Jump to content

Trayvon Martin Killing


Eric83

Recommended Posts

  • Members
Posted

Obama has been called a thug more times than can be counted by keyboard commandos online, who insist that they are not racist. And he's been called a thug, despite wearing suits, being a constitutional lawyer, both a state and federal senator and now President, so that says to me that bias doesn't fall upon what close you wear, it's about color.

And if a fool wants to see a racist President, they should look up Reagan's welfare queen speech that he gave in Philadelphia, Mississippi of all places. I always found it suspect that he gave racial charged speech in a out of the way town like that, but if you've ever seen "Mississippi Burning", you'll know exactly why he did it. Him and Lee Atwater were racist trash.

  • Replies 291
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members
Posted

The thing that gets me is that the Zimmermaniacs are going out of their way to demonize Trayvon as a "thug" because he smoked a joint or got suspended or some other teenage nonsense that half the country has done at one point or another. Then you look at Obama who comes from a single parent family, studied hard, got a law degree from Harvard, gave back to his community (but apparently community organizer is a bad thing now), is a devoted husband and father, became a senator and won the presidency by a clear margin TWICE and he's still a "thug" in their eyes too.

The only thug in this scenario is the delusional freak who walked the streets with a gun.

  • Members
Posted

IKR! Don't even get me started on that pig Richard Nixon. And I guess that person wants to ignore all the Presidents that owned other human beings. It amazes me how some want to act offended because Obama dared to address race relations in this country. Someone on CNN said he should be speaking for all of America and not picking a side. LOL! How did he pick a side? I can't.

I saw a bunch of suburban housewives on 20/20 last night talking about how smoking weed has made them better mothers. I bet nobody was calling them a thug as they watched that. SMH.

  • Members
Posted

I'm curious as to why you believe this is exactly what happened.

Following someone may not technically be illegal but it's a form of harassment. If I recall correctly, George Zimmerman said he asked Trayvon Martin where he was going which was really none of his business. Trayvon Martin was in a no-win situation with George Zimmerman.

Think about it for a moment and ask yourself what would have been a satisfactory response. You've just turned 17, you're walking alone at night and a strange man follows you and starts interrogating you. Wouldn't you feel threatened in any way or at the very least unsafe?

For some reason you seem to keep insisting that it is totally out of the realm of possibility that this kid felt any fear for his life or threatened in any way by a stranger following him in the rain at night then interrogating him. I would have been scared and I cannot tell you with 100% certaintly what I would have done because I can only guess. I'm just guessing the panic button would have gone off.

Short of George Zimmerman staying in his car and leaving that kid alone, anyone who says that Trayvon Martin would have been alive under any circumstances after encountering George Zimmerman is not being realistic. Once George Zimmerman left his car, whatever ounce of rational behavior left his mind.

And if you cannot imagine how Trayvon Martin might have felt, imagine that you're George Zimmerman and you're driving at home in the night in the rain and see someone you find suspicious. You call the police. Why would you then leave the safety of your car to follow the person if you weren't letting your emotions get the best of you? Anything could happen so why take that chance if not for the fact that you know that you can always shoot the person if something doesn't go your way?

  • Members
Posted

Because of the testimony of the eye witness Jonathon Good.... and the fact that it matches up with Zimmerman's account from the police interview the day after the shooting. And would I have left my car? No. But If I were Trayvon, I'd sure as hell would have called 911. Like I said earlier, dumb and dumber equal tragedy. I still want to know who in hell walks 2 miles in the rain for a bag of skittles?

  • Members
Posted

I don't think boycotts are stupid. Ineffective often, but not stupid. We're a capitalist country. We care more about money than anything. Besides, this isn't the same as a customer boycott of a retailer. It's more akin to a company saying they won't consider opening a branch in a certain state. I didn't care when it was just Stevie Wonder but Beyonce? Timberlake? The Stones? Those are real money generators. Ted Nugent and Meatloaf aren't going to make up for that.

  • Members
Posted

Did they check his bumper for scratches? Jesting aside, it is very convenient that this happened a week after the trial finished. If he's so innocent, he would have asked the police to keep his name anonymous, something that I doubt he did.

  • Members
Posted

Given that the networks are being forced to report it (like any of the big three would unless they had to), I would assume it's legit.

And I don't really have the time or the interest in that !@#$%^&*] Zimmerman to care about verifying. If it's true, good for him. It doesn't erase Trayvon, but I'm sure that family was glad he was around (if the story's legit).

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


  • Recent Posts

    • I did not care, just clarifying that was the discussion point. If there are ice cream bars in Statesville I am sure there is a full spa
    • Seeing Peter Bergman (Jack) and Melody Thomas Scott (Nikki) act opposite each other really makes me mad that their short-lived reunion in 2012 was just that... short-lived. I've always loved the Jack/Nikki pairing.
    • No.  I recall there was also a mention about how distracting it was EOB's Gwen wasn't wearing nail polish as well.  That it was someone's pet peeve. And, yes, the fact characters can have a manicure in prison is the wildest continuity issue here.
    • Can anyone remember Mary Ellen Stuart's run as Jenny? I'm trying to fill in the cracks for missing stuff that we overlooked.  Bulletpoints:  * Dated Ross * Rusty's police partner * Directly responsible for Dinah coming forward about George Stewart (Cam's father)
    • But that's not weird... nail polish is allowed in prisons via commissary. Same with general makeup, haircuts, and hair colouring products.
    • This is DAYS, the show that said you could brainwash anyone with simple kitchen appliances.  An actor's nail polish or lack thereof should be the least of our concerns, lol.
    • It was not that she wasn't wearing nail polish, it is that she managed to get a manicure in prison
    • "We're Knot Done Yet": the name of this lovely podcast AND what JVA tells her plastic surgeon at every appointment. In other news, Michele Lee is reminding me more and more of my old music teacher from elementary school, and I couldn't STAND that bitch.
    • I apologize if this has been covered already, but does anyone know whether Douglas Marland was HW'ing by that point?  If he was, then I see what he meant when he said (in so many words) that he had inherited a mess when he started at GH.  Aside from Alan and Monica, none of that material seems very promising.  The story with Mark Dante and the Corbins is the wrong kind of predictable (y'know, the kind where you know what's going to happen, but you just don't give a crap?), the stuff with Scotty and Laura is cute but toothless, I don't know WHAT the hell Gina and Steve Carlson's character are arguing about and Rick Webber has to be the dumbest man alive not to see David Hamilton twirling his invisible moustache over how to make a killing off Lamont Corbin's declining health.  (By the way, "LAMONT CORBIN"?  What is this, "The Shadow"?  And "Corbin Limited" sounds like some jive I'd hear over on Y&R.) In a way, it's kind of like watching today's GH, right down to the dialogue that's serviceable and pushes plot along but says nothing about the characters' inner lives.
    • It absolutely was; the narrative was there, and they followed it promptly. Maybe that's back when women had babies at young ages?!?!?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy