Jump to content

Y&R actress out


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 264
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

 

None of the young white actors paraded around during Bryton's tenure were nearly as successful as him either (with the exception of MG who failed his fair share of stories while having the added beat of phyllis's to play in every story he  had while BJ didn't have Dru).  Doesn't that mean BJ is the best of the lost. 

 

Agree to an extent. I think the pairing with Hilary helped grow the character up. Made viewers see him as a possible romantic  partner for other ladies. You're spot on there.  But I can't give her credit for how he comes across, good or bad, in business scenarios. The guy has to own something. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yeah, what I can say is once I saw her with him I was able to take him a bit more seriously as a businessman. Seeing him juggling female drama and work put things in a different light. Would it be the same with Abby, hell no. It'd be Teen Ricky and Lucy at the Copa.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

Something similar happened with the Noah character, who was always better as a child/adolescent character but when he reached adulthood got a lot of poorly written storylines and odd pairings that flopped.

 

 

Speaking of parallels, Hilary did fill that role that Sharon used to occupy, the villified character that TPTB would plunck down in any storyline that was failing because the actress (MM and SC) is so versatile that they both can lift just about any sagging storyline.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think both Adamson and Ordway were cast because JFP knew and liked them from Hollywood Heights. But there was no actual plan for a character or what to do with them. I think he was more talented than her, but his character never went anywhere. Abby and Noah (and to a lesser extent Kyle, who knows about the latest one) exist(ed) to be male and female story/romance widgets on the show. They are not actual fleshed out characters, and they are not played by actors capable of elevating mediocrity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

I get it, Hilary makes you take him more seriously. I've noticed that they dress him differently when he's with her versus not. When he was with Mariah,Devon's suits diappeared. Once he started back being pushed more into Hilary's orbit again, the suits reapoeared. 

 

Adult Noah's role on the show seemed more to be Sharon's support than a character in his own right. Mariah often times feel the same way. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Abby gets a decent amount of airtime, and has a lot of connections. I think that her and Devon would get decent airtime if they show decided to put them together. Especially if they slow burned the relationship and had her support him after losing him losing Hilary. 

 

I think that one of her biggest problems she's had with men in the past if that she was in lot of situations where she was either in triangles with them with her relatives/ex relatives. And/or they dated her relatives/ex-relatives. (Victoria, Nikki, Ashley, Sharon, etc...).... Devon hasn't dated a lot of her family members like that and I think that he could be a nice change of pace for her.(I like her with Arturo too though he has already been involved with Nikki and was mixing it up with Summer the other day.) In addition to seeing a nice chemistry between them, I think that she's doing a nice job as Abby. (I love her devotion to Ashley and how she cares about Jack even when he messes up.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

When did actors (especially actors of color that are already dealing with the inherent systemic obstacles issues historically plaguing the genre) suddenly need all these qualifications to qualify as a "strong lead" on Y&R?

 

Heinle & Morrow are passable actors, at best, and they're never without stories & airtime.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Again, pointing to other mediocre leads doesn't address any critique of Bryton James. It's deflecting. You can disagree, as others have, but simply changing the subject isn't an argument. Nor does suggesting BJ isn't necessarily the bee's knees mean absolving anyone else.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

And that's fair - that's a difference of opinion on the topic. I was addressing the post above me. Speaking of:

 

 

Sure. So when you can talk about the actual points about BJ and not do whataboutism trying to talk about literally anything else, you know where to find me.

 

Or you could admit you just don't really give a shít about the original topic - Mishael Morgan's firing - and tip out. Your call.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

I hate to be a pest but, talking [!@#$%^&*] about bryton isn't the original topic either.  I maintain that it's odd to turn a topic about Sony not valuing Mishael into a bitch fest about bryton.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy