Jump to content

Y&R: TMZ reporting on Michael Muhney


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

And the rationalizing is almost as bad.

Someone elsewhere online actually said, the allegations were concocted (to paraphrase) because he would've been fired long ago. If he were suspended pending investigation, would they have to announce it? No! That person's rationalization makes no sense to me. He could have been working provided he not be on set at the same time as HK during the investigation.

Someone else claimed that the allegations couldn't be true because he gave an interview to NB after he was fired. These people obviously never heard of what the PR people refer to as '...getting out in front of a story...' so you can put out your version first. The only problem is that this approach assumes that there won't ever be pushback from the other side. Well, that has happened. And so far MM is radio silent. At this point, even he knows that no good can come from him opening up his yap.

These MM fanatics are ensuring that things will drag on through the mud. They might just push and push until more nastiness shows itself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Soap Opera Digest put the TMZ article on their newsfeed and some of those ladies are going crazy in there. Reminds me of how Megyn Kelly couldn't sit still the night President Obama won his re-election. They're all over the place and spouting out the nuttiest things.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The reason these news outlet are putting this story up is because they have known it was true all along and wasn't at liberty to say due to HHK. Now that is is out, they are under no obligation to remain silent.

All these people begging for him to come back should cease and desist. And all these folks, mostly women, not caring and still wanting him at Y&R should walk a mile in HHKs shoes. She deserves to have a safe and harassment free work place. And she doesn't deserve to be fired or forced to quit to get it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I'm not sure it's as unpopular as you think.  I just think the show knew they were in a bind, and needed a proven couple for the viewers to invest in. Trying to reunite Vanessa and Ross had just failed in 87. I don't think Ed and Holly's affair was well received, as Simon and Garrett had a brother/sister chemistry. Enter Billy and Vanessa, who give you history and an out not to try and do a Josh/Reva/Billy triangle, which would've really wrecked the relationship between Josh and Billy. I'd have been ok with trying Vanessa/Ross again, and doing a Vanessa/Ross/Holly/Billy quad for a while. I hated Nadine. HATED. She had to be the most insufferable also-ran before ATWT's Julia Lindsay.
    • GROSS. Michael Swan was hot back in his ATWT days. Now he's 76 and WAY past his hot years.    
    • Since she kidnapped, locked up and tried to kill her father's wife I'd say that is still a pretty big deal
    • I'm good with the gushing, too. There aren't many soap icons like John Black, and that's important to celebrate and remember. And yes, life does go on for other characters, but as they say, timing is everything. Going sky diving the day before the funeral? And during a week of shows that were so powerful emotionally? No.    
    • No. There might have been a slight pause for dramatic effect after his "death," but pretty soon after they showed him in France getting plastic surgery and getting involved with his doctor, then planning with her to bring Christina to France. (She thought he had good reason to do it; she wasn't a bad person or anything). Now that I think of it, there must have been some kind of pause before that, during the 70s. Rita was accused of killing a private patient for an inheritance when she lived in Texas. Part of the backstory was that Roger had been there, too. Not sure exactly when or how long that was.
    • I've already stated that I don't like Doug being written as this meek and submissive. It was so lame watching him leave her like that. Vanessa can divorce him, but she then needs to get her thot ass into therapy. She's not only having sex with every guy she runs into, but is now having  sex with a skeevy perv on a poker table. I'm going to give the BTG some credit here. For months, many on this board were delighting in the Vanessa/Joey flirting and what they saw as chemistry. I think we're now seeing what the writers always intended -- that Joey is a disgusting POS wannabe mobster.
    • John Black actually was the ultimate good guy soap hero. So I don’t mind the town gushing over him. It’s deserved.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy