Jump to content

Who would you consider the Nixon, Bell, and Phillips of PRIMETIME


allmc2008

Recommended Posts

  • Members

Since this is centered around comparing Soap creators to Primetime Creators my gut is telling me it should be here and not primetime oxides.

I think David Jacobs of Knots/DALLAS could be considered the "Irna Phillips" of Prime Time considering he popularized the primetime soap. Perhaps he could be the Nixon because the Knots/Dallas story is comparable to OLTL/AMC story. Meaning, Knots was his original conception but the networks didn't want it so he created DALLAS. When Dallas was successful they greenlit KNOTS. Agnes, of course, had a similar situation. AMC was first but they wanted to test her so she created OLTL. When that was a success they greenlit AMC. Maybe he is the Bill Bell because of his slow paced and psychological storytelling?

Perhaps Norman Lear could be the Nixon of Daytime as he used ATIF as a platform to tell current events using the formula of sit-com. AMC was used the same but used the soap formula.

Anyway, I can't wait to here everyone's thoughts!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 17
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

The first name that came to mind was Steven Brocco. He might not have "created" the TV cop shows but he blew the door off it's hinges. First with Hill Street Blues...making it gritty and real. The after the very sucessful L.A. Law (which is still studied in law schools), he did it again with NYPD Blue making it more normal by using swear words and do the occasionally "butt scenes' never seen before or since on network primetime television. NYPD Blue lasted 10 seasons.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think this is a lot harder to qualify, because even a "hit" show has such a brief life compared to the soap opera.

Norman Lear, certainly in the '70's. Steven Bochco in the '80's. Aaron Spelling, for better or worse from the '70's to the '90's. Stephen Cannell. JJ Abrams I think really reinvigorated the serialized drama (that have their own, defined mythology) with Alias in 2001 and Lost a few years later.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Agree. Plus, primetime television isn't a genre unto itself the way daytime drama is. Comedy, drama, variety, miniseries, etc. -- all co-exist within primetime. In order for the analogies to Nixon, Bell and Phillips to work, I think you might have to break it down genre by genre.

For example, you could say Lucille Ball (and by extension, Desi and their writers) was the Irna Phillips of primetime comedy since "I Love Lucy" was arguably the first, successful, ground-breaking TV sitcom. The "Agnes Nixon" and "Bill Bell" might be Carl Reiner ("The Dick Van Dyke Show") and Norman Lear ("All in the Family"), or even Jim Brooks & Allan Burns ("The Mary Tyler Moore Show"). The JER, though...? Maybe Garry Marshall ("Happy Days") or Miller/Boyett?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I would say Gene Roddenberry would be the Agnes Nixon one here in that he used his format to tell stories with real world meaning, he used comedy, he worked in romance, and he used character actors in key roles like she did. He used his hammy characters like McCoy and Kirk and turned them into people you cared about much the way she would go on to do for characters like Pheobe and Langley.

"Irma Phillips" could mean anything really. Was she truly a good writer? It seems doubtful looking at how painfully slow vintage soaps can be, but she was the first and the trailblazer. Perhaps Rod Serling, as the first superstar TV writer, is the Irma Phillips of primetime.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Perhaps, in the field of sci-fi (or "genre") television, I might be inclined to think of Serling as the Irna Phillips, with Roddenberry as the Agnes Nixon (and then, somewhere down the line, Glen A. Larson as the JER or Megan McTavish).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

You said it better than I did.

It would be fascinating to breakdown the "family trees" of television. Desilu would be one, Sid Caesar, Steve Allen, etc, and see all the talent that ran through the various shows.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

TV Land, back when they were making these great shows that charted all kinds of TV history, had a mini-series called "TV Land Moguls" where each episode studied the "name" producers from each decade and then showed a marathon of their shows. The 50s had Desilu, Sheldon Leonard, and Danny Thomas; the 60s had Quinn Martin, Jack Webb, Paul Henning, and Sherwood Schwartz; the 70s had Aaron Spelling, MTM, Norman Lear, Lorimar, and Garry Marshall; the 80s had Stephen J. Cannell, Steven Bochco, Susan Harris, and Carsey-Werner; and the 90s-00s had David E. Kelley, Worldwide Pants, Dick York, Darren Starr, and Jerry Bruckheimer. I was PISSSSSSSSSED because of all the shows they decided to show for this, they didn't show any Dallas or Dynasty, which were massive hits for their respective companies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

There could be two reasons for that:

1. They couldn't clear the rights to use clips (which doesn't seem likely, but...).

2. They aren't what could be considered "prestigious" shows. (Of course, if you're Aaron Spelling, for example, and you've produced shows such as "The Love Boat" and "Fantasy Island," you'd be hard-pressed to include a show that DOESN'T come across as "junk-food TV.")

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Wow, do I agree with you. Chelsea is coming off as ridiculous. All she does is look for a woman to date while not caring about her business at all. That she's bi is great, but they're not writing her like she's bi. She seems to be lesbian. Yeah, I know -- "no labels." I just don't find the writing for her story to be anything other than awkward.   -- I hope we get some diagnosis finality with Bill's trip to the hospital. I don't want to see these trips to the ER every other day. -- Naomi is going to blame herself for Bill's health problems? GMAB. -- Ashley doesn't read as a real nurse in the slightest. -- Another day, another rinse and repeat conversation with Derek and Ashley. YAWN. -- Kat is making mistakes, but she's fun to watch and listen to, regardless. -- I still think the Joey/Vanessa/Doug gambling story sucks. I know Doug is deeply in debt, but I don't like him acting this meek and submissive.  -- I'm not sure what Joey's plan was from the beginning, or why he had to seduce Vanessa at all to get his way. I'm not sure what Vanessa ever saw in Joey -- why doesn't he give her the ick? -- I'm fine with a story where Doug and Vanessa take out Joey.  -- The fades to commercials were pretty bad today.
    •   Victoria's house (that she long ago lived in with Billy) burned down (I think Aunt Jordan set ablaze?). Mariah and Tessa and baby Aria had been living in the tack house but they bought a house we've never seen and moved there. Victoria, Claire, and Cole now live in the tack house.
    • Victoria’s previous house burned down.    And I know why characters frequent Crimson Lights 3 times a day for brownies, muffins and empty mugs:   THERE’S PCP IN EVERYTHING. 
    • Today was a good episode, and the week for that matter. I think they've also done a better job with background music. The scenes in todays episode weren't as silent as they usually are in the background and it was noticeable. I think the show has found its groove well and I'm still invested. 
    • Garneau was in the Liberal party and his riding was in Montreal. He was the first Canadian in outer space.
    • I agree. I really have enjoyed this story from the beginning. I feel like it needed the time for us to care about Doug. They've done a nice job of explaining his motives and making me care for him. I still feel like he's doomed and Vanessa will end up being a widow and now I'm invested in that *not* happening now that I've fallen for him. Friday was good but so was the entire week. I think they're doing such a nice job of keeping things moving. We got good movement with Bill's story this week, Chelsea is attempting to date, Andre and Dani are having tough conversations about their relationship, of course Anita reunited with Sharon. There is *so* much going on and I didn't even cover all of it.  I wish all of the soaps would take a page out of BTG book and start rotating their stories. I love that everybody is getting a chance to shine and they don't just sit on one lead story to the point you get sick of it. 
    • Did Jordan Clarke have a departure sometime between 1985 and 1989? I know Robert Newman had three runs: 1981-1984, 1986-1991, 1993-end.
    • Well, they usually weren't on the show at the time for long until the late 90's. But yeah, they really deserved a story centered on them, and not through the lens of Reva.
    • Chelsea was doing the absolute most today! Why was she introducing her sister to a woman she doesnt know? That whole scene was embarrassing. Madison needs to stay away from her bc she is too immature
    • Gosh, what a waste with Lunacy. Why have her live with $B, reveal Finn, pardon her, etc What makes this story incredibly hollow is that what Luna is asking isn't unreasonable - to spend time with her cousin father. She's not asking to move in with them. How hard with it be for Finn to throw her a bone by, say, I'll meet you for lunch/coffee once at week at the hospital cafeteria. Lunacy isn't going to hurt Finn. In fact, all her crimes were related to finding her father and it turns out to be someone she's loved her entire life. Instead of course-correcting the nonsense of last summer, Brad somehow found a way to make this worse! That's a skill... Of all the younger actors B&B has cast during the past 5 years, LY has shown the most growth and range. Why get rid of her? 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy