Jump to content

Dallas: Discussion Thread


John

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

It would have opened up some great storylines if Pam, Cliff, Katherine, and Afton all had to share Rebecca's house. Little Christopher was cute when he kissed J.R. with crackers and milk all over his mouth. A lot of people slam this poor child actor calling him ugly. I wished they had kept him instead of the later recast. I found that kid grating.

Please register in order to view this content

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

So I've been watching some of Season 8 as I prep to finally begin watching the big Dallas/KL creative switcheroo in sync. Is it me or is the whole abrupt Afton/Mandy Winger swap one of the most egregious examples of just how disposable most women on this show are?

Afton wasn't exactly queen of the suffragettes but the audience was somewhat invested in her long-suffering loyalty to Cliff Barnes, the premiere goat-faced fool and anime pervert of '80s primetime drama. Within an episode or two though she is gone and fully replaced in Cliff's life by another comely sexbomb, Mandy Winger, played by Deborah Shelton, last seen as a largely mute male fantasy dream girl for the hapless protagonist of Brian De Palma's classic film Body Double. There is a reason Shelton has maybe five to ten lines tops in that movie before getting slaughtered by a power drill, and Season 8 demonstrates it beautifully. Now, less than halfway into the season Mandy has simply replaced Afton in virtually all aspects of story: Accompanying Cliff to his sister's house to cluck over Pam, agreeing blithely to Cliff's latest doomed scheme against J.R. who she will surely fùck, etc. The only major change is hair color and less personality.

I still have a lot of annoying notes on the close of Season 6 of Knots Landing that I will foist upon this board at some point soon. But there's a reason I take time with that show and dedicate myself to it, whereas Dallas is just silly fluff. It's because so much of the show is an endless Mobius loop of male power fantasy.

Edited by Vee
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Dallas has a masculine energy that can be very off-putting, especially when viewed through a 2023 lens.

All 1980s primetime soaps have to be watched with the mindset that they are products of their time and a lot of things are not going to hold up well by today's standards.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I've watched a lot of '80s shows both then and now, I was born pretty early in the decade lol. I don't have oversensitivity about that. But Dallas often makes most of those other shows look like Designing Women. And it wouldn't be an issue for me if, as I've said before, I didn't feel most of Dallas was extremely repetitive story-wise. You switch a few names out (like Afton and Mandy) and you get the same plots with these characters year after year, and little evolution. I do think the earlier seasons had highlights, and I do still enjoy characters like poor Clayton, etc. It's hard seeing what became of Pam in particular in later years, she started out a firecracker. Sue Ellen is beyond parody at this point for me.

I will say Jamie Ewing at least got a little fire back presenting that oil/land deed at the latest barbecue, though I do think Jenilee Harrison is miscast (imagine if they'd landed the young Demi Moore or something). Yet apparently she too will somehow end up in bed with old pervert Cliff Barnes!

Edited by Vee
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

In this 1974 news clip they do a short interview with a male model/actor named Robin Clarke. I thought he looked familiar and then I realized he played the guy(Ed Haynes) who claimed to be Pam's first husband in 1978. He appears at 2:46

Please register in order to view this content

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Please register in order to view this content

    • Watching the cult of Fetterman collapse is one of the few political bright spots for me. The best part  is watching all the people who built him up now decide they want to tear him down. I'll be fascinated to see how this ends for him. https://buckscountybeacon.com/2025/05/pennsylvanias-democratic-senator-john-fetterman-raises-alarms-with-outburst-at-meeting-with-union-officials/

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Long ago, this Rachel fan channel uploaded a number of clips of Rachel with Felicia during the alcoholism story, and this one in particular stands out for me. 

      Please register in order to view this content

      And then you have this scene, which is the dark mirror of the above, especially the final moment: By the late '80s, especially after Wallingford's death, those times were gone, and Donna Swajeski added further misery to Felicia with the Gold Street backstory. Luckily, after a bit of time the show found a good framing for this new twist on Felicia. The stories with finding and losing a love from her past, learning that a woman she hated was the daughter she'd spent years searching for, sinking into alcoholism, they all fit into the type of material suited for the '40s and '50s screen goddesses.  When Dano tried some of this old weepy type of material when she went back to ABC, it mostly fell flat, as the atmosphere wasn't the same and her character always felt shoehorned in. It worked perfectly at this period on AW because you had Iris, you had Rachel, you had Donna - you had a number of tough-but-vulnerable women of a certain age, most of them grandmothers by this point, but still trying to find love, find themselves. This is what AW could have had earlier if they hadn't dumped Pat and Alice, but better late than never. This is an approach you saw more often on British soaps than on US soaps, which for a number of years respected women in that age group. Both UK and US soaps have done away with this, both countries having the ladies devolve into perpetual ingenues (with added doses of endlessly self-aware camp in the UK) or just being shipped off entirely.  You could even see that on AW with the treatment of Iris (shipped off, never to be mentioned again, too old to return), Donna (repeatedly humiliated and crippled), Felicia (regressed into degrading herself with married John), Rachel (mother to newborn twins, put into lengthy periods of trauma through her new relationship with Carl). 
    • I'm of a certain age where I caught some of Upton's final year and it was not great but Jean Holloway was worse. All I remember is Bambi, Bambi, Bambi!
    • Yes, of course, all of those servants added to the overall picture at AW & also people had relationships with those servants! I like it when Anita asks after one of the servants at the club, how their children are doing & like that. 
    • Great scenes between Marlena and EJ today. Paula and Jeanne are making EJ have more depth than Ron had during his long drawn out tenure.
    • Might as well say it, Minority opinion, granted, but I like Joss & I'm okay with this WSB story & i hope that Emma will be their next recruit & she & Joss can be partners.
    • Thanks again @Paul Raven  The Arlene/Ben/Betsy triangle is one I wish I could see for myself as on paper it doesn't tend to excite me but I can see how well-constructed it was. I wish I could see the Rick/Meg relationship too, although I wish they'd had him genuinely fall for Meg after he gets together with Cal. The whole Brooke/Deacon/Bridget story on B&B was horribly damaging to Brooke as a character but it was dramatically very sound because I could completely believe Deacon would fall for messy and vulnerable Brooke after finally settling down with the more docile Bridget.
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy