Jump to content

Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice


YRBB

Recommended Posts

  • Members

http://deadline.com/2016/03/batman-v-superman-opening-weekend-box-office-records-1201726300/

 

Reading through the comments, this interested me:

 

oey Seph • on Mar 26, 2016 9:08 am

After an initial meeting with Snyder, it’s well documented that Chris Nolan vocally opposed Zack’s notes on Goyer’s trestment, for Superman to kill Zod. Snyder believed (and still believes) that he is a better filmmaker who knows these characters better than (wait for it) Chris Effing Nolan.

Shortly after that initial meeting, Nolan packed his bags and severed AL ties of Syncope and Legendary with WB. (He produces in name only, and hasn’t revisited a set or meeting since meeting Snyder in the very beginning of MoS, to check on his progress.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 200
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Ugh. Why am I not surprised. It's been obvious for years that DC has no respect for the Superman family, likely because they aren't raping and pillaging. 

 

Is Snyder really an Ayn Rand groupie? That would explain a lot. 

 

I guess at least Goyer's involvement means I'll never have to see any gay characters involved (ie, ruined and marauded)...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think Warner Bros. is definitely very uncomfortable with Superman and virtually any non-Batman comic property, and always has been. Suicide Squad is dark, gritty and focused on supervillains which suits their tone, and the film itself will feature not only Batman villains but Batman himself.

 

Over in the comics wing they seem to be trying to curry favor with this "Rebirth" event which appears to be re-grafting the old DC Universe onto the new one in some weird way - reassembling the history of the Titans and their mentors, I think, and changing some things back to the way they were. But that's not enough for me to get me to re-invest in what's become of them sadly, I dropped DC completely at least four or five years ago. It's a strange testament to how blinkered things have become there when their big announcement of new titles today included one Superman book for each Superman - one featuring the New 52 version, the other featuring the pre-reboot Superman who is still married to Lois with a young son named Jonathan (who is getting his own book "Super Sons" with Damian Wayne's Robin). The original (and real IMO) Supes and Lois are now randomly living in the same DCU as the New 52 characters under false identities - why? I have no idea. When did the Clark and Lois we've known since the '80s have a biological son? Off-camera. I love the pre-New 52 DC before it got mutilated, but this is all just so cluttered and ridiculous. All this mess proves the New 52 never should have happened. (Something Grant Morrison rather pointedly commented on in his unusually dark ending to his Batman run, which had been disrupted by the sudden line-wide continuity reboot before he took leave of DC altogether - Morrison too loves Superman.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Having seen the movie last night I don't think it's godawful as the critics made it seem, however it was dreadfully boring. The special effects were mundane and the storyline was average. The climatic fight scene felt like a video game. Strange that Wonder Woman is jumping around and heaving herself and there wasn't a smidgen of dust somewhere on her body with all that epic fiery debris flying around. Nope!  Her skin and was just as perfect as ever. Batman instantly deciding Superman was no longer a threat based on a name rung hollow when he still did not know all the facts. It still did not negate why he hated Superman in the first place. Eisenberg was miscast as Lex and the schizophrenic acting does nothing for the character. I find Lois Lane highly annoying. She's a gnat I wish would go away.  And absolutely, Superman is way too dark.  It's just gloom and more gloom with pensive looks and grimaces throughout the entire movie. Even in tender scenes with Lois, Superman looks pensive. There was not one single moment of genuine laughter from the character. Superman is not Batman but they might as well have been given how interchangeably similar they were portrayed. I'm still trying to decide if Afleck made a decent Batman. Outside the costume, I kept seeing the actor but in costume I almost forgot. It was kind of jarring.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Administrator

I enjoyed it, especially the last half of the movie.  The final battle with Doomsday was one of the better fights in a comic book movie.  I loved Wonder Woman in this fight - the way she was introduced by using the shield to save Batman; the way she just flew through the air to attack with her sword, and using the lasso to tie up Doomsday.  I don't really know much about WW but seeing her in this made me excited for origin story movie next year. 

 

Batman was more vicious, more violent in his attacks, like against the bad guys who had Martha Kent, than any other previous Batmans.  I hope there's an R-Rated version of this fight in the R-Rated Directors Cut.  I thought Batfleck was awesome.

 

Loved all the hints/foreshadowing to future films: Lex's file on Aquaman, Flash, WW, Cyborg; Bruce's dream where we see references to Darkseid and an evil Superman; Lex's painting which I think is another Darkseid reference; The Flash warning Bruce about Lois "being the key" and having to "save us"; The Joker reference with "haha the jokes on you Batman" written on what apparently was Robin's suit, so maybe The Joker killed Robin. 

 

I didn't like the majority of Jesse Eisenberg's portrayal of Lex Luthor - he did his usual fast-paced-speaking and tics.  The only good parts of his portrayal was when we saw the evil and Lex's eyes, when he was straightforward serious.  I hope to see more of that and less tics in future films.   I think Bryan Cranston would've been great in this role, but maybe Snyder was apprehensive about people seeing him as Walter White again instead of Lex (Bryan playing another bald bad guy). 

 

I was hoping to see more of Clark/Lois together - I just don't think feel enough of a connection to this pairing in two movies now.

 

Looking forward to the Justice League movie - I know they start shooting in April.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Administrator

When we see Bruce's mom get killed again in the beginning of the movie, I thought, "Why do we need to see this again? Everyone knows this part of Bruce's story."  But I loved that "Martha" moment at the conclusion of the Batman/Superman fight.  I knew both Clark and Bruce have mothers named Martha, but it was an "oh yeah!" moment for me because I never seen it put in that context before, nor have I thought about that myself.  LOL   Batman didn't kill Superman *just because* "Martha" was also Superman's mother's name - he didn't know that until Lois came in and told him.  He stopped killing Superman because he was wondering why Superman was saying his mother's name.  Then after finding about Martha Kent being taken by Lex, Batman realizes Superman isn't just a "God" who can do whatever he wants, he realizes that Superman has a mother just like him, a mother that someone loves, a mother that he doesn't to see die (again).  That's what I took out of those scenes. 

 

"Why is Superman dark and broody?"  I think it's because no matter all the good that he has been doing, people are still questioning him, tearing him apart, blaming him for what happened in Man of Steel (Zod coming to Earth because of him, destroying all those buildings therefore "killing" all those innocent lives); and then being blamed again for more deaths in Africa, and then again for what happened on Capitol Hill.  That stuff takes a toll on you, so he was in a bad place mentally.   Now that people are on his side, maybe he'll be "brighter" in the movies to come.  We'll have to wait and see what his resurrection will be like.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

If not for the Jimmy Olsen thing I might have seen this someday, as I sort of wanted to see how Affleck did as Batman (I've always simultaneously thought Affleck was douchey/dull/sort of hot/charismatic...). Facewise he's sort of how I have headcanoned Batman/Bruce more than once.

 

I have to admit all the "Batman doesn't kill" brouhaha surprised me, as I could swear I remember him killing quite a bit. 

 

I sometimes get the feelings many modern comic and movie writers don't actually like Lois Lane but feel they have to include her. It's too bad - she's actually a cool character when given the chance. 

 

Based on the critical mauling I expected more negative fan reviews. They have been negative, but not on the disaster the reviews would suggest. It's sort of the inverse of Age of Ultron, which a lot of people seemed to dislike and struggle with, but tried not to be too negative because Whedon and Marvel are golden children.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Maybe it's because I had very low expectations, but I found her one of THE best parts of the movie and WW was badass. That was certainly a pleasant surprise. 

 

The Jimmy Olsen thing was truly horrific, only slightly made better by the fact they didn't make it clear it was him. Still, it made NO sense and was truly unnecessary. However, specifically in the context of the movie, and only in that, it didn't register as much, considering it happened really early on and then things moved on.

 

Your comments on Affleck are really amusing to me because that's exactly how I feel about him. Thought I was the only one!

 

I have always loved Lois Lane in the various incarnations of Superman I've seen but this version of her really tests my nerves. I don't think they get her.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • My only recollection of Ms Felder in Tom Lissanti's book is that she was not well liked backstage, and nobody was aware of rumors that she was fired because of her looks, including the network executive interviewed for the book.
    • a) you would not be sorry, but  b) full episodes from the first half of '89 are hard to find. 
    • Ya see..., that's why I can't watch this show on my own!

      Please register in order to view this content

      I'm ripping it for being dumb, meanwhile half the episode goes over my head.  Hello pot, I'm kettle.
    • When put very plainly it wouldn't make sense, but you could say that Ashley would prefer someone that can pay his own way without sharing expenses and has more than a working class experience. Andre might want someone more stable and level headed. Of course the issue is that the characters don't match despite the plausibility of a connection making s
    • I am fine with no one mentioning Bob-ette again.  It's frustrating not ever knowing what was up with him truly or why we wasted so much time on that to never get a conclusion.  I am willing to forget it though. Abe being on the board makes more sense to me because of Lexie and Theo.  I think there was a wing dedicated to Autism research or treatment years ago possibly named after Theo and Lexie was the chief of staff at some points and worked there for years.  I could see Abe having interest in the hospital still.
    • TR eventually came to be a nickname for Theresa Regina, the name her kidnappers gave her. Estelle never referred to her as Rebecca, though, always Theresa. I guess that was what TR wanted.    TR went to Switzerland. Jane returned for the last week.  After Ryder died, TR never had a love interest. I assume they gave up. I wouldn’t have dropped John Loprieno as Danny but he got squeezed out by Quinn, really. A TR/Evie/Jerry triangle might’ve worked.    David Forsyth and Jackie Schultz had good chemistry. I liked Luann though. I think Sharon Gabet would’ve been a more interesting recast, and she might’ve kept Joe Lambie on as Lloyd.    But Suzi and Wendy were gone, and Liza was talking about leaving town to join Gary in Africa, so before the cancellation, I do believe Liza was getting phased out.  Sunny and Patti and Evie were set up as heroines, and it was a small show. 
    • Andre/Ashley are a mismatch and not in a cute opposites attract sort of way. He is a very stylish photographer, independently wealthy, wordly  and she is a simple, struggling nurse with limited experiences. He has been having a covert sexual relationship with an older divorced woman and she is involved with a meat and potatoes blue collar  dude. Just  don't see what the attraction would be on either side.
    • I read that somewhere too - maybe it was mentioned in that book? I hope it's true.
    • I took a break from Edge of Night to finally start watching this. I watched the first week's worth of episodes. I started off chronologically even though they released the show originally with the Barnabas era first (don't know when he comes in). I had those discs in the complete coffin collection. I'm watching the complete series on Amazon so I hope Amazon doesn't pull a Knots Landing and yank the series before I finish as I don't have all of the beginning episodes. Thoughts: I appreciate the creepy black and white vibe and how everything is so mysterious even when it's just people walking into rooms. I also like seeing actors I know (Louis Edmonds, Joan Bennett, Mitchell Ryan, Conrad Bain (although he might be a cameo), etc.). It was nice to finally see Joel Crothers as I have yet to see him on Edge of Night. Crothers is quite looking so I wish he'd show up on EON. Mitchell Ryan is also attractive. I like how they set up Devlin's animosity towards the Collins family during this week.  We're left to wonder why Roger is so upset. Why is Devlin angry? What happened to Roger's wife? Who wrote to Victoria? Not much has really happened but I'm intrigued. The dialogue is certainly not on the level of EON. It amuses me they leave bloopers in. Bennett in particular struggles with doors. Was this filmed live? 
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy