby and Ambyr have so much chemistry.  The only thing I'd change is Kat saying "you're dead to me."  That's a phrase usually said about someone you care about.  I would've preferred something like "You will never be my sister," or something similar to that.  Nice contrast at the end with both mothers/daughters:  Kat comforting/consoling her mother, and Eva being locked out by her mother.  Yeah, I wasn't a big of fan of the singing either, especially after your daughter's life has been destroyed.  What?  LOL And I also agree with those that thought Dana/Leslie's scenes with the Dupree's didn't feel right since Eva is not a Dupree....unless she is.  But as of right now, she's not. 
    • Trisha Mann-Grant, Ambyr Michelle, Sean Freeman are destined for bigger and better things. They need to move on as soon as their initial contracts are done.
    • Daphnée Duplaix and Trisha Mann-Grant on Instagram live, 5/5/2025 just concluded, saved here https://www.instagram.com/p/DJSsYb7PDv8/                
    • I really need to see Anita in a scene that isn't with a family member. In fact, I would have preferred that she would have gotten rid of the mob and had a one on one with Leslie to lay down the law with her.  I'm going to say it, Mike Manning has been completely lifeless on this show. Other than people's superficial fondness for him, I don't get what they see in him as an actor. I never saw him on DAYS though. The show had another really strange cut right before the opening credits where it looked like they almost cut off Nicole mid-sentence.  Kat/Eva are carrying this show on their backs. Lock them in for lifetime contracts, I beg.
    • There's a 1980 scene of Victor and Katherine in the Chancellor Estate living room where they went over a contract that would put Victor in charge of Chancellor Industries, but it was rewritten that Katherine brought Victor to Genoa City so he could run Chancellor Industries.
    • Put me in the minority in being happy about Cat not being Abby. After the two adult recasts played tag with the role, it's time for a few years of rest. I have a huge list of things I hate about RC's writing, but that choice was not one of them. 
    • Except she never worked there at all and barely even knew where the Chancellor Industries plant was located  In 1980, Kay attempted to install Derek Thurston (her third husband) in a position at Chancellor Industries.  The show introduced a character named George Packard who'd supposedly been running Chancellor since Phillip's demise in 1975.  (George Packard's storyline in 1980 was attempting to keep Derek Thurston from bankrupting the company.)   We didn't hear much of anything about Chancellor Industries for the next twenty-five years.  Then, at that point, we met Eliot Hampton (?) who'd been running the company for decades and had been embezzling from it.  Jill took it upon her herself to oust Eliot Hampton (?) and take control of the company.  That's when Kay became actively involved in the management of the company.  From 1974 till 2004 Kay Chancellor was strictly a hands-off owner.  It was downright absurd that the last ten years of life, she was written as this formidable businesswoman who'd always been involved in Chancellor Industries.  
    • Well, it's going to be something when he finds out the truth.  Agreed.  On that note, I can't until it all comes out. I find Lulu to be ridiculous. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy