Jump to content

The soap opera writers' discussion


Recommended Posts

  • Members

And his obit said that Jo didn't have one but two mastectomies. 

 

Paul Raven's post with Shaw's timeline of writing stints makes me pretty certain that the soap book I saw featured his storyline plans for Love of Live, with Meg returning in the late 60s. I'll have to get over to Alexander Library at Rutgers and see if I can find it. Mind you, it was decades ago when I came across the book. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 429
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

 

Perhaps the book you are thinking of is "From Mary Nobel to Mary Hartman" written by Madeleine Edmonson and David Rounds. Rounds had appeared on Love of Love in the 60s and later had a featured role on Mary Hartman. The book was published in 1976 and can be found on Amazon. I mention this because I read it once years ago and I think it had story information for LOL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Okay, everyone, I found the SUCCESSFUL SCRIPTWRITING book (my public library had it online). It won't let me copy and paste the text, so I have retyped the important parts of the interview Robert J. Shaw did. It follows below:

*****

Page 131-132: "I did a show for a long time called "Search for Tomorrow," and there was a very fine actress on it named Mary Stuart. Mary is one of the best in the business, and she has played the lead in "Search" for all 25 years (meaning he wrote for her around 1976). When we go to New York, one of the obligatory things is to take Mary to lunch so she can find out what's coming up for her. One time we finished dessert and she said 'Well, are there any exciting plans?' and I said 'As a matter of fact, Mary, I don't want to get you in a stir but in the next few months you're going to have a mastectomy. Don't worry, it'll come out fine.' She said 'Oh that's very interesting...it'll be my third.'

 

Page 132: "...the pace was painfully slow in the old days. I had a show, "Love of Life" where I literally had a woman in labor for seven weeks. Thirty-five shows and she was still in O.B. waiting to deliver the child."

 

Page 133: "I think our audience has gotten younger...the important audience to me is the 18 to 25 group. I know that's what Procter & Gamble wants. They feel, with justification, that your grandmother has been using a certain kind of soap all their lives and nothing is going to make her change. But younger people are very receptive to advertising and have an open mind about which products they're going to buy."

 

Page 134: "Procter & Gamble buys a new soap maybe every ten years. "Texas" is a perfect example. They let it go two years before they took it off the air, and it never got a rating above 2.4. But they are very patient, so it doesn't allow a lot of room for new programming. "General Hospital" for example is 24 years old (meaning this interview was done in 1987).

 

Page 135: "The head writer, while he or she is highly paid and has many responsibilities, is usually the first one whose head is chopped off. They never think to examine the whole committee, it's the head writer's fault when things go badly."

 

"In the old days of early television I use to write all five scripts. Those were half-hour scripts and I could write five in two days, easily, and take three days off. But no longer. Now they've become productions. Soap operas got that name not only because they sold soap but because the average scene was played out in the kitchen. Now "General Hospital" has a whole city underground; they're going to freeze Port Charles and now we've got a new character we're bringing in, a police commissioner, and he has a secret room with so many gadgets you wouldn't believe it: teleprinters; computers and so forth. This all takes time to write." (I assumed he was talking about Sean Donely, but Sean was introduced in October 1984 by Anne Howard Bailey. So maybe he's talking about someone else?)

 

On page 136 he says they are about six weeks ahead writing scripts before they are filmed and air. He says GH has paid research people. An actual doctor or nurse they can call to ask medical questions.

 

Page 137: "I can do "Search for Tomorrow" for five years and think, 'If I have to write one more line for that woman, I will go out of my mind.' So you leave one show and go on to another one. The characters will be different, and that can be stimulating, although of course the stories won't be all that different. There are only a few basic plots. The triangle always works, the Lady and the Tiger always works. I think every writer to some extent follows the dictum 'when in doubt, steal!'

 

"A good head writer on a soap makes between $6000 and $7500 a week, 52 weeks a year (mid 80s wages)."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Judging from his final quote, I don't think Shaw was saying he wrote for SFT for five years.  I think he was speaking metaphorically, saying that ANY writer is bound to go a little nuts if he/she stays at one show for too long.

 

Post-er(s): But he said he did SFT for "a long time," when he was HW only for a year.

Me: To your average soap opera writer, a year at any show is probably a long time.

 

 

 

OTOH, Laiman, along with Sheri Anderson and Thom Racina, understood that female viewers were soaps' bread-and-butter, which is why romance, and especially supercouples, seemed so important to them when they were writing DAYS.  They gave consistently what they thought their average audience members -- again, females -- wanted consistently.

Edited by Khan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

I'm pretty sure I have the book in question. It's called "Writing for Television." Max Wylie is the writer. In the soap writing section, Winsor and Shaw were the subjects who provided a majority of the material. The episode provided is from Robert J. Shaw. It's heavy into the Tess / John Randolph story. The storyline projection, titled "Extended Visit," involves Sarah Dale selling her home in Barrowsville and moving in with the Sterlings in Rosehill. Sarah's presence in the Sterling home puts pressure on Vanessa and Bruce's marriage which leads Bruce to stray with Lucy Beale, an expert on historical sites in New York. Part of the projection does outline Meg's return (she wants her mother's money) and delves a little into Meg's time away from the story (involvement with a married man and running a tavern). The projection is credited to Winsor and the story is set to start in December. I found an article from February, 1968 mentioning Sarah's return and the friction caused by her arrival on the Sterling's marriage. I don't know why Meg doesn't return, but it's interesting to note that Meg is mentioned by Winsor in the article.

 

There is also another book, it may be "From Mary Noble to Mary Hartman," that details another planned return for Meg. I believe this one would have been under Don Ettlinger around 1963. I'm pretty certain Paul Raven posted it in the "Love of Life" section years ago. The book included a monthly outline of "Love of Life" during the Phillip Holden / Glenn Hamilton story and it stated something along the lines of Meg returns and becomes involved in real estate. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I had no idea that Roy Winsor had returned to LOL at some point as HW.  Do any LOL fans remember his work during that period?  If so, how was it (good, bad, in-between)?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Concerning Agnes Nixon, I have not liked her mystery storylines.   I am basing this on the mysteries of All My Children.   Her work on the early One Life to Live (which was co-written with Don Wallace and Paul Wallace) may have been better, but the show did not air in my vicinity during that time.  (just from 1971 on)

 

The Jason Maxwell murder was not very satisfying when it was revealed that Mona was his killer (although she did not remember and spent no time imprisoned).

 

The Eddie Dorance murder had more elements of mystery, but the deathbed confession of Claudette (a longtime character who had spent years in the spotlight but whose appearances had mostly disappeared to the background) was not very satisfying.  The Lars Bogart murder was also much better,  and I think that Ms. Nixon intended that Silver be the killer.  (The storyline that evolved about Lars being a Naxi and that he and Olga were siblings were not the best.)

 

The Sybil Thorne murder was probably the best in terms of mystery.

 

I have read that Henry Slesar wrote that the writer had to know who the murderer is in a good murder mystery and that the writing be done with that in mind.   I have the impression that Ms. Nixon does not follow that rule.   The Alex McIntyre mystery is one in which I felt that the show had no idea of the identity of the murderer (Will Courtlandt) and only decided to write the character off the show at the next-to-the-last minute.   

 

It took little deduction for me to know that it was Mr. U who was stealing Palmer's money (although I was not sure of the motive).

 

Furthermore, I have long felt that Taylor Roxbury-Cannon was one of the most intriguing characters that Ms. Nixon ever created with so many storyline possibilities.  However, at some point, the character was re-imagined and recast (with a very good actress who had little storyline) and that the character was ruined.   However, that may not have been the doing of Ms. Nixon.

 

I felt that the Louie Greco murder mystery was excellent, but I think that it was written my Lorraine Broderick. (Please correct me if I am wrong.)

 

Ms. Nixon may be accused of using the romantic triangle too often, but she used it effectively, and she was the master of that - therefore I refuse to criticize her for that (which made up much of her writing style).  She was determined to reunite Frank and Nancy, so other characters such as Caroline was not written as well rounded as others in her many romantic triangles.

 

Agnes Nixon, I feel, was the best writer.   She created a whole town of characters who we loved to watch.   The mysteries, however, were lacking.

 

 

 

 

Also, concerning Ms. Nixon, the introduction of Stuart Chandler was quite a shock.   It is one of the few times that I can remember in daytime television that I actually screamed when Stuart's existence was revealed.   How Bonnie McFannden, Ellen Chandler, and Erica Chandler were used in building the intrigue is extremely commendable!

The use of the Stuart in later storylines was good, and characters such as Stuart and Lily Montgomery  are not too common on daytime television.

 

The  hysteria surrounding Michael Delaney as the gay high school teacher is to be commended.   However, I figured out almost immediately that Kevin Sheffield would be revealed as a gay character.

 

I particularly liked the reactions of Hector Santos and Opal.  Opal was keeping her own secret that she had borne a bi-racial son.

 

I liked Erica's new family after her marriage of Jackson.

Edited by danfling
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

That’s interesting, @danfling. I was just curious because I never really watched Nixon shows when she was actually driving the storylines. (I began AMC during McTavish and OLTL during Malone, and Loving never aired in my hometown.) I had just never heard many complaints about her writing or discussions about her blindspots (whereas I hear tons about other masters like Bell, Labine, Marland, et al). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think the Sybil Thorne mystery came when Wisner Washam became head-writer.. or perhaps co-headwriter.. so that could be why that was a pretty good mystery.  

 

I do agree that Nixon wasn't strong in terms of writing mysteries.. and I don't recall reading a lot of mysteries being written by her.  It does seem like the majority of the Cortlandt gothic tone came when Wisner Washam took over as head-writer as well.


And from what my mom said about Loving (when she was head-writer in the mid 80s of it).. was that it became less about the college and business... and more about the community of Corinth (she even did that one character that was possessed by a demon as well.. which makes no sense to me LOL).

 

Since someone mentioned Labine, I think her biggest strength and weakness was her hamster effect.  There wasn't a lot of character growth nor any true storyline progression on Ryan's Hope especially.  Delia always was scheming, Jill and Frank kept playing their will they/won't they game, and Faith was always a hot mess... and when it looked like all those characters were moving onto new story and/or growth.. she'd pull the rug out from the viewer by having the character resume the same story beat.  The first few years of that show, it was ok.. but when Jill/Frank kept doing their dance by the late 80s.. it was like 'enough guys'... and Delia/Faith were shipped out of town by other writers because of the continual holding pattern of these characters.  Viewers had gotten conditioned to accept it so the show ended up in a catch 22 because of it.  But Labine could tug at the heart strings and write great family scenes like no one else could.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Claire Labine was a big fan of Greek tragedy, and a big believer in psychology, so that might explain some things.

 

Similarly, I think I read somewhere that one of Agnes Nixon's biggest influences was Louisa May Alcott.  If so, then THAT might explain why stories about young love, mixed with contemporary issues, tended to be where Nixon shone greatest as a writer.

 

I know we've said this before, but it always bears repeating: Wisner Washam never gets enough credit for the tremendous work he did as AMC's HW during the early- and mid-'80's.  In the entire history of that show, in fact, there were only three writers who truly "got" AMC: Agnes Nixon (of course), Lorraine Broderick (even if she wrote more clunkers than the other two) and Washam.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I get that about Labine, but perhaps she would have been better served writing a telenovela with a start, middle, and end than an ongoing continuing drama.  She also could write a good mystery/action movie (The Bride in Black starring Susan Lucci was a great tv movie that had a strong New York backdrop, strong Italian family, criminals, and a mystery to boot... a shame she didn't write more made for tv movies).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Admittedly, I was a latecomer to ATWT (first becoming a regular viewer in 2000). But I really liked KMH's Emily. I thought she was a very specific kind of neurotic professional character, and I loved her prickly relationship with MM's Susan. I will say I don't think the show did her any favors after Hal died, stranding her in storylines with several of the show's dullest characters: nu-Paul, nu-Meg, and nu-Dusty. I actually quite liked one of her last major storylines, when she discovered she had a grown-up biological son with Larry named Hunter. But then Hunter just sort of disappeared, and the story fizzled out, which was pretty typical of the late Goutman years. 
    • I know the fashions have gotten mixed reviews but I actually like what the new costume designer is putting the cast in. It feels more modern and the more tacky pieces I feel make sense for rich people. They're buying for the brand and the price and we often see celebs in things like this. Especially for a character like Nikki, I feel the more over the top (and tacky), the more realistic it is.
    • Well, her staff pointing out the movie connection never seemed to stop Long from using those plots.  She was right about Vanessa--she needed a man who loved her, which she'd never really had up to then. But as others have pointed out, Long borrowed heavily from Taming of the Shrew to get it done. (which while I kinda disputed that, I get more now, having watched Kiss Me Kate a few times since.)
    • "Holly had her share of the blame..." NO, she did NOT. WOW. That's what you get for trying to be fair and giving these people the benefit of the doubt! The Rita rape episodes do not seem to be available. It sounds like Calhoun thought it was not dramatized, but it was. I saw it when it aired. Yes, it's close to 50 years ago, and memories aren't 100% reliable. I also know that Zaslow reportedly complained that it was written too much like a seduction and that's why the Dobsons portrayed Holly's rape differently. Maybe it started like a seduction and she rejected him and that's when it turned violent. I don't remember that part, if it exists. What I do remember is that Roger threw Rita so violently to the floor that she hit her head. They showed him coming at her from her point of view and he looked all fuzzy. It was an act of violence, not a seduction. Rita kept it a secret until it looked like Roger might be acquited, and then finally admitted it. She didn't make it up, it definitely was not a ploy.
    • I was actually referencing another scene between Roger and Alex, which I think is right after they marry.  But yeah---I'm not really impressed with Calhoun's reasoning. Or the "both recall it wasn't unprovoked" line. Wasn't Holly trying to leave him when he raped her? Oy vey.
    • I know we have discussed the location of Bay City in the Another World thread and the fact that originally Irna conceived of it as being the real Bay City MI, and it was later writers that treated it as a fictional Bay City [probably IL]. This article seems to suggest that that idea was well-established by 1981. I wonder when it started.
    • Desert Sun, 22 December 1983 Guiding Light’ writer looks for fresh ideas By TOM JORY Associated Press Writer NEW YORK (AP) - “Guiding Light” has been a daytime companion for millions since 1937, starting on radio and switching to TV after 15 years. Can anything new, really new, ever happen to the Bauers or the Reardons or any of the other folks in Springfield? “I get really upset,” says Pamela Long Hammer, principal writer for the CBS soap opera since March, “because I’ll come up with this neat scenario and someone will say, ‘That’s like “Strangers on a Train.’” “I think, ‘They keep stealing my material.’ “The way I figure it,” she says, “there are only so many stories in the world. It’s the characters who keep the show new and exciting. All of our stories come from them: I don’t come up with a plot, and then work a character into it.” Continuity is important. Someone out there surely knows all that’s happened, to everyone on the show, in 46 years. How about Miss Long Hammer? "Nope. I care about what our core families have been doing,” she says. “I’m always interested in what happened to Bert Bauer (played since 1950 by Charita Bauer) 20 years ago, but as far as going back and reading scripts, no. “Others on the show keep track,” she says. “I’ll suggest something, and be told, ‘You don’t remember, but five years ago, they had this terrible fight. They would never speak to one another now.”’ Miss Long Hammer, a former Miss Alabama who came to New York as an aspiring actress in 1980, began writing for daytime television while playing Ashley on NBC’s “Texas.” She eventually wrote herself out of the story. Her staff for “Guiding Light” includes nine writers, among them her husband, Charles Jay Hammer, whom she met while both worked on “Texas.” NBC dropped “Texas” after two seasons, and episodes from the serial currently are being rerun on the Turner Broadcasting System’s cable-TV SuperStation, WTBS. Gail Kobe, who was executive producer of “Texas,” now has the same job on “Guiding Light.” And Beverlee McKinsey, who played Iris Carrington in “Another World” on NBC, and later in "Texas,” will join the Light” cast of the CBS soap in February. Miss Long Hammer is reponsible for the long-term story, which can mean looking ahead 18 months or more. Staff writers deal with specifics, including the scripts for individual episodes. She says she draws on “imagination and instinct” for the “Guiding Light” story. Often, that involves inventing new characters. “‘I look at Vanessa (Maeve Kinkead), one of our leading ladies,” Miss Long Hammer says. "What could make the audience care more about her? “Then I think, ‘Why can’t she find a man she can love, who will also love her?’ Voila, here comes Billy Lewis (Jordan Clarke). “Another example,” she says, “is Alan Spaulding (Christopher Bernau). All of a sudden, he’s got a sister no one ever knew about. “They come complete,” says Miss Long Hammer of the serial’s characters, including the new ones. “We know who they are and where they came from long before the viewer gets all that information. That’s one of the most interesting things about daytime, the complexities of the characters.” The writers make a big effort to keep the show contemporary, and four of the leading players are in their late teens or early 20s Judi Evans, who plays Beth Raines, Kristi Tesreau (Mindy Lewis), Grant Aleksander (Philip Spaulding) and Michael O’Leary (Rick Bauer). “Guiding Light,” longevity notwithstanding, is a moderate success by that ultimate yardstick of the industry; ratings. The show is behind only “General Hospital,” “All My Children” and “One Life to Live,” all on ABC, and CBS’ “The Young and the Restless,” among soaps. And Miss Long Hammer says she’s convinced writing is the key to even greater achievement. “When I say I love the characters, it’s not a light thing,” she says. “I think what the audience senses is an enthusiasm and an energy among the people who do the show.”
    • I initially read this as Marilyn Manson and did a double take.  Thanks for the screen grabs. The outfits are horrible. Somehow Victoria's Miss Piggy dress is the best. Ashley looks like a French madam bent on revenge, and Abby looks like she hot glued lace scraps to her garbage bag.
    • LOL...I do have the vaguest of memories of Katherine driving her and Phillip Sr to his death. But I don't recall Katherine being as over-the-top as Reva. Surprisingly, I don't even think Brenda Dickinson's Jill was---although lord knows Brenda probably is a real-life Reva. I have read the recaps of earlier Roger, and it surprised me that he doesn't love Holly. He had an affair with Hillary (SHOCK, I tell you, SHOCK when I read that one) while married to her.  Thanks to the cast turnover, other than Jerry and Maureen Garrett, there wasn't anyone else he had worked with, that I can recall. It would've been interesting if Mart Hulswit had still been in the role of Ed, how much more they might've let Ed/Roger clash. I really do have a soft spot in my heart for Krista's Mindy.
    • San Bernardino Sun, 21 July 1981 Soap gets a new lease on life By TOM JORY Associated Press NEW YORK (AP) NBC's Texas premiered Aug. 4, 1980, in the toughest time slot in daytime TV opposite top rated General Hospital on ABC and CBS' enduring -Guiding Light As recently as the first of this year, " Texas appeared doomed, a victim of barely measurable ratings. All that has changed, and the show approaches its first anniversary with a new executive producer, a new team of writers, a new look and a new slant on life. Even the ratings have improved a bit, from 14 percent to l5 percent of the audience in the time period in November and December to 15 percent to 16 percent today. "We have Houston like Ryan's Hope has New York City," says Gail Kobe who took over Texas as executive supervising producer in March,"and we feel a real tie with that city. We've got to reflect in the show what's happening in that real town, and I think we're doing that." It was a significant step, taking Texas- its roots in the fictional Bay City of NBC's Another World -to a real-life setting. "I don't think it's got to be  the kind of place that people can't can't find on the map," says Ms. Kobe "I think the audience in daytime is more prepared for reality today." It meant giving the show a recognizable Houston backdrop, a more contemporary sound -country and western performers like Ray Price will appear periodically and a lighting system that would clearly represent the hot, bright Texas sunlight. . Texas faced difficult odds from the start, the competition and the inevitable comparison with CBS' prime-time superhit, Dallas, notwithstanding. There was the problem of introducing a multiplicity of characters, many of them imports from Another World, as well as a story line, in an hour-long format. "It was the first show to start at an hour," says Kobe, a former actress who had been supervising producer for Procter & Gamble Productions, which owns Texas and five other daytime shows. "It's very difficult to fill that much time with a large cast, and not leave the viewer confused. "With a daily show, you have to let the audience know who to root for," she says. ''And if you're trying to begin a story, too, no one's going to keep track." The changes began even before Kobe took the show from Paul Rauch, who had faced the seemingly impossible task of producing both Texas and Another World simultaneously. Beverlee McKinsey, whose generally unpleasant character, Iris, had come to Texas from Another World as a young ingenue, was given back her mean streak.  "She had become a sweet woman,"Kobe says, "and the audience was used to seeing her do terrible things. It just didn't work." In addition, she says, time was spent establishing the identities of the characters. Joyce and Bill Corrington, who had created the show with Rauch, were replaced as head writers in February by Dorothy Purser and Samuel Ratcliffe.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy