Jump to content

DAYS Writers to Halt Writing until SONY/NBC Reaches Deal


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 26
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Look at all the writer changes ...

 

1998-1999: Morina

1999-2002: Langan

2002-2003: Brash/Cwickly

2003: Higley #1

2003-2006: Reilly

2006: Milstein

2006-2008: Sheffer

2008-2011: Higley #2

2011-2012: MarDar

2012-2015: Tomsell

2015-?: Higley/Griffith

 

Lord

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 Really hope this is successful! Even if they still want to keep the fast paced filming schedule why not film mid-January -may (with an extended spring break) and then again late September-December (with a fall break and thanksgiving break). Follow a school's semester schedule. They could still have some random dark weeks in there if needed too. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

This has been my biggest problem with DAYS - for example, I think of Summer 2014 when the Kate/Sami revenge S/L was quite captivating and I think the audiences were getting into it, but BOOM, it was wrapped in a couple of weeks. The problem with the writers guessing what viewers want is that they can't capture those lightning in a bottle connections - B&B (except for the past 9 months) was very good at making those adjustments - if something unexpected hit, you can bet within 4 weeks you'd be seeing more and converse was true (see, Drunk Brooke - a story that Bell thought was a huge winner on paper and was going to be Emmy worthy, etc., but it was a complete faceplant - no pun intended - was wrapped in amazingly fast. Y&R has also done this under Pratt. 

I'm glad NBC is stepping in - they clearly see what works and doesn't work from an audience and ratings perspective. It's clear DAYS has a large group of fans who sit by the sidelines and will gladly return (or at least watch a bit more frequently) for the right stories. I hope this works.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

On the one hand, I think DAYS is resisting, because they want to limit the network's impact on storylines.  If they tape far, far ahead, then Corday can protect his writers from the network and their perceived interference,  But, on the other hand, if what we are getting now is the result of NBC not being able to give notes on what is and isn't working, then maybe -- in this case -- a little more network intervention might be good.

 

Here's what I think: if NBC wants DAYS to abandon their current production model, then they need to loosen the proverbial purse strings a little.  I'm not saying turn back the clock to 1985, when DAYS could afford to leave the country every week.  Just give them enough money to allow them to produce a quality show everyday without having to convert actors' dressing rooms into doctors' offices or tape in one day what other shows tape in one decade.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Ellen is working for The Lord and Glenn Beck. She's deep in her own world and not coming back.

 

I think claiming they do it to avoid network interference is partly an excuse. The truth is the show and Ken Corday are deeply risk-averse and fickle, and I think he likes working in a vacuum so he can keep turning on a dime without much static from the audience. Any time they have a potentially exciting new story or direction they kill it in the crib. Every single time, for years and years. Then they reverse course, then reverse back. That's on the show, not NBC. It comes from the core.

 

There's a million cases of this but just look at the anniversary stuff - Aiden and Hope married, Aiden dies, Bo back, Bo dies a week or two later, now she's onto Rafe. Adrienne and Justin are back together - now they're not! These are C-players and they doubled back even on that.

 

It's impossible to invest in DAYS because DAYS has zero interest in investing in anything long-term and does not write long-term. It's all about what makes Ken Corday feel happy or secure in the moment, and production-wise what saves him money, even if that means shitty lights, music, sets, actors. It is a show with an embarrassment of riches in history and characters and wildly different eras, but it will never, ever get it together because its showrunners have made it into a ADHD clownhouse.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Christie said in her interview this week that she recently started taking acting classes again, and has been doing some work in England, so that helped her to jump into Carrie for this (as well as it being all so familiar, it really was home.)
    • Andrea Barber aka Kimmy Gibbler did have a few scenes with Drake too, when he first came on. Christie came in the middle of that storyline 
    • Carrie, as played by Andrea Barber, was at Bo & Hope's wedding. She was the flower girl. The ringbearer was Zachary Parker, the little boy that Megan tried to pass off as her and Bo's son. Andrea's Carrie was at Tony & Anna's real wedding (Aug. 5, 1985). She appeared for the last time on March 21, 1986. Christie's Carrie debuted on April 14, 1986. It appears that Carrie remained in Salem, just off-screen, during that near-month. Christie picked up with what Andrea had been playing, apprehension over John.
    • I don't think she is. I think she just created some really boring characters and for some reason doesn't know what to do with them.  But let's say that she is being force to write these characters that she doesn't like or want to write for.......that's a really bad sign that the creator of the show is being told what to do from the very beginning.  With so many EPs, I was worried there could be too many cooks in the kitchen, too many people giving notes - all those EPs are representing companies who have a stake in the show.    Canada continues to be one episode ahead. Thursday's US episode is another lacklustre episode, even with Leslie in it.  We'll see if Friday or Monday's episode in Canada will be a repeat. 
    • Like a lot of soaps, once relatives left, they kinda dropped off the face of the earth and out of conversations. I don't know why writers do that. If they just don't want to confuse viewers, or don't think it matters, or want the liberty kind of revise history to make their stories work. After Josh left in '84, he's barely mentioned. Even when Billy's railing against Kyle and refusing to accept him, it'd be the most natural thing in the world to say "Kyle's NOT by brother, JOSH is!" and I don't think he ever really says that.  The only writer I can recall who didn't do that is Doug Marland on ATWT. 
    • IIRC, there is a line during this time period where Reva says something like Marah is her first-born child, which fans were not thrilled with.  Dylan makes a few appearances through the rest of the show (and a much later recast that isn't really worth talking about, with a face that is familiar to you). He will make one briefly during 1997, if you get that far.
    • Another great episode.  GH has been pretty good this year, loading up the chamber, because now there's many bullets to fire, and another one was fired today when Nina found out Michael is the father of Sasha's baby.  I hope this secret comes out at the hearing.  I've also liked the slow burn with Gio/Emma. There's just so many things to look forward to on this show now.  GH is finally back to being really good. 
    • I'm all for it. Get them Nina!   

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I am blown away that Christie Clark is 51, and she debuted 39 years ago. They gave her a lovely script today.  But, I could not think of any other examples in culture of someone able to jump right back into the skin of a character, after virtually retiring from acting years ago. I was trying to recall if Carrie left for a bit with Anna after Roman died (because she wasn't at Bo & Hope's wedding), and then returned as a pre-teen Christie?  Or if she was just SORASed off-screen?  But, whenever I see the character I am reminded how much more trauma she's endured than Sami, and yet she remains such a nice person.
    • Weirdly I feel like Nina was the most sus about the entire situation.  Normally I would have given this one to Carly, but Nina was always kind of trying to make it make sense. I think Nina (and Alexis) are actually really smart characters.  They just constantly get in their own way with dumb plans lol.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy