Jump to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Soap Opera Network Community

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

GH50: Week of June 17 Discussion

Featured Replies

  • Member

I keep saying RC only know how to write two types of women. The loud and obnoxious type or perpetual victims. Exception for the occasions when he gives a combo of the two types.

.

lol then what would Anna or Elizabeth under him be?
  • Replies 250
  • Views 21.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Member

Liz mostly seems to be there so AJ and Nik can posture.

Anna is...well, she has a pulse. I think.

  • Member

I think there are moments where Howarth does the cold, curious, alien side of Franco very well, but for the most part it's clear the writers just desperately want Todd back. And it's so bizarre and so, so inappropriate with this particular character, who in his original incarnation talked at length about enjoying murder and crowed about Michael's rape. And 99% of the time it's embarrassing to watch.

The scene with KA the other day at the mansion where he talked about the two sides of himself was actually very good work by RH IMO, particularly when he veered towards obsessing over the mention of Jason, but it was in part disconnected from the Franco we know, who was some sort of demented pathology, either psychopath or sociopath. The truth is that Franco is all that bestial side of himself - anything else is a lie or a trick, either for himself or usually, for other people.

They could have very well used RH as the cold, alien, menacing Franco in the way GH has used Connie Towers as Helena - as a recurring villain. I think RH could do that very well. Instead they're trying to make Franco into a gray leading man. It will never work.

I was talking to some Roger fans or should I say stans, you know, the ones who want to be raped by him, and absolutely NOTHING is wrong with any of this to them. I didn't imagine they would have a problem because if anyone can "redeem" FrankenTodd, Roger is that person (translation: I will forgive anything as long as I get RH). I even told them that Roger showed signs that this could be pulled off for what they are trying to do with the character in the scenes with KA Friday. I didn't watch the entire show, but I wanted to see those scenes so that I would know that his entire presence won't be cringe worthy for the duration. But those scenes are .02% of the time. The rest is a clown. Roger is trying to be Franco with Todd tendencies when he should be playing a dark soul trying to find his way back to humanity. Craptini/Roger have no idea where they need this chacter to be and go, so they are just letting Roger have at it! The new poll in SOD says so much - 46% of the viewers don't care as long as it's Roger in the role. Many of them took the poll to mean that it's 50/50 wacko.png

I wouldn't mind seeing if this show could write for a black couple too but not at the expense of the few BM/WW soap pairings. I know Y&R and B&B refuses to pair black men with white women and will only pair them black women. I also know this pairing is a joke too because they are poorly written for and they could've paired Shawn with a younger woman.

Shawn and Alexis were never meant to be taken seriously. This was just so that we would not see Craptini as the oppressive pieces of garbage they really are when they dropped kicked Sharly and humiliated Shawn as foreplay for CarJoke. I know I know, Craptini hire black people all the time...yadda yadda yadda! If they were not going to write Shawn with Carly, they should have brought in someone else. As it stands, they took one character they had no intentions of caring about and put him with a character the show has not given 2 chits about in YEARS! WTFev! My mama didn't raise no fool!!!!!

Edited by ChitHappens

  • Member

KSt is so on her way out. She got kind of salty on twitter when asked about it.

Kirsten Storms?

  • Member

The rumor is she's leaving in 2014 and likely came from the fact she didn't go to the Emmys, just as MS joining is likely from spotting her talking to FV at the Emmys and I think attending the gh after party at some point.

Pretty sure Kirsten is under contarct til mid 2014. So six-eight planned exit for letting someone go during one of their cycles it pretty out there.

  • Member

Yep rumors have been floating around that she's on her way out and then she got defensive on twitter about it.

Keep her away from Dool, if Belle Black comes home I want Martha Madison.

  • Member

There's no point to Maxie and there hasn't been in a long time. This surrogate story is just a big who cares, and if it leads to a baby switch with the water filter, that's another who cares, like the one with Sam and Tea. They don't even use Maxie as any type of spark plug character. There's no reason she's there.

  • Member

Making Maxie pregnant was an idiotic idea. But it's every other story RC (and ABC) have had for any woman over 18 for at least 13 years.

  • Member

Making Maxie pregnant was an idiotic idea. But it's every other story RC (and ABC) have had for any woman over 18 for at least 13 years.

This is worse than giving Brenda and Sam children. There are certain soap characters to whom you don't give children, and Maxie is one of those characters. Outside of that, Maxie's health was not an issue, and it should have been. She's taking quite the risk for a child "that's not hers". Ridiculous. Then you take the point of contention off contract? What in the sam hell is going on here?!

  • Member

This is worse than giving Brenda and Sam children. There are certain soap characters to whom you don't give children, and Maxie is one of those characters. Outside of that, Maxie's health was not an issue, and it should have been. She's taking quite the risk for a child "that's not hers". Ridiculous. Then you take the point of contention off contract? What in the sam hell is going on here?!

Exactly and Brenda, Sam, and Maxie were all those types of characters.

  • Member

Exactly and Brenda, Sam, and Maxie were all those types of characters.

I am okay with Sam having a kid, but Brenda and Maxie should not be saddled with kids. Especially Brenda, who had a kid with some dayplayer and not Sonny or Jax.

Anyhow, what is this S&C crap? Why is Sonny threatening to kill his ex-wives lately? The ones he actually claimed to love? Wasn't everyone saying a few months ago he was going to off Brenda for sleeping with Mikey and now Carly? RC has no idea how to write Sonny at all.

Edited by carolineg

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.