Jump to content

AMC: The Prospect Park Era (old production thread)


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 9.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

What's the big deal about the cast size? AMC has 20 actors on contract. Cassandra/Petey/Miranda/AJ/Celia take up five contracts. A couple of adult newbies and the rest are familiar faces and veterans. What's so bad?

I've seen posts elsewhere (not here) saying the same "OMG AMC is soooo different". Not like that but you get my gist. It's not that different of a show. We didn't even have Adam, Joe or Brooke ON CONTRACT.

Not directed towards anyone specifically here but still, what's so bad about the cast? Big whoop they have newbies. Why is that such an "OMG NOOOOO" thing?

To me these actors all seem much better cast than anything we usually got on ABC. They look the parts, they are all enthused about their jobs. Give 'em a chance people.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I agree, but really you can't argue with these people. They've made up their minds (even if they don't seem to be sticking to their proclamations of not watching the show so far.) The cast sizes are more than respectable for the start of a 30 minute soap--back when PP originally announced the shows (the first time) I actually suspected we'd get smaller lists of contract players.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

True.

Yeah, I remember hearing rumors it would be 15-18. Not to mention we'll likely have several (if not many) recurring characters and likely more of a chance of actors coming back for guest arcs, etc. I think this format shows far more promise than anything a network would give or do. And plus, each episode is 30 minutes. We're only getting four 30 minute episodes a week of scripted content. I mean, it's a two hour movie, really. So 20-25 (with recurring) is PLENTY. Anymore and the balance would likely be horrible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I call this soap provincialism.

There are some soap fans who are so stuck in a fugue of nostalgia that anything and everything new is considered a threat. IMO, these are people who truly want to see the same thing over and over. The want to see Erica Kane playing the ingenue and Tad the Cad or Palmer and the dobermans. They aren't interested in your newfangled microwave oven or iPhone because their wood stove and Princess phone works perfectly fine, thank you very much

I don't know what these newbies bring to the table but I'm willing to give them a chance to prove themselves. If I think they suck, I'll be one of the first to say so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yes, and let me go a step further - it's really not something we should be doing. This goes for everybody including me as I know that I've done it myself. I think we're all better than that and we can be better than that. It's one thing to say you think somebody is a horrible actor or even say "I don't find her or him attractive." I'm not opposed to observations either: hair, makeup, etc. That's fine. It's another thing to seriously be calling the actors (or each other) ugly. <-- FYI, I don't think I've ever seen an ugly soap actor, IJS. I think you guys know when a line is crossed, you're all just so used to crossing it due to OUR moderation issues (the lack of it) ;)

Okay, now to more serious matters...

I agree. She has the best set of curls I think I've ever seen on soaps. The only correction I'd make is I'd cut it at least 8 inches shorter than it was for the majority of her last few years on the show. I did like her Carla Suarez hair though (the short straight bop). I feel like YouTube deleted 1000s of AMC clips. I was going to post a clip of the bop.

Re: Cast size:

... there's a considerable chance AMC will have at least 3-4 more contract cast members before the year ends.

I don't think all of these actors are on regular one year contracts. My thinking is a lot are on episode guarantee contracts that fit into what they want to do and what the show wants to do with them.

If I'm wrong or even if I'm right, my suggestion would be rotating short story arcs. That would probably help keep storyline and character balance on the show too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Well said. Same here. I'll be all about admitting if they suck.

I do admit the HW's for AMC give me a tiny pause of concern but I feel like Prospect Park has done a ton of things right, for me, with these reboots (well, the people they've HIRED to handle the reboots) so I'm willing to hope for the best.

And Denyse seriously reminds me of Taylor Swift. Completely. Just give her blonde hair.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yeah. McPherson's work absolutely seems to fit AMC. If you just look at her DAYS storylines, I don't think they were horrible. Execution, yes. Atrocious. DAYS has too many hands in the pot. I truly feel like it's doing so well now simply because of the scriptwriters.

I think so too (pretty much everyone in the cast has praised Smith to high heaven). It's why I wasn't so quick to be that upset over McPherson. I have no idea about Betsy's abilities.

Thank you smile.png

And to explain a little better, I'm only "cautious" about the HW's because it's almost like the "fear of the unknown" you know? No idea what to expect, which is also exciting.

I'm just pleased the soaps are free of ABC (well, they're mostly free)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Hehe. Wrong thread.

      Please register in order to view this content

        Overall, I would agree. However, it has been interesting while I'm waiting for something to happen to see her experimenting with finding characters' individual styles. I feel she's slowly getting it. But yes, it has been hit and miss.    Like when she tries to give a particular style to one person and think it will work for someone else. Like she's lightened up Nick's style which was...different. Almost like she was listening to JM's own style, but keeping it within Nick's bandwagon. Then she tried a similar style on Billy and it just didn't work.
    • It's been pretty well-known since that that BBG was offered a similar deal as Ken Howard (ie 4-6 episodes) and she told them to fudge off. With Jane Wyman, I don't doubt they were willing not to hold her to her contract, but in those early episodes where she appears, she's written sitting down or in a bed for a reason. Her health genuinely seemed in decline.
    • Agree, but I am talking more about the initial casting. Melissa might have only lasted a season if Ana Alicia hadn't impressed.
    • I'm not that impressed with the costuming, still very hit and miss,not much improvement and some of the outfits for Nikki in particular have been awful. Maybe Mariah's secret is she encountered Ian and killed him? That might work except for the fact that her mother has done the same thing.
    • Ana Alicia was far more dynamic and charismatic than McGeehan or Vernon though. Some of it due to the writing of course, but not all of it.
    • It actually felt like TM-G was a bit softer in her scenes with nu-Ted that kind of matched his meeker energy as Ted on Friday. I was very curious how she’d play off him and now I have my answer.
    • My thoughts exactly! Fantastic find @DRW50!  
    • That was interesting; thanks. Courtney looks tired and/or bored AF, LOL!
    • 5-12   Lord have mercy.   I'm not sure how I feel about it. Perhaps what I said last week or the week before last. If the highlight of a soap is what people are wearing and not the writing, that's not a good thing. And that was how I was feeling watching this. There was not anyone that I was interested in seeing in the episode outside of Daniel and Sally tbh. Because Daniel continues to be the only thing that humanizes Phyllis for me.    I could care less for the Billy/Sally scenes where he's woe is me. I could care less about Kyle/Claire since the writers took all the drama right out of the pairing. Humanized or not, I could care less for Giggly Heffa.    I barely care for Teriah. But for me, it's nice to see something going on with them. Though it seems so horribly contrived.    I liked the costume designer appears to be trying to find individual styles for some of the characters. For me, Tessa's with the boots stood out given her indie musician history. It seems like Claire's style is coming into its own with block colors. I like Kyle's wardrobe is loosening up somewhat. I even loved the striped dress that Phyllis had on.    But again...where is the writing?
    • It was reported that Jane Wyman absence in the final season was due to health (it's documented that Jane was diabetic) but I believe her episodes being cut was a budget mode move. Similar move Dallas pulled in 1990, it was reported that Barbara Bel Geddes retired due to health (it's documented that Barbara had a heart condition) but I say salary dump. Jane Wyman only acted once after Falcon Crest, a 1993 episode of Dr. Quinn, Medicine Woman, but she lived another 14 years after that. Barbara Bel Geddes did not act again after her last episode of Dallas in 1990 but she lived another 15 years after that. The trifecta of suck at Lorimar was Les Moonves, Leonard Katzman, and Michael Filerman. It was a pattern across all three CBS primetime soaps in the off the rails plus budget mode era to salary dump the long-time female cast members and bring on sweet young things hired on the cheap. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy