Jump to content

OLTL: Thursday, May 23, 2013 Episode Discussion


Recommended Posts

  • Members

As long as everybody's knocking Matthew for being a deadbeat, I would really enjoy a scene where Natalie tells Matthew what it feels like to raise her child alone and how she worries about the long term impact John's abandonment will have on Liam.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 91
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

It could happen so naturally. And Natalie wouldn't necessarily have to be scolding Matthew. She could just be talking about her own difficulties without realizing how Matthew might take it. I could even see Matthew defending John because John was someone he looked up to. It could just be an interesting scene. Matthew acting as surrogate John, while Natalie is herself or surrogate Destiny.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Was I the only one today thinking that someone should remind Bo that he wasn't much of a father to HIS own son Drew, much like Matthew is now. I was waiting for Nora to say something today when they were discussing getting Matthew to spend more time with his son. Bo could easily speak to Matthew and explain how fast time is and how he sees Matthew making the same mistakes he made and that how he hopes Matthew and Drews time together isn't cut short as Bo' was with his first son

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I so love this idea! I'm trying to remember, did we ever get Matthew in scenes with cousin Natalie before? I remember back further we used to get Kevin/Joey/Jessica with CJ/Sarah a good amount but I don't remember the later generation of kids mixing it up as much with extended family. Anyway, this works regardless- Matthew/Clint are tight and Bo/Nat are tight plus Natalie is now friends with Destiny so its all very interconnected. I hope they play this beat- these writers seem to get the importance of family connections so maybe it will happen. At this point, Destiny has been better integrated with Matthew's family so we need some scenes of him and the Buchanans. Plus, Rob is too good to limit to drinking games and shirtless scenes in the apartment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

We don't know once we hit into the Shelter episodes if we'll see everyone. With the regular episodes, OLTL has been doing a pretty good job with showing the cast, but I can't say I like this change until we get into the Snoop week.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The previews for Snoop week (which I think is now 2 weeks) feature a good number of characters . I always love that they bring Snoop in as Bo's old friend so I expect a good week for Bora fans. I don't like the change but I'm trying to be positive. I expect more of shift in who is featured once we hit the point where RH heads back to tape GH. That will free up a decent amount of space on the canvas even though I'll miss Todd. Hopefully Dorian's part will amp up once we get past the first taped cycle where Robin was ill. I love the younger crew but can see that they need a rest day- not sure how fast that will come on the new schedule.

Does anyone else feel driven to drink when reading the comments under the episode on Hulu?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Really? There was like 4 mins of Michelle based scenes, and they were clearly there (at this point) to show Dani's feelings. I mean of course you can ff all you want, but they were barely even about Michelle (but I admit I seem to be one of the few soap fans who doesn't watch with my finger on the FF trigger whenever someone is on screen who I don't find interesting.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

LOL I feel like we're watching different shows ;) My main issue with the John thing, related to GH. On GH wasn't it basically said that Nat would not take John's calls at all and was hiding behind her dad? Here they make it sound like he just has never called her--still I never cared much about John, and his reasoning on GH for staying away from his son was inane so I can go with it.

SO I guess Destiny DOES work nights at the Banner--so much for my idea that she was secretly working nights at sugardaddy.com or whatever though I guess there could be more there.

Completely disagree with your last point. They've shown us several times that Destiny refuses hand outs from Bo and Nora although they apparently keep trying to give them. She DID take some clothes for her son, and Bo and Nora sometimes babysit him--but both of those things are things I feel nearly any loving grandparent would offer and want to do, and it would be stubborn and foolish to not accept them. That doesn't make her independent. Natalie also was happy to accept Vicki looking after Liam--does that mean she's a co-dependent leech to her family?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Please register in order to view this content

    • And while I'm doing catch-up, it's good to see you did as well. And YES. This is how May Sweeps SHOULD be. A story climaxing. Another A story being built up as we did with the aftermath of the first A story climaxing. B plots being built up...actually moving and being interested in most of them...if not all. hehe. New story being started. And even the C plots are moving, too. 
    • It definitely did. Nothing major, but I clocked the minor changes too. Passions did something similar with its theme in the later years and people thought I was crazy, but the nuances are there if you're paying attention. 
    • What? A nice little mini-marathon of catching up before work.    YES, PLEASE. 
    • I guess they copied literally everything from that C&R scene, the dialogue etc 
    • And even then...you have to wait a couple of weeks to be sure he's actually dead.

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Apparently. lol.  Well you know I don't mind standing also with the cheese so  
    • I have nothing to add. Everything you said is on point, and I don't know whether to laugh hysterically at it or throw things at the television. I do know it's terrible soap opera.  
    • Characterization: - I realized I have PTSD from Ted #1’s constant swaying. The moment I saw NuTed, I actually caught myself thinking, “Why isn’t he rocking?” - Leslie makes very little sense from a storytelling perspective unless she’s completely psychotic. What was she hoping to achieve with all her dramatic reveals and aliases? Also… who wouldn’t put two and two together after Laura’s accident? - Anita and Dani come across as mean-spirited, and honestly, the Duprees should just be portrayed as full-on villains. Been saying this since day one—remember when Dani punched Haley and the whole Dupree clan just walked away from her with that “shame on you” look? Wrong on so many levels. Glad others are finally seeing it too. - Mona is sanctimonious and I can’t stand her. She’s the worst kind of person: lower-to-middle class but constantly making excuses for the rich. - Call me crazy, but I’m actually enjoying Ashley and Derek’s storyline. I’ll take this neurotic OCD queen over the sanctimonious, multi-talented nurse any day. Plus, soap couples are usually so plastic. They deal with insane drama but never go to the bathroom, never plan a weekend away. Look at Kat and Tomas—every scene is just them planning lunch or dinner…! - Btw by now André seems bored af by Ashley.   WTF Moments: - No young woman would be even remotely interested in going to a casino (looking at Eva). And it’s wild how the show is treating gambling like it’s some kind of therapeutic hobby—like retail therapy or something. - What are they doing with Smitty’s eyebrows… and more importantly, why?   Parallels with Other Soaps: - I like Nicole, but she reinforces my belief that soaps should never include psychiatrists. If they’re portrayed accurately, they ruin the fun by rationalizing everyone’s childish and selfish behavior. If they’re portrayed inaccurately (hi Taylor from B&B), it’s equally bad. - Anita’s story is giving major SSM vibes from 2017‘s Y&R, when Victor got Nikki to start playing the piano again.  - Karla played a model on B&B too…

      Please register in order to view this content

        Direction & Continuity: - Pascarelli is hands down the worst director this show has. - Wednesday’s episode started with a nighttime establishing shot of Orphey Gene’s… but all the scenes that followed were clearly set in daytime—until halfway through the episode, when it suddenly switched back to night. - The picture on the piano at the Duprees’ house shows two little girls and two little boys. Who are the boys? One could be Martin (or Tyrell?), but who’s the other kid? (And speaking of pictures… no one under 50 is walking around with a printed photo in their pocket. But I digress.) - I love catching the time on the phones when they pop up onscreen. Friday’s episode was supposedly set before lunch, but Vernon’s phone said 3:15 in one scene and 3:50 in the next. A few scenes later, Kat is playing Leslie’s audio for Jacob and her phone shows 10:40. Cool. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy