Jump to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Soap Opera Network Community

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

AMC: Monday, May 6th Discussion

Featured Replies

  • Member

Everything you've cited is exactly what I think these shows need to avoid. This soap fetish (I'm referring to the genre, not you) that every character on the canvas has to be tied by blood to the almighty core makes these shows closed off and incestuous. It also kills the possibility for diversity and I'm not referring just to racial diversity, I mean the diversity of the types of stories that can be told. When all of your characters come from the same primordial sea of two or three families with all those shared experiences you kill off the drama that comes from different kinds of people with different experiences bouncing off of each other and end up with a canvas full of people who all remember summers in Pigeon Hollow.

in theory IA with you but with a shorter show, less airtime and a limited cast, I think they should invest in characters than can serve multiple purposes/roles. One with ties fulfills this than just a random newbie.
  • Replies 233
  • Views 18.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Member

Did someone seriously just suggest we should have Krystal instead of Jane? !@#$%^&*] no.

  • Member

Not to pick on AMCHistory--but I believe that's exactly what they said...



I'm a guy, Eric! LOL.

You're right, "dire" is too exaggerated, as is my saying the whole school is against Miranda ... I think Miranda's style of making everything seem so horrible for her was rubbing off on me, not that that's an excuse. Also, yes, it's still early days for the story.

I do still think David/Angie was the only good story in the episode though, and perhaps in the show overall so far right now. I also continue to have concerns about the young actors.

Thanks for the explanation--I see your point somewhat (though I think the youth dialogue has been better this week--after two episodes anyway--than last.) I will say as much as I seem to fight most points with you, I actually, perhaps oddly, look forward to reading your reviews.

  • Member

I stand by my statement. I would have rather saw Krystal and the BJ's set back over a newbie like Jane. I think that Cheap hit it on the head, this is a short-show, I would rather a character be able to fit more than just one role a be more than just a glorified extra.

Even Myrtle was more than just a "listening ear" at her inception. She was Kelly's surrogate mother. She was Lincoln's surrogate mother. She was a thorn in Langley and Phoebe's side. Her days as the town Sage came around much later. They played up her relationship to the Tyler family throught the 80's until the majority fell off the canvas.

  • Author
  • Member

Uh KWAK was a newbie at one time.

but on that note I'll take Jane over KWAK any day. THe show can stay Carey twit free as far as I'm concerned.

  • Member

Even Myrtle was more than just a "listening ear" at her inception. She was Kelly's surrogate mother. She was Lincoln's surrogate mother. She was a thorn in Langley and Phoebe's side. Her days as the town Sage came around much later. They played up her relationship to the Tyler family throught the 80's until the majority fell off the canvas.

Myrtle was a lot of things. Enemy to Phoebe, surrogate mother to Erica, town feminist, business owner, voice of reason, etc... my point is that she was allowed to grow into all those roles. The fact that Jane isn't on the frontburner right now isn't a drawback. It's good. We get to slowly watch her develop relationships with the people of PV so that when she finally does come to the forefront it will make sense. I'd rather watch Jane become important to the canvas than be handed a character like Lanie and told that she's important because of her pedigree. It's the CJ Holden Syndrome all over again.

  • Member

What happened to letting a character become important? At least she isnt being shoved down our throats.

  • Member

I stand by my statement. I would have rather saw Krystal and the BJ's set back over a newbie like Jane. I think that Cheap hit it on the head, this is a short-show, I would rather a character be able to fit more than just one role a be more than just a glorified extra.

Even Myrtle was more than just a "listening ear" at her inception. She was Kelly's surrogate mother. She was Lincoln's surrogate mother. She was a thorn in Langley and Phoebe's side. Her days as the town Sage came around much later. They played up her relationship to the Tyler family throught the 80's until the majority fell off the canvas.

I guess I have two arguments--though I see your point. One is, that I would hope this show would never become the incestuous romp that B&B is. Check out the original AMC cast--there are a few contract actors (and Jane's not contract) who went nowhere and seemed to just be nurses, etc. I don't know if that's a bad thing at all.

But my second point is I suspect Jane does have a key function in the show and we just haven't seen it yet.

  • Member

Myrtle was a lot of things. Enemy to Phoebe, surrogate mother to Erica, town feminist, business owner, voice of reason, etc... my point is that she was allowed to grow into all those roles. The fact that Jane isn't on the frontburner right now isn't a drawback. It's good. We get to slowly watch her develop relationships with the people of PV so that when she finally does come to the forefront it will make sense. I'd rather watch Jane become important to the canvas than be handed a character like Lanie and told that she's important because of her pedigree. It's the CJ Holden Syndrome all over again.

who is CJ Holden?
  • Member

who is CJ Holden?

OLTL, silly. The character everyone constantly wants, or is told rumours about that any new male character will be his return. No matter that since he left the show as a kid, he really doesn't have any clear personality, etc.

  • Member

OLTL, silly. The character everyone constantly wants, or is told rumours about that any new male character will be his return. No matter that since he left the show as a kid, he really doesn't have any clear personality, etc.

there is no character on OLTL called CJ Holden. Now there is a CJ Roberts

  • Member

Well, they did intend to bring him back at least once or twice in the last ten years. But yes, when everyone these days (or in the last five years) assumes any white male under 40 coming to OLTL is C.J. - I just don't think that's going to happen. (And his name is Roberts.)

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.