Jump to content

GH: Discussion for the Month of May


Recommended Posts

  • Members

:rolleyes: As usual, you're twisting my words around -- which I despise. Let me, once again, make it even simpler so you can get it.

When I said she's nobody's victim, I was speaking about Jason giving her the cold shoulder (and Liz not pussyfooting around Sam in their exam room conversation). The first time she kept vital information from him in order to protect him, he got angry, told her he doesn't like it when she does it and said not to do it again. Fine. Chalk it up to a mistake. The SECOND TIME she did it in just a few short weeks, it's not a mistake. It's a choice. If she knows how Jason feels about her doing this and she makes the decision of her own free will to DO IT AGAIN, she's got nobody to blame but herself. Franco, being raped and being "slapped around by Jiz" have nothing to do with her decision to keep Jason in the dark about the baby's paternity and Jason's biological relation to Franco. Those are excuses but not justification for her continuing to do something against her husband's wishes, therefore, Jason's coldness is not unjustified.

I'm sorry. Am I not making sense to everyone, or is it just the people using selective memory that are having a problem understanding what I'm saying? I'm saying if you're in a marriage, you do something your spouse immensely dislikes, tells you so and asks you not to do it again -- and turn right around and do it again, almost immediately, the only thing you're a victim of is your poor decision making.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Oh poor Sam. She has all of these "moments of weakness." Poor girl is never responsible for anything she does because all those mean people keep making her do the wrong thing.

It's kind of like when she paraded around her mother's husband in next to nothing clothes. Then after they had sex, he made her do it.

Poor Sam.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yeah I understand your point, you are defending Jason's actions because in some bizarre way this story has been twisted to be more about Jason being lied to then about his wife being raped by his own twin brother. You can staunchly believe and defend that notion as much as you want -- the sad thing is that is directly the perspective the writers are writing it from, besides the fact that Jason looks like a complete @sshole. However it doesn't change the fact that this story is disgusting and the way both Jason and Liz are treating a rape victim is despicable by all measures. No matter what justifications this show argues and how many commentors agree with the treatment it's still reprehensible. Badgering a rape victim about her assault and pregnancy that came from said assault is twelve different thousand cases of bad taste, and it's not hard at all to see that. Add in Sam's health defects, pregnancy issues and everything else and both members of Laison are complete scum for treating her the way they have been. But this is nothing new. Liz and Jason have always treated others like garbage. But excuse us if we aren't all supposed to agree that Liason was "in the right" for attacking Sam for carrying a child that was produced from rape. What a horrible, bad, mean, person Sam is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Jason has a right to be upset with Sam for blabbing. I called it the minute she opened her mouth to John again and thought Jason would be justified in his feelings. He however is taking it to a whole other levekl and seems to have NO COMPASSION or regard for what Sam is going through. Everything since the reveal has been all about HIM as if only his feelings matter in the world. The fact that his wife was raped and now carrying the baby of her rapist doesnt matter. He just let her leave their home and and doesnt even try to bring her back after she was KIDNAPPED and almost MURDERED. Like WTF? She telling John about Franco merits her to get the shoulder like that. He hasnt even tried to see her or act concerned. There is no justification for Jason's current treatment of Sam. Its cruel.

With all that said its too bc she has only been concerned about him. She put her own feelings and trauma on the backburner bc she was so focused on how the news and revelation would affect him. She hasnt even really dealt with whats happened to her and how she was violated. Jason's pain is been the priority and he's taken that and pretty much spit in her face.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Oh, for Christ sake. This is exactly why I've asked you to quit responding to my posts. You twist my words and make it into something that I've never even said. If you want to believe Sam is a victim of Evil Liason, by all means, go for it. But quit using my posts to twist my words to suit your agenda.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

You touched on everything except why she made the decision to keep him from knowing the information she got from Heather after knowing how he feels about her last failed attempt at protecting him by not telling him anything. What did she think? The second time would be the charm? As for his treatment being cruel, it's a matter of opinion. It's unrealistic to think a man would happily love and raise the baby of his wife's rapist without any conflicting feelings of his own. His feelings are about the baby and Franco, not about her. Sam MADE THE DECISION to move out. He didn't kick her out. I don't see how it's cruel that he let her make her decision. That, if anything in this crappy story, is the only thing that's true. Jason believes in letting people make their own decisions... because of the very same reason he's pissed with Sam: He hates it when people don't let him do the same.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'm trying to figure out what part of this story is about Sam being raped? She isn't talking about how violated she feels or suffering any bad dreams or reactions to the rape. Maybe if she were, I'd feel like this was a story about her being raped. But all we've seen is her torment over Jason not accepting Franco's baby. And it's not about Franco the rapist. It's about Jason's evil psycho twin. I hate rape stories because I hate that I always feel like soaps trivialize this violent crime. That is most certainly true in this case. Sam's rape is total plot point to manufacture a WTD story and keep Franco alive in a way. But the rape isn't top of mind for Sam. It's hardly part of the story and that's not at all what she's struggling with here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

That's all true. Also a major part of the problem is that Sam herself did not know whether she had been raped afterward, a big WTF for women who were watching. Then they dragged that out forever. It's not as if Sam is such a scintillating character that most viewers were hanging on the edge of their seats waiting. By the time the reveal came, few gave a shht.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Some notes about today's show.

1. I actually liked how everyone is so skeptical about Connie/Kate. At least it was an honest reaction.

2. Where in the devil did they find that newscaster? I usually give bad soap acting a pass, but my gosh that was off the chart.

3. I never realized until today, how much the kid who played Jack before the SORASing looks like Roger Howarth.

4. This is probably unpopular, but I am really digging Sam and McBain. I see real chemistry there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I think they’re desperately trying to cover his awful tattoos. But anyway them being unable to style short kings properly has been a major pet peeve of mine for a while now.  I honestly don’t understand what some people expect from actors to even begin considering them for recognition. Let’s be real—awards mostly mean that an actor is respected by their peers and has some level of cultural relevance. Actual judgment on the acting itself? That’s often secondary—highly subjective and shaped by the times. I completely agree on both points. If you’re an actor or a dancer you shouldn’t get any tattoos (sorry not sorry). Tomas’ tattoos are ugly too. And regarding the couples- you’re completely right. These writers are unable to write romance.   Further comments: - Kat cannot be this dumb to keep tampering with evidence over and over again. And I’m officially not a fan of the actress—every time she’s in a scene with Leslie, she doesn’t seem intimidated at all. She plays it like comic relief, which is just too much, especially when paired with Leslie’s histrionics and over-the-top antics. Leslie is older, dangerous, and has literally been portrayed as homicidal—Kat should be at least a little scared. • I also didn’t like Kat playing damsel in distress with the hotel manager. It gave off the same weird energy as Dani with the cop. I would’ve much preferred the version Paul Raven suggested, with her sneaking in through housekeeping. • And yes, Dani again accused Hayley of faking the pregnancy—this time even specifying she might be using a pillow under her shirt. (No fake miscarriage being mentioned) I stand by my take: this is ridiculous writing. No one in the real world—except us, the chronically online soap watchers—would even think of such a conspiracy theory. Haley is no Beyoncé. • What in the world was Chelsea wearing in her hair the other day? And this whole thing with Madison is beyond cringe. Chelsea’s coming off as needy and toxic—basically like every other Dupree. • I’m glad the casino storyline is moving forward, but it’s still boring as hell. Honestly, I’d be so here for a plot twist where Vanessa and Doug take Joey out. • The direction and editing lately have been rough. Abrupt cuts, weird pacing… something just feels off overall. There’s a strange uneasiness to how it’s all coming together. • And finally: Tomas is too much of a saint. Where are the messy sluts when you need them? (Vanessa doesn’t count.)
    • Andrew sure has hard nips.
    • I was watching some August 1987 episodes and they brought back so many memories. I had some thoughts: Lisa and Jamie were so dull. Lisa was such a nothing character. It boggles my mind that so much story was centered around her in such a short amount of time. Joanna Going is a talented actress, but the material was just not there.  It was so good to see Wallingford and Mitch again. I know there was talk about Felicia a while back, but these episodes reminded me how integral Felicia was for the show.  Sally Spencer was done so dirty. She is turning in superb performances in an icky storyline. I wish she had stuck around longer. She has chemistry with everyone. The McKinnons should have lasted longer. Spencer had some strong stuff with Stephen Schnetzer and Mary Alexander. AW waster such a talented actress by getting rid of her. Justice for Cheryl too. I also missed Ed Fry when he left. Sandra Ferguson was a star from the moment she came on. She was charismatic and just popped. She had immediate chemistry with RKK and blended in well with Wyndham and Watson. I'd forgotten about the teenage Matthew.  I have no memory of Peggy Lazarus. She must not have lasted long. Was the original plan for John that he was going to turn out to be the twins' real father?      
    • If the new and improved copies that @rsclassicfanforever has uploaded can be manually moved into the "by month, by year" folders, that would be awesome. I personally don't think it's necessary to keep the older versions (which either have Dutch subtitles hard coded on them, or are lesser in picture quality). That's a lot of valuable drive space that could be cleared. Just my view but can appreciate others may feel differently. The structure had been by month by year previously, so I think it would be easier to conform to that, where so much prior work to get it to that format has already been done. Hopefully you can "drag and drop" so the new copies are in the right month/year? Re Clips, I never look at them now we pretty much have the episodes in full. Appreciate others may use, however. Thanks for all your hard work here @BoldRestless!
    • Oh yes defintely, Josh Griffith repeats and repeats the same storylines.
    • Isnt’t this storyline similar to the Cameron Kirsten situation though? Sharon thought she killed him. He ended up being alive and Sharon was being tormented with thinking she was seeing his face everywhere and that’s how we got that iconic scene with her and Nikki in the sewers.   I understand in Mariah’s case this is different circumstances but it does seem like a play on that whole thing. Maybe I’m wrong. I just wish if they were going to make any character follow in Sharon’s foot steps it would be Faith. Mariah wasn’t even raised by her, and her personality is different. I would expect her to take a different path. I understand I could be completely jumping ahead because the storyline hasn’t even played out yet but we’ll see. 
    • Thanks again @Paul Raven Monica was completely without redeeming qualities at this point. I always found the whole Monica = Carly narrative regressive, as I don't think shows comparing characters so heavily is ever a great idea, but she's actually worse than Carly was. Was it the Pollocks who had Leslie have a miscarriage?  Giving her a child, especially by rape, was not a good idea, but a part of me wishes they'd committed to it just to see what story it might have had in later years.
    • @janea4old Your detailed explanation and delving into the psychology and motivations is no doubt the opposite of what we will see onscreeen. As @ranger1rg stated we will get a few scenes and some sketchy explanations. Like the adoption of Aria, most of it will take place off screen.
    • I'm suddenly fearful that DAYS is going to pull a Flowers-for-Algernon stunt and Bo's progress will be reversed.  While @te. is stuck on Abe's tiny bedroom, I can't stop thinking of the size of Bo's huge hospital room.
    • Okay, why are Paulina and Abe sleeping like that?!  I'd take a screen grab if I wasn't lazy, but come on.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy