Jump to content

BRAVO: Vanderpump Rules


rlj

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 575
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

I think you can start from last season and be fine honestly. 

 

Just remeber that Jax, Stassi, Kristen and all the newbies (but Charli who bested Jax at the Season 8 reunion) got the boot.

Edited by Taoboi
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

So I did go back and watched the first 2 episodes of last season. Here ar early thoughts:

 

Lala...what a bitch. Clearly having a baby didnt soften her up. She's just the worst. A nasty ball of negative energy. Her man is disgusting and ugly. I cant beleive she has sex with him. Im assuming he has money

 

Arianna. I remember liking her but she comes across annoying here. Its crazy how much Lala hates her here yet will ride for her in present day

 

Scheanna. Still irritating but at least her man is fine.

 

Toms. I get them confused and cant remember which is married to whom. I always had a soft spot for Schwartz and he still fine

 

Katie....irrelevant

 

Charli. She's kinda boring. She seems too sweet for this group

 

Raquel. She comes across as such a good girl. She's also very sweet and likeable so knowing she becomes this skank villian is gonna be quite a trip

 

Im glad most of the cast no longer work at Sur bc I couldnt imagine pushing 40 and still in that same position with most of their acting aspirations having never popped off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Please register in order to view this content

 

I can't believe that I've ever liked her.

 

She is. They were picking on her too much in Season 8. But her claim to fame was being able to take on Jax at the Season 8 reunion and dragged his a%^. There would have been more for her if they had not finally fired him and Bethanny, but yep. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Oh I believe it!!! I'm about ready to play catch up binge myself. lol. 

 

And I saw LVP's appearance gave WWHL some ratings for the first time in a little while, too. And since it was tapped onto the VPR episode, I'm sure it was MUCH higher. 

 

Everywhere I go and everywhere I look EVERYONE is talking about the show again. It's on EVERYBODY'S lips. It even hits last week's PEOPLE...funnily enough coupled (or not) with Chris Rock's special talk.

 

It is literally EVERYWHERE. And I don't think Ariana has even released a statement yet...but has filmed I think. So this is lightning in a bottle and Bravo would be a fool to not go for it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Watching this past weeks episode was so telling! These girls have Raquel pegged way before the Scandoval reveal! I wonder if we didn’t know what was to come if I’d be feeling sorry for Raquel... but since I do, I don’t! I’m fully on board with the mean girls! And this unexpected Charlie vs Kristina Kelly feud is fun and stupid and I’m here for it! This season is already so much better than last years and we still have so much more to go!

 

I’m hoping with Kristen coming back to film with Ariana and Jax and Brittany being on WWHL next week that the ban has been lifted and Stassi will also be returning! She was always my fav!

 

Please register in order to view this content

Edited by MrPrezident
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I think Hotel would have the similar demos as Dynasty W 19-49 would have been strong. St Elsewhere survived b/c it attracted wealthier/urban viewers and The Equalizer was probably stronger with men and younger viewers. So each had their own niche-good counter-programming. As for Aaron Spelling's influence over ABC in terms of scheduling, I don't know if he would have been happy with Charlie's Angels moving to Sunday, The Colbys scheduled on Thursdays or Matt Houston moved to Fridays. I think he just had to roll with the punches.
    • Thank you @Broderick. That information was so helpful. I watched the first episode of the "Mansion of the Damned" storyline. I was extremely confused by Margaret Colin's Paige and her relationship to other characters. Your post helps me understand what's happening. The rest of the show was easy to understand and I'm enjoying it. Hunter's Nola is a good character for me since I know Kim Hunter from other work.  I must have seen clips of Edge of Night before because I remember seeing April. 
    • How is it back tracking when it was in fact the word I originally used? It's not.
    • You know what is a great way to stop these unclear "rumors"?  Just stop posting them and then back tracking with words like "apparently".   Anyhow, I didn't find the Tracy/Lois scenes as good as I hoped.    
    • Jason, in thinking this over, I realize that we look at this space, differently. To me it is a potentially collaborative space. Now that I've realized this, what I should have said, "I'm having a problem because what I'm seeing is not matching up with your descriptions. Maybe these files I just got are misdated. Maybe it's something else. I will keep you posted. Meanwhile this episode, its edit, is ready, even though I might have to issue a corrected date later. But, people can enjoy the performances now. 
    • Thank you for the constructive suggestion. 
    • But how is it "apparent" that she signed a new 3-year contract? Your wording had a voice of authority -- as if you knew it was true. A better way to post about it? Say you read online that she signed a new contract, but have no idea if that's true.
    • This interview actually reminds me a bit of Kim Zimmer’s press during the infamous clone storyline on Guiding Light, or Deidre Hall during the possession story on Days. All three were seasoned daytime veterans who made it clear they valued airtime for their characters, not just being part of a romantic pairing. It seems that idea was part of the pitch behind these bigger-than-life plots. They all took big swings in their performances. When I read Kim Zimmer’s memoir, I thought she captured it best — she wanted to be respected for being willing to take those risks. To paraphrase her, she knew it was ridiculous for Reva to think she was pregnant after menopause, but she still threw herself into those scenes and made them real. That’s what really struck me about Victoria Wyndham’s interview too. She responded like a real person. It felt like she was telling Michael Logan that she knew Justine — and a geriatric pregnancy with twins — was totally preposterous, but that she still deserved credit for trying to keep the show alive and entertain the audience. And honestly, I think that's more than fair. Logan is looking for a reductive answer for who is to blame.  And, she's telling him to accept that they were all well-meaning.  Which is not a defense of bad storytelling.  But, I understand that she's frustrated because she interpreted Logan's critique as a lack of commitment, and she wants him to know that she was committed! (maybe not for the best, but committed).
    • Fine, you only had to say so. It's not a problem to me NOT to post this. I have no idea what this means. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy