Jump to content

Love and Hip Hop Thread


Cheap21

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

YAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAS. You know they are... you know they are because he was the one that exposed all the drama.

LMAO Eric, yeah he's not... doing too well. I know the others were saying like he had issues and was off his meds and then tried to sue him and stuff because of the claims he was making.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Part 2 was full of hypocrites trying to psychoanyalyze Joseline! It shocked me how much sense and intelligence Young Jock has. Karlie didn't turn but the others were doing everything in their power to get Joss off the show. Not gonna happen. If anything, you just guaranteed her a big fat raise!

Joseline on drugs? How so? That heifer is on 10,000 at all times and drugs have nothing to do with it.

Mimi, didn't you take a photo with coke residue in the background?

Deb, she was right. Joss didn't bring Stevie down. Water sinks to its own level.

Rasheeda, STFU!

Erica D, STFU

Mama Dee, one of the most violent on the show, STFU

Kirk, STFU!

Arian, great lipstick, but STFU!

Bambi, just sit there as you are and look gorgeous. She is the most together out of every woman on this show. Her taste in animals is questionable but she's not pathetic.

Schleprock, just sit there and look dumb - you're only quality!

Young Jock, you just gained 2,000,000 points!

Karie, you just gained 15,000,000 points and you got this much because I never really thought you were loyal to anything or anyone, but you showed some loyalty. Good for you :)

What some folks will do for 15 minutes:

Let's see:

Mimi did porn to keep it interesting and keep her spot on the show.

Kirk/Rasheeda did a fake break up to keep it interesting and stay on the show

Joseline just shows up and is Joseline! Who's really pathetic and uninteresting? Those who have to fake it!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

What I found odd was that majority of the people commenting on the situation has NEVER filmed opposite of Joseline their entire run on the show. Or if they have, it's been once or twice. Most of the time, Joseline is to herself and the ONLY two women she's really filmed that much with was K. Michelle and Karlie and they both still like her. I found it odd that Momma Dee, Rasheeda, Kirk, etc. were commenting on someone they barely know.

And Mimi tossing out drug allegations was ironic seeing as she's a big coke head her damn self.

I'm just glad that Deb was the only person to somewhat sympathize with Joseline regardless what happened earlier. I'd actually like to see her reach out and mentor Joseline because I think she can do it.

But the whole reunion being about Jos is the main reason why she has top billing on the show and why she ain't going nowhere, no time soon. I even heard that Mona took Stevie/Jose out to dinner afterwards. Yeah, they ain't going nowhere. All that hot air they were breathing has fallen on death ears.

Joseline just showed them all that when you talk sh*t, you bound to get hit. Don't pop them gums if you ain't to jump off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

That sh-t was embarrassing. Just cancel the show now. I didn't find all that fighting entertaining. It was pure ratchet. What pathetic, miserable excuses for human beings. They acted more like animals. I even saw the glasses being thrown. Joseline's ass needs to be arrested. If she wasn't the star, Id say fire her bc there is no show without her. So I say cancel it. Shut this sh-t down and bring on Hollywood

Wow, did they really just spend the entire episode talking about Joseline's fight? They should have cut all that commentary out and aired it after the last part as some sort of special uncut episode

I also found it strangely uncomfortable how they kept talking about Jos' alleged drug problem

Mimi said she doesn't care about Jos and Steve. Yeah right! Yes you do

AJbiP4w.png

YES! We haven't had any cartoon characters all season

Edited by Cheap21
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

What made it even funnier was that ALL of them are ratchet and have engaged in violence on this show. The nerve of them to act like they are classy and have more sense than Stevie and Joseline. :lol: This reunion has been horrible.

Edited by Eric83
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Cheap, who should be embarrassed? Jos was the only one on attack and could not be stopped.

VH1 will not be getting rid of this cash cow and if they cared, there is no way that footage would have been shown.

Mona? It's all about the Benjamins for her. She can sniff ratchet from miles away.

I think spending the entire hour talking about Jos/Stevie was a bad idea and showed how worthless the others are. I agree with B. Mona could keep Jos and Stevie and the others are easily replaced. They showed that NOTHING really happened with them all season and that they are uninteresting.

Karlie is smart. She didn't betray Jos because she knows Jos won't be going anywhere. Stay on the winning team. Smart lady! Kaleena was another smart one. She doesn't film with Jos, so she had nothing to say.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

They should all be embarassed. I know I would be if I was associated with that mess. They should cancel the show. Make a Jos and/or Steevie spinoff if necessary but it's a wrap for ATL. Nothing but fake storylines and people who are too old to be trying so hard to remain relevant

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't think that Mona should stick a fork in the ATL franchise. That's her main cash cow out of the LAHH franchise. If anything, [as previously stated] last night made it easier for Mona to trim a large percentage of the cast. If I were Mona, I'd keep Joseline & Karlie. Everyone else can go. Those two drove the most interesting stories of the season anyways. I'd bring on Young Joc and his lady and find four other women to join the cast alongside them. It won't be hard. A rapper, his main chick, and side chick is a dime a dozen in Atlanta.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

But then ATL will literally be like the mess that was NYC when they brought in a whole bunch of random new people to the fold in season 3. Heck they started that here but at least most of them were extras and not main cast members. If Jos is the star then why do they need to keep this show and this format? I really think they should cancel it and do a spinoff with a new concept

Edited by Cheap21
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I was talking about 1986, but the glimpses of 1982 are about the same. 
    • I skimmed some of the 1982 synopses; Steve was planning on an opening an office in Finland, and I think Jim went there as part of the preparation. That probably was a big issue; AW had already gone to San Diego that year, with Rachel/Steve/Mitch. And to upstate NY with Pete and Diana. I wonder if upstate was as expensive lol  AW in 1982 has always fascinated me, because of how messy it was 
    • That makes sense. What a messy time for the show. And any changes they made were mostly for the worse.
    • The transition from Neal to Adam was very abrupt, and to be honest my theory is that the character of Neal was designed so that we think he is super shady but then it turns out that he was on the side of good all along so Neal could have seamlessly become a hero of the BCPD with no need for Adam. I don't know whether Robert Lupone was hired on a short contract or if he was fired from a longer-term contract because they decided they wanted someone who was more of a leading man type, but I can imagine a scenario where Charles Grant did both the undercover Egyptian treasure/flirt with Victoria and the straighter-arrow day to day police investigation. But in my imagined scenario the MJ prostitution plotline probably doesn't exist and instead he probably continues a relationship with Victoria. The story seems very odd to me. I assume that David Canary would have been included only because a plotline where Steve is going to Finland in which only Rachel is seen in actual Finland seems unlikely. The synopses explicitly mention that Alice can't go with Steve but would whoever was playing Alice at that time have had the kind of clout to get the remote cancelled? It also strikes me as unlikely that production would have approved the expensive location shoot and *then* cancelled it only because of jealousy. It seems more likely that they rejected it because of the expense but then the jealousy part got added to the gossip speculatively, possibly because while it was being worked out they justified not including more castmembers because of the expense. 
    • My comment has nothing to do with cast resentment, but does relate to the Finland location shoot: It may be a coincidence, but Jim Matthews died in Finland in 1982.  Hugh Marlowe's final episode was in April 1982, but the character probably didn't die untll May or June. (I'm unable to find the character's date of death, only the date of Marlowe's final episode). SInce Jim and Rachel had very little interaction after around 1975, it is unlikely Jim's death in Finland had any connection to Rachel's potential visit, but the choice to have Jim die in that location at that time is a head-scratcher.  I'm sure the writers sent Jim on an extended trip (and off-screen) because of Marlowe's illness.  But Finland seems like a strange choice considering the (then) recently cancelled location shoot.  
    • I totally understand your sloths concern about it and I agree with you. Let’s hope the show plays it’s cards right.    Further comments about the last few episodes: - I liked that one of the attendees was filming the scene. That’s realistic. I wonder if the writers will follow up with that.  - Martin and Smitty trying to drag Leslie out was very heteronormative, so perfectly in line with them two as characters lol.    As for the future: it’s obvious the Duprees will come to accept Eva one way or another, but the rivalry with Kay should be here for the long term   On the topic of acting: the only bad actors I’m seeing are Ted and Derek. Tomas hasn’t proven to be either good or bad, so far, but he’s certainly mediocre and uncharismatic. He sucks the energy out of the scenes and I don’t see any couple of women ever vying for him. 
    • I’m trying to think which actors VW were working with at the time, and none of them had been there for a while. Even like Mac and Ada didn’t have that big of a part in Rachel’s storyline.  And Jamie was involved with all that movie stuff.
    • Brooke did ads before ATWT too. That probably helped get her the job. After ATWT she seemed to branch more into hosting, along with ads.  I think I saw Kelley in an ad or two, but you're right she wasn't on as much. 
    •   Thanks for sharing these. I wonder if Charles might have been in the running for Adam. I know Preacher was a bit of a bad boy at times on EON, but Neal seemed to be a step down, and Robert Lupone had played a similar part on AMC. Given the huge cast turnover at this point I wonder who thought they had been there long enough to go.  Laura Malone/Chris Rich would get a remote within the next year. 
    • Interesting.  It seems to allude to that statement that Warren Burton made around that time about some AW actors getting special treatment.  I wonder who was resentful about not getting to go. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy