Jump to content

Paula Deen


Eric83

Recommended Posts

  • Members

It's not real life, I agree with you. But certain things characters say on shows, in movies, the main stream continues to support racism in this country. And the actions may not directly deal with one another, but I think there is a relationship, as certain written scenes have influenced or sustained certain attitudes and prejudices from it's viewers.

I agree Eric on freedom to speak your mind. I did, and really what I found hypocritical in general, I am not directing all of this at you, was the retaliation towards Paula using images and terms to emphasize her ignorance, but at the same time belittle Kunta Kinte who was a credible character in a pertinent television event. And I appreciate your apology, but I am just asking to be responded to in a manner that doesn't demean that fact that I offered something critical, albeit debate, because I want to get answers. I am not here to cause trouble like "London" said, or that I am a bird of "racist" feathers as Ann insinuated...and she did. I will apologize I put the cart before the horse in the "N" word first, as the emphasis lies on claims of discrimination in the work place .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 253
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Paula Deen's racism results from her ignorance and her stubbornness only compounds it. I get the impression that she's been told that some of the "funny" stories she tells are offensive to some and she does it anyway. Why? Because "she is what she is" and it is, after all, her right to speak her mind and be herself. I have no problem with her being WYSIWYG. All of her black friends know exactly what she is. They know that she believes they are so much less than she is and they're able to make an informed decision.

She serves as a catalyst that brought the truth about the way a lot of other people think and/or their beliefs to the surface.

What I find a real shame is that sites claiming to be devoted to "black news" including Huffington's page, have made her their focal point. She apparently ranks above all the other trite happenings with which they're consumed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

She uses racist language, makes racist jokes, creates a racially hostile atmosphere and has her black employees use a different bathroom at her business and you don't think that she is "an out and out racist." I guess all that is left for her to do is beat, lynch, or drag a black person behind a car for her to meet this classification to you and some others.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

For !@#$%^&*]'s sake. Blazing Saddles used racist language as satire. It was a comedy meant to show how ignorant and self-defeating racism is. Are you claiming that Paula Deen is engaging in some sort of satirical performance art or are you do you genuinely not see the difference? This level of false equivalence is what got you feeling beat up on earlier in this thread.

I've noticed that there is little support for Paula Deen that isn't rooted in "Oh yeah? Look over there...and ignore the context while you do it!!" At least I'm willing to say, "She's old, Southern and just a product of her times and environment." You just want to pretend that she did nothing wrong and demand the rest of us do the same because of soap operas and Mel Brooks.

It's Derailing for Dummies 101.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

If all of those things are true, then I might believe she is a racist. However none of that has been proven or admitted. She admitted to the n word and the wedding, which are awful. But the rest is heresay at this point and until there is concrete evidence surrounding it, I'm not ready to tar and feather her over it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

We can all pretty much filter whatever someone says or does in order to keep ourselves from being accountable in any way for supporting shady or seemingly shady individuals. I think if people want to support or stand behind Paula Deen or whoever, they shouldn't feel any need to have to explain why. Be proud that you're so open minded, etc.

Comparing her real life actions to fictional works and characters is a serious stretch. It's kind of like saying that a person who loves Mickey Mouse should be a-okay with actual rodents because there's no difference.

The question people may want to consider is how they would like to work for the "harmless" Paula Deen? Do you think a woman who shows such disregard for the feelings of others because she wants to get her jokes in and "is what she is" would make a real fun employer?

So far, I've seen a lot of finger pointing of the unless you're a saint you have no right to judge variety. I haven't seen much about how lucky the plaintiff and her fellow employees should feel to be allowed to work for the great Paula Deen. In fact outside of references to her as one of those white liberals who iis apparently more offended by racism than white people, I haven't seen any of the loyal supporters address the hostile work environment claims.

There's a whole lot of concern about poor Paula Deen's feelings and well being so they think buying her book is going to teach everyone else a lesson. Her black friends and employees are supposed to grin and recognize her greatness as she finds new ways to insult them because she's just an old southern lady stuck in her old southern way. If she decided to shoot some of them and say it was just her southern way, I'm pretty sure people would find a way to be fine with that as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

She probably will sue them depending on the terms of her contract with them. They must think they have some legitimate ground for dumping her.

Either she will find another publisher or she can self-publish--especially since there is clearly an interest in her book.

As for the lack of focus on the sexism claims--that topic is usually low on the totem pole. People will get more worked up over the President killing a fly in a way that's not considered to be humane.

People actually showed up outside of the courthouse to cheer for Aaron Hernandez as if they were at some pre-game rally. The man is accused of killing someone.

The media loves the racism angle best. And it will get Jesse Jackson some coverage since he says she can be redeemed and I am sure he will be more than happy for some cost, to facilitate that process.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I suspected that this might have been the real reason for the cancellation. Trisha Yearwood's southern cooking show has taken off and I think they want to make that one of their top programs, rather than hanging on to a twelve year old program that they barely even promoted anymore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • very danceable theme song https://x.com/iammskye1/status/1923509048416043443
    • You are not. I'm so happy that this storyline for Anita is finally showing movement. 
    • A shame that Santa Barbara lost the Andrades but I wonder what the Dobsons had in mind for them. From what I know of the Joe/Kelly situation, they didn't seem to know what to do with the Perkins. I don't think McConnell in particular gets enough acclaim for what she added to the show.  The Dobsons (from what I know of the show) didn't seem to know what to do with Augusta. This was especially true on their second go around but that was also Rauch getting back at her, so who knows?
    • Thanks. Some of that sounds even heavier into crime than EON was at that point, although I guess you still had the Vickie/Julian romance and Heather losing her baby. The biggest difference is probably the comfort characters at EON, like Nancy and Mike. Oh, now I think I remember a little about the raciness. Was there something about toes? Considering the short time he was at OLTL, I'm not sure if moving made a big difference for Jameson, but I guess it still helped moving to a show that was seen as being revived around that point. Thanks. I'm sure there are other options listed in Paul's proposed soaps thread, but Lovers & Friends was so hurriedly thrown together it gives the impression NBC was just desperate, flying blind. They took for granted the audience Somerset had in that timeslot. I wonder if one more year might have mattered...probably not, but you always wonder, as that whole thing ended up leading to even more headaches and bad decisions for NBC Daytime.  What I might have done is consider moving some AW characters over to Somerset.  Trying to figure out who I'd choose...definitely not Iris. 
    • When the show debuted, Louise Sorel came on like gangbusters. But then in the fifth week, they introduced Lionel, and her star power dimmed. Unfortunately her character became more of a jealous, shrewish wife. Lionel came on like gangbusters after the earthquake, especially in December 1984, but unfortunately after that, they had his character in jail for 2 months, which dimmed his star power. I'm watching late February 1985, and Mason is still dull as dirt. His character hasn't come alive yet. The show is really doing a good job with the Kelly/ Peter stuff, mostly due to the performances. It's too bad they couldn't make Peter this interesting from the beginning. 
    • 5-14   Well, I'm glad I went back and started from Wednesday. I remember watching and reading the comments here. I figured that perhaps rather than what soaps usually do...have an episode focused on other plots while the A story has a day off and is in the background aka Thursdays typically...this show just did it on Wednesday. I still liked it because I'm such a biased Jazmen fan. And I like how the episode continued the various threads from the fallout from the SilkPress/Eva reveal (Eva v Kat being the standout and Eva's continued attempts to find her landing as she is in pariah phase), but I think the problem I found with it was that outside of the above, the show decided not to focus on any B plot, either so the stories outside of the above were C plots.    I like Dani and Andre. I like what they are. I like how it has been a slow burn in the background. But of course, at some point it will come out or they will hit the next phase in their story. I have liked that you can see Dani still being herself, but Andre's influence is clear...like when she took his advice and basically parroted him to Pamela a few weeks ago. And she was actually defending her man basically here. And their pillow talk...mmm. They have such chemistry and such built in drama. And well-paced for a C plot. No story is good without some twists and near misses, so I was happy to see that Nicole...even with her dealing with her own feelings which was cool to keep the SilkPress storyline alive...almost figured it out. Yeah, near miss...always lets you know how invested you are.

      Please register in order to view this content

          And I've said it before, but it's not like the writers can truly go to the well for the Dani/Bill/Hayley story right now. So for now, they can only be developed/explored through individual storylines. Dani has Andre and her growing business. Bill with the trembling hand as well as messing with the Martin/Smitty marriage seem to be his. So Hayley for now is the weak link. She so needs her own storyline. I thought she would continue to try to fight for her place in the community. She still might. But right now, her just following Bill around like an insecure puppy ain't it. And she is still talking about that honeymoon? Ha!   I like the June storyline so far. It's something different. And we know I like the good guy/good girl couple of Jacob and Naomi. Because soaps still need good guys. And I'm not sure where it's going...though I love all of you all's theories about it. And that picture...another clue.   Everything with Eva the Pariah is giving old school soap, and I love it. Cuz any villain/vixen/anti-heroine has to go through that uphill battle of being accepted when they fall or their schemes are exposed. And she is straight underdog. And I like how realistic it has been so far with some people being able to move forward with her and people being against her for what she did. Unlike some soaps *cough*Y&R*cough* It feels like it could go in any direction and that just feels exciting. And we still have so much plot to play. Laura's accident. SilkPress clearly won't go down without a fight. The rivalry between Eva and Kat. The potential split in opinions on Eva within the Dupree house...especially given what a lot of us think in terms of if Eva is a twin or was switched or something else entirely. And everyone is acting their butts off. And if they aren't, they are definitely growing into it. So far...it's all good.   Loved dinner at the Martin/Smitty household. I liked they even kept the C plot with Ty mildly going. And I'm a sucker for a montage involving makeovers and/or hair.    Of course, I have to mention the best (for me) C plot of all right now...ANITA!!! Great to see she's finally getting a story slowwwwwly going. Okay, perhaps even too slow for me. lol. But it has been building. But now to see it moving. To get some good solo Vernon/Anita scenes to see their chemistry on display. And then the coda with the phone call...so Sharon ain't happy with her. Can't...and I do mean CAN'T...wait to see how it develops.
    • DAYS OF OUR LIVES 10-1-1976 Doug & Julie's wedding #1 Taped on 9-16-1976, Episode #2740
    • I have just uploaded 91 mp3 files, audio only, radio episodes of Guiding Light. https://archive.org/details/guiding-light-ep-0857 Guiding Light Radio Episodes For many years Guiding Light was broadcast on radio. These are some of those episodes, audio only, of course. They are mp3 files.
    • I don't know if this will be useful. If it's not please scroll on by. If it is, great! This is Part 1 of 3.  Search For Tomorrow. (1977). Daytime TV Library Series No. 7.   Between 1975 and 1977, Daytime TV Magazine, the leading publication dedicated to US daytime programs, began a series of special editions dedicated specifically to one serial.  In early 1977, they released issue #7 which focused on the longest running serial at that time, “Search for Tomorrow”.   The publication contained interviews with key cast members and productions staff, such as the producers, directors, writer and costume designer.  It included a synopsis of the story from origin to that point, lots of pictures and a key item: What it took to make an episode of the show.   At the time, SFT was enjoying a revitalization after four years mediocre ratings.  The new producer, Mary-Ellis Bunim rose up the ranks from secretary to producer in late 1973.  Under her guidance, ratings jumped.  In the 1973-1974 ratings, “Search” placed 9th with a 7.7.  In the 1974-1975 season, it rose to a 4th with a 9.4.  At the time of this edition, it hovered around 5th with an 8.6 rating, winning its time period and coming in third of the five CBS soaps. Some of the questions posed were:             What did the title mean to the actors?             What is your opinion about the Emmys?             What character would they want to switch with?             Did the actors feel there was a bias against acting on a soap?             When did you start on the show?             What motivates your character? I will cover some here & some in other articles. Today I will cover how the show got on the air: The Show On The Air – Step by step how SFT got on the air in 1976. At the time, “Search for Tomorrow” was taped at the CBS Studio 51 & 54 on the lower West Side of Manhattan (probably the studio at W. 26th Street that was a later home to “Guiding Light”). 8:00 AM – The director of the day (there were three at the time), the production assistant and actors in the first act arrive.  Actors arrived based on the acts they were in between 8:00 AM and 9:45 AM and went to the rehearsal hall. 9:00 AM – Makeup artist and hair stylist arrive (there was one of each except for special episodes where full cast were part of the episode). 9:00 AM – Makeup artist and hair stylist arrive (there was one of each except for special episodes where full cast were part of the episode). 9:30 AM – Producer Mary-Ellis Bunim and Associate Producer Bob Getz arrive and go to their offices on the second floor. 9:45 AM – 10:15 AM – Director of the day checks sets in studio on the third floor. Actors begin make-up and hair sessions. 10:15 AM – 11:45 AM – This is the time for first rehearsal on set (called FAX) with cameras. Blocking and camera angles are perfected. 11:45 AM – 12:15 PM – First run-through in studio.  Producer and associate producer watch action in their office via CCTV.  Rough edges are smoothed out. 12:15 PM – 12:45 PM – Actors lunch break.  Notes made by producer and associate producer during run through are given to director in production office. 1:00 PM – 1:20 PM – Directors give notes to actors and studio personnel. Final touches to actors’ hair and make-up. 1:30 PM – 2:00 PM – Dress rehearsal.  Producers watch on CCTV and make final notes. 2:00 PM – 2:15 PM – Producers give final notes to directors in control room. 2:15 PM – 2:30 PM – Final notes given to actors and studio personnel by director. Notes on production elements (i.e., does liquor look real? Are props in assigned locations?) given by associate producer. 2:30 PM – 3:00 PM – Taping the episode. (SFT taped only two days before air). 3:00 PM – 3:15 PM – Tapes are checked.  If all is OK, cast is excused. Thus, “Search for Tomorrow” put on a show in LESS than SEVEN AND A HALF HOURS!  This time does not include the homework the actors and directors have to do before arriving at the studio.  Directors stated it took eight to twelve hours of homework for every episode they direct.  The producer has to spend time reading rough drafts and editing scripts, making notes for the writer, working on long-term story and character development. The associate producer spends outside office hours, organizing all facets of production elements and making sure they are all intact.  On a daily basis, auditions are held, attendance at script consultations and going over the following day’s schedule.  With luck, the producer can leave the studio between 6:00 and 7:00 PM. Written by DM James Fairbanks, Posted with permission. 
    • Please register in order to view this content

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy