Jump to content

Which Literary Classic Would You Adapt to Series?


Khan

Recommended Posts

  • Members

Right now on TV, we have series inspired by such literary works as "The Count of Monte Cristo" ("Revenge"), "Alice in Wonderland" ("Once Upon a Time in Wonderland"), "The Legend of Sleepy Hollow" (er, "Sleepy Hollow"), and the classic fairy tales written by the Brothers Grimm (duh) and others ("Once Upon a Time," "Beauty and the Beast"). Which is to say nothing of the upcoming NBC series "Dracula" or the 3,000 "Wizard of Oz"-inspired TV pilots being developed as we speak.

So, here's my question: out of the works remaining in the canon of world literatures -- from "The Epic of Gilgamesh" to...whenever -- which would YOU adapt to series television if you could? What spin would you put on it in order to make it seem fresh and contemporary and not just a straight re-telling of a familiar tale?

(Or maybe you're someone who feels primetime TV has become too reliant on recycling stories, including ones that have become entrenched in the public consciousness. If so, feel free to discuss those views here, too.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 27
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

"Tess" is EXACTLY what I had in mind, AMS! Of course, if you stayed entirely true to the story, viewers (and especially female ones) will stone you, lol. It could be a modern-day adaptation, but the "Tess" character would have to avoid the sad fate at the end.


IA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Of course! If it were to be an open-ended tale, we'd have to avoid that ending or at least add in a surprise twist to keep the story moving.

Thinking more on Lord of the Flies (which I need to reread and watch both movies again, because it's been so long, and I love that story so much), I really don't see why it couldn't also be an open-ended series. Set it in the present day, but keep the set-up the same. I think the lack of female characters (and, thus, het ships) would be a disadvantage for some people, but they'd deal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Khan, I also believe we both acknowledged in another thread some time ago that the characters from Bret Easton Ellis' series of novels and that whole world would be a goldmine for some type of adaptation. Not classic literary characters, of course, but a show on HBO would nonetheless be absolutely brilliant if handled correctly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

With Bret Easton Ellis' endorsement, if not his cooperation and direct involvement, I wouldn't mind a cable series that did just that, Bright Eyes. Specifically, I would set the series at Camden College in the early '80's, the period of time when diverse characters from all of Ellis' novels were there simultaneously, and where all their lives and adventures intersected.

Another possibility: George Eliot's "Silas Marner," only set in a futuristic, dystopian society. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Frankly, I'm surprised no network has seized upon a chance to turn the "Arabian Nights" into a series. You have the framework (Scheherazade tells her stories for "1001 nights"), the hook or gimmick (she must keep Shahryar entertained -- OR SHE'LL DIE!!!), and a plethora of mini-arcs (each of her stories, lushly dramatized -- perhaps by a sort of repertory company of actors, "American Horror Story" style).

It could be part soap opera, part romantic drama (as the king and his new bride play that will-they-or-won't-they game), part adventure, part mystery (are the stories Scheherazade telling clues that point to some diabolical plot or conspiracy?)...it could have a little bit of everything.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • @Liberty City I look forward to your write ups everyday. 

      Please register in order to view this content

      And I couldn't be happier, I loved her from the beginning. She's a great addition to the cast.  
    • Mona... quit being a 'pick me'.  You're nothing to the Duprees except the help.  Now when you find out what Silk Press Sheila did to Laura than you can go off on her... until then.. stay quiet. I prefer the Joey/Vanessa scenes because they aren't the Duprees. Am I supposed to root for the Duprees?  I don't tend to root for, nor sympathize with those that come from privilege.  I'll always root for the underdog. 
    • Sheila in that Bill/Liam scene was utterly pointless and ruined the moment completely. Bell needs to cut his losses with KB, he clearly has NO idea what to do with Sheila    LMFAO        
    • I liked that realism, too.  (DanaLeslie/Lulu/whoever  is still shifty enough to have paid someone to learn those details over the years, though)
    • Please register in order to view this content

      date: Monday, May 12 | Sara A. Bibel, Jazmen Darnell Brown | Anthony Pascarelli Teddy Boy. Teddy Bear. DEADBEAT! Now we know where Deadbeat gets it from. Vanessa in a random two-second spotting with Deadbeat? Oh, okay then! Dana is selling herself to Nicole right now. Oh, look who it is... Anita showing up to support Dani in her demure confrontation with Deadbeat2. Mona is not playing with Eva; from "backstabbing heifer" to "girl bye", she is not playing with her. At all. Joey is fully playing Vanessa, and she's so easily falling for it. C'mon, honey, don't do that. Shanice is going to be a comfort board for Douglas when he takes her advice and helps him heal himself. Mona going off on Dana just like she deserves. Mama Dupree went off: "Handle your business!" Could Eva and Randy be potentially paired for a one-night stand? That could be an interesting twist. Damn Mona with the continued burns, this time for Dana: "Hell was made for people like you, Leslie. Enjoy the burn." Anita questioning her own decisions and instincts feels really natural and real. It's a nice change of pace from the other matriarchs we've seen established in American daytime. Now the true Dana/Ted scenes are coming out. Anita warning Eva that she'll never be a part of the Dupree family shows the claws are fully out. Teddy fully calling Dana "demented" and "psychotic" is going to cause some problems, won't it? Notes: I fully need Maurice Johnson (Ted) gone yesterday; his performances are just not selling to me. Love seeing Tamara Tunie (Anita) beginning to get her teeth into the meat of the scripts. It's about time. Karan Kendrick (Mona) delivered today!!! She's such a breath of fresh air.
    • Oh yeah Leslie is Sheila Carter levels of delulu    Damnit, Ambyr Michell you gutted me with that quivering lip
    • Damn, Anita doesn't play, that was pretty vicious.  I hope Eva gets her redemption.
    • Please register in order to view this content

      I doubted the tests but i liked that htey had Nicole as a doctor mention that the test also had genetic markers that matched Teds that Leslie really wouldnt have been able to fake. I think most people thought the test only said 99.999% chance match but its more detailed than that
    • I love Jon Lindstrom on GH...  but I don't enjoy him as Joey, at all.  Joey is a dud character.   And I don't feel any Joey/Vanessa heat at all.  I can see that the actors are trying to show it but it doesn't come off as believable to me. And it's obvious that Joey is using Vanessa and doesn't care a bit about her.  
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy