Jump to content

Facts of life Reboot


John

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 124
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

 

 

All of the girls had the potential to be interesting personalities.  It's easy to see why the show went with the Blair vs. Jo dynamic but whenever I look back at the original iteration of the series, I see shades of the Blair/SueAnn dynamic and find it to be quite interesting.

Nancy was sort of a Type A personality but I guess that may not have been enough to distinguish her from Blair?  I think this was a case of the sheer number of characters may have worked against Felice Schachter. 

It's weird but when I look back Cindy's tomboy tendencies seemed different from Jo's tomboyish-ness.  But again, television doesn't really allow for many subtleties and FOL decided to go with a more "on the nose" version of tomboyish-ness in Jo's working class "grease monkey" to Cindy's version, that might have introduced the idea of complex sexual identities that the show/network clearly wasn't ready to deal with. 

One thing that was evident from the beginning was the bond between Natalie and Tootie and the fact that they took those ridiculous rollerskates off Tootie's feet in the 2nd iteration of the series could only be described as a good thing.

Molly Ringwald's character was cute as a button but again, there were so many characters as to render the show chaotic and Molly just didn't seem to be a character that was suitably developed. It all worked out for Ringwald, who went on to be the 80s movie teen queen though. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

Because, the writers of that episode hadn't watched the show from the beginning, and they were too lazy to do the research.  Plain and simple.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

Wasn't there that episode where Tootie had found a small group of black students at a nearby campus and was trying to discover her blackness, began to wear dashikis and had temporarily isolated herself from the rest of her Eastland colleagues?

I realize that I've really only seen it once in reruns during a FOL marathon last year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

Oh, IA.  I meant that there was definitely a reference point to draw on with a whole entire episode about it.  Even if it was meant to show that her Eastland colleagues accepted her, that would be a different idea from how Tootie actually felt-- that she needed something more culturally.  The seeds were there because there was an entire episode about it. It would've been valid to have an expansion on those ideas and reflect on what it truly meant from Tootie's perspective. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

That ALWAYS irritated me. That and a lot of other things about the episode. But to be fair, when the 'other girls' interacted with the girls I don't really ever remember much of them interacting with Jo, but I could be forgetting about small scenes. It still irritated me though and as Khan said, clearly they had no familiarity with the earlier version of the show, or didn't care. It was a plot point for Jo, as it had become "The Jo Show" for a while at that point. Everything revolved around her.

 

I forgot about that episode. But yeah, that's a good point. Would have been nice to follow up on that, especially when Tootie is so dismissive of Eastland in the series finale.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

I hated that too 

Please register in order to view this content

  It made no sense since all those girls were technically "there" the entire time at Eastland and frequently popped up in the first few seasons. 

 

Looking back at the first year, I always thought Molly Ringwald was the weakest link, ironically. Her delivery of her lines was terrible, like she had a mushy mouth. She was a bad actress at the time. 

 

Of the original cast that was discarded, I liked Felice Schachter (Nancy) the most. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

I mean, Molly was cute. I thought she delivered some of her lines well but yeah I can agree. But you can see star in her regardless, IMO. Though I have to admit I think she's a bit overrated.

 

I agree about Felice. I liked her the most too. 

 

And, maybe not a popular opinion, but I found Kim Fields was fairly bad at times. Her mom was too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I am a Gay Man - and I remember an episode with Cindy and someone told her not to hug a girl like that.  That girls shouldn't hug a girl that way.  I still remember thinking...is that me?  That's me.  I want to hug a guy like that.  And someone saw Cindy touch a girl like that and - what does that mean about me?  It's so weird that I remember something like that, which may not have happened.  I just remember something like that.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I need to watch this show again.  I remember Cindy hugging someone and someone telling her not to hug another girl like that.  I remember it being cindy so it was the first season.  I had no idea it was the first episode. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I agree. I really have enjoyed this story from the beginning. I feel like it needed the time for us to care about Doug. They've done a nice job of explaining his motives and making me care for him. I still feel like he's doomed and Vanessa will end up being a widow and now I'm invested in that *not* happening now that I've fallen for him. Friday was good but so was the entire week. I think they're doing such a nice job of keeping things moving. We got good movement with Bill's story this week, Chelsea is attempting to date, Andre and Dani are having tough conversations about their relationship, of course Anita reunited with Sharon. There is *so* much going on and I didn't even cover all of it.  I wish all of the soaps would take a page out of BTG book and start rotating their stories. I love that everybody is getting a chance to shine and they don't just sit on one lead story to the point you get sick of it. 
    • Did Jordan Clarke have a departure sometime between 1985 and 1989? I know Robert Newman had three runs: 1981-1984, 1986-1991, 1993-end.
    • Well, they usually weren't on the show at the time for long until the late 90's. But yeah, they really deserved a story centered on them, and not through the lens of Reva.
    • Chelsea was doing the absolute most today! Why was she introducing her sister to a woman she doesnt know? That whole scene was embarrassing. Madison needs to stay away from her bc she is too immature
    • Gosh, what a waste with Lunacy. Why have her live with $B, reveal Finn, pardon her, etc What makes this story incredibly hollow is that what Luna is asking isn't unreasonable - to spend time with her cousin father. She's not asking to move in with them. How hard with it be for Finn to throw her a bone by, say, I'll meet you for lunch/coffee once at week at the hospital cafeteria. Lunacy isn't going to hurt Finn. In fact, all her crimes were related to finding her father and it turns out to be someone she's loved her entire life. Instead of course-correcting the nonsense of last summer, Brad somehow found a way to make this worse! That's a skill... Of all the younger actors B&B has cast during the past 5 years, LY has shown the most growth and range. Why get rid of her? 
    • On the subject of sets (seems more interesting to discuss than the actual show)  Some sets we don't see anymore Lauren/Michael apartment (haven't seen that in years) Victoria's house (are Marian/Tessa living there?) Apartment above Crimson Lights (I think Chelsea was the last resident) Penthouse (Lily's home) Chancellor Estate (Devon/Abby) Chancellor office (once Dark Horse) Nick's house GCAC room (used as residence/hotel room for several characters) Some of these may pop up again. The tack house,for example, was not seen for many months before being used again. Have I missed anything?
    • Thanks for searching through everything. Worked on them so long, just too lazy to check for those links myself, so I am glad you chose to do it! I guess I never did type out anything for 1973-1977 in regards to the preemptions, but they are on the charts at least (and this far back, they don't seem to do any of those "breakouts" anymore, so things are simpler in the 1970's, so eventually I could type those out). 
    • I dump on the Y&R sets problem all the time, but BOLD is no better -- and they're not even introducing new sets. All of their sets are years old, and very few look like they're inhabited by people with money. Is that going to change with this move? I'd rather they save the money spent on another remote, which is no better than an HGTV travelogue, and get some new/better sets.
    • The donut posts here make up for a Friday show that was barely meh. Aside from seeing Anna, I really didn't care much about anything else. While I understand the thought behind breaking up all the sadness with "other scenes," I'd rather they moved right to John's funeral. Instead of hearing a stupid story about John changing some minor character's tire 20 years ago, just move on to the crying. I also thought the Chad and Cat scenes were a waste. I realize not everyone is devastated by John's death to the point of not functioning, but going sky diving is a choice. By the way, Jack and Jennifer are giving me nothing on this return. Please leave asap. DAYS did such a great job with John's death, so ending the week this way was a letdown.
    • Add Dr. Montgomery to list of fine women on this show! I hope the show goes forward with Madison/Chelsea and then once they're developed, bring back Allison, who is now divorced or a widow, for a Madison/Chelsea/Allison triangle.  It would definitely be the hottest triangle in daytime.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy