Jump to content

Soap Opera Weekly -- RIP


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 69
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Yes i was going to say the same thing. I remember they used to put the cast of Melrose Place and Beverly Hills 90210 on the cover back in the early 1990's. This isn't new. I just didn't like it when it turned into more of a "enquire" type magazine with eye-grabbing headlines several different stories on the cover. I liked when they would pick one soap and put them on the Cover and put little headlines on top about something else. I did not like when it started putting all big stories on the cover, along with big headlines that are misleading. they started it around 2003..

for back issues, go here. http://www.soapoperaworld.com/index.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

If they had expressed their honest opinions about the writing, they would also have been punished in the short-term by being denied access to those all-important spoilers. In the long-term, however, this conduct only hastened the genre's demise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Agreed. I remember the AW Cover with Frankie/Cass/Kathleen like it was yesterday. Their Santa Barbara tribute issue was the finest in the business- I don't believe SOD even got one. Frankly, the only reason SOD became successful in the late 90s was by copying the old SOW format.

And sorry Carolyn Hinsey, but there has never been nor will there ever be a finer soap opinion column than Marlena DeLaCroix's Critical Condition. I LOVED the Our Miss Brooke piece she did, essentially saying Brooke had gone mad with her sexual obsession with Thorne. It was the most in-depth, psychological examination of a character I'd ever seen printed in a soap mag. Frankly, I think it was around 2000 when they really fell off the beaten path.

Lastly, am I mistaken, or did they give AW as fine a tribute issue as they did for SB??

Either way, I read SOW pretty much every week from the beginning and often bought it. SOD, not so much.

Edited to Add: I still am in LOVE with their Daytime Emmy Dream Ballot issues they did in the early days, as well as the For Your Consideration issue. FYC came out before the ballots- they'd release it right at the end of the eligibility period to encourage actors to put their name in the ring as well as push actors they thought should be nominated.

The Dream Ballot was based on the actual Emmy Ballot and was voted on by their editors as to who they thought deserved recognition that year. Plus, they'd reveal many of the actors who kept their names off the ballot so we'd understand why they weren't chosen. And to top it off, we'd even get Honorable Mentions/Runners Up.

Obviously, that is what my SON Emmy Dream Ballot is based on, which I will start voting on in the beginning of April, FYI.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

What I enjoyed most about Marlena was she didn't try to be the voice of the people. Carolyn Hinsey was so horribly condescending as she tried to act like every viewer, and lecture viewers in that faux-folksy manner. Marlena never tried to act like her opinion was anything but her own.

My favorite Marlena column was the one she wrote about McTavish's GL - The Hollow Drum.

I also loved their "rating the replacement" articles, and the anniversary issues where they would try to get quotes from all the major actors over the years. Their DAYS issues from 1995 were wonderful and were the first real exposure I had to the history of DAYS. Even yesterday, I saw an old photo of Denise Alexander with her head cocked, holding a pencil, and I immediately said to myself, "Hey, that was in the Soap Opera Weekly DAYS issue."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy