Jump to content

Jean and Shelly's one year contract up. Will ABC renew?


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 54
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Am I supposed to be impressed she wrote for Y&R, the most boring soap in the history of TV?   She has written for 5 soaps according to wikipedia...if that doesn't qualify as same old same old, merry go round hack, then I don't know what does.   Why would I want anyone who has any sort of Y&R sensibility anywhere near a show attempting to be entertaining?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

 

+1.

 

I used to think Y&R had to be the most boring and stilted show around.  Then I saw what happened once the show had rid itself of the Bell/Alden influence.  Say what you will about the glacial pacing and constipated dialogue, but at least what characters did and said made sense.  Bell and his team made sure that characters' intentions were clear to the audience.  Could we really say that about Y&R now?

 

Regardless, though, I really wouldn't get my hopes up about Kay Alden returning.  I doubt Mal Young even knows who she is, and probably doesn't care.  If anything, I wouldn't be surprised if Young were to recruit another veteran of UK soaps to succeed Pratt as HW.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

:lol: The funny thing is, you didn't even have to say that you think Y&R is boring. You're one of those. Your bias was clear even before you ever replied.

 

 

Your ignorance is also showing. At least do some proper research.

 

She has written for two soaps.

 

Y&R (for THIRTY-TWO years)

and B&B (for SIX years).

 

Hardly an insane soap-jumper.

 

By the way, William J. Bell wrote for SIX soaps. Is he a hack, too? :lol:

 

It's not the amount of shows, but the quality. And Alden's Y&R is classic.

 

I personally never said she should write for GH. Not everyone fits everywhere. But GH would improve 300% by having her, regardless of how low the quality is now.

 

+1

 

Another myth & misconception. Y&R was verbal acrobatics, in itself amazingly complex and difficult to write. Despite that, every character sounded different, the dialogue had a wonderful ebb and flow and it was all very character-specific. Stylized and melodramatic? Sure. But also very, very unique and exciting.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

These days not much, but I am watching soaps since 1981ish, and I don't think I have ever turned on Y&R and didn't find people staring at each other with these B.S. pauses trying to be dramatic.   And Peter Bergman has to be the worst offender of them all.   He reminds me of the ham actor played by Lionel Barrymore in 20th Century.   Nothing on that show with the unnatural pausing and constant staring everyone does resembles anything close to realistic, good acting or good storytelling.  I understand they used to have to do that constantly so the audience could hear the piano notes of the theme song under the scenes, but the show always was and always will be complete crap.  MTS and that grating voice of hers, EB and his mumbling, I have no clue how PB kept his job all these years--he literally is why soap actors and their hammy ways get made fun of, and that wax face of his with his 1970s newscaster hair.   She should rest in peace, whatshername who died last year playing Chancellor, but she couldn't act to save her life. 

 

I don't really watch much these days.   I watch the occasional DOOL and If I hear Constance Towers or someone I like is making a guest appearance on GH I'll watch the clip. 

 

The Young and the Restless

  • Scriptwriter: May 13, 1974–80
  • Breakdown writer: 1980–87
  • Script editor: 1983–85, 1986–87
  • Associate head writer: 1987–97
  • Co-head writer: 1997–98, February 16 – December 22, 2006
  • Head writer: 1998 – February 15, 2006

All My Children

One Life to Live

  • Story Consultant: December 2006 – April 2007

General Hospital

The Bold and the Beautiful

  • Co-head writer (2008–13)
  • Associate Head Writer (August 6, 2007 – January 21, 2008; April 16, 2008 – 2008)
  • Interim Head Writer (February 5, 2008 – April 15, 2008)


 Five soaps.   Kay Alden, story consultant for GH 2006/2007--one of the worst year's in the show's history.   Consulting like that no show needs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

^

Any and everyone knows that Kay Alden wasn't even used during her time at AMC, GH, or OLTL. Word on the street is, Frons snatched and grabbed her b/c SONY/CBS let her go. Everyone knows Frons was the EP, Head Writer, and Story Consultant for all the ABC shows. Kay could've submitted tons of good stuff and I am sure it was all shot down b/c it didn't match what Frons wanted. Frons love plot driven stories and Kay typically wrote character driven.

 

That woman is FAR from a failure. You wouldn't know that b/c you just said that Y&R wasn't your type of show. I can assure you that Kay Alden is no hack. She had her duds but she surpasses the remnants writing the remaining 4 shows by a country mile and then some. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I’ve reached the summer of 1998.  Until now, my impression has been that the show has steadily improved since the great quality dip of 1994, reaching as high as 8/10 in 1997. Sure, I could complain about a few things in 1997 (Claudia got wasted after her initial storyline; Thorne’s feelings for Taylor were a bit too sudden; the storyline where Sheila lived with James and Maggie while pregnant got rather boring; Mike periodically revisiting Sheila despite being on the run from authorities), but overall it was a very strong year.  I liked the Thorne/Taylor/Ridge triangle, the mystery plot about who shot Grant, the sham wedding to trap Sheila, Stephanie/Eric/Lauren, and Clarke manipulating his way back to working at Forrester. I even liked the Greenland storyline with Eric/Lauren/Rush, although I had expected to hate it. Maybe 1996 tops 1997 in raw soapy excitement (especially as Sheila got a chance to interact with a larger canvas of characters), but certain problems with overall storyline cohesion puts it somewhat below 1997 for me. Unfortunately, 1998 has turned out to be a bit of a speedbump, perhaps on par with 1995 levels of quality: - Maggie’s character really got trashed after James left her to be with Sheila, and the early 1998 storylines where she imprisoned Sheila in the house from Psycho, or installed those wires and mikes and such in her house to make her think she’s going crazy, were total GARBAGE. So much so that the latter storyline (and Maggie with it) pretty much disappeared into a limbo.  - I have mixed feelings about the twins plotline with Lauren. No way did Rush survive being shot with a crossbow through the chest, and the romance between Lauren and Rush’s good twin brother Johnny was rather dry to me. I did however enjoy the camp aspect of Rush taking his brother’s place to be with Lauren, and Eric rescuing her. But it doesn’t appear like Bell cared too much about the Johnny/Lauren romance beyond the twin storyline gimmick, and it too disappeared in an unsatisfactory manner (come on, why not hire Johnny’s actor for just 5 more episodes for an arc where he realizes Lauren is not over Eric, or JUST SOMETHING?) - Clarke wormed his way back to FC in late 1997, which had exciting storytelling potential, but then he disappeared almost entirely. Sad to see my favorite character wasted in this manner. Does he get anything interesting to do between now and the Morgan saga of 2000-2001? - The Thomas saga was entertaining in 1997, but it got stretched out too much, and made some of early 1998 tiresome, with Ridge having to decide YET AGAIN which woman he wants to be with. On the plus side, I like the plotline of Thorne being neighbors with Macy and Grant, and we’ve finally been introduced to the SORASed Rick/Amber/CJ crowd. The Stephanie/James/Sheila triangle is also starting, and it makes me excited (I remember seeing some if it in my childhood). I know Sheila, Grant, and James are all leaving soon, which I honestly kind of dread - between them and Clarke’s near-absence, it feels like herd is going to get culled too much in the near future. But I know there’s the familiar 1999-2002 to look forward to.
    • LOL - this is a perfect description, and that's what I loved about it! May be a bit campy, but it immediately caught my attention in a good way.  I'm not familiar with the Fishing Trip storyline, I'll have to look that up. I've noticed that about Josh, which has made him less attractive to me overall. He just yells a lot when he's not happy. Wow, Reva was married to HB!  LOL - "Always... eventually, and again"
    • I love your ideas. I would love to see Jack grown up this confused unhinged individual. He should hold a grudge against both Brooke and Taylor.   
    • @chrisml

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Lois's return has been a bust. So disappointing that the writers have never written for her. As with Tracy, the pool of GH vets is so thin, there's no one to pair her with. Doubtful they would go to the trouble of properly recasting a legacy character and then sticking  him with Lois; they're obviously not that invested. If she wants to be on this show, it'll be as a noisy grandma who stays in the background. 
    • I love me some Anita and TT. They need to give her a good storyline and I know that it's coming. 
    • @Franko Thanks for tagging me. A few days ago I was talking in another thread about the rise of "snarky" critics for TV shows in the '90s online recaps, but this is just more along the lines of a mauling. There's also the unspoken reality that films like Steel Magnolias were seen as movies for women, so therefore they sucked. Pauline Kael also had her share of blunt, at times incredibly nasty remarks, but the vitriol is often balanced by her love for film. I'm not seeing that here.  With that said, the comment about Field's work becoming unbearable describes how I felt when I tried to sit through her and Maura Tierney on ER. 
    • I skipped most of Daniel too. I think it's awful he has kids with Nicole, Csrky5 and Chloe and Brady, Bo and Philip do not. 
    • Please register in order to view this content

         
    • A great day. Feeling happy and accomplished.

      Please register in order to view this content

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy