Jump to content

AMC: The Prospect Park Era (old production thread)


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Yeah. I think it's kind of a zero sum game. Some people would've tuned in for Erica. Others would've tuned out. Some would've tuned in for Rylee and Zendall. Others, like myself, would've considered that the kiss of death. The idea that this actor or that couple would guarantee ratings IMO has been disproven time and time again. And I say that as someone who has engaged in many a couple/actor flame war.

It seemed to me that there were people who were down for the experiment and others who simply weren't and PP spent time and money they didn't have trying to placate the people who simply weren't. I wish they'd had enough funding to really keep these shows going daily for a year or so. Then they would've found their audience and the haters could've just fallen away.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 9.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

The fact is that the audience for "Minx," Ryan, Greenlee that would consider any of them dealbreakers is extremely minimal. Those characters or couples simply don't make AMC. The show can even survive without Erica, as the new show proved. It wasn't the show that was lacking. It was financing.

The shady past of the PP guys is no secret, but it's also par for the course in Hollywood. There's no one clean. The question was whether they could keep the money flowing.

If ABCD wanted to simply transplant the shows with the existing production and teams back onto a slot in their schedule, sure, I'd be for it. But I'd be very concerned about what they'd say about some of the casting, storylines, etc. I said the other night there's so much in terms of casting, character beats, story focus that today's ABCD would never have signed off on. Frank Valentini's very good at many things, but he'd never have cast Eric Nelsen in such a key role. The Internet and streaming is still the new frontier, and I think it's where soaps need to end up going, right down to the freedom from restrictions and puritanical micromanagement based on network management's dim view of their audience base.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

They need either a network or simply a much stronger parent company/investor.

The problem is most of the traditional networks that generally deal in soaps today don't want to invest in new writers or ideas. So you get the same people breathing the same air who often have lost any kind of larger perspective, even when many of them are still very talented, still hard workers. And a big reason the new shows worked for me was because they took chances the way soaps used to, often in a lot more subtle ways - candor about sex or drugs, yes, but also just the ability for people to talk about life in a way that mimicked the character building on primetime drama (which in turn mimics the way soaps used to do character). You could've easily seen a lot of the stuff with Téa and Dani on OLTL, J.R. and A.J. and Miranda and Zach/Bianca on AMC, even Matthew and Destiny and Bo and Nora or Blair and Jack on a nighttime family/teen show. They pushed the envelope in those ways as opposed to just doing so by telling stories about sperm and rape and child molestation and someone's latest alter - all old hat by now on daytime.

Daytime today thinks "social issues" and "pushing the envelope" means retelling a crass story with a slightly different angle. As in, Jessica's crazy again but this time she just thinks she's her teenaged self looking to get her cherry popped by Cristian, or Lulu's gone wild because she was kidnapped and frozen by Frozen Stavros Cassadine. The new shows were the opposite of that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

But AMC and OLTL were a success on Hulu, John! Both shows were in the top ten when both of them launched their second seasons, and both of them stayed in the top forty, thirty, or twenty shows throughout their first seasons' run! if the shows are going to be cancelled then, the blame shouldn't be placed entirely on us the viewers since we made both shows a success online!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It can survive without her? Um, you're talking about a short season of an hour a week and then nothing, and a probable cancellation. That's surviving? FWIW, I don't think Erica Kane was a make or break factor for the show as a whole, but you can't really claim the show can survive without her when in all likelihood it's over and gone.

Yes, it does seem obvious that the financing was lacking, but personally my friends and I found a lot lacking in this season. I realize that is an unpopular opinion here, but I know quite a few people who don't post on this board who were thrilled AMC was coming back, and who ended up disappointed in what was shown. In some ways, yes, it was an improvement over what ABC aired, but in others, I don't think it was.

As for what ABC would have done vs. what PP did, well, that's all speculative at this point, but IMHO the network that put a young Jesse McCartney as JR Chandler would have been likely to cast Eric Nelsen as AJ IF they'd done a 5 year jump. It's the five year jump I don't think ABC would have done. But Eric? Yes, I think he's absolutely the sort of person they'd have cast as AJ. It's Michael Nader as Dimitri I don't think ABC would have ever brought back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yes, you're exactly right; I'm saying AMC can absolutely survive without Erica Kane, and I'm pretty sure Susan Lucci would be the first to say so. I'd have loved to see her and I adore Susan, but it not only was surviving, it was thriving.

I know you don't like hearing it, but for a lot of people the show was excellent. It was the best that show has been in well over a decade, and probably well into sometime in the late '90s. The show didn't fail. The parent company and its financing did. This is about money.

And you know as well as I do that the network that hired Jesse McCartney is long gone. They also let him go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

No doubt they were most watched but it seems like that wasnt enough. Scuttlebutt is that PP just broke even and they needed to make profit. plus the pay for ad space on the net is less than TV so they werent making TV money off the ads that were run.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I said quite a while ago that I didn't trust Jeff K. I can't help but feel PP lied about a lot of things and strung people along, plus they were way in over their heads from the start and couldn't get their act together.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

With soap audiences, sadly this is true IMO. I read so many people who just could not handle the show not being almost exactly like it was on the network(like it being "free," on channel 7. whatever). With the right people at the helm, this might have changed, who knows. PP did try and they were successful at some things-just not management and PR.

Sure, I can agree they don't owe fans a heck of a lot, but IMO they do owe the actors something at least. They still have had no official word and that is wrong. However, being straight with fans goes a long way in keeping them in good graces. Actors/celebs know they don't owe the fans anything but their best performance, but many of them still deal with fans, talk to them, even go out of their way at times when they don't need to. This keeps fans interested in them and their projects. PP needs some people/PR skills.

+1!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I wonder if the PP AMC/OLTL audience that did not follow each and every bit of news regarding these reboots had an overall more enjoyable viewing experience. There's a fine line between harmless pontification and neurotic obsession around these parts. The utterly pressed and obsessed investment in coverage of PP's every move was not a good look. I think it would have been better if one day out of the blue it was announced that 40 in the can episodes of both shows were now available for download/streaming. A second batch, unanticipated, unpromised.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

         
    • @TaoboiI ran into Dani’s favorite party planner again tonight

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I think they’re desperately trying to cover his awful tattoos. But anyway them being unable to style short kings properly has been a major pet peeve of mine for a while now.  I honestly don’t understand what some people expect from actors to even begin considering them for recognition. Let’s be real—awards mostly mean that an actor is respected by their peers and has some level of cultural relevance. Actual judgment on the acting itself? That’s often secondary—highly subjective and shaped by the times. I completely agree on both points. If you’re an actor or a dancer you shouldn’t get any tattoos (sorry not sorry). Tomas’ tattoos are ugly too. And regarding the couples- you’re completely right. These writers are unable to write romance.   Further comments: - Kat cannot be this dumb to keep tampering with evidence over and over again. And I’m officially not a fan of the actress—every time she’s in a scene with Leslie, she doesn’t seem intimidated at all. She plays it like comic relief, which is just too much, especially when paired with Leslie’s histrionics and over-the-top antics. Leslie is older, dangerous, and has literally been portrayed as homicidal—Kat should be at least a little scared. • I also didn’t like Kat playing damsel in distress with the hotel manager. It gave off the same weird energy as Dani with the cop. I would’ve much preferred the version Paul Raven suggested, with her sneaking in through housekeeping. • And yes, Dani again accused Hayley of faking the pregnancy—this time even specifying she might be using a pillow under her shirt. (No fake miscarriage being mentioned) I stand by my take: this is ridiculous writing. No one in the real world—except us, the chronically online soap watchers—would even think of such a conspiracy theory. Haley is no Beyoncé. • What in the world was Chelsea wearing in her hair the other day? And this whole thing with Madison is beyond cringe. Chelsea’s coming off as needy and toxic—basically like every other Dupree. • I’m glad the casino storyline is moving forward, but it’s still boring as hell. Honestly, I’d be so here for a plot twist where Vanessa and Doug take Joey out. • The direction and editing lately have been rough. Abrupt cuts, weird pacing… something just feels off overall. There’s a strange uneasiness to how it’s all coming together. • And finally: Tomas is too much of a saint. Where are the messy sluts when you need them? (Vanessa doesn’t count.)
    • I was watching some August 1987 episodes and they brought back so many memories. I had some thoughts: Lisa and Jamie were so dull. Lisa was such a nothing character. It boggles my mind that so much story was centered around her in such a short amount of time. Joanna Going is a talented actress, but the material was just not there.  It was so good to see Wallingford and Mitch again. I know there was talk about Felicia a while back, but these episodes reminded me how integral Felicia was for the show.  Sally Spencer was done so dirty. She is turning in superb performances in an icky storyline. I wish she had stuck around longer. She has chemistry with everyone. The McKinnons should have lasted longer. Spencer had some strong stuff with Stephen Schnetzer and Mary Alexander. AW waster such a talented actress by getting rid of her. Justice for Cheryl too. I also missed Ed Fry when he left. Sandra Ferguson was a star from the moment she came on. She was charismatic and just popped. She had immediate chemistry with RKK and blended in well with Wyndham and Watson. I'd forgotten about the teenage Matthew.  I have no memory of Peggy Lazarus. She must not have lasted long. Was the original plan for John that he was going to turn out to be the twins' real father?      
    • If the new and improved copies that @rsclassicfanforever has uploaded can be manually moved into the "by month, by year" folders, that would be awesome. I personally don't think it's necessary to keep the older versions (which either have Dutch subtitles hard coded on them, or are lesser in picture quality). That's a lot of valuable drive space that could be cleared. Just my view but can appreciate others may feel differently. The structure had been by month by year previously, so I think it would be easier to conform to that, where so much prior work to get it to that format has already been done. Hopefully you can "drag and drop" so the new copies are in the right month/year? Re Clips, I never look at them now we pretty much have the episodes in full. Appreciate others may use, however. Thanks for all your hard work here @BoldRestless!
    • Oh yes defintely, Josh Griffith repeats and repeats the same storylines.
    • Isnt’t this storyline similar to the Cameron Kirsten situation though? Sharon thought she killed him. He ended up being alive and Sharon was being tormented with thinking she was seeing his face everywhere and that’s how we got that iconic scene with her and Nikki in the sewers.   I understand in Mariah’s case this is different circumstances but it does seem like a play on that whole thing. Maybe I’m wrong. I just wish if they were going to make any character follow in Sharon’s foot steps it would be Faith. Mariah wasn’t even raised by her, and her personality is different. I would expect her to take a different path. I understand I could be completely jumping ahead because the storyline hasn’t even played out yet but we’ll see. 
    • Thanks again @Paul Raven Monica was completely without redeeming qualities at this point. I always found the whole Monica = Carly narrative regressive, as I don't think shows comparing characters so heavily is ever a great idea, but she's actually worse than Carly was. Was it the Pollocks who had Leslie have a miscarriage?  Giving her a child, especially by rape, was not a good idea, but a part of me wishes they'd committed to it just to see what story it might have had in later years.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy